Skip to main content

Historical Root of Knowledge Management: A Bibliographic Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management and Knowledge Sharing

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to analyse the historical root of knowledge management from 1930 to 2020 through a systematic review of the international academic literature. The research work consisted of a systematic review that involved the analysis of articles that presented both theoretical and empirical research results. The research was performed from 1930 to 2020 on the Web of Science databases. We conclude that despite the environmental awareness and knowledge that exists about this concept, it has not yet reached a sufficiently comprehensive level to apply it. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce certain variables such as the generation and use of information as well as the formation of human capital in this regard. A compilation of recent works was made to identify how knowledge management affects the enterprises that currently face serious problems in this domain, aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic, and to generate a contribution to the state of the art and the subject knowledge gaps in the subject. The major limitation of this paper is the lack of access to the content of articles located in databases such as Web of Science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbar, A., & Mokhtarpour, R. (2016). Tracing the historical origins of knowledge management issues through referenced publication years spectroscopy (RPYS). Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1393–1404. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2016-0019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S., Peters, L. D., Khan, I. U., Ali, W., & Saif, N. (2020). Organizational learning and hotel performance: The role of capabilities’ hierarchy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85, 102349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, A. (1999). El Management en el Siglo XXI. Granica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, R., Fontodrona, J., & Poveda, C. (2017). La industria 4.0: El estado de la cuestión. Economía Industrial, 406, 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrion, I., Landroguez, S., & Rodríguez, A. (2016). Critical processes of knowledge management: An approach toward the creation of customer value (pp. 1–7). University of Twente Conference Proceedings Repository.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayeux, A. (1964). ¿Qué es el Evolucionismo? México: Ed. Planeta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1994). The age of social transformation. Atlanta Monthly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, S., & Bennet, H. (2010). A narrative review of the published ethical debates in palliatives care research and an assessment of their adequacy to inform research governance. Palliative Medicine., 24(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonson, R. (2010). Knowledge management practices within Hong Kong organizations. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 2(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561411011054805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., Ababneh, B., Hall, M., & Shaw, D. (2009). Knowledge management: A review of the field and of OR’s contribution. Journal of the Operational Research Society., 60(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2008.168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farfán, D., & Garzón, M. (2006). La Gestión del Conocimiento. Editorial Universidad del Rosario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Romero, J. G. I. (2008). La generación de conocimiento organizacional en la micro, pequeña y mediana empresas (MIPYMES) de Durango. Editorial UJED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Osorio, M., & Gómez-Romero, J. (2018). Las incapacidades y estilos de aprendizaje organizacional: estudio comparativo de las Mipymes en Bogotá–Colombia y Durango–México. Estudios Gerenciales, 34(148), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2018.148.2590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, M., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal., 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B., Johnson, C., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Clinical Update, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, M. E., Böhmann, T., & Krcmar, H. (2007). A strategy for knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management., 11(6), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710832127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooff, B., & Huysman, M. (2009). Managing knowledge sharing: Emergent and engineering approaches. Information & Management, 46(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, E. (2001). La Tercer Vía. Diana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasimuddin, S. (2006). Disciplinary roots of knowledge management: A theoretical review. International Journal of Organizational Analysis., 14(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/10553180610742782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khunsoonthornkit, A., & Panjakajornsak, V. (2018). Structural equation model to assess the impact of learning organization and commitment on the performance of research organizations. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macharzina, K. (1999). Editorial: Free trade at the zenith? Management International Review., 39(4), 301–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Aragón, C., & Aguilar Morales, N. (2022). Una revisión sistemática de la literatura del aprendizaje organizacional y el desempeño. Revista Científica Visión De Futuro, 27(1), 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milla Calderon, L., Martelo Gómez, R., & Peña Pertuz, M. (2018). Gestión del conocimiento para la difusión de producción intelectual en la educación universitaria. Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, 13(1), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2018v13n1.2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakash, M., & Bouhnik, D. (2021). La gestión del conocimiento no está muerta. Ha cambiado de aspecto. Y seguirá cambiando. Gestión del Conocimiento y Procesos, 28(1), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991). La Empresa Creadora de Conocimiento. Harvard Business Review, 69 (noviembre de diciembre), 96-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2000). La Organización Creadora de Conocimiento. Como las Compañías Japonesas Crean la Dinámica de la Innovación. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pautasso, M. (2019). The structure and conduct of a narrative literature review. In M. Shoja, A. Arynchyna, M. Loukas, A. D’Antoni, S. Buerger, M. Karl, & R. Tubbs (Eds.), A guide to the scientific career. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118907283.ch31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. John Wiley. Pisano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, M. (2016). Gestión del Conocimiento: Orígenes y Evolución. El Profesional de la Información., 25(4), 526–534. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.jul.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce Telles, C., & Gómez Romero, J. G. I. (2022). Estilos de liderazgo y aprendizaje organizacional: un estudio de caso. Ibero-American Journal of Economics & Business Research, 2, 1. https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoecb.v2i1.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prusak, L. (2001). Where did knowledge management came from? IBM System Journal., 4(4), 1002–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(97)00018-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Function Secretary. (2018). Marco Conceptual sobre Gestión del Conocimiento. https://usp.funcionpublica.gob.mx/html/Documentacion-DGDHSPC/AutogestionConocimiento/MarcoConceptual_GestionConocimiento.pdf.

  • Rodríguez, A., Rodríguez, L., & Briseño, A. (2022). Corporate social responsibility in the Covid-era. An Exploratory Literature Review. In Research in administrative sciences under Covid-19 (pp. 177–192). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80262-297-320221011

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rubier Valdés, D. (2019). La incidencia de la gestión del conocimiento en el éxito de las organizaciones. COODES, 7(3), 392–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The age and practice of the learning organization. Century Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1998). Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology., 48, 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tejedor, B., & Aguirre, A. (1998). Proyecto Logos: Investigación relativa a la capacidad de aprender de las empresas españolas. Boletín de estudios económicos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting, C. (2017). A literature review on knowledge management in organizations. Research in Business and Management., 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5296/rbm.v4i1.10786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting, S., & Colin, X. (2017). Investigación en Negocios y Gestión. Academia. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 4(1), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1999). El Cambio del Poder. In Traducción Rafael Aparicio. Plaza & Janes Editores, S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management., 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdes, L. (2002). La Re-evolución Empresarial del Siglo XXI. Conocimiento y Capital Intelectual: Las Nuevas Ventajas Competitivas de la Empresa. Grupo Editorial Norma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valeri, M. (2021). Organizational studies. Implications for the strategic management. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valeri, M., & Baggio, R. (2022). Knowledge management in tourism: Paradigms, approaches and methods. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2022-506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villasana, L., Hernández, P., & Ramírez, E. (2021). La Gestión del Conocimiento, Pasado, Presente y Futuro. Una Revisión de la Literatura. Trascender, Contabilidad y Gestión., 18(6), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.36791/tcg.v0i18.128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittke, T. (2020). Cultura Organizacional como factor crítico en la Gestión del Conocimiento: Reflexiones en base al caso de una empresa industrial pública en Uruguay. Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad, 10(3), 168–201. https://doi.org/10.26864/PCS.v10.n3.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, I., & Chen, J. (2014). Knowledge management driven firm performance: The roles of business process capabilities and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1141–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, A., Ulrich, D., Nason, S., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2000). Las Capacidades del Aprendizaje en la Organización. “Como Aprender a Generar Ideas con Impacto”. Oxford University Press, S.A. de C.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, C., Liu, A., & Chen, G. (2018). High performance work systems and corporate performance: E influence of entrepreneurial orientation and organizational learning. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-018-0025-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Emmanuel Pérez Brito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brito, A.E.P., Zapata, M.I.B., Romero, J.G.I.G. (2024). Historical Root of Knowledge Management: A Bibliographic Review. In: Valeri, M. (eds) Knowledge Management and Knowledge Sharing. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37868-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics