Erratum

In the original publication of this article [1] there was 1 incorrect value displayed in Table 1. In this Erratum the incorrect (Table 1 in this Erratum) and correct version of Table 1 are shown (Table 2 in this Erratum). Only a part of Table 1 is shown in this Erratum. The full version of Table 1 is available in the original article. The original publication has been updated with the correct data; the error did not impact the scientific outcome of the study. The publisher apologizes to the authors and readers for the inconvenience.

Table 1 Original version of Table 1 as published on 15 August 2017
Table 2 Correct version of Table 1, the value 28 has been corrected to 25