Skip to main content

What Is Sustainability? A Review of the Concept and Its Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Reporting

Abstract

Whereas the concept of sustainability is broadly acknowledged as being multidimensional, its various dimensions have brought to light different discourses over time and have often been treated separately. In some cases, this separation has limited the actual implementation of sustainability to its mere rhetoric. By relying upon a review of the relevant literature which addresses the notion of sustainability (or of sustainable development), the present chapter aims to explore this notion by identifying its key dimensions and the intertwining relationships between them. In so doing, the challenges and opportunities brought out by an integrated approach towards sustainability are also emphasised, together with the role played by governance structures, business models, management, measurement and reporting systems in implementing ‘integrated sustainability’ within organizations. In this context, the contribution of integrated reporting is explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In line with Gray (2010), in this chapter we will use the expressions ‘sustainability’ and ‘sustainable development’ as two analogues. In so doing, we also acknowledge a slight difference between the two expressions, in which ‘sustainability’ refers to a state, while ‘sustainable development’ refers to the process for achieving this state (see Gray 2010).

  2. 2.

    Although this chapter is the result of the joint efforts and collaboration of the two authors, Elena Giovannoni is the author of Sects. 2.1, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6; Giacomo Fabietti is the author of Sects. 2.2 and 2.3. This chapter is based on the outcomes of a broader research project entitled “From governance and risk management rules to performance: roles, tools and enabling conditions in Italian firms”. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of this research project provided by national funding within PRIN 2009.

  3. 3.

    Given the numerous theoretical streams which have approached the concept of sustainability from different perspectives, it would be impossible to provide a comprehensive review of the literature which has addressed this notion in only one chapter. More generally, as argued by Kidd (1992, p. 3) “the literature relating to sustainability is so voluminous that full analysis were not practical. And if it were practical it would probably not be worth the effort”. Far from attempting to provide an exhaustive review, in this section we draw on some key studies which have addressed the concept of sustainability from different perspectives in order to outline some of the key discourses which have informed the debate regarding this concept.

  4. 4.

    This report is also known as the Brundtland Report.

  5. 5.

    In general, hybrids have been defined as new phenomena (practices, tools, organizations, etc.) produced out of two or more elements that are normally found separately (Miller et al. 2008).

References

  • Abdel-khalik A (2002) Reforming corporate governance post Enron: Shareholders Board of Trustees and the auditor. J Account Public Pol 21:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambec S, Lanoie P (2008) Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad Manage Perspect 22(4):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriof J, McIntosh M (eds) (2001) Perspectives on corporate citizenship. Greenleaf, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad Manage J 53(6):2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana J, Lee M, Walker J, Dorsey C (2012) In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanfor Soc Innov Rev Summer:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston G, Hartgraves A (2002) Enron: what happened and what we can learn from it. J Account Public Pol 21:105–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry MA, Rondinelli DA (1998) Proactive corporate environmental management: a new industrial revolution. Acad Manage Exec 12:38–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhimani A, Soonawalla K (2005) From conformance to performance: the corporate responsibilities continuum. J Account Public Pol 24:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen HR (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Row, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd B, Henning N, Reyna E, Wang DE, Welch MD (2009) Hybrid organizations: new business models for environmental leadership. Greenleaf, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Braungart M, McDonough W (1998) The next industrial revolution. The Atlantic Monthly. October 282(2):82–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Busco C, Frigo M, Giovannoni E, Riccaboni A, Scapens RW (2005) Beyond compliance: why integrated governance matters today, Strategic Finance, August, pp. 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright W, Craig JL (2006) Sustainability: aligning corporate governance, strategy and operations with the planet. Bus Process Manag J 12(6):741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catturi G (2007) La valorialità aziendale, vol 1. Cedam, Padova

    Google Scholar 

  • Charreaux G, Desbrières P (2001) Corporate governance: stakeholder value versus shareholder value. J Manag Gov 5:107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coda V (1988) L’orientamento strategico dell’impresa. UTET, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier PM, Berry AJ (2002) Risk in the process of budgeting. Manag Account Res 13(3):273–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier PM, Berry AJ, Burke G (2004) Risk and control: drivers, practices and consequences. Chartered Institute of Management Accountant

    Google Scholar 

  • COSO (2004) Enterprise risk management—Integrated framework, Executive summary. Committee of Sponsoring Organisation of the Treadway Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis K (1960) Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? Calif Manag Rev 2:70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey N, Bramley G, Power S, Brown C (2011) The social dimension of sustainable development: defining urban social sustainability. Sustain Dev 19:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JA, Fallon LA (1989) The concept of sustainability: origins, extensions and usefulness for policy. Soc Natur Resour 2:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doane D, MacGillivray A (2001) Economic Sustainability-the business of staying in business, New Economics Foundation, London. http://www.projectsigma.co.uk/RnDStreams/RD_economic_sustain.pdf

  • Dresner S (2002) The principles of sustainability. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Drexhage J, Murphy D (2010) Sustainable development: from Brundtland to Rio 2012, Background paper for the high level panel on global sustainability, United Nations, New York. http://www.un.org/wcm/webdav/site/climatechange/shared/gsp/docs/GSP1-6_Background%20on%20Sustainable%20Devt.pdf

  • Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strat Environ 11:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahy M, Roche J, Weiner A (2004) Beyond corporate governance: creating corporate value through performance, conformance and responsibility. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick WC (1960) The growing concern over business responsibility. Calif Manag Rev 2:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2013) G4 sustainability reporting guidelines—reporting principles and standard disclosure. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf

  • Gond J, Grubnic S, Herzig C, Moon J (2012) Configuring management control systems. Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Manage Account Res 23:205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R (2010) Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Account Org Soc 35(1):47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P, Lovins A, Lovins LH (1999) Natural capitalism: creating the next industrial revolution. Little, Brown, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri J, Journeault M (2010) Eco-control: the influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Account Org Soc 35:63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood AG (2009) Accounting and the environment. Account Org Soc 34(3–4):433–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull C, Rothenberg S (2008) Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strateg Manag J 29(7):781–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) (2013) Consultation draft of the international IR framework. http://www.theiirc.org/wp-content/uploads/Consultation-Draft/Consultation-Draft-of-the-InternationalIRFramework.pdf

  • International Union for Conservation of Nature/United Nations Environment Programme/World Wildlife Fund (IUCN/UNEP/WWF) (1980) World conservation strategy: living resource conservation for sustainable development. http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/WCS-004.pdf

  • Jaffe A, Peterson S, Portney P, Stavins R (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us? J Econ Lit 33(1):132–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph G (2012) Ambiguous but tethered: an accounting basis for sustainability reporting. Crit Perspect Account 23:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd CV (1992) The evolution of sustainability. J Agr Environ Ethic 5(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilcullen M, Ohles Kooistra J (1999) At least do no harm: sources on the changing role of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Ref Serv Rev 27(2):158–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2011) KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. http://www.kpmg.com/PT/pt/IssuesAndInsights/Documents/corporate-responsibility2011.pdf

  • Lamb R, Davidson E (2004) Hybrid organization in high-tech enterprise. Paper presented at the 17th Bled eCommerce Conference, Slovenia, 21–23 June 2004, pp. 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk SA, Sroufe RP, Calantone R (2003) Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. J Oper Manag 21:329–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikes A (2008) Chief risk officers at crunch time: compliance champions or business partners? J Risk Manag Financ Inst 2(1):7–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles M, Covin J (2000) Environmental marketing: a source of reputational, competitive and financial advantage. J Bus Ethic 23(3):299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller P, Kurunmäki L, O’Leary T (2008) Accounting hybrids and the management of risk. Account Org Soc 33:942–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Azorín JF, Claver-Cortés E, López-Gamero MD, Tarí JJ (2009) Green management and financial performance: a literature review. Manag Decis 47(7):1080–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen J, Thrane S (2006) Accounting network complementarities and the development of inter-organisational relations. Account Org Soc 31:241–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24(3):403–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache AC, Santos F (2011) Inside the hybrid organization-an organizational level view of responses to conflicting institutional. ESSEC Working Paper 11001. http://www.essec.edu/faculty/showDeclFileRes.do?declId=9761&key=__workpaper

    Google Scholar 

  • Phills JA Jr, Deiglmeier K, Miller DT (2008) Rediscovering social innovation. Stanfor Soc Innov Rev Fall:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson J (2002) Tackling social exclusion. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) Creating shared value. Harvard Bus Rev January–February:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe P (2000) Is the assertion of minority identity compatible with the idea of a socially inclusive society? In: Askonas P, Stewart A (eds) Social inclusion: possibilities and tensions. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 169–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddell R (1981) Ecodevelopment: economics, ecology, and development: an alternative to growth imperative models. Gower, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs I (1984) The strategies of ecodevelopment. FAO Ceres 17:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher EF (1973) Small is beautiful: economics as if people mattered. Harper & Row, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Seal W (2006) Management accounting and corporate governance: an institutional interpretation of the agency problem. Manag Account Res 17:389–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tivy J, O’Hare G (1982) Human impact on the eco-system. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (1972) Report of the United Nations Conference on the human environment. http://www.un-documents.net/aconf48-14r1.pdf

  • United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network (UNSDN) (2013) An action agenda for sustainable development. http://www.unsdsn.org/files/2013/06/130613-SDSN-An-Action-Agenda-for-Sustainable-Development-FINAL.pdf

  • Werbach A (2009) Strategy for sustainability: a business manifesto. Harvard Business, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (2000) Eco-efficiency: creating more value with less impact. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute/ International Institute for Environment and Development (WRI/IIED) (1986) World resources 1986. Basic Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Giovannoni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giovannoni, E., Fabietti, G. (2013). What Is Sustainability? A Review of the Concept and Its Applications. In: Busco, C., Frigo, M., Riccaboni, A., Quattrone, P. (eds) Integrated Reporting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02168-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics