Abstract
This review summarizes and evaluates the available information on honeybee nestmate recognition. Nestmate recognition is the ability of members of a colony to discriminate members of their own colony from others, particularly conspecifics, trying to enter the nest. Honeybee nestmate recognition is mediated by chemical cues that bees gain after emergence as adults. The comb wax in the nest is an important intermediary for transfer of cues among bees in the colony, resulting in a relatively uniform recognition profile which is carried by workers in the colony. Alkenes and free fatty acids are the primary chemical cues in the recognition profile. The ability of honeybees to discriminate nestmates from non-nestmates has raised the question of whether recognition mechanisms might exist to support nepotism within colonies. A variety of experimental approaches have failed to generate support for preferential behavior among highly related subgroups of bees in honeybee colonies. Other questions addressed in this review include queen recognition, response thresholds for expression of recognition, and sensory and information gathering aspects of the recognition system of honeybees. Nestmate recognition in honeybees is a valuable model system for the study of social recognition in animals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beekman M, Oldroyd BP (2008) When workers disunite: intraspecific parasitism by eusocial bees. Ann Rev Entomol 53:19–37
Boch R, Morse RA (1979) Individual recognition of queens by honey bee swarms. Ann Entomol Soc Am 72:51–53
Boch R, Morse RA (1981) Effects of artificial odors and pheromones on queen discrimination by honey bees (Apis mellifera L) (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 74:66–67
Boch R, Morse RA (1982) Genetic factor in queen recognition odors of honey bees. Ann Entomol Soc Am 75:654–656
Boomsma JJ, d’Ettorre P (2013) Nice to kin and nasty to non-kin: revisiting Hamilton’s early insights on eusociality. Biol Lett 9:20130444
Boulay R, Hefetz A, Soroker V et al (2000) Camponotus fellah colony integration: worker individuality necessitates frequent hydrocarbon exchanges. Anim Behav 59:1127–1133
Bowden RM, Williamson S, Breed MD (1998) Floral oils: their effect on nestmate recognition in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Insectes Soc 45:209–214
Breed MD (1981) Individual recognition and learning of queen odors by worker honeybees (Apis mellifera). Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 78:2635–2637
Breed MD (1983) Nestmate recognition in honeybees. Anim Behav 31:86–91
Breed MD (1987) Kin recognition in highly eusocial insects. In: Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (eds) Kin recognition in animals, Wiley, New York, pp 243–285
Breed MD (1998a) Chemical cues in kin recognition: Criteria for identification, experimental approaches, and the honey bee as an example In Chemical communication in social insects, R K Vander Meer, M L Winston, K E Espelie and M D Breed, eds Westview Press: Boulder, pp 57–78
Breed MD (1998b) Recognition pheromones on the honey bee. Bioscience 48:463–470
Breed MD, Bennett B (1987) Kin recognition in highly eusocial insects. In: Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (eds) Kin recognition, Wiley, New York, pp 243–285
Breed MD, Buchwald R (2008) Cue diversity and social recognition. In: Gadau J, Fewell JH (eds) Organization of insect societies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 171–192
Breed MD, Julian G (1992) Honey bee nestmate recognition: simple rules do not apply. Nature 357:685–686
Breed MD, Stiller TM (1992) Honey bee Apis mellifera, nestmate discrimination: hydrocarbons effects and the evolutionary implications of comb choice. Anim Behav 43:875–883
Breed MD, Velthuis HHW, Robinson GE (1984) Do worker honey bees discriminate among larval genotypes? Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:737–739
Breed MD, Fewell JH, Williams KR (1988a) Wax mediates the acquisition of honey bee nestmate recognition cues. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 85:8766–8769
Breed MD, Stiller TM, Blum MS, Page RE Jr (1992) Honey bee nestmate recognition: effects of queen fecal pheromones. J Chem Ecol 18:1633–1640
Breed MD, Welch CK, Cruz R (1994) Kin discrimination within honey bee colonies: An analysis of the evidence. Behav Processes 33:25–40
Breed MD, Garry MF, Pearce AN, Bjostad L, Hibbard B, Page RE (1995b) The role of wax comb in honey bee nestmate recognition: genetic effects on comb discrimination, acquisition of comb cues by bees, and passage of cues among individuals. Anim Behav 50:489–496
Breed MD, Page RE Jr, Bjostad L, Hibbard B (1995c) Genetic components of variation in comb wax hydrocarbons produced by honey bees. J Chem Ecol 21:1329–1338
Breed MD, Leger EA, Pearce AN, Wang YJ (1998) Comb wax effects on the ontogeny of honey bee nestmate recognition. Anim Behav 55:13–20
Breed MD, Guzmán-Novoa E, Hunt GJ (2004a) Defensive behavior of honey bees: organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees. Ann Rev Entomol 49:271–298
Breed MD, Perry S, Bjostad LB (2004b) Testing the blank slate hypothesis: why honey bee colonies accept young bees. Insectes Soc 51:12–16
Breed MD, Diaz PH, Lucero KD (2004c) Behavioural tests of models for information processing in nestmate recognition by honey bees, Apis mellifera. Anim Behav 68:921–928
Breed MD, Deng X-B, Buchwald R (2007) Comparative nestmate recognition in Asian honey bees, Apis florea, Apis andreniformis, Apis dorsata, and Apis cerana. Apidologie 38:411–418
Breed MD, Cook C, Krasnec MO (2012) Cleptobiosis in social insects Psyche, Article ID 484765, p 7
Buchwald R, Breed MD, Bjostad L, Hibbard BE, Greenberg AR (2009) The role of fatty acids in the mechanical properties of beeswax. Apidologie 40:585–594
Buczkowski G, Silverman J (2006) Geographical variation in Argentine ant aggression behaviour mediated by environmentally derived nestmate recognition cues. Anim Behav 71:327–335
Butler CG, Free JB (1952) The behaviour of worker honeybees at the hive entrance. Behaviour 4:262–292
Carlin NF, Holldobler B (1986) The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp) 1. Hierarchical cues in small colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:123–134
Carpenter JM, Perera EP (2006) Phylogenetic relationships among yellowjackets and the evolution of social parasitism (Hymenoptera : Vespidae, Vespinae). Am Mus Novitates 3507:1–19
Chaline N, Sandoz JC, Martin SJ, Ratnieks FLW, Jones GR (2005) Learning and discrimination of individual cuticular hydrocarbons by honeybees (Apis mellifera). Chem Senses 30:327–335
Chapman NC, Makinson J, Beekman M et al (2009) Honeybee, Apis mellifera, guards use adaptive acceptance thresholds to limit worker reproductive parasitism. Anim Behav 78:1205–1211
Chapman NC, Beekman M, Oldroyd BP (2010) Worker reproductive parasitism and drift in the western honeybee Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:419–427
Costanzi E, Bagneres A-G, Lorenzi MC (2013) Changes in the hydrocarbon proportions of colony odor and their consequences on nestmate recognition in social wasps. PLOS One 8:e65107
Couvillon MJ, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Odour transfer in stingless bee marmelada (Frieseomelitta varia) demonstrates that entrance guards use an “undesirable-absent” recognition system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1099–1105
Couvillon MJ, Caple JP, Endsor SL et al (2007) Nestmate recognition template of guard honeybees (Apis mellifera) is modified by wax comb transfer. Biol Lett 3:228–230
Couvillon MJ, Roy GGF, Ratnieks FLW (2009) Recognition errors by honey bee (Apis mellifera) guards demonstrate overlapping cues in conspecific recognition. J Apic Res 48:225–232
Couvillon MJ, van Zweden JS, Ratnieks FLW (2012) Model of collective decision-making in nestmate recognition fails to account for individual discriminator responses and non-independent discriminator errors. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:339–341
Couvillon MJ, Segers FH, Cooper-Bowman R, Truslove G, Nascimento DL, Nascimento FS, Ratnieks FL (2013a) Context affects nestmate recognition errors in honey bees and stingless bees. J Exp Biol 216:3055–3061
Couvillon MJ, Segers Francisca HID, Cooper-Bowman R et al (2013b) Context affects nestmate recognition errors in honey bees and stingless bees. J Exp Biol 216:3055–3061
Crosland MJW (1989) Kin recognition in the ant Rhytidoponera confusa 2. Gestalt odor Anim Behav 37:920–926
Crozier RH, Dix MW (1979) Analysis of two genetic models for the innate components of colony odor in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:217–224
Dani FR, Foster KR, Zacchi F, Seppa P, Massolo A, Carelli A, Arevalo E, Queller DC, Strassmann JE, Turillazzi S (2004) Can cuticular lipids provide sufficient information for within-colony nepotism in wasps? Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 271:745–753
Dani FR, Jones GR, Corsi S et al (2005) Nestmate recognition cues in the honey bee: differential importance of cuticular alkanes and alkenes. Chem Senses 30:477–489
D’Ettorre P, Wenseleers T, Dawson J et al (2006) Wax combs mediate nestmate recognition by guard honeybees. Anim Behav 71:773–779
Downs SG, Ratnieks FLW (2000) Adaptive shifts in honey bee (Apis mellifera L) guarding behavior support predictions of the acceptance threshold model. Behav Ecol 11:326–333
Downs SG, Ratnieks FLW, Jefferies SL et al (2000) The role of floral oils in the nestmate recognition system of honey bees (Apis mellifera L). Apidologie 31:357–365
Downs SG, Ratnieks FLW, Badcock NS et al (2001) Honeybee guards do not use food-derived odors to recognize non-nestmates: a test of the odor convergence hypothesis. Behav Ecol 12:47–50
Drijfhout FP, Kather R, Martin SJ (2010) The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in insects. In: Zhang W, Liu H (eds) Behavioral and chemical ecology, pp 91–114
Fan YL, Richard FJ, Rouf N, Grozinger CM (2010) Effects of queen mandibular pheromone on nestmate recognition in worker honeybees, Apis mellifera. Anim Behav 79:649–656
Friend LA, Bourke AFG (2012) Absence of within-colony kin discrimination in a multiple-queen ant, Leptothorax acervorum. Ethology 118:1182–1190
Getz WM (1982) An analysis of learned kin recognition in Hymenoptera. J Theor Biol 99:585–597
Getz WM, Bruckner D, Parisian TR (1982) Kin structure and the swarming behavior of the honey bee Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:265–270
Greenberg L (1979) Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition. Science 206:1095–1097
Holmes MJ, Tan K, Wang Z, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M (2013) Honeybee (Apis cerana) guards do not discriminate between robbers and reproductive parasites. Insectes Soc 60:265–271
Jones SM, van Zweden JS, Grueter C et al (2012) The role of wax and resin in the nestmate recognition system of a stingless bee, Tetragonisca angustula. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1–12
Kalmus H, Ribbands CR (1952) The origin of the odors by which honeybees distinguish their companions. Proc Roy Soc B 140:50–59
Kather R, Drijfhout Falko P, Martin SJ (2011) Task group differences in cuticular lipids in the honey bee Apis mellifera. J Chem Ecol 37:205–212
Kellner K, Heinze J (2011) Absence of nepotism in genetically heterogeneous colonies of a clonal ant. Ethology 117:556–564
Koyama S, Takagi T, Martin SJ, Yoshida T, Takahashi J (2009) Absence of reproductive conflict during queen rearing in Apis cerana. Insectes Soc 56:171–175
Kryger P, Moritz RFA (1997) Lack of kin recognition in swarming honeybees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:271–276
Leadbeater E, Dapporto Turillazzi S, Field J (2014) Available kin recognition cues may explain why wasp behavior reflects relatedness to nestmates. Behav Ecol 25:344–351
Lindauer M (1952) Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat. Z Vergl Psychol 36:299–345
Lyon C, Buchwald R, Breed MD (2012) The use of flax oil to influence honeybee nestmate recognition. J Econ Entomol 105:1145–1148
Mann CA, Breed MD (1997) Olfaction in guard honey bee discrimination of non-nestmates. Ann Entomol Soc Am 90:844–847
Moore AM, Breed MD, Moor MJ (1987) The guard honey bee; ontogeny and behavioral variability of workers performing a specialized task. Anim Behav 35:1159–1167
Pirk CWW, Neumann P, Ratnieks FLW (2003) Cape honeybees, Apis mellifera capensis, police worker-laid eggs despite the absence of relatedness benefits. Behav Ecol 14:347–352
Rangel J, Mattila HR, Seeley TD (2009) No intracolonial nepotism during colony fissioning in honey bees. Proc Roy Society B 276:3895–3900
Ratnieks FLW, Visscher PK (1989) Worker policing in the honeybee. Nature 342:796–797
Ratnieks FLW, Kaercher MH, Firth Verity et al (2011) Acceptance by honey bee guards of non-nestmates is not increased by treatment with nestmate odours. Ethology 117:655–663
Reeve HK (1989) The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat 133:407–435
Sheehan MJ, Tibbetts EA (2011) Specialized face learning is associated with individual recognition in paper wasps. Science 334:1272–1275
Smith BH (1983) Recognition of female kin by male bees through olfactory signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:4551–4553
Smith BH, Breed MD (1995) The chemical basis for nestmate recognition and mate discrimination in social insects. In: Carde RT, Bell WJ (eds) Chemical ecology of insects II. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 287–317
Soroker V, Hefetz A (2000) Hydrocarbon site of synthesis and circulation in the desert ant Cataglyphis niger. J Insect Physiol 46:1097–1102
Stabentheiner A, Kovac H, Schmaranzer S (2002) Honeybee nestmate recognition: the thermal behaviour of guards and their examinees. J Exp Biol 205:2637–2642
Starks PT (2004) Recognition systems. Ann Zool Fenn 41(6):689–892
Starks PT, Fischer DJ, Watson RE et al (1998) Context-dependent nestmate-discrimination in the paper wasp, Polistes dominulus: a critical test of the optimal acceptance threshold model. Anim Behav 56:449–458
Sturgis SJ, Gordon DM (2012) Nestmate recognition in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a review. Myrmecol News 16:101–110
Tan K, Wang ZW, Yang MX, Hepburn R, Radloff S (2010) Nestmate recognition differences between honeybee colonies of Apis cerana and Apis mellifera. J Insect Behav 23:381–388
Tyus HM (1998) Comb exchange as an aid in uniting honey bee colonies. Am Bee J 138:669–671
Van Oystaeyen A, Oliveira RC, Holman L, van Zweden JS, Romero C, Oi CA, d’Ettorre P, Khalesi M, Billen J, Wäckers F, Millar JG, Wenseleers T (2014) Conserved class of queen pheromones stops social insect workers from reproducing. Science 343:287–290
van Zweden JS, d’Ettorre P (2010) Nestmate recognition in social insects and the role of hydrocarbons. In: Blomquist GJ, Bagneres AG (eds) insect hydrocarbons: Biology, Biochemistry, and Chemical Ecology, pp 222–243
Vander Meer RM, Breed MD, Winston ML, Espelie KE (eds) (1998) Pheromone communication in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, p 368
Visscher PK (1986) Kinship discrimination in queen rearing by honey bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:453–460
Wenseleers T, Alves DA, Francoy TM, Billen J, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL (2010) Intraspecific queen parasitism in a highly eusocial bee. Biol Lett 2010:0819
Zinck L, Chaline N, Jaisson P (2009) Absence of nepotism in worker-queen care in polygynous colonies of the ant Ectatomma tuberculatum. J Ins Behav 22:196–204
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breed, M.D., Cook, C.N., McCreery, H.F., Rodriguez, M. (2015). Nestmate Recognition in Eusocial Insects: The Honeybee as a Model System. In: Aquiloni, L., Tricarico, E. (eds) Social Recognition in Invertebrates. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17599-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17599-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17598-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17599-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)