Abstract
The main purpose of The NorwegianGene Technology Act (1993) is to enforcecontainment of genetically modified organisms(GMOs) and control of GMO releases.Furthermore, the Act intends to ensure that``production and use of GMOs should take placein an ethically and socially justifiable way,in accordance with the principle of sustainabledevelopment and without detrimental effects tohealth and the environment.'' Hence it isobvious that, for the Norwegian authorities,sustainable development is a normativeguideline when evaluating acceptableconsequences of GMO use and production. Inaccordance with this, we have investigated theextent to which the sustainability criteriawere decisive for the destiny of one approvedand one declined application of geneticallymodified plant release. The presentunderstanding of the ecological,socio-economical, and cultural consequences ofGMO use and release is fragmentary anduncertain. We consider the PrecautionaryPrinciple and the notion of equitabledistribution as key issues within thesustainable development framework, henceconstituting important foundations for ouranalyses. The Act is legitimizingsustainability criteria, but does not seem tosecure their conversion into concrete action.We envisage a more conscious implementation ofthe Norwegian Gene Technology Act.Sustainability concerns ecological, economical,and social values, and these can only beensured through long-term thinking, initiationof independent risk-associated research, andbroad involvement of all stakeholders in theevaluation of GMO issues and concerns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Backer, I. L., “Sustainability and Benefit to the Community Concerning the Release and Use of Genetically Modified Organisms in the Norwegian Gene Technology Act,” International Conference on the Release and Use of Genetically Modified Organisms: Sustainable Development and Legal Control (The Norwegian Biotechnology Advisory Board, Oslo, 1995), pp. 41–50.
Barrett, K., Canadian Agricultural Biotechnology: Risk Assessment and the Precautionary Principle, PhD dissertation (University of British Columbia, 1999).
Bayertz, K., Gen-Ethics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994), pp. 153–197.
Beetham, P. R., P. B. Kipp, X. L. Sawycky, C. J. Arntzen, and G. D. May, “A Tool for Functional Plant Genomics Cause in vivo Gene-Specific Mutations,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 96 (1999), 8774–8778.
Benbrook, C. M., “Troubled Times Amid Commercial Success for Roundup Ready Glyphosate Efficacy is Slipping and Unstable Transgene Expression Erodes Plant Defence and Yield,” AgBioTech InfoNet Technical Paper No. 4 (2001) (www.biotechinfo. net/troubledtimes.hmtl).
Bergelson, J., C. P. Purrington, and G. Wichmann, “Promiscuity in Transgenic Plants,” Nature 395 (1998), 25.
Cameron, J. and J. Abouchar, “The Precautionary Principle: A Fundamental Principle of Law and Policy for the Protection of the Global Environment,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review XIV (1991), 1–28.
Case Documents: Genetically Modified Begonia (1993-12-13) Herbicide Tolerant Rape (1994-07-08) (http://www.bion.no.). Herbicide tolerant rape notification C/UK/94/M1/1, Ministry of Environment (http://odin.dep.no/md/engelsk/topics/biodiversity/genetechnology)
Chévre A. M., F. Eber, A. Baranger, and M. Renard, “Gene Flow from Transgenic Crops,” Nature 389 (1997), 924.
Christiansen, S. B. and P. Sandø, “Bioethics: Limits to the Interference with Life,” Animal Reproduction Science 60–61 (2000), 15–29.
Clark, E. A. and H. Lehman, “Assessment of GM Crops in Commercial Agriculture,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2001), 3–28.
Cox, C., “Glyphosate, Part 1: Toxicology,” Journal of Pesticide Reform 15(3) (1995), 14–20 and “Glyphosate, Part 2: Human Exposure and Ecological Effects,” Journal of Pesticide Reform 15(4) (1995), 14–20.
Crawley, M. J., R. S. Hails, M. Rees, D. Kohn, and J. Buxton, “Ecology of Transgenic Oilseed Rape in Natural Habitats,” Nature 363 (1993), 620–623.
Crawley, M. J., S. L. Brown, R. S. Hails, D. D. Kohn, and M. Rees, “Transgenic Crops in Natural Habitats,” Nature 409 (2001), 682–683.
Davies, K., “What Makes Genetically Modified Organisms so Distasteful?” Trends in Biotechnology 19 (2001), 424–427.
Dobson, A., Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).
Dovers, S. R., T.W. Norton, and J.W. Handmer, “Uncertainty, Ecology, Sustainability and Policy,” Biodiversity and Conservation 5 (1996), 1143–1167.
Ellstrand, N. C., H. C. Prentice, and J. E. Hancock, “Gene Flow and Introgression from Domesticated Plants into Their Wild Relatives,” Ann Rev Ecol Systematics 30 (1999), 539–563.
EU: Commission of the European Communities, Communication on the Precautionary Principle (Brussels, 2000) (http://europa.eu.int).
EU: Commission of the European Communities, European Commission Revises GM Labelling and Tracing Rules (Brussels, 2001a) (http://europa.eu.int).
EU: Commission of the European Communities, Main Results of Eurobarometer 55.2 (Brussels, 2001b) (http://europa.eu.int).
Freestone, D. and E. Hey, “Origins and Development of the Precautionary Principle,” in D. Freestone and E. Hey (eds.), The Precautionary Principle and International Law (Kluwer Law International, Netherlands, 1996), pp. 3–15.
Foster, K. R., P. Vecchia, and M. H. Repacholi, “Science and the Precautionary Principle,” Science 288 (2000), 979–981.
Funtowicz, S. O. and J. R. Ravetz, “The Worth of a Songbird: Ecological Economics as a Post-Normal Science,” Ecological Economics 10 (1994), 197–207.
Gebhard, F. and K. Smalla, “Transformation of Acinetobacter sp. Strain BD413 by transgenic sugar beet DNA,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64 (1998), 1550–1554.
Gebhard, F. and K. Smalla, “Monitoring Field Releases of Genetically Modified Sugar Beets for Persistence of Transgenic Plant DNA and Horizontal Gene Transfer,” FEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 (1999), 261–272.
Gene Technology Act 1993. The Act Relating to the Production and Use of Genetically Modified Organism. Act no. 38 of 2 April 1993, Oslo, Norway.
Hall, L., K. Topinka, J. Huffmann, L. Davies, and A. Good, “Pollen Flow between Herbicide Resistant Brassica napus is the Cause of Multiple-Resistant B. napus Volunteere,” Weed Science 48 (2000), 688–694.
Heeger, R. and F. W. A. Brom, “Intrinsic Value and Direct Duties: From Animal Ethics Towards Environmental Ethics?” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2001), 241–252.
Holland, A., “The Biotic Community. A Philosophical Critiques of Genetic Engineering,” in P. Wheale and R. McNally (eds.), The Biorevolution: Cornucopia or Pandora Box (Pluto Press, London, 1990), pp. 166–174.
Iamtham, S. A. and A. Day, “Removal of Antibiotic Resistance Genes from Transgenic Tobacco Plastids,” Nature Biotechnolology 18 (2000), 1172–1176.
James, C., Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2000, ISAAA Briefs No. 23, Ithaca (New York, 2001) (http://www.isaaa.org).
Jiggins, J., “Citizen Participation in Defining the Alternatives,” in B. Rydhagen and C. Dackman (eds.), Dolly and the Bean (Universitetstryckeriet, 1999, Luleå), pp. 79–92.
Jordan, A. and T. O'Riordan, “The Precautionary Principle in Contemporary Environmental Policy and Politics,” in C. Raffensperger and J. Tickner (eds.), Protecting Public Health and the Environment, Implementing the Precautionary Principle (Island Press, Washington, 1999), pp. 15–35.
Kapuscinski, A. R., L. R. Jacobs, and E. E. Pullins, Making Safety First a Reality. Final Report of the March 2–3, 2001 Workshop (ISEES, Minnesota, 2001) (http://www. fw.umn.edu/isees).
Levidow, L. and C. Marris, “Science and Governance in Europe: Lessons from the Case of Agricultural Biotechnology,” Science and Public Policy 28 (2001), 345–360.
MacArthur, M., Triple-Resistant Canola Weeds Found in Alberta (The Western Producers, 2000) (http://www.producer.com.articles/20000210/news).
Marshall, G., “Herbicide-Tolerant Crops — Real Farmer Opportunity or Potential Environmental Problem?” Pesticide Science 52 (1998), 394–402.
Midgley, M., “Biotechnology and Monstrosity: WhyWe Should Pay Attention to the ‘Yuk Factor',” Hasting Center Reports 30(5) (2000), 7–15.
Mikkelsen T. R., B. Andersen, and R. B. Jørgensen, “The Risk of Crop Transgene Spread,” Nature 380 (1996), 31.
Myhr, A. I., “Biosafety in Norway,” Binas News 5 (1999) (http://binas.unido.org/binas).
Norton, B., “Sustainability, HumanWelfare and Ecosystem Health,” Environmental Values 1 (1992), 97–111.
Novak, W. K. and A. G. Haslberger, “Substantial Equivalence of Antinutrients and Inherent Plant Toxins in Genetically Modified Foods,” Food and Chemical Toxicology 38 (2000), 473–483.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Genetically Modified Crops: The Ethical and Social Issues (Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 1999, London). (http://www.nuffield.org/bioethics).
Redclift, M., “Sustainable Development: Needs, Values, Rights,” Environmental Values 2 (1993), 3–20.
Rissler, J. and M. Mellon, The Ecological Risks of Engineered Crops (MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1996).
Rotblat, Sir J., “A Hippocratic Oath to Scientists,” Science 286 (1999), 1475.
Scanlon, T. M., “Rights, Goals, and Fairness,” in S. Scheffler (ed.), Consequentialism and Its Critics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988), pp. 74–92.
Sen, A., Inequality Reexamined (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1992).
Shrader-Frechette, K., Risk and Rationality (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1991).
Slovic, P., “Beyond Numbers: A Broader Perspective on Risk Perception and Risk Communication,” in D. G. Mayo and R. Hollander (eds.), Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management (Oxford University Press: New York, 1991), pp. 48–65.
Snow, A. A., B. Andersen, and R. B. Jørgensen,”Costs of Transgenic Herbicide Resistance Introgressed from Brassica napus into Weedy B. rapa,” Molecular Ecology 8 (1999), 605–615.
The Royal Society of Canada, Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada (http://www.rsc.ca, 2001).
Thompson, P. B., Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective, Techniques and Perspectives in Food Biotechnology, Vol. 1 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1997), pp. 216–240.
Traavik, T., “An Orphan in Science: Environmental Risks of Genetically Engineered Vaccines,” Research report for DN. No. 1999-6 (Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, 1999).
USDA, “Genetically Engineered Crops: Has Adoption Reduced Pesticide Use?” (http://www.ers.usda.gov/epubs/pdf.agout/aug2000, 2000).
WCED (World Commission on Environment and development), Our common future (Oxford University Press, UK, 1987).
Westra, L., “Biotechnology and Transgenic in Agriculture and Aquaculture; the Perspectives from Ecosystem Integrity,” Environmental Values 7 (1998), 79–96.
Williamson, M., J. Perrins, and A. Fitter, “Releasing Genetically Engineered Plants: Present Proposals and Possible Hazards,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5 (1990), 417–419.
Wolfenbarger, L. L. and P. R. Phifer, “The Ecological Risks and Benefits of Genetically Engineered Plants,” Science 290 (2000), 2088–2093.
Wynne, B., “Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics of GMOs,” Science as Culture 10 (2001), 445–481.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Myhr, A.I., Traavik, T. Sustainable Development and Norwegian Genetic Engineering Regulations: Applications, Impacts, and Challenges. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16, 317–335 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025616015955
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025616015955