Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of cropping systems and crop rotations on weeds

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamics of weed populations in arable fields are influenced by environmental and soil characteristics and also by cropping system and management practices. Manipulation of cropping systems to improve weed management requires a better understanding of the spatial and temporal dynamics of weeds, seed losses and seed production. To assess the effect of different cropping systems and various crop rotations on the weed population and seed bank, we conducted a field study at the experimental farm in Khorasan Agricultural Research Center, Mashhad, Iran. The experimental design was a split plot with 3 crop rotations as the main plots, and five cropping systems consisting of high-input, medium-input, low-input, organic and integrated systems applied to the sub-plots. Our results show that weed seed densities in organic and integrated cropping systems, of about 5000–6000 seeds/m2 were higher than conventional and high-input cropping systems showing about 2000 seeds/m2. Weed seed density in continuous winter wheat of approximately 6300 seeds/m2 was higher than other rotations with about 5000 seeds/m2. Weed composition in the high-input system was 11 species with 66 plants/m2. Whereas in the low-input and organic systems, the weed populations were 15 and 13 species with 145 and 220 plants/m2, respectively. Changes in weed seed bank density and species composition often occur when crop management practices and crop rotations are altered. For example, continuous winter wheat fields showed more annual grass weeds, but broadleaf weeds were more abundant in sugar beet-winter wheat rotation. The weed population in continuous winter wheat plots comprised 90% grass and sedge weeds, while in sugar beet-wheat rotation, it was only 43% of total weed density. Broadleaf weeds were 55.2% in sugar beet-winter wheat but 9.4% of total weed density in continuous winter wheat. Different rotations that include crops with different life cycles such as winter wheat-maize and winter wheat-sugar beet could lead to additional benefits of reducing the weed seed bank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson R.L. (2007) Managing weeds with a dualistic approach of prevention and control. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 27, 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • vAvola G., Tuttobene R., Gresta F., Abbate V. (2008) Weed control strategies for grain legumes, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28, 389–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachthaler G. (1974) The development of the weed flora after several years direct drilling in cereal rotation on different soils, Proceeding of the 12th British Weed Control Conference, pp. 1063–1071.

  • Bagmet L. (2000) Dynamic of the segetal element of weed flora in the Lower-Volga region, Z. Pflanzenk. Pflanzen. 17, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball D.A. (1992) Weed seed bank response to tillage, herbicide and crop rotation sequence, Weed Sci. 40, 654–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball D.A., Miller S.D. (1990) Weed seed population response to tillage and herbicide use in three irrigated cropping sequences, Weed Sci. 38, 511–517.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barberi P., Cozzani A., Macchia M., Bonari E. (1998) Sample size and composition of the weed seed bank under different management systems for continuous maize cropping, Weed Res. 38, 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belde M., Mattheis A., Sprenger B., Albrecht H. (2000) Long-term development of yield affecting weeds after the change from conventional to integrated and organic farming, Z. Pflanzenk. Pflanzen. Special Issue 17, 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belo A.F., Dias L.S. (1998) Changes in grass-weed seed banks in relation to crops and rotations, in: Champion G.T., Grundy A.C., Jones N.E., Marshall E.J.P., Froud-Williams R.J. (Eds.), Aspects of Applied Biology 51, Weed Seed Banks: Determination, Dynamics and Manipulation, pp. 221–228. Publ. Association of Applied Biologists, C/O Horticulture Research International Wellesbourne, Warwick, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit D.L., Derksen D.A., Panneton B. (1992) Innovative approach to seed bank studies, Weed Sci. 40, 660–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw R.E., Larney F.J., Lindwall C.W., Watson P.R., Derksen D. (2001) Tillage intensity and crop rotation affect weed community dynamics in a winter wheat cropping system Can. J. Plant Sci. 81, 805–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhler D.D. (1995) Influences of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in maize and soybean in the central USA, Crop Sci. 35, 1247–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhler D.D., Stoltenberg D.E., Becker R.L., Gunsolus J.L. (1994) Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices, Weed Sci. 42, 205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhler D.D., Kohler K.A., Thompson R.L. (2001) Weed seed bank dynamics during a five-year crop rotation, Weed Technol. 15, 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caixinhas M.L., Jeronimo A., Rocha, F., Leitao A. (1998) Relationship between the seed bank and actual weed flora in an agricultural soil in the Tapada da Ajuda (Lisbona), in: Champion G.T., Grundy A.C., Jones N.E., Marshall E.J.P., Froud-Williams R.J. (Eds.), Aspects of Applied Biology 51, Weed Seed Banks: Determination, Dynamics and Manipulation, pp. 51–57. Publ. Association of Applied Biologists, C/O Horticulture Research International Wellesbourne, Warwick, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardina J., Sparrow D.H. (1996) A comparison of methods to predict weed seedling populations from the soil seed bank, Weed Sci. 44, 46–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carofa M., Tourdonneta S., Saulasb P., Flocha D.L., Roger-Estradea J. (2007) Undersowing wheat with different living mulches in a no-till system. II. Competition for light and nitrogen, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 27, 357–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chicouen D.E. (2007) Mechanical destruction of weeds, A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 27, 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbach N., Roger-Estrade J., Chauvel B., Caneill J. (2000) Modelling vertical and lateral seed bank movements during mouldboard plowing, Eur. J. Agron. 13, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A.S., Liebman M. (2003) Cropping system effects on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) demography: I. Green manure and Tillage timing, Weed Sci. 51, 919–929.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A.S., Dixon P.M., Liebman M. (2004) Using matrix models to determine cropping system effects on annual weed demography, Ecol. Appl. 14, 655–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawit M., David S.E. (1997) Weed and seed bank management with integrated methods as influenced by tillage, Weed Sci. 45, 706–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derksen D.A., Lafond G.P., Thomas A.G., Loeppky H.A., Swanton C.J. (1993) Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems, Weed Sci. 41, 409–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessaint F., Chadoeuf R., Barallis G. (1997) Nine year’s soil seed bank and weed vegetation relationships in an arable field without weed control, J. Appl. Ecol. 34, 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucet C., Hamill A.S. (1999) Separating the effects of crop rotation from weed management on weed density and diversity, Weed Sci. 47, 729–735.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forcella F., Durgan B.R., Buhler D.D. (1996) Management of weed seed bank in: Proceedings of Second International Weed Control Congress, pp. 123–130, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • Gomez K., Gomez A. (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, pp. 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber H., Haendel K., Broschewitz B. (2000) Influence of farming system on weeds in thresh crops of a six-year crop rotation, Z. Pflanzenk. Pflanzen. Special Issue 17, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hald A.B. (1999) Weed vegetation (wild flora) of long established organic versus conventional cereal fields in Denmark, Ann. Appl. Biol. 134, 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman M., Dyck E. (1993) Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management, Ecol. Appl. 3, 92–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R.J., Felton W.L. (1993) Effect of crop rotation, tillage practice, and herbicides on the population dynamics of wild oats in wheat, Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 53, 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E.J.P., Brown V.K., Boatman N.D., Lutman P.J.W., Squire G.R., Ward L.K. (2003) The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields, Weed Res. 43, 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris R.F., Elmore C.L., Rejmanek M., Akey W.C. (2001) Spatial arrangement, density and competition between barnyardgrass growth and seed production, Weed Sci. 49, 69–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reuss S.A., Buhler D.D., Gunsolus J. (2001) Effects of soil depth and aggregate size on weed seed distribution and viability in a silt loam soil, Appl. Soil Ecol. 16, 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjursen H. (2001) Change of the weed seed bank during the first complete six-course crop rotation after conversion from conventional to organic farming, Biol. Agric. Hortic. 19, 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire G.R., Rodgers S., Wright G. (2000) Community-scale seed bank response to less intense rotation and reduced herbicide input at three sites, Ann. Appl. Biol. 136, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoski L.M., Cardina J. (2006) Weed seedbank community composition in a 35-yr-old tillage and rotation experiment, Weed Sci. 54, 263–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoate C., Boatman D., Borralho R.J., Carvalho C.R., Desnoo G.R., Eden P. (2002) Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe, J. Environ. Manage. 63, 337–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabaglio V., Gavazzi1 C., Schulz M., Marocco1 A. (2008) Alternative weed control using the allelopathic effect of natural benzoxazinoids from rye mulch, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28, 397–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Elsen T. (2000) Species diversity as a task for organic agriculture in Europe, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 77, 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdú A.M., Mas M.T. (2007) Mulching as an alternative technique for weed management in mandarin orchard tree rows, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 27, 367–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Ghorbani.

About this article

Cite this article

Koocheki, A., Nassiri, M., Alimoradi, L. et al. Effect of cropping systems and crop rotations on weeds. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29, 401–408 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2008061

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2008061

Navigation