Abstract
If a greater emphasis on modelling in the science education curriculum is to be justified, it will have to be as ‘authentic’ as possible. From the three approaches to authenticity (the child-developmental, the subject-developmental, and the practitioner-situational points of view), a realistic approach must recognise existing subject-content focused practice in science education whilst seeking to attain the maximum engagement by students that is provided by the circumstances of actual scientific practice . The several constraints on such an innovation in schools are identified and existing ways of addressing them are outlined. Particular attention is paid to the identification of contexts that will provide problems capable of being modelled. It is argued that the capability to model authentically will entail a progressive development of experience from school-focused contexts to those that are science- practitioner- focused.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Modeling science classrooms after scientific laboratories. In R. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 80–85). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70–102.
Ben-Ari, M. (2005). Situated learning in ‘This high technology world’. Science & Education, 14(3–5), 367–376.
Bernstein, B. (1990). The structure of pedagogic discourse: Class, codes and control. London, UK: Routledge.
Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878–898.
Brewer, W. F. (2008). In what sense can the child be considered to be a “little scientist”? In R. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 38–49). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 195–213.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2001). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218.
Collins, A., Brown, J., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Cognition and instruction: Issues and agendas (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2004). Supporting prospective teachers’ conceptions of modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1379–1401.
Doyle, W. (2000). Authenticity. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to a more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 115–130.
Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Conceptions, misconceptions, and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10(1), 61–98.
Gopnik, A. (1996). The child as scientist. Philosophy of Science, 63(4), 485–514.
Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., & Kuhl, P. (1999). The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains, and how children learn. New York, NY: William Morrow.
Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822.
Helms, J. V. (1998). Science and/in community: Contexts and goals in practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 643–653.
Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 71(256), 33–40.
Hsu, P.-L. (2010). From a sense of stereotypically foreign to belonging in a science community: Ways of experimental description about high school students’ science internship. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 291–312.
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 591–607.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science & Education, 84(6), 757–792.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386.
Keys, C. W. (1995). An interpretative study of students’ use of scientific reasoning during a collaborative report writing intervention in ninth grade general science. Science Education, 79(4), 415–435.
King, A., & Brownell, J. (1966). The curriculum and the disciplines of knowledge: A theory of curriculum practice. New York, NY: Wiley.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, H.-S., & Songer, N. B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923–948.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724.
Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (2000). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education (5th ed.). Kiel, Germany: Institute of Science Education, University of Kiel.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
Raghavan, K., & Glaser, R. (1995). Model-based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum. Science Education, 79(1), 37–61.
Robertson, A. (2007). Development of a shared vision: Lessons from a science education community collaboration. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 681–705.
Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic science education: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Schwartz, D. L., Varma, S., & Martin, L. (2008). Dynamic transfer and innovation. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 479–506). New York, NY: Routledge.
Svoboda, J., & Passmore, C. M. (2013). The strategies of modeling in biology education. Science & Education, 22(1), 119–142.
von Glaserfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17–40). New York, NY: Norton.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilbert, J.K., Justi, R. (2016). Towards Authentic Learning in Science Education. In: Modelling-based Teaching in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29039-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29039-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29038-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29039-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)