Abstract
Soft systems methodology (SSM) is an approach for tackling problematical, messy situations of all kinds. It is an action-oriented process of inquiry into problematic situations in which users learn their way from finding out about the situation, to taking action to improve it. The learning emerges via an organised process in which the situation is explored using a set of models of purposeful action (each built to encapsulate a single worldview) as intellectual devices, or tools, to inform and structure discussion about a situation and how it might be improved. This paper, written by the original developer Peter Checkland and practitioner John Poulter, gives a clear and concise account of the approach that covers SSM’s specific techniques, the learning cycle process of the methodology and the craft skills which practitioners develop. This concise but theoretically robust account nevertheless includes the fundamental concepts, techniques, core tenets described through a wide range of settings.
This chapter uses edited excerpts and selected figures from Checkland, P. and Poulter, J. (2006) Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its use for Practitioners, copyright of John Wiley and Sons Limited. Reproduced with permission.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Checkland P.B. and Winter M.C. 2006 ‘Process and content: two ways of using SSM’, Journal of the Operational Research Society vol. 57 (12) pp. 1435–1441
References
Bell, S., Benatti, F., Edwards, N. R., Laney, R., Morse, D. R., Piccolo, L., & Zanetti, O. (2018). Smart cities and M 3: Rapid research, meaningful metrics and co-design. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 31(1), 27–53.
Brocklesby, J., & Beall, E. (2018). Processes of engagement and methodology design in Community Operational Research–Insights from the indigenous peoples sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 996–1005.
Burns, D. (2014). Systemic action research: Changing system dynamics to support sustainable change. Action Research, 12(1), 3–18.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and Its Use Practitioners, Teachers and Students. Chichester: Wiley.
Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester: Wiley.
Emes, M., Smith, S., Ward, S., & Smith, A. (2018). Improving the patient discharge process: implementing actions derived from a soft systems methodology study. Health Systems, 1–17.
Ison, R. (2017). Systemic inquiry. In Systems Practice: How to Act (pp. 251–274). London: Springer.
McLellan, J. D. and Blanchard, R. E., (2018). Micro-generation in conflict: The conditions necessary to power economic development in rural Afghanistan. Available via: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/32954
Proches, C. N. G., & Bodhanya, S. (2015). An application of soft systems methodology in the sugar industry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(1), 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Open University
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Checkland, P., Poulter, J. (2020). Soft Systems Methodology. In: Reynolds, M., Holwell (Retired), S. (eds) Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7472-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7472-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-7471-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-7472-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)