Skip to main content
Log in

Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: The Role of Learning from Failure

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ERP implementations remain problematic despite the fact that many of the issues are by now quite well known. In this paper, we take a different perspective from the critical success factors and risks approaches that are common in the information systems discipline to explain why ERP implementations fail. Specifically, we adapt Sitkin's theory of intelligent failure to ERP implementations resulting in a theory that we call “learning from failure.” We then examine from the viewpoint of this theory the details of two SAP R/3 implementations, one of which failed while the other succeeded. Although it is impossible to state, unequivocally, that the implementation that failed did so because it did not use the approach that was derived from the theory, the analysis reveals that the company that followed many of the tenets of the theory succeeded while the other did not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alschuler D, Dorin R. AcceleratedSAPWorks! An executive white paper, AberdeenGroup, June 1998, http://www.aberdeen.com.

  • Ang K, Thong J, Yap C. IT implementation through the lens of organizational learning: A case of insuror. Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems 1997.

  • Argyris C. Strategy, Change and Defensive Routines. Boston: Pitman, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schon DA. Organizational Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asbrand D. Peering across the abyss: Clothing and shoe companies cross the ERP chasm. Datamation Executive Diary: Part 3, January 1999.

  • Attewell P. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science 1992;3:1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey J. Trash haulers are taking fancy software to the dump: Allied waste, following waste management, to shed SAP's costly R/3. The Wall Street Journal June 9, 1999:B4.

  • Bancroft N, Seip H, Sprengel A. Implementing SAP R/3: How to introduce a large system into a large organization. (2nd ed.) Manning Publications, 1998, Chapters 6, 7, and 11.

  • Barki H, Rivard S, Talbot J. Toward an assessment of software development risk. Journal of Management Information Systems 1993;10(2):203-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block R. The Politics of Projects. Yourdon Press, Prentice-Hall, Chapter 1, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown C, Vessey I. ERP Implementation Approaches: Towards a Contingency Framework. Research-in-Progress, Twentieth International Conference on Information Systems. Charlotte, 1999.

  • Bulkeley WM. When things go wrong. The Wall Street Journal. November 18, 1996, R25.

  • Caldwell B. Andersen sued on R/3. Information Week July 6, 1998.

  • Champy J. Packaged systems: One way to force change. Computerworld December 22, 1997:61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliffe S. ERP implementation: How to avoid $100 million write-offs. Harvard Business Review January-February 1999:16-17.

  • Computergram International FoxMeyer plus two sue Andersen for SAP snafus. Computergram International July 20, 1998.

  • Davenport TH. Putting the enterprise into enterprise systems. Harvard Business Review July-August 1998:121-131.

  • Deloitte Consulting, ERP's second wave: Maximizing the value of ERP-enabled processes, 1998.

  • Dodgson M. Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies 1993;14(3):375-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • FinTimes SAP in $500m US lawsuit. Financial Times Surveys, September 2, 1998:2.

  • Fiol C, Lyles M. Organizational Learning. Academy of Management Review 1985;10(4):803-813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable GG. A conversation with Tom Davenport. forthcoming: Journal of Global Information Management.

  • Girard K, Farmer MA. Business software firms sued over implementation. CNET News.com November 3, 1999, http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1008-202-1428800.html.

  • Hedberg B. How organizations learn and unlearn. In Nystrom PC & Starbuck WH (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981;1:3-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman T. Software snafu triggers order delays, loss: Snap-On software leads to $50M dip. Computerworld News, July 6, 1998:6.

  • Holland CP, Light B. A critical success factors model for ERP implementation. IEEE Software March/June, 1999:30-35.

  • Huber G. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures. Organization Science 1991;2(1):88-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • IW SAP Installation scuttled: Unisource cites internal problems for $168 M write-off. InformationWeek January 26, 1998.

  • Jesitus J. Broken promises? FoxMeyer's project was a disaster.Was the company too aggressive or was it misled? Industry Week November 3, 1997:31-37.

  • King J. Dell zaps SAP. Computerworld May 26, 1997:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter JP. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review 1995;73(2):59-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt B, March JG. Organizational Learning. In W.R. Scott & J. Blake (Eds.) Annual Review of Sociology 1988;14:319-340.

  • LJX Files, The complaint in Brown v. Andersen Consulting, http://www.ljx.com/LJXfiles/bankruptcy/andersen.html

  • Lyytinen K, Mathiassen L, Ropponen J. Attention shaping and software riskÐA categorical analysis of four classical risk management approaches. Information Systems Research 1998;9(3):233-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounamaa PH, March JG. Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Science 1987;33:107-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • March JG. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science 1991;2(1):71-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML, Benjamin RI. The magic bullet theory in IT-enabled transformation. Sloan Management Review Winter 1997; 38(2):55-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML, Tanis C. The enterprise systems experience·from adoption to success. In Zmud RW (ed.), Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past. Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 1994;5(1):14-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterland A. Blaming ERP, CFO Magazine, January 2000 (http://www.cfonet.com/Articles/CFO/2000/00Jablam.html)

  • Pentland BT. Information systems and organizational learning: The social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 1995;5(1):1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Millar V. How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review 1985;63:149-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevich, Lynda, Quantum's leap. CIO February 15, 1997.

  • Robey D, Wishart NA, Rodriguez-Diaz AG. Merging the metaphors for organizational improvement: Business process reengineering as a component of organizational learning. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 1995;5(1):23-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross J. Dow Corning Corporation (A): Business Processes and Information Technology, Center for Information Systems Research. Sloan School of Management, MIT. 1996a.

  • Ross J. Dow Corning Corporation (B): Reengineering Global Processes. Center for Information Systems Research. Sloan School of Management, MIT. 1996b.

  • Ross J. Dow Corning (C): Transforming the organization. Center for Information Systems Research. Sloan School of Management, MIT, 1999.

  • Sauer C. Deciding the future for IS failures: Not the choice you might think. In Currie W and Galliers RG (eds.), Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JE, The FoxMeyer Drugs' bankruptcy: Was it a failure of ERP?. Proceedings of the Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems. 1999:223-225.

  • Scott JE, Vessey I. Toward a Multi-Level Theory of Risks in Enterprise Systems Implementations, Working paper, 2000.

  • Senge PM. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday, 1990.

  • Sitkin SB. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior 1992;14:231-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman C. Big-bang R/3 rollout forced compromises with business goals. Computerworld March 16, 1998;32(11):1, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein EW, Zwass V. Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Information Systems Research 1995;6(2):85-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner M. Critical success factors in enterprise wide information management systems projects. Proceedings of the ACM-SIGCPR Conference 1999:297-303.

  • Welti N. Successful SAP R/3 Implementation: Practical Management of ERP Projects. Addison-Wesley Longman Limited, 1999, Chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks LP, Griffiths C. Management and risk in major Information Technology Projects. In Willcocks LP, Feeny D, Islel G (eds.), Managing IT as a Strategic Resource. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire England, 1997:203-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M. From SAP to `nuts!' Computerworld November 10, 1997;31,45:68-69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, J.E., Vessey, I. Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: The Role of Learning from Failure. Information Systems Frontiers 2, 213–232 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026504325010

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026504325010

Navigation