Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Before and After Instructions on the Speed of Sequential Responding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Order judgements are slower and less accurate when reversed. That is, when participants see two events in a sequence (e.g., circle …square), they are quicker to report ‘Before’ statements (e.g., “Circle before Square”) than ‘After’ statements (“Square after Circle”). The current study sought to determine whether a reversal effect will also occur when participants are instructed to produce a sequence of responses. Twenty participants were trained to criterion on simple ‘Before’ and ‘After’ instructions that specified sequences of two responses (e.g., “Circle before Square”). In a subsequent test, participants produced instructed sequences (e.g., circle … square) more quickly and more reliably when instructed to choose one stimulus before another than when they were requested to choose one stimulus after another. The implications of these findings for current theories of relational responding are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, G., & Halford, G. S. (2002). A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 153–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beaman, C. P., & Morton, J. (2000). The separate but related origins of the recency and the modality effect in free recal. Cognition, 77, 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti, D. T. (1989). Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 259–276.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1971). On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dermer, M. L., & Rogers, J. G. (1997). Schedule control over following instructions comprised of novel combinations of verbal stimuli. The Psychological Record, 47, 243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1964/1885). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. New York: Dover.

  • Hall, J. W., Sekuler, R., & Cushman, W. (1969). Effects of IAR occurrence during learning on response time during subsequent recignition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule- governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, L. J., Thompson, S., & Hayes, S. C. (1989). Stimulus equivalence and rule following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 275–291.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L. (1932). The goal gradient hypothesis and maze learning. Psychological Review, 39, 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, J. M., O’ Hora, D. P., Leslie, J. C., & Smyth, S. (2012). Sequential responding in accordance with temporal relational cues: a comparison of before and after. The Psychological Record, 62(3), 463–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft. (1998). Visual Basic Version 6.

  • O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2002). Response latencies to multiple derived stimulus relations: testing two predictions of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 52, 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. (2004). Derived relational networks as novel instructions: a possible model of generative verbal contro. The Psychological Record, 54, 437–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiljan, I. (2007). IrfanView. Retrieved from http://www.irfanview.com.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of Reinforcement. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D. L., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Hyland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hyland, J.M., Smyth, S., O’Hora, D.P. et al. The Effect of Before and After Instructions on the Speed of Sequential Responding. Psychol Rec 64, 311–319 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0026-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0026-y

Keywords

Navigation