Introduction

Growing vegetable transplants in containers offers a number of advantages over direct seeding in the field. Transplant production allows for the control of root zone attributes, often through the selection of potting media composition. Potting media may contain a single ingredient or they may be a composite blend. Components with different characteristics may provide optimal physical and chemical properties for specific crops and cultural conditions (Bunt 1988).

Peat is one of the most commonly used potting media components and is defined by Zaccone et al. (2007) as:

“A blond to black organic material (<25% by weight mineral matter) formed under waterlogged conditions from the partial decomposition of mosses and other bryophytes, sedges, grasses, shrubs, or trees. The structure of peat (from fibric to sapric), the relative proportions of C, H, and O, and, consequently, main chemical and physical properties vary depending upon the botanical composition, and degree of decomposition”.

Horticultural peat is graded and processed to have appropriate properties for uniform plant growth, such as low bulk density, high total porosity, and high nutrient exchange capacity (Blievernicht et al. 2012). It is, however, an effectively non-renewable resource (Sendi et al. 2013), and it can be expensive. Furthermore, there is an increasing suite of environmental concerns surrounding the harvest of peat, including the destruction of wetland ecosystems, the release of greenhouse gasses, and the incidence of smoldering fire phenomena (Zaccone et al. 2014). Due to the economic and environmental concerns surrounding the harvest of peat, suitable alternatives are needed (Roberston 1993), but currently lacking (Bullock et al. 2012).

A wide variety of organic wastes—as diverse as anaerobically digested dairy fiber (Lamont and Elliott 2016a, b), biochar (Steiner and Harttung 2014), pine tree substrate (Jackson et al. 2008), date palm wastes (Ghehsareh et al. 2012, 2013; Ghehsareh 2013), vermicomposts (Gupta et al. 2014; Haghighi et al. 2016), peanut waste (Torkashvand et al. 2015), and spent mushroom compost (Lopes et al. 2015)—have been evaluated as potting media components. The consistency of direct or partial peat replacements varies significantly (Chong 2005), and consequently, many produce unsatisfactory results (Bustamante et al. 2008; Jung and Yang 2014), due to the presence of phytotoxic compounds, pathogens, high salt contents, or unsuitable physical properties (Sharif et al. 2014). The lack of physical and chemical stability over time further limits the utility of many composts as peat replacements (Raviv 2005). It is difficult to obtain ideal characteristics in a single compost for all the crops (Do and Scherer 2013). Mixing peat with composts can minimize hazardous salinity levels of single material (Mahmoud et al. 2014). Some materials have been identified as acceptable peat alternatives, but they are not produced in sufficient quantity to impact the market, or they are too expensive, or they may be commonly contaminated with weed seeds or metal fragments (Beeson 1996; Hartz et al. 1996). Despite the challenges, composts can also have beneficial attributes, such as providing plant nutrients or suppressing disease or promoting the growth of beneficial microbes.

The composts used in this trial were made from leguminous guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) and jantar (Sesbania aculeata), as well as non-leguminous wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw, and rice (Oryza sativa) hulls. Guar and jantar are herbaceous legumes commonly used in crop rotation or as green manures. Such crops have the potential to supply significant amounts of plant available N. Currently, no research has been done to evaluate guar or jantar composts as peat alternatives. Rice hulls are an agricultural by-product, which are usually treated as waste. Globally, there are more than 100 million tons of rice hulls produced per year (Okafor and Okonkwo 2009).

The objective of this research was to evaluate guar, jantar, wheat straw, and rice hull composts as partial or complete substitutes of peat in growing media for muskmelon (Cucumis melo). To achieve this goal, the physiochemical properties of media with varying proportions of compost were analyzed. These blends were then used to grow muskmelon transplants, which were evaluated upon commercial maturity and after transplanting in the field.

Materials and methods

Media preparation and analysis

Composts of guar, jantar, wheat straw, and rice hulls were prepared through composting by Inckel et al.’s (2005) pit method. The composted materials were air-dried for 2 days and ground. The ground materials were divided into five size-based grades by sieve: 3.3–5, 2–3.3, 1–2, 0.5–1, and <0.5 mm. Air-filled porosity (AFP) is the volume of air retained in media after irrigation and full drainage (Sharif et al. 2014). Grades of each compost were mixed in various proportions to obtain an AFP of 10%, as described in Mustafa et al. (2016). An AFP of 10% was identified as suitable for growing muskmelon transplants (Mustafa et al. 2016). The 10% AFP composts were blended with peat to produce the potting mixes used in subsequent trials and analysis. These mixes contained 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 100% composts, by volume, plus a 100% peat control. The % AFP, total water-holding capacity (TWHC), percent shrinkage, and wet and dry bulk densities of the potting media were determined according to Nkongolo and Caron (1999) and Sharman and Bodman (1993), as described in Mustafa et al. (2016).

To quantify P, K, Zn, Fe content, EC, and pH, potting medium was mixed with distilled water in a 1:5 medium:water ratio and shaken in a horizontal shaker at 120 rpm for 1 h and filtered to produce aqueous extracts (CEN 1999). The pH of extracts was measured using a Beckman Zero-Matic® pH meter (Beckman Coulter, Brea California, USA, Model: 511212), and electrical conductivity (EC) was determined using a CM-1 Mark Kent EC meter (Electric Instrument Ltd. England). The concentration of K in media was determined using a flame photometer (Jenway, PFP7, UK). The concentration of P in media was determined using a spectrophotometer and the molybdovanadate phosphoric acid method (Jones et al. 1991). The concentrations of Fe and Zn were determined using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Model Pye Unicam SP 2900, UK) (Jackson 1962). Total N was determined using sulfuric acid digestion and distillation with a Marco-Kjeldahl apparatus. The concentration of B was determined by dry-ashing (Grains and Mitchell 1979) and colorimetric measurement using the azomethine-H method as described by Bingham (1982). There were three replications for each compost and compost-peat blend.

Transplant growth and field establishment

Muskmelon (Melon 1, Syngenta) transplants were grown for 30 days after sowing in an unheated polyethylene-covered greenhouse (25–30 °C), at the farm of Bahaudin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan (30°12′N, 71°29′E) in February, with natural daylight conditions, using the potting media blends described above. One tray was used for each replication and each treatment was replicated three times, following a completely random design. Plug trays (60 plugs per tray, plugs with 2.5 cm diameter, 5.5 cm depth) were filled with respective media and each plug was planted with one muskmelon seed. Trays were watered-in uniformly to maximum saturation and watered throughout the experiment, by hand, as needed.

Emergence percent was calculated by dividing the number of seedlings that emerged by the total number of seeds planted. For destructive measures, three transplants were harvested at random from each experimental unit plug tray, with the exception of tray edges. Transplant height was measured from the root collar to apical meristem. Leaves were collected, cleaned with tissue paper, and then measured using an LI-COR LI-3000 leaf area meter (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE). Transplants were uprooted when the media were moist. Roots were washed and dried with tissue paper before weighing to determine the fresh weight of transplants. Stem diameter was measured below the cotyledon node with Vernier calipers.

For nutrient analysis, transplants were washed with distilled water and oven-dried at 70–80 °C for 48 h. The dried transplants were ground and passed through a 1 mm sieve (Yoshida et al. 1978). Total nitrogen was determined using the method of Jackson (1962). One gram of plant material was digested in a mixture of 20 mL of concentrated HNO3 and 10 mL of 72% HClO4. Samples were digested, cooled, and transferred to 100 mL volumetric flasks. Plant tissue P, Fe, Zn, and B concentrations were measured as described for the media samples above.

Statistical analysis

While parametric models were appropriate for guar, jantar, and wheat straw compost data, they did not fit the rice hull compost data well. To create a better model for the experiment, locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) procedures were used instead (Cleveland and Devlin 1988). LOESS is a nonparametric procedure for hypothesis testing that is not based on any assumptions about the probability distributions of the variables being tested (Sheskin 2004). Analysis was conducted using SAS PROC SGPLOT with the LOESS statement (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Media analysis

Total water-holding capacity (TWHC) of guar, jantar, and wheat straw composts increased with increasing percentage of composts (Fig. 1a). Conversely, TWHC decreased with increasing percentage of rice hull compost with 100% rice hull compost having the smallest TWHC (Fig. 1a). Blends that contained 10% of each compost had TWHC similar to the 100% peat control (Fig. 1a). The shrinkage increased with increasing proportions of compost in the experimental media (Fig. 1b). The addition of guar compost or jantar compost resulted in the greatest shrinkage, with guar > jantar, where the proportions were ≥50% (α = 0.05). The addition of wheat straw compost resulted in lower levels of shrinkage, and the addition of rice hull compost resulted in the lowest levels of shrinkage (Fig. 1b). Dry bulk density increased with increasing proportions of all composts. The observed values of wet bulk density from the 100% peat controls were, for all but one experimental unit, higher than the values of wet bulk density observed from the experimental mixtures. Wet bulk density decreased as the compost percentages increased from 10 to 50%. The lowest levels of wet bulk density were observed for 50% guar and jantar composts. Samples that contained 10 or 100% of all composts had similar wet bulk densities (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Non-parametric regressions of total water-holding capacity (a), shrinkage (b), dry bulk density (c), and wet bulk density (d) of media with guar, jantar, wheat straw, and rice hull compost combined in varying proportions of peat. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. Symbols represent data points correlating to their, respectively, colored regression line

The pH of 1:5 extract samples of guar and jantar composts increased with increasing compost proportions up to 50% compost; however, the pH of the 50% guar compost media was similar to that of the 100% guar compost, and the pH of the 10% jantar compost media was similar to that of the 100% jantar compost. The pH of media with wheat straw compost increased with increasing proportions of compost. The pH of media-containing rice hull composts was not greatly affected by varying proportions of compost (Fig. 2a). The EC of media increased with the addition of guar and jantar composts and decreased with the addition of wheat straw and rice hull composts with all blends containing 10% composts having an EC similar to the 100% peat control (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Non-parametric regressions of the pH (a), electrical conductivity (b), total N concentration (c), and P (d), K (e), Fe (f), B (g), and Zn (h) concentrations of media with guar, jantar, wheat straw, and rice hull compost combined in varying proportions of peat. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. Symbols represent data points correlating to their, respectively, colored regression line

Total N increased with the addition of both guar and jantar composts, to approximately twice as much total N in 100% guar and jantar composts as in the 100% peat compost (Fig. 2c). In contrast, total N decreased with increasing proportions of wheat straw and rice hull composts with 100% rice hull compost having a total N concentration close to 0 (Fig. 2c). This indicated the higher N content of peat, on average, compared to wheat straw and rice hulls. Concentrations of P and K increased with increasing proportions of guar, jantar, and wheat straw composts, and, while 50% guar, jantar, and wheat straw compost blends had statistically similar amounts of P, 100% guar had the greatest concentration of P and K overall. Concentrations of P and K were not greatly affected by varying proportions of rice hull compost, and remained slightly lower than that of the 100% peat control (Fig. 2d, e). Concentrations of Fe and B remained similar to the 100% peat control across all proportions of guar and jantar composts and decreased with increasing proportions of wheat straw and rice hull composts (Fig. 2f, g). This indicated the relatively lower levels of Fe and B to be found in wheat straw and rice hulls as compared to peat. The pattern of Fe and B was similar for Zn, except Zn only decreased with the addition of wheat straw compost up to 50%, but had a similar Zn concentration in 100 and 10% wheat straw compost blends (Fig. 2h). Overall, samples of media-containing guar and jantar composts contained greater amounts of nutrients than the rice hull or wheat straw compost media.

Transplant growth and field establishment

The levels of germination modeled by nonparametric regression, for all of the experimental media, were within the range of approximately 87–93%. The fresh weight of transplants grown in all media-containing guar, jantar, and wheat straw composts was significantly less than the 100% peat control. Fresh weight of transplants increased slightly with increasing proportions of rice hull compost up to 50% compost. While the 50% rice hull blend produced the greatest transplant fresh weight, it was not significantly different from the 20, 30, or 100% rice hull compost media (Fig. 3b). Varying proportions of jantar and wheat straw composts did not greatly affect transplant height, although blends of 50% compost produced somewhat taller plants. Media-containing guar compost produced a similar trend in transplant height to the jantar and wheat straw composts, except there was a dramatic decrease in height for the 20% guar blend. Plant height increased with the addition of rice hull compost up to 50% rice hull compost, which produced the tallest plants overall. The 10 and 100% rice hull compost media all produced plants of similar height (Fig. 3c). Leaf area varied little across compost types and proportions (Fig. 3d). Stem diameter varied little across compost proportions within a compost type, but media-containing rice hulls generally produced thicker stems than media-containing jantar or wheat straw compost (Fig. 3e). Root length was greater for plants grown in media-containing rice hull compost than for the other composts but did not vary greatly with increasing proportions of rice hull composts (Fig. 3f). Overall, media-containing rice hull composts, especially at the 50% proportion, produced larger, more vigorous transplants than the other compost blends. The nonparametric model generated an intercept for leaf area and root length in rice hull compost that was very different from the other composts, indicating that small additions of rice hull compost can significantly affect transplant leaf area and root length.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Non-parametric regressions of the germination (a), fresh weight (b) shoot height (c), leaf area (d), stem diameter (e), and root length (f) of muskmelon transplants grown in media with guar, jantar, wheat straw, and rice hull compost combined in varying proportions of peat. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. Symbols represent data points correlating to their, respectively, colored regression line

Transplants grown in media-containing guar compost had the greatest N concentrations, followed by those grown in media-containing jantar compost, with tissue N concentration increasing with increased proportion of these composts. In contrast, transplants grown in the wheat straw and rice hull compost blends had significantly less N and decreased in concentration with the addition of these composts. Transplants grown in the blends containing wheat straw and rice hull compost up to 50% had similar N concentrations; however, transplants grown in 100% rice hull had greater N concentrations than those grown in 100% wheat straw compost (Fig. 4a). Transplant P concentration increased with increasing proportions of all composts; however, P concentrations increased more with the addition of guar and jantar than with wheat straw and rice hull composts. Wheat straw compost additions increased P concentrations of tissues slightly more than rice hull compost (Fig. 4b). Transplant K concentrations increased with the addition of jantar, and especially guar composts. Transplant K concentrations increased only slightly with the addition of wheat straw and rice hull composts (Fig. 4c). Transplant micronutrient concentrations increased similarly with the addition of guar and jantar composts, although B concentration increased more with the addition of jantar. Conversely, transplant micronutrient concentrations decreased similarly with the addition of wheat straw compost and rice hull compost. Transplant Fe concentrations were, however, slightly greater in the 100% rice hull blend than in the 100% wheat straw blend (Fig. 4d–f). Overall, transplants grown in media-containing guar or jantar compost had greater quantities of all measured nutrients than those grown in the wheat straw and rice hull composts.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Non-parametric regressions of the N (a), P (b), K (c), Fe (d), B (e), and Zn (f) tissue concentrations of muskmelon transplants grown in media with guar, jantar, wheat straw, and rice hull compost combined in varying proportions of peat. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. Symbols represent data points correlating to their, respectively, colored regression line

After transplantation, plants grown in the rice hull compost blends, especially those with 30–50% rice hull compost, had the greatest growth rate and yield. Overall, growth rate and yield for the other composts were not greatly affected by type or proportion (Fig. 5a, b).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Non-parametric regressions of growth rate (a) and yield (b) in the field of muskmelon transplant grown in media with guar, jantar, wheat straw, and rice hull compost combined in varying proportions of peat. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. Symbols represent data points correlating to their, respectively, colored regression line

Discussion

Overall, transplants grown in the 30–50% rice hull compost blend were the largest and most vigorous, and had the best performance when transplanted in the field. The success of the rice hull compost blends was due to good physical and chemical properties, many of which were quite different for rice hull compost than the other composts. The good physical and chemical characteristics of rice hull compost blends enabled good transplant establishment and growth, leading to vigorous transplants and, in turn, well established, high yielding plants in the field.

While the ranges of TWHC and shrinkage in these composts corresponded with Kuisma et al. (2014) and Ghehsareh et al. (2013), all of the composts had relatively high dry bulk densities (>0.3), and except for rice hull compost, high water-holding capacity and shrinkage. These characteristics are apt to lead to compaction and water logging (Raviv 2011). The low TWHC of rice hull compost likely allowed good drainage, avoiding the risk of waterlogging. Peat and rice hull compost likely have complimentary physical properties that, when blended in the correct ratio, providing ideal root zone properties. The similarity of wet bulk densities for 10 and 100% composts may be due to interactions between particles from peat and compost, or due to fluffing during mixing.

The pH of all media and blends was outside of the recommended range of 5.5–6.3 for 1:5 extracts of composts as potting media components (Sánchez-Monedero et al. 2004), although wheat straw and rice hull compost blends up to 50% were close to the recommended range. In soilless potting media, high pH values, such as those measured in guar and jantar compost blends, can greatly reduce the availability of P and many micronutrients, leading to nutrient deficiencies (Dole and Wilkins 1999). The EC of all composts and their blends fell below the recommended threshold of <500 µS cm for composts in potting media (Ceglie et al. 2015). The decrease of EC with the addition of guar and jantar composts may be due to more moisture contained in these composts with higher TWHC. Guar and jantar compost had greater quantities of N, P, and K than the 100% peat control and blends of these composts contained significant concentrations of these macronutrients. Guar and jantar composts contained similar amounts of Fe, B, and Zn to peat so their addition to peat did not greatly alter micronutrient concentrations. It is unsurprising that these leguminous crops contain significant amounts of nutrients, since they are used as green manures and able to engage in symbiotic relationships with rhizobia to fix atmospheric nitrogen into a bioavailable form. Wheat straw compost contributed amounts of P and K to blends similar to the leguminous composts. In contrast, rice hulls contained a smaller quantity of most measured nutrients than peat, and therefore, blends containing rice hulls contained fewer nutrients than the 100% peat control. More nutrients than those measured may have been released during plant growth as the method used to measure initial nutrient concentration only measures labile, water soluble nutrients. More nutrients may have become available, as organic materials were decomposed by microbes or root exudates.

Despite the problems with nutrient availability that may have been expected with the high pH of the guar and jantar blends, the tissue nutrient analysis of transplants grown in these blends showed increasing concentrations of all nutrients with increasing proportions in the compost. Concentrations of all measured nutrients, except P, of transplants grown in the wheat straw and rice hull compost blends did, however, decrease with increasing compost proportions. Because tissue P concentration increased with increasing proportions of rice hull compost, it appears there is more plant available P in rice hull compost than the 1:5 extract samples suggested. Nutrients in composts can display varying degrees of extractability when composts are used in potting mixes due to complex interactions between media components (Evans et al. 2011). Interactions between media components could explain some of the discrepancies between nutrients measured in media blends and tissue nutrient concentration. There appears to be no clear relationship between transplant tissue nutrient concentration and transplant growth or field performance. With this in mind, the good performance in rice hull compost blends is likely due to the differences in the physical properties, pH, and EC of rice hull compost, from the other compost blends. Other factors that were not measured may have also contributed to success of the rice hull compost blends. For example, rice hulls contain high levels of silicon (Gachukia and Evans, 2008), which have been shown to alleviate stress and improve plant growth (Neocleous 2015; Shi et al. 2016), and may be helpful in transplant establishment, especially under stressful field conditions.

The best results were achieved with the 30–50% rice hull compost blends. It is unclear which physiochemical factors were most important in influencing plant growth, but it seems that the physical properties of media had a greater influence on plant growth than measured nutrient concentration in media. Perhaps, even better results could be achieved with greater proportions of peat replacement or with blends using multiple composts. While rice hull compost is the preferable replacement for peat, plants grown in all compost blends produced yields equal or greater to the control, so they could all be acceptable replacements.