Skip to main content

Abstract

Minimally invasive colorectal surgery has evolved from a laparoscopic procedure to various stages of purely laparoscopic, purely robotic, and hybrid techniques. This has been driven primarily by the location of the patient’s disease process, the advances in surgical skill, and the availability of enhanced technologically advanced equipment. The clinical goals have not changed. They include improved short-term outcomes, better quality of life, acceptable long-term oncologic outcomes, reduced operative times, and containing costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weber PA, Merola S, Wasieleswski A, Ballantyne G. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:1689–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2162–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, et al. Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1633–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1701–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Souza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, et al. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1000–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, et al. Randomized clinical trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, et al. Robot-assisted right colectomy with lymphadenectomy and intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: technical considerations. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:1219–26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Morpurgo E, et al. Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2856–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL. Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1713–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baik SH. Robotic assisted colorectal surgery. In: Baik SH, editor. Robot surgery. Rijeka: InTech; 2010. p. 73–94. www.intechopen.com.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3061–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, et al. Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1521–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baek JH, Pastor C, Pigazzi A. Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:521–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, et al. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1551–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, et al. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2485–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, et al. Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):672–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagtegaal ID, Van de Velde CJ, Van der Worp E, Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group, et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1729–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1480–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, et al. Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS. 2009;13:176–83.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pigazzi A, Luca A, Patriti A, et al. Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1614–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A. Total robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:447–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Luca F, Cenciarella S, Valvo M, et al. Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1274–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hussain A, Mahmood H, Singhal T, et al. Long-term study of port-site incisional hernia after laparoscopic procedures. JSLS. 2009;13:346–9.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Brunt LM. Wound complications of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1420–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brennan TJ, Zahn PK, Pogatski-Zahn EM. Mechanism of incisional pain. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2005;23:1–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Franklin Jr ME, Ramos R, Rosenthal D, Schuessler W. Laparoscopic colonic procedures. World J Surg. 1993;17:51–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi GS, Park IJ, Kang BM, Lim KH, Jun SH. A novel approach of robotic-assisted anterior resection with transanal or transvaginal retrieval of the specimen for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2831–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hellan M, Maker JK. Transvaginal excision of a large rectal stromal tumor: an alternative. Am J Surg. 2006;191:121–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fu T, Liu B, Zhang S, et al. Transvaginal local excision of rectal carcinoma. Curr Surg. 2003;60:187–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sanchez JE, Rasheid SH, Kreiger BR, Frattini JC, Marcet JE. Laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal approach for sigmoidectomy and rectocolpopexy. JSLS. 2009;13:217–20.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Diana M, Perretta S, Wall J, et al. Transvaginal specimen extraction in colorectal surgery: current state of the art. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:e104–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Franklin ME, Kelley H, Kelley M, et al. Transvaginal extraction of the specimen after total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:294–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Karahasanoglu T, Hamzaoglu I, Aytac E, Baca B. Transvaginal assisted totally laparoscopic single-port right colectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21:255–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1205–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Obias M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Obias, V., Milas, L.J. (2015). Robotic Approaches. In: Ross, H., Lee, S., Champagne, B., Pigazzi, A., Rivadeneira, D. (eds) Robotic Approaches to Colorectal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09120-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09120-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09119-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09120-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics