Skip to main content
Log in

The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.)

I. Hierarchical cues in small colonies

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The phenotypic cues that provide for rejection of non-nestmates by workers of the ant genus Camponotus could derive from any or all of four sources: (1) environmental odors; (2) the individual's own genetically-determined recognition pheromones or “discriminators”; (3) a “gestalt” or mixture of transferable discriminators, produced by each nestmate and absorbed by all; and/or (4) the discriminators of the queen applied to all nestmates. To test these hypotheses, four series of small experimental colonies were created: inter- and intraspecific mixed colonies containing queens, queenless worker groups, and pairs of worker groups between which a single queen was repeatedly switched. Intraspecific mixed colonies and queenless groups were further divided into groups receiving different diets. Aggression of workers in 165 experimental colonies was assayed in a total of 4064 neutral arena tests. Workers adopted into inter- and intraspecific mixed colonies with queens were highly aggressive to unfamiliar kin from pure colonies, independent of diet and of the proportion of different kin groups in the colony. However, queenless workers exhibited less aggression to unfamiliar kin than to non-kin, demonstrating the existence of worker discriminators. Diet differences slightly enhanced aggression among unfamiliar queenless kin. Non-kin sharing a switched queen were as unaggressive to one another as were sisters. The ability to adopt queenless workers between colonies gradually declined over 1–2 wks following their emergence from pupae. We propose a hierarchy of importance of cue sources in determining nestmate discrimination in small Camponotus colonies: Queen discriminators> worker discriminators>environmental cues. A flow-diagram model of social insect kin recognition, based on the “phenotype matching” concept of Holmes and Sherman (1983), is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhatkar A (1983) Interspecific trophallaxis in ants, its ecological and evolutionary significance. In: Jaisson P (ed) Social insects in the tropics. Presses de Univ. Paris-Nord, (pp. 105–123)

  • Bhatkar A, Whitcomb WH (1970) Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Fl Entomol 53:229–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Boch R, Morse RA (1981) Effects of artificial odors and pheromones on queen discrimination by honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Ann Entomol Soc Am 74:66–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Boch R, Morse RA (1982) Genetic factor in queen recognition odors of honey bees. Ann Entomol Soc Am 75:654–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed M (1981) Individual recognition and learning of queen odors by worker honeybees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:2635–2637

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed M (1983) Nestmate recognition in honey bees. Anim Behav 31:86–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian MV (1983) Social insects: ecology and behavioral biology. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckle G, Greenberg L (1981) Nestmate recognition in a sweat bee (Lasioglossum zephyrum): Does an individual recognize its own odors, or only odors of its nestmates? Anim Behav 29:802–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin NF, Hölldobler B (1983) Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants. Science 222:1027–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton W (1950) Ants of North America. Bull Mus Comp Zool 104, Harvard Univ

  • Crozier RH, Dix MW (1979) Analysis of two genetic models for the innate components of colony odor in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrzanski J (1966) Contribution to the ethology of Leptothorax acervorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Acta Biol Exp 26:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JP, Chambers J (1984) Identification and source of a queen-specific chemical in the pharoah's ant, Monomorium pharaonis (L.). J Chem Ecol 10:1731–1747

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielde AM (1903) Artificial mixed nests of ants. Biol Bull 5:320–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Forel A (1923) Le monde social des fourmis, vol 4. Libraire Kundig, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HG, Roberts RB (1980) Foraging behavior of the carpenter ant, Camponotus pennsylvanicus, (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in New Jersey. J Kans Entomol Soc 53:295–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HG, Roberts RB (1982) Entourage pheromone in carpenter ant (Camponotus pennsylvanicus) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) queens. J Kans Entomol Soc 55:568–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamboa G, Reeve H, Pfennig D (1986) The evolution and ontogeny of nestmate recognition in social wasps. Ann Rev Entomol 31:431–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz WM (1982) An analysis of learned kin recognition in Hymenoptera. J Theoret Biol 99:585–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz WM, Smith K (1983) Genetic kin recognition: honey bees discriminate between full and half sisters. Nature 302:147–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg L (1979) Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition. Science 206:1095–1097

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins CP, Haskins EF (1983) Situation and location-specific factors in the compatibility in Rhytidoponera metallica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Psyche 90:163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1962) Zur Frage der Oligogynie bei Camponotus ligniperda Latr. und Camponotus herculeanus L. (Hym. Formicidae). Z Angew Entomol 49:337–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1973) Formica sanguinea (Formicidae): Futterbetteln. Encyclopedia Cinematographica, E2013, Göttingen

  • Hölldobler B (1976) Tournaments and slavery in a desert ant. Science 192:912–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Bartz S (1985) Sociobiology of reproduction in ants. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart (pp. 237–258)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Michener CD (1980) Mechanisms of identification and discrimination in social Hymenoptera. In: Markl H (ed) Evolution of social behavior: hypotheses and empirical tests. Dahlem Konferenzen 1980. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim (pp. 35–58)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1977) The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution. Naturwisschenschaften 64:8–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1982) The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. Am Zool 22:491–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1983) Kin recognition in animals. Am Sci 71:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaisson P (1972a) Nouvelles experiences sur l'aggressivite chez les Fourmis; existence probable d'une substance active inhibitrice de l'aggressivite et attractive secretee par la jeune Formicine. C R Acad Sci Paris Ser D 274:302–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaisson P (1972b) Mise eh evidence d'une pheromone d'attractivite produite par la jeune ouvriere Formica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). C R Acad Sci Paris Ser D 274:429–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouvenaz DP, Banks WA, Lofgren CS (1974) Fire ants: Attraction of workers to queen secretions. Ann Entomol Soc Am 67:442–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutsum AR, Saunders TS, Cherrett JM (1979) Intraspecific aggression in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosus. Anim Behav 27:839–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmus H, Ribbands CR (1952) The origin of the odours by which honeybees distinguish their companions. Proc R Soc London Ser B 140:50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofgren CS, Glancey BM, Glover A, Rocca J, Tumlinson J (1983) Behavior of workers of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) to the queen recognition pheromone: Laboratory studies with an olfactometer and surrogate queens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 76:44–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabelis AA (1979) Wood ant wars: the relationship between aggression and predation in the red wood ant (Formica polyctena Forster). Netherlands J Zool 29:109–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall W (1983) Introduction to probability and statistics. Duxbury Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzer A (1982) Nestmate recognition and incompatibility between colonies of the acacia ant Pseudomyrmex ferruginea. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:165–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzer A, Visnon SB (1985) Kinship and incompatability between colonies of the acacia ant Pseudomyrmex ferruginea. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Page R, Erickson E (1984) Selective rearing of queens by worker honey bees: Kin or nestmate recognition. Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:578–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneirla TC (1971) Army ants: a study in social organization. Topoff HR (ed) Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Holmes WG (1985) Kin recognition: Issues and evidence. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart (pp 437–460)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart R (1985) Nestmate recognition in leptothoracine ants: exploring the dynamics of a complex phenomenon. Ph D thesis, Univ of Toronto

  • Visscher PK (1986) Kinship discrimination in queen rearing by honeybees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:453–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis DI (1962) Aggressive behaviour in the ant Formica fusca. Anim Behav 10:267–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins JF, Cole TW (1966) The attraction of army ant workers to secretions of their queen. Texas J Sci 18:254–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterbottom S (1981) The chemical basis for species and colony recognition in three species of myrmicine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ph D thesis, Univ of Southampton

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlin, N.F., Hölldobler, B. The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19, 123–134 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299947

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299947

Keywords

Navigation