Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon storage in biomass, litter, and soil of different plantations in a semiarid temperate region of northwest China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Annals of Forest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

A large area of abandoned land in the semiarid temperate region of China has been converted into plantations over the past decades. However, little information is available about the ecosystem C storage in different plantations.

Aim and methods

Our objective was to estimate the C storage in biomass, litter, and soil of four different plantations (monospecific stands of Larix gmelinii, Pinus tabuliformis, Picea crassifolia, and Populus simonii). Tree component biomass was estimated using allometric equations. The biomasses of understory vegetation and litter were determined by harvesting all the components. C fractions of plant, litter, and soil were measured.

Results

The ecosystem C storage were as follows: Picea crassifolia (469 t C/ha) > Larix gmelinii (375 t C/ha), Populus simonii (330 t C/ha) > Pinus tabuliformis (281 t C/ha) (P < 0.05), 59.5–91.1 % of which was in the soil. The highest tree and understory C storage were found in the plantation of Pinus tabuliformis (247 t/ha) and Larix gmelinii (1.2 t/ha) respectively. The difference in tree C fraction was significant among tree components (P < 0.05), following the order: leaf > branch > trunk > root. The highest soil C (SC) was stored in Picea crassifolia plantation (411 t C/ha), while Populus simonii plantation had a higher SC sequestration rate than others.

Conclusion

C storage and distribution varied among different plantation ecosystems. Coniferous forests had a higher live biomass and litter C storage. Broadleaf forests had considerable SC sequestration potential after 40 years establishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdallah F, Chaieb M (2012) The influence of trees on nutrients, water, light availability and understorey vegetation in an arid environment. Appl Veg Sci 15:501–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao MK, Woodward FI (1998) Net primary and ecosystem production and carbon stocks of terrestrial ecosystems and their responses to climate change. Glob Chang Biol 4:185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon RL (2008) Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320:1458–1460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Editorial Committee of Soil Analysis (1996) Soil physical and chemical analysis and description of soil profile. China State Standards Press, Beijing, In Chinese

  • Díaz-Pinés E, Rubio A, Van Miegroet H, Montes F, Benito M (2011) Does tree species composition control soil organic carbon pools in Mediterranean mountain forests? For Ecol Manag 262:1895–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH, Zhao SQ, Ci LJ (2001) Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science 292:2320–2322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farley KA, Kelly EF, Hofstede RGM (2004) Soil organic carbon and water retention following conversion of grasslands to pine plantations in the Ecuadoran Andes. Ecosystems 7:729–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finzi AC, Van Breemen N, Canham CD (1998) Canopy tree soil interactions within temperate forests: Species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:440–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Z, Fang J, Pan Y, Birdsey R (2010) Inventory-based estimates of forest biomass carbon stocks in China: A comparison of three methods. For Ecol Manag 259:1225–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie SE, Schimel JP, Trumbore SE, Randerson JR (2000) Controls over carbon storage and turnover in high-latitude soils. Glob Chang Biol 6:196–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holst T, Mayer H, Schindler D (2004) Microclimate within beech stands-part II: thermal conditions. Eur J For Res 123:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA (2005) Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Glob Chang Biol 11:945–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F, Johnson DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA (2007) How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137:253–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DW (1992) Effects of forest management on soil carbon storage. Water Air Soil Pollut 64:83–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul M, Mohren GMJ, Dadhwal VK (2010) Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:489–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laganière J, Angers DA, Paré D (2010) Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 16:439–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li KR, Wang SQ, Cao MK (2003) Vegetion and soil carbon storage in China. Sci China Ser D 33:72–80, in Chinese with English abstract

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yi MJ, Son Y, Park PS, Lee KH, Son YM, Kim RH, Jeong MJ (2011) Biomass and carbon storage in an age-sequence of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) plantation forests in central Korea. J Plant Biol 54:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma QY (1989) A study on the biomass of chinese pine forests. J Beijing For Univ 11:1–10, in Chinese with English abstract

    Google Scholar 

  • Martius C, Höfer H, Garcia MVB, Römbke J, Förster B, Hanagarth W (2004) Microclimate in agroforestry systems in central Amazonia: does canopy closure matter to soil organisms? Agrofor Syst 60:291–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul KI, Polglase PJ, Nyakuengama JG, Khanna PK (2002) Change in soil carbon following afforestation. For Ecol Manag 168:241–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Cruzado C, Mansilla-Salinero P, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R, Merino A (2012) Influence of tree species on carbon sequestration in afforested pastures in a humid temperate region. Plant Soil 353:333–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulp CJE, Nabulars GJ, Verburg PH, de Waal RW (2008) Effect of tree species on carbon stocks in forest floor and mineral soil and implications for soil carbon inventories. For Ecol Manag 256:482–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvester WB, Orchard TA (1999) The biology of kauri (Agathis australis) in New Zealand. I. Production, biomass, carbon storage, and litter fall in four forest remnants. N Z J Bot 37:553–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Wang DX, Zhang H, Li ZG, Wei YF, Hu TH (2009) Forest ecosystem services and their valuation of Ningxia area. J Northwest A&F Univ (Nat Sci Edit) 37:91–97, in Chinese with English abstract

    Google Scholar 

  • Trum F, Titeux H, Ranger J, Delvaux B (2011) Influence of tree species on carbon and nitrogen transformation patterns in forest floor profiles. Ann For Sci 68:837–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesterdal L, Elberling B, Christiansen JR, Callesen I, Schmidt IK (2012) Soil respiration and rates of soil carbon turnover differ among six common European tree species. For Ecol Manag 264:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Arx G, Dobbertin M, Rebetez M (2012) Spatio-temporal effects of forest canopy on understory microclimate in a long-term experiment in Switzerland. Agric For Meteorol 166:144–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winjum JK, Schroeder PE (1997) Forest plantations of the world: their extent, ecological attributes, and carbon storage. Agric For Meteorol 84:153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang QZ, Wang CK, Wang XC, Quan XK (2009) Carbon concentration variability of 10 Chinese temperate tree species. For Ecol Manag 258:722–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang KR, Dang HS, Tan SD, Wang ZX, Zhang QF (2010) Vegetation community and soil characteristics of abandoned agricultural land and pine plantation in the Qinling Mountains, China. For Ecol Manag 259:2036–2047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng SX, Shangguan ZP (2007) Photosynthetic physiological adaptabilities of Pinus tabuliformi and Robinia pseudoacacia in the Loess Plateau Chinese. J Appl Ecol 18:16–22, in Chinese with English abstract

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Financial support for this research came from the CAS “Strategic Priority Research Program-Climate Change: Carbon Budget and Relevant” (XDA05050202), the State Forestry Bureau Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (200904056) and the National Key Laboratory Fund (10502-Z8).

Contribution of the co-authors

Yang Gao: measuring the samples, running data analysis and writing the paper. Jimin Cheng: supervising the work. Zhengrui Ma, Yu Zhao and Jishuai Su: collecting the samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jimin Cheng.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Shuqing Zhao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, Y., Cheng, J., Ma, Z. et al. Carbon storage in biomass, litter, and soil of different plantations in a semiarid temperate region of northwest China. Annals of Forest Science 71, 427–435 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0355-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0355-z

Keywords

Navigation