Skip to main content

Towards Authentic Learning in Science Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modelling-based Teaching in Science Education

Part of the book series: Models and Modeling in Science Education ((MMSE,volume 9))

Abstract

If a greater emphasis on modelling in the science education curriculum is to be justified, it will have to be as ‘authentic’ as possible. From the three approaches to authenticity (the child-developmental, the subject-developmental, and the practitioner-situational points of view), a realistic approach must recognise existing subject-content focused practice in science education whilst seeking to attain the maximum engagement by students that is provided by the circumstances of actual scientific practice . The several constraints on such an innovation in schools are identified and existing ways of addressing them are outlined. Particular attention is paid to the identification of contexts that will provide problems capable of being modelled. It is argued that the capability to model authentically will entail a progressive development of experience from school-focused contexts to those that are science- practitioner- focused.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Modeling science classrooms after scientific laboratories. In R. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 80–85). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ari, M. (2005). Situated learning in ‘This high technology world’. Science & Education, 14(3–5), 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1990). The structure of pedagogic discourse: Class, codes and control. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W. F. (2008). In what sense can the child be considered to be a “little scientist”? In R. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 38–49). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2001). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Cognition and instruction: Issues and agendas (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2004). Supporting prospective teachers’ conceptions of modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1379–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (2000). Authenticity. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to a more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Conceptions, misconceptions, and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10(1), 61–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A. (1996). The child as scientist. Philosophy of Science, 63(4), 485–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., & Kuhl, P. (1999). The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains, and how children learn. New York, NY: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, J. V. (1998). Science and/in community: Contexts and goals in practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 71(256), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P.-L. (2010). From a sense of stereotypically foreign to belonging in a science community: Ways of experimental description about high school students’ science internship. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 591–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science & Education, 84(6), 757–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keys, C. W. (1995). An interpretative study of students’ use of scientific reasoning during a collaborative report writing intervention in ninth grade general science. Science Education, 79(4), 415–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., & Brownell, J. (1966). The curriculum and the disciplines of knowledge: A theory of curriculum practice. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-S., & Songer, N. B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (2000). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education (5th ed.). Kiel, Germany: Institute of Science Education, University of Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, K., & Glaser, R. (1995). Model-based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum. Science Education, 79(1), 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. (2007). Development of a shared vision: Lessons from a science education community collaboration. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 681–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic science education: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., Varma, S., & Martin, L. (2008). Dynamic transfer and innovation. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 479–506). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda, J., & Passmore, C. M. (2013). The strategies of modeling in biology education. Science & Education, 22(1), 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Glaserfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17–40). New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilbert, J.K., Justi, R. (2016). Towards Authentic Learning in Science Education. In: Modelling-based Teaching in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29039-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29039-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29038-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29039-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics