Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamical limitations on the Antarctic iron fertilization strategy

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

MARTIN et al. have proposed an ingenious means by which the rise in atmospheric CO2 content generated by the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation might be partially compensated1. The idea is that plant production in the nutrient-rich surface waters of the Antarctic could be stimulated by the addition of dissolved iron, thereby reducing the CO2 partial pressure in these waters and allowing CO2 to flow from the atmosphere into the Antarctic Ocean. We have used a box model calibrated with transient tracer data to examine the dynamical aspects of this proposal, and conclude that after 100 years of totally successful fertilization the CO2 content of the atmosphere would be lowered by only 10±5% below what it would have been in the absence of fertilization. So if after 100 years the CO2 content of the atmosphere were 500 fjiatm without fertilization, it would be between 425 and 475 µ atm with full fertilization. In other words, if our model calibration is correct, even if iron fertilization worked perfectly it would not significantly reduce the atmospheric CO2 content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baum, R. Chem. Engng. News 68, 21–24 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin, J. H. & Fitzwater, S. E. Nature 331, 341–343 (1988).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin, J. H. & Gordon, R. M. Deep Sea Res. 35, 177–196 (1988).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, J. H., Gordon, R. M., Fitzwater, S. & Broenkow, W. W. Deep Sea Res. 38, 649–680 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin, J. H., Gordon, R. M. & Fitzwater, S. Nature 345, 156–158 (1990).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin, J. H. Palaeoceanography 5, 1–13 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deacon, G. E. R. Discovery Rep. 15, 125–152 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ostlund, H. G. & Stuiver, M. Radiocarbon 22, 25–53 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stuiver, M. & Ostlund, H. G. Radiocarbon 22, 1–24 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stuiver, M. & Ostlund, H. G. Radiocarbon 25, 1–29 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Broecker, W. S., Peng, T-H., Ostlund, G. & Stuiver, M. J. geophys. Res. 90, 6953–6970 (1985).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oeschger, H., Siegenthaler, U., Schotterer, U. & Gugelman, A. Tellus 27, 168–192 (1975).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Foster, T. D. & Weiss, R. F. Antarct. J. U. S. 74, 76 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stouffer, R. F., Manabe, S. & Bryan, K. Nature 342, 660–662 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, TH., Broecker, W. Dynamical limitations on the Antarctic iron fertilization strategy. Nature 349, 227–229 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/349227a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/349227a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation