Abstract
Most survey data on sexual activities are obtained via face-to-face interviews, which are prone to misreporting of socially unacceptable behaviors. Demographers have developed various private response methods to minimize social desirability bias and improve the quality of reporting; however, these methods often limit the complexity of information collected. We designed a life history calendar—the Relationship History Calendar (RHC)—to increase the scope of data collected on sexual relationships and behavior while enhancing their quality. The RHC records detailed, 10-year retrospective information on sexual relationship histories. The structure and interview procedure draw on qualitative techniques, which could reduce social desirability bias. We compare the quality of data collected with the RHC with a standard face-to-face survey instrument through a field experiment conducted among 1,275 youth in Kisumu, Kenya. The results suggest that the RHC reduces social desirability bias and improves reporting on multiple measures, including higher rates of abstinence among males and multiple recent sexual partnerships among females. The RHC fosters higher levels of rapport and respondent enjoyment, which appear to be the mechanisms through which social desirability bias is minimized. The RHC is an excellent alternative to private response methods and could potentially be adapted for large-scale surveys.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There is no “gold standard” against which to compare respondent self-reports of sexual behavior to determine their quality (Catania et al. 1990; Fenton et al. 2001). Therefore, our strategy is to use data collected from a conventional face-to-face survey approach as the benchmark against which to compare reporting on the RHC.
DHS calendars generally collect five-year monthly information on pregnancies/births, contraceptive use and source, reason for contraceptive discontinuation, and marriage/union status. Age (by month) at sexual debut, frequency of sexual intercourse, the type and number of sexual partners, consistency of condom use, and how these characteristics and behaviors vary within each relationship are not recorded (Ali et al. 2003). All of this information, with the exception of contraceptive source and reason for discontinuation, is included on the RHC. Relationship information is included in calendars designed by Yoshihama et al. (2005) and Martyn (2009) as well, although information is collected at yearly intervals and relationship dimensions are fairly limited.
This referencing process is believed to map onto the structure of autobiographical memory to result in higher-quality retrospective reports than standard survey questioning techniques (Anderson and Conway 1993; Belli 1998). For example, filling out calendar information for the period “year in school” could jog the respondent’s specific memory about the first romantic or sexual partner (known as parallel retrieval), and thinking about the first partner may prompt memory about a later partner (sequential retrieval within domain) (Belli et al. 2007).
An index for economic status was constructed from 14 items relating to household assets, housing characteristics, and utilities and infrastructure. Principal components analysis was used to generate standardized weight scores, which were summed to produce index scores. These were then ranked and divided into wealth quintiles.
In the RHC sample, 12.9% of respondents commenced sexual activity prior to the 10-year reference period.
We compensated respondents for the time and effort required to complete the RHC and SPQ interviews. While compensation may in itself be an inducement for more truthful reporting of sexual experiences, funds were applied equally and should not lead to differential reporting across instruments.
These and all other results not shown are available from the first author upon request.
Interviewer effects could arise if some interviewers performed better than others, for example. If these interviewers happened to complete more RHC interviews, then the RHC could produce improved reporting because it reduces social desirability bias and/or because the best interviewers administered it.
Interviewers covered each enumeration area in teams of two to four, each with at least one male and one female interviewer. It was often the case that a female interviewer, for example, was interviewing a respondent when a male team member selected the next eligible respondent, who was female. In this case, the research team proceeded as follows: if a same-sex interviewer was not available, respondents were asked if they felt comfortable talking to an opposite-sex interviewer and, if so, were asked to proceed with the interview. If not, an appointment was made for a same-sex interviewer to return at a later time. In total, 18.6% of female respondents were interviewed by males, and 23.5% of male respondents were interviewed by females.
Given that the principal investigators, study director, and supervisors encouraged interviewers to complete at least four questionnaires per interviewer per day in the field, it appears that when time was available at the end of each day, interviewers—particularly female interviewers—completed an additional SPQ interview.
Although the numbers of lifetime and recent sexual partners are bounded at zero, for ease of exposition, we use the term “left tail” to refer to reports in the lower ends of the distributions.
Because a small number of respondents were divorced, separated, or widowed, we constructed a dichotomous measure of ever married as the control variable for marital status.
One alternative explanation for the lower numbers of lifetime sexual partners reported by males on the RHC in Tables 2 and 3 is that, given the great amount of detail being collected on each relationship, male respondents may have been under the impression that the researchers were primarily interested in more serious types of relationships on the RHC or they intended to reveal details about more serious ones only. We stressed during training that all types of partners should be reported on the RHC and SPQ. In addition, we find that males reported more casual and other types of recent sexual partners (one-night stands and commercial sex workers) on the RHC (38.8% had at least one of these types) than on the SPQ (28.0%), which helps rule out this explanation. Females also reported more of these less serious types of partners on the RHC (13.7%) than on the SPQ (11.7%).
For male respondents, we find that the expected number of lifetime partners is 0.09 higher for those interviewed by a male compared with a female interviewer, and the expected number of partners in the last year is 0.15 larger when interviewed by a male, both of which are statistically significant. For male respondents, a male interviewer also increased the odds of reporting ever having sex by 1.9 times compared with a female interviewer, which is significant at the .10 level.
Greater fatigue among male than among female respondents is also supported by the finding that 10 of the 12 respondents who did not report details of all of their relationships in the last 10 years on the RHC because of lack of time were male.
Our conclusion that fatigue and recall error are not major explanations for differential reporting of the actual numbers of sexual partners across instruments does not imply that they do not affect retrospective reporting or that the RHC does not have the potential to reduce these types of error for other measures. The conversational flexibility of the RHC interview combined with the use of effective retrieval cues could motivate and aid respondents to recall more precise timing of relationship transitions and more details of relationship dimensions than the SPQ format, for example (Belli and Callegaro 2009; Belli et al. 2007). Alternatively, fatigue could result in fewer relationship dimensions being reported in detail on the RHC.
Results in Table 4 are similar in terms of significance levels if measures are constructed dichotomously, with the category very/significant coded 1 and somewhat/moderate and not/none coded 0.
References
Ali, M. M., Cleland, J., & Shah, I. H. (2003). Trends in reproductive behavior among young single women in Colombia and Peru: 1985–1999. Demography, 40, 659–673.
Anderson, S. J., & Conway, M. A. (1993). Investigating the structure of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 1178–1196.
Anderson, J. E., Mosher, W. D., & Chandra, A. (2006). Measuring HIV risk in the U.S. population aged 15–44: Results from Cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth. Advance Data, 377, 1–27.
Axinn, W. G., & Pearce, L. D. (2006). Mixed method data collection strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Axinn, W. G., Barber, J. S., & Ghimire, D. J. (1997). The neighborhood history calendar: A data collection method designed for dynamic multilevel modeling. Sociological Methodology, 27, 355–392.
Axinn, W. G., Pearce, L. D., & Ghimire, D. (1999). Innovations in life history calendar applications. Social Science Research, 28, 243–264.
Balán, J., Browning, H. L., Jelin, E., & Litzler, L. (1969). A Computerized approach to the processing and analysis of life histories obtained in sample surveys. Behavioral Science, 14, 105–120.
Bankole, A., Biddlecom, A., Guiella, G., Singh, S., & Zulu, E. M. (2007). Sexual behavior, knowledge and information sources of very young adolescents in four sub-Saharan African countries. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 11(3), 28–43.
Belli, R. F. (1998). The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory, 6, 383–406.
Belli, R. F., & Callegaro, M. (2009). The emergence of calendar interviewing. In R. F. Belli, F. P. Stafford, & D. F. Alwin (Eds.), Calendar and time diary methods in life course research (pp. 31–52). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Belli, R. F., Shay, W. L., & Stafford, F. P. (2001). Event history calendars and question list surveys: A direct comparison of interviewing methods. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 45–74.
Belli, R. F., Smith, L. M., Andreski, P. M., & Agrawal, S. (2007). Methodological comparison between CATI event history calendar and standardized conventional questionnaire instruments. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 603–622.
Bongaarts, J., Buettner, T., Heilig, G., & Pelletier, F. (2008). Has the HIV epidemic peaked? Population and Development Review, 34, 199–224.
Buvé, A., Weiss, H. A., Laga, M., Van Dyck, E., Musonda, R., Zekeng, L., . . . Hayes, R. J., for the Study Group on Heterogeneity of HIV Epidemics in African Cities. (2001). The epidemiology of gonorrhoea, chlamydial infection and syphilis in four African cities. AIDS, 15(Suppl. 4), S79–S88.
Case, A., Paxson, C., & Ableidinger, J. (2004). Orphans in Africa: Parental death, poverty, and school enrollment. Demography, 41, 483–508.
Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Thornton, A., Freedman, D., Amell, J. W., Harrington, H., . . . Silva, P. A. (1996). The life history calendar: A research and clinical assessment method for collecting retrospective event-history data. International Journal of Method in Psychiatric Research, 6, 101–114.
Catania, J. A., Gibson, D. R., Chitwood, D. D., & Coates, T. J. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339–362.
Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) [Kenya], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Kenya], & ORC Macro. (2004). Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Calverton, MD: CBS, MOH, and ORC Macro.
Clark, S., Kabiru, C., & Mathur, R. (2010). Relationship transitions among youth in urban Kenya. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 73–88.
Cleland, J., Boerma, J. T., Caraël, M., & Weir, S. S. (2004). Monitoring sexual behaviour in general populations: A synthesis of lesson of the past decade. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 80(Suppl. II), ii1–ii7.
Corbin, J., & Morse, J. M. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: Issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 335–354.
Curtis, S. L., & Blanc, A. K. (1997). Determinants of contraceptive failure, switching, and discontinuation: An analysis of DHS contraceptive histories (Demographic and Health Surveys Analytical Reports No. 6). Calverton, MD: Macro International Inc.
Curtis, S. L., & Sutherland, E. G. (2004). Measuring sexual behaviour in the era of HIV/AIDS: The experience of Demographic and Health Surveys and similar enquiries. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 80(Suppl. II), ii22–ii27.
Dijkstra, W., Smit, J. H., & Ongena, Y. P. (2009). An evaluation study of the event history calendar. In R. F. Belli, F. P. Stafford, & D. F. Alwin (Eds.), Calendar and time diary methods in life course research (pp. 257–275). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–19). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Fenton, K. A., Johnson, A. M., McManus, S., & Erens, B. (2001). Measuring sexual behaviour: Methodological challenges in survey research. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 77, 84–92.
Freedman, D., Thornton, A., Camburn, D., Alwin, D., & Young-DeMarco, L. (1988). The life history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociological Methodology, 18, 37–68.
Gersovitz, M., Jacoby, H. G., Dedy, F. S., & Tapa, A. G. (1998). The balance of self-reported heterosexual activity in KAP surveys and the AIDS epidemic in Africa. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 875–883.
Giordano, P. C. (2003). Relationships in adolescence. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 257–281.
Goldman, N., Moreno, L., & Westoff, C. F. (1989). Collection of survey data on contraception: An evaluation on an experiment in Peru. Studies in Family Planning, 20, 147–157.
Gregson, S., Zhuwau, T., Ndlovu, J., & Nyambukapa, C. (2002). Methods to reduce social desirability bias in sex surveys in low-development settings: Experience in Zimbabwe. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29, 568–575.
Gregson, S., Mushati, P., Whit, P. J., Mlilo, M., Mundandi, C., & Nyyamukapa, C. (2004). Informal confidential voting methods and temporal changes in reported sexual risk behavior for HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 80(Suppl. II), ii36–ii42.
Gross, N., & Mason, W. S. (1953). Some methodological problems of eight-hour interviews. The American Journal of Sociology, 59, 197–204.
Hanck, S. E., Blankenship, K. M., Irwin, K. S., West, B. S., & Kershaw, T. (2008). Assessment of self-reported sexual behavior and condom use among female sex workers in India using a polling box approach: A preliminary report. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 35, 489–494.
Hart, T. C., Rennison, C. M., & Gibson, C. (2005). Revisiting respondent “fatigue bias” in the National Crime Victimization Survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 345–363.
Heuveline, P. (2003). HIV and population dynamics: A general model and maximum-likelihood standards for East Africa. Demography, 40, 217–245.
Hewitt, P. C., Erulkar, A. S., & Mensch, B. S. (2004). The feasibility of computer-assisted survey interviewing in Africa. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 319–334.
Jaya, Hindin, M. J., & Ahmed, S. (2008). Differences in Young people’s reports of sexual behaviors according to interview methodology: A randomized trial in India. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 169–174.
Kabiru, C., Luke, N., Izugbara, C., & Zulu, E. (2010). The correlates of HIV testing and impacts on sexual behavior: Evidence from a life history study of young people in Kisumu, Kenya. BMC Public Health, 10, 412–423.
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) & ICF Macro. (2010). Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2008–09. Calverton, MD: KNBS and ICF Macro.
Leridon, H. (1990). Cohabitation, marriage, separation: An analysis of life histories of French cohorts from 1968 to 1985. Population Studies, 44, 127–144.
Lindstrom, D. P., Belachew, T., Hadley, C., Hattori, M. K., Hogan, D., & Tessema, F. (2010). Nonmarital sex and condom knowledge among Ethiopian young people: Improved estimates using a nonverbal response card. Studies in Family Planning, 41, 251–262.
Luke, N., Goldberg, R., Mberu, B., & Zulu, E. M. (Forthcoming). Social exchange and sexual behavior in young women’s premarital relationships in Kenya. Journal of Marriage and Family.
Madhavan, S., Schatz, E., & Clark, B. (2009). Effect of HIV/AIDS-related mortality on household dependency ratios in rural South Africa, 2000–2005. Population Studies, 63, 37–51.
Manlove, J., Ryan, S., & Franzetta, K. (2007). Contraceptive use patterns across teens’ sexual relationships: The role of relationships, partners, and sexual histories. Demography, 44, 603–621.
Martyn, K. K. (2009). Adolescent health research and clinical assessment using self-administered event history calendars. In R. F. Belli, F. P. Stafford, & D. F. Alwin (Eds.), Calendar and time diary methods in life course research (pp. 69–86). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
McCombie, S. C., & Anarfi, J. K. (2002). The influence of sex of the interviewer on the results of an AIDS survey in Ghana. Human Organization, 61(1), 51–57.
Mensch, B. S., Hewett, P. C., & Erulkar, A. S. (2003). The reporting of sensitive behavior among adolescents: A methodological experiment in Kenya. Demography, 40, 247–268.
Mensch, B. S., Hewett, P. C., Gregory, R., & Helleringer, S. (2008). Sexual behavior and STI/HIV status among adolescents in rural Malawi: An evaluation of the effect of interview mode of reporting. Studies in Family Planning, 39, 321–334.
Merli, M. G., Hertog, S., Wang, B., & Li, J. (2006). Modelling the spread of HIV/AIDS in China: The role of sexual transmission. Population Studies, 60(1), 1–22.
Morris, M. (1993). Telling tails explain the discrepancy in sexual partner reports. Nature, 365, 437–440.
Morris, M., & Kretzschmar, M. (1997). Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS, 11, 641–648.
Munthali, A. C., & Zulu, E. M. (2007). The timing and role of initiation rites in preparing young people for adolescence and responsible sexual and reproductive behavior in Malawi. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 11, 150–167.
Nnko, S., Boerma, J. T., Urassa, M., Mwaluko, G., & Zaba, B. (2004). Secretive females or swaggering males? An assessment of the quality of sexual partnership reporting in rural Tanzania. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 299–310.
Orubuloye, I. O., Caldwell, J. C., & Caldwell, P. (1997). Perceived male sexual needs and male sexual behavior in southwest Nigeria. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 1195–1207.
Plummer, M. L., Ross, D. A., Wight, D., Changalucha, J., Mshana, G., Wamoyi, . . . Hayes, R. J. (2004a). “A bit more truthful”: The validity of adolescent sexual behaviour data collected in rural northern Tanzania using five methods. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 80(Suppl. II), ii49–ii56.
Plummer, M. L., Wight, D., Ross, D. A., Balira, R., Anemona, A., Todd, J., . . . Hayes, R. J. (2004b). Asking semi-literate adolescents about sexual behavior: The validity of assisted self-completion questionnaire (ASCQ) data in rural Tanzania. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 9, 737–754.
Poulin, M. (2010). Reporting on first sexual experience: The importance of interviewer-respondent interaction. Demographic Research, 22, 237–288. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.11
Potdar, R., & Koenig, M. A. (2005). Does audio-CASI improve reports of risky behavior? Evidence from a randomized field trial among young urban men in India. Studies in Family Planning, 36, 107–116.
Smith, D. J. (2000). “These girls today are na war-o”: Premarital sexuality and modern identity in southeastern Nigeria. Africa Today, 37(3–4), 98–120.
Smith, D. J. (2007). Modern marriage, men’s extramarital sex, and HIV risk in southeastern Nigeria. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 997–1005.
Smith, J. P. (2009). Reconstructing childhood health histories. Demography, 46, 387–403.
Smith, J. P., & Thomas, D. (2003). Remembrances of things past: Test-retest reliability of retrospective migration histories. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 166, 23–49.
Strickler, J. A., Magnani, R. J., McCann, H. G., Brown, L. F., & Rice, J. C. (1997). The reliability of reporting of contraceptive behavior in DHS calendar data: Evidence from Morocco. Studies in Family Planning, 28, 44–53.
Tavory, I., & Swidler, A. (2009). Condom semiotics: Meaning and condom use in rural Malawi. American Sociological Review, 74, 171–189.
Tawfik, L. A., & Watkins, S. C. (2007). Sex in Geneva, sex in Lilongwe, and sex in Balaka. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 1090–1101.
Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867–873.
Watkins, S. C., Rutenberg, N., & Wilkinson, D. (1997). Orderly theories, disorderly women. In G. W. Jones, R. M. Douglas, J. C. Caldwell, & R. M. D’Souza (Eds.), The continuing demographic transition (pp. 213–245). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
Weiss, H. A., Buvé, A., Robinson, N. J., Van Dyck, E., Kahindo, M., Anagonou, S., . . . Hayes, R. J. for the Study Group on Heterogeneity of HIV Epidemics in African Cities. (2001). The epidemiology of HSV-2 infection and its association with HIV infection in four urban African populations. AIDS, 15(Suppl. 4), S97–S108.
White, M. J., Muhidin, S., Andrzejewski, C., Tagoe, E., Knight, R., & Reed, H. (2008). Urbanization and fertility: An event-history analysis of coastal Ghana. Demography, 45, 803–816.
Wight, D., & West, P. (1999). Poor recall, misunderstandings and embarrassment: Interpreting discrepancies in young men’s reported heterosexual behaviour. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 1(1), 55–78.
Wight, D., Plummer, M. L., Mshana, G., Wamoyi, J., Shigongo, Z. S., & Ross, D. A. (2006). Contradictory sexual norms and expectations for young people in rural northern Tanzania. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 987–997.
Xu, H., Luke, N., & Zulu, E. M. (2010). Concurrent sexual partnerships among youth in urban Kenya: Prevalence and partnership effects. Population Studies, 64, 1–15.
Yoshihama, M., Gillespie, B., Hammock, A. C., Belli, R. F., & Tolman, R. M. (2005). Does the life history calendar method facilitate the recall of intimate partner violence? Comparison of two methods of data collection. Social Work Research, 29, 151–163.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this research was provided by a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (R21-HD 053587), as well as supplementary funding from the Population Studies and Training Center, Department of Sociology, and UTRA at Brown University; the African Population and Health Research Center; and the Population Research Center at the University of Chicago. The authors gratefully acknowledge the role of research team members Caroline Kabiru, Rachel Goldberg, Hongwei Xu, Aidan Jeffery, Rena Otieno, Salome Wawire, Alena Davidoff-Gore, and Rohini Mathur. We thank the data management staff at the African Population and Health Research Center; Michael White, Catherine Andrezjewski, Holly Reed, and Justin Buszin for information regarding calendar design; Hongwei Xu and Sanyu Mojola for research assistance; and Kelley Smith for editorial assistance. We also thank the interviewers and respondents in Kisumu. Rachel Goldberg, Dennis Hogan, Caroline Kabiru, Kaivan Munshi, and Michael White provided helpful feedback on the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luke, N., Clark, S. & Zulu, E.M. The Relationship History Calendar: Improving the Scope and Quality of Data on Youth Sexual Behavior. Demography 48, 1151–1176 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0051-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0051-2