Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Delayed Report and Motive for Reporting on Perceptions of Sexual Harassment

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined whether the timing of the report and the victim's apparent motive for reporting influences women's and men's perceptions of sexual harassment. Undergraduates (153 women, 149 men) listened to 1 of 6 versions of audiotaped testimony of the victim and defendant. The report was filed either immediately or 18 months later, and motive either was presented as altruistic, retaliatory, or was not specified. Participants chose a verdict, rated the defendant's guilt, and rated the defendant and victim on several dimensions. Higher guilt ratings, more positive evaluations of the victim, and more negative evaluations of the defendant were associated with immediate reporting and an altruistic motive, although women weighed these factors more heavily than did men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blumenthal, J. A. (1998). The reasonable woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Law and Human Behavior, 22(1), 33-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borger, G., Walsh, K. T., Thornton, J., & Gest, T. (1991, October 21). Judging Thomas: A Supreme Court nominee—and the nominating system—on trial. U.S. News and World Report, pp. 32-36.

  • Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23(1), 75-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, D. (1992, March). The real Anita Hill. American Spectator, pp. 18-30.

  • Bursik, K. (1992). Perceptions of sexual harassment in an academic context. Sex Roles, 27, 401-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney, D., & Russell, R. C. (1994). An overview of sexual harassment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 10-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M., Swan, S., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Waldo, C. (1998). Sexual harassment and assault: Chilling the climate for women in academia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 419-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, T. W., Turban, D. B., Olson, D. E., Dwyer, P. D., & Lapreze, M. W. (1996). Factors affecting perceptions of workplace sexual harassment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 489-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrich, S. (1991). Sex at work. Stanford Law Review, 43, 813-861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Baily, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., et al. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn't she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women's responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E. (1990). Methodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment research. Population Research and Policy Review, 9, 235-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A. (1995). How subjective is sexual harassment? An examination of rater effects. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 447-467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., & Koss, M. P. (1993). Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 28-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J., & Meltzoff, J. (1998). Perceptions of sexual harassment as a function of target's response type and observer's sex. Sex Roles, 39, 253-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, J. L., Maver, J. A., & Hoffman, D. (1999). Situational and individual influences on judgments of hostile environment sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1395-1415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. S. (1991, November 11). Letter to the editor. Newsweek, p. 12.

  • Jones, T. S., & Remland, M. S. (1992). Sources of variability in perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 27, 121-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S., Remland, M. S., & Bruner, C. C. (1987). Effects of employment relationship, response of recipient and sex of rater on perceptions of sexual harassment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 55-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. C., Hannon, R., & Whitten, L. (1996). Effects of gender and situation on the perception of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 34, 35-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenig, S., & Ryan, J. (1986). Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus. Sex Roles, 15, 535-549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, A. J., & Guadagno, R. E. (1999). Perceptions of sexual harassment victims as a function of labeling and reporting. Sex Roles, 41, 921-940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markunus, P. V., & Joyce-Brady, J. M. (1987). Underutilization of sexual harassment grievance procedures. Journal of the National Association of Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors, 50, 27-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986).

  • Morgan, P. A. (1999). Risking relationships: Understanding the litigation choices of sexually harassed women. Law and Society Review, 33(1), 67-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, T. A. (1997). The effects of consistency, previous relationship, and the woman's reaction on judgments of sexual harassment: A factorial survey approach. (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 4503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B., & McKinney, K. (1995). Research on sexual harassment: Lingering issues and future directions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 605-611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, T., Carpenter, S., Dull, V., & Bartlett, K. (1982). The factorial survey: An approach to defining sexual harassment on campus. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 99-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., Caldwell, D., & DeLuca, L. (1992). Tolerance for sexual harassment related to self-reported sexual victimization for sexual harassment related to self-reported sexual victimization. Gender and Society, 6, 122-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. A. (2001). Defending sexual harassment in the 90s. Retrieved June 28, 2001, from www.jri-inc.com/sexharr.htm

  • Riger, S. (2000). Transforming psychology: Gender in theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D. H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 914-922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, J., Ginorio, A. B., Remick, H., & Stringer, D. M. (1986). Counseling victims of sexual harassment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 23, 316-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets, V. L., & Braver, S. L. (1999). Organizational status and perceived sexual harassment: Detecting the mediators of a null effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1159-1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepela, S. T., & Levesque, L. L. (1998). Poisoned waters: Sexual harassment and the college climate. Sex Roles, 38, 589-611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrier, D. K. (1996). Introduction and brief overview. In D. K. Shrier (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace and academia:Psychiatric issues (pp. 1-19). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale, M. S. (1998). The direct and moderating influences of sexual-harassment pervasiveness, coping strategies, and gender on work-related outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 521-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R. J., & Myklebust, K. (1992). The influence of a history of romance on judgments and responses to a complaint of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 27, 345-357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomman, D. A., & Wiener, R. L. (1987). Physical and psychological causality as determinants of culpability in sexual harassment cases. Sex Roles, 17, 573-591.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment of federal workers: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988). Sexual harassment of federal workers: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1994). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Trends, progress, and continuing challenges. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine-French, S., & Radtke, H. L. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for an incident of sexual harassment in a university setting. Sex Roles, 21, 545-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. W., Brown, R. S., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Price, J. R. (1995). An attributional (causal dimensional) analysis of perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1169-1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. B., & Cyr, R. R. (1992). Escalating commitment to a relationship: The sexual harassment trap. Sex Roles, 27, 47-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, D. L., Bonner, T. O., Blaney, P. H., & Murray, E. J. (1981). Depression and social attraction. Motivation and Emotion, 5, 153-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, G. E., & Riederle, M. (1994). Sexual harassment and prior sexual trauma among African-American and White American women. Violence and Victims, 9, 233-247.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana

    Deborah Ware Balogh, Mary E. Kite, Kerri L. Pickel, Deniz Canel & James Schroeder

Authors
  1. Deborah Ware Balogh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary E. Kite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kerri L. Pickel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deniz Canel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. James Schroeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Ware Balogh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balogh, D.W., Kite, M.E., Pickel, K.L. et al. The Effects of Delayed Report and Motive for Reporting on Perceptions of Sexual Harassment. Sex Roles 48, 337–348 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022990530657

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022990530657

Search

Navigation