Skip to main content

Prostheses in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Laparoscopy of the Abdominal Wall Hernia

Abstract

The prostheses used in inguinal hernia repair have ranged from preformed polypropylene to the current three-dimensional meshes consisting of little material and large pores. Today, mesh pores and material content (polypropylene, polyester mostly) are very important when considering the lifestyles of the patient. Correctly choosing the mesh according to the characteristics of the patient and the hernia is essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aquaviva D, Bounet P. Cure d’une volumineuse eventration par plaque deCrinofil. Extraits Bull Soc Chir de Marseille1944. Quoted by Zagdoun J, Sordinas A. L’utilisation des plaques de nylon dans la chirurgie des hernies inguinales, Academie de Chirurgie, Se`ance du 25 Nov 1959; 747–54.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Usher FC, Ochsner J, Tuttle LLD. Marlex mesh: a new plastic mesh for replacing tissue defects, experimental studies. Am Surg. 1959;24(12):969–74.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Usher FC. Knitted Marlex mesh. An improved Marlex prosthesis for repairing hernias and other tissue defects. Arch Surg. 1961;82:771–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. LeBlanck KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroehtylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3:39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Negro P, Proposito D, Carboni M, et al. In: Carbonell F, editor. Hernia inguinocrural. Valencia: Ethicon; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amid PK. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997;1:15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bellón JM. Propuesta de una nueva clasificación de prótesis destinadas a la reparación de defectos herniarios en la pared abdominal. Cir Esp. 2005;78(3):148–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coda A, Lamberti R, Martorana S. Classification of prosthetics used in hernia repair based on weight and biomaterial. Hernia. 2012;16:9–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R, et al. Functional and morphologic properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg. 2002;26:1472–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia [International Endohernia Society] (IEHS). Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2773–843.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowham AS, Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbons Jr RJ, et al. Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair. Ann Surg. 1997;225:422–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Ekkernkamp A. Recurrence risks in randomized trials of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: to pool or not to pool (this is not the question). Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389:492–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Phillips EH, Rosenthal R, Fallas M, et al. Reasons for early recurrence following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:140–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chowbey PK, Garg N, Sharma A, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3073–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Akolekar D, Kumar S, Khan LR, Beaux A, et al. Comparison of recurrence with lightweight composite polypropylene mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an audit of 1,232 repairs. Hernia. 2008;12:39–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bittner R, Leibl BJ, Kraft B, et al. One-year results of a prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing four meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP). Hernia. 2011;15:503–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bittner R, Schmedt CG, Leibl BJ, et al. Early postoperative and one year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of extralight titanized polypropylene mesh and traditional heavyweight polypropylene mesh on pain and seroma production in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). World J Surg. 2011;35:1791–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Langenbach MR, Schmidt J, Ubrig B, et al. Sixty-month follow-up after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair with three types of mesh: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1790–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Currie A, Andrew H, Tonsi A, et al. Lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(8):2126–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bellows CF, Shadduck PP, Helton WS, et al. The design of an industry-sponsored randomized controlled trial to compare synthetic mesh versus biologic mesh for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2011;15:325–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Agresta F, Bedin N. Transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: is there a place for biological mesh? Hernia. 2008;12:609–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Tejada Gómez MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 7.1 Biomaterials Abbreviations

Appendix 7.1 Biomaterials Abbreviations

PET:

Polyester (polyethylene terephthalate)

PEU:

Polyether urethane

PG 910:

Polyglactin 910

PGACL:

Polyglycolic acid-caprolactone

PGCA:

Polyglecaprone acid

PLA:

Polylactic acid

PGA:

Polyglycolic acid

PP:

Polypropylene

cPP:

Condensed polypropylene

PTFE:

Polytetrafluoroethylene

ePTPE:

Condensed polytetrafluoroethylene

ePTFE:

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene

PVD17:

Polyvinylidene fluoride

prp:

Polyvinylpyrrolidone

PU:

Polyurethane

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gómez, A.T., Luque, A.B. (2014). Prostheses in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair. In: Suárez Grau, J., Bellido Luque, J. (eds) Advances in Laparoscopy of the Abdominal Wall Hernia. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4700-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4700-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4699-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4700-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics