Introduction

Crude oil is the major source of energy in the world. The technologies, which improve the recovery efficiency and reduce environmental impacts, will be promising alternative to traditional oil recovery technologies. Biotechnology is considered as a new field recently introduced to the oil industry for various applications (Vazquez-Duhalt et al. 2002). Petroleum is a complex mixture of hydrocarbons and other organic compounds (Hamme et al. 2003). Crude oil is classified for economic value according to American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity, based on a surface measurement of the specific gravity of degassed oil. API gravity of heavy oils are 20 or less whereas a typical light oil is around 36–38 API (Head et al. 2003). Heavy oil is a thick, black, sticky fluid with high viscosities and densities compared to conventional oil. It generally contains high carbon, sulfur, and heavy metals. Al-Sulaimani et al. (2011) reported that around 2 trillion barrels of conventional light crude oil and 5 trillion barrels of heavy crude oil still remain in reservoirs worldwide. The oil fields of South Oman are reported to contain heavier crude oil, and significant discoveries of heavy oil—around 7+ billion barrels, Stock Tank Oil Initially In Place (STOIIP) in early 1990s led to a greater emphasis on their development (Nadyal et al. 1983). The average oil viscosity at a reservoir temperature of 50 °C varies from 1200 to 3600 cp (Malik et al. 2010). Crude petroleum exists in the complex capillary network of oil reservoirs. Traditional recovery technologies (primary—natural pressure drive of the reservoir and secondary—fluid injection) can recover a maximum of 40–50 % of the oil. Whereas in tertiary recovery—chemicals (polymer, alkaline and surfactants) and thermal energy (steam, combustion and hot water) are used to recover trapped crude oil. Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR) is a tertiary recovery technique, which involves the use of microbes and their metabolic products including biosurfactants, biopolymers, biomass, acids, solvents, gases and enzymes to increase the recovery of crude oil from depleted and marginal reservoirs (Behlülgil and Lu 2002; Bryant 1987; Sen 2008). Armstrong et al. (2015) studied the MEOR mechanisms of bioclogging and interfacial tension (IFT) reduction effects of pore morphology on residual oil mobilization. They reported that bioclogging with IFT reduction is the most effective MEOR treatment option in terms of enhancing oil recovery (EOR). Le et al. (2015) reported that MEOR has been shown to increase oil recovery by approximately 3–10 %, during field trials and laboratory tests. They also reported the progress in pilot testing of MEOR applications in the Daqing oilfield of north China, where over the past decade, different MEOR technologies were developed, and cumulative oil increments have reached more than 1.2 × 105 times using these methods. Microorganisms use long-chain n-alkanes as carbon and energy source and higher rate of hydrocarbons utilization is also reported by bacterial consortium from oil exposed environments (Beilen et al. 2003; Bentoa et al. 2005; Geetha et al. 2013; Kebria et al. 2009). Due to microbial growth and polymer production, fluid components of oil are altered and viscosity reduction is achieved by degradation of oil components. Montiel et al. (2009) reported that oxidization and bio-upgrading of asphaltenes is the promising way to enhance fluidity and pumping of heavy crude oil. Still microbial systems have not been developed as a commercial service for heavy oil recovery because there are little data available or research specifically with heavy oil to support the commercialization. Microbial enzymes like peroxidase and lactase can also be used to treat heavy oil (Montiel et al. 2009). Enzymes like hydrolase and oxidoreductase breaks a covalent bond in their substrate adding a water molecule in the process (Harris and McKay 1998). Jumpstart Energy Services in USA developed Greenzyme®—an enzyme-based enhanced oil recovery. It is able to reduce paraffin waxy components and viscosity. Enzyme active site attaches to the oil and catalyzes it, so larger oil droplets are broken into smaller ones allowing more oil release and improved mobility and permeability.

The aim of this work was to isolate and identify spore-forming bacterial consortia from oil contaminated soil samples and explored its potential in biological upgrading of heavy crude oil.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Oil contaminated soil samples were collected from seven different oil wells from Oman (well-19, well-14, well-28.1, well-28.2, Wasta well, Wafra well and oil-based mud collected from dumping area near oil reservoir) and heavy crude oil samples (API 16) were kindly provided by a local oil company in Oman.

Isolation of bacterial consortia

One gram of each soil samples was added to 15 ml of sterile distilled water and heated at 85 °C for 30 min, to eliminate the majority of non-spore forming bacteria. Aliquots of 2 ml sterile heavy crude oil and 1 ml diluted soil samples were inoculated in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks each containing 50 ml of one of the following minimal media: M6 (Mukherjee et al. 2009), M7 (Cooper et al. 1981) and M8 (Nazina et al. 2005). The compositions of media used are M6 (g/l): NaCl, 0.01; K2HPO4, 2.2; KH2PO4, 0.14; CaCl2. 2H2O, 0.04; MgSO4, 0.6; NH4NO3, 3.3; FeSO4, 0.2; trace mineral solution, 0.5 ml/l. M7 (g/l): KH2PO4, 4.083; MgSO4-, 0.197; NH4NO3, 4.002; NaHPO4, 7.119; trace mineral solution, 1 ml/l. M8 (g/l): NaCl, 7; K2HPO4, 0.09; KH2PO4, 0.21; NH4Cl, 0.8; MgCl2.5H2O, 0.2; CaCl2. 2H2O, 0.05; NaHCO3, 2.2; trace mineral solution, 1 ml/l. Respective uninoculated minimal media flasks with heavy crude oil were also incubated as negative controls. All flasks were incubated aerobically at 40 °C on rotary shaker at 160 rpm for up to 21 days and samples were analyzed at 3, 7, 17 and 21 days for biosurfactant production (surface tension—ST and interfacial tension—IFT), growth measurement (by measuring optical density at 660 nm—OD660), well assay on crude oil containing agar plates, and gas chromatography analysis. For isolating individual bacteria from the consortia, 0.1 ml of inoculum was taken from 21 days grown culture media and plated on M7 agar plates, with heavy crude oil as a carbon source, and incubated at 40 °C for 7–12 days. Isolates obtained were further streaked on Luria–Bertani (LB) agar plates and checked for purity prior to subsequent molecular analysis. The isolated bacteria from different consortia were morphologically analyzed (using scanning electron microscopy) and identified by molecular identification (using 16S rRNA sequencing).

Analytical techniques

ST, IFT and growth measurement

ST and IFT were analyzed using a Pendant Drop Tensiometer (DSA100, Krüss, Germany). The IFT was measured by immersing the sample into n-hexadecane (Sigma, USA) as embedding light phase. All measurements were carried out in triplicates at ambient temperature (25 °C) and pressure (1 atm) where the averages of three independent readings are reported. The growth was analyzed by measuring optical density at 660 nm (Heliose Spectrophotometer, Thermo Spectronic, USA).

Well assay

The ability of bacterial strains to degrade heavy crude oil was investigated by carrying out the well assay experiments. Filtered and non-filtered aliquots of each sample were used for this assay to check the difference in degradation of oil between bacteria and their extracellular metabolites (for e.g., enzymes). Wells of 0.5 cm diameter were made in M7 agar plates with heavy crude oil. Samples were filtered with 0.22 µm sterile filters, to remove all bacteria. Approximately 0.1 ml of filtered and non-filtered aliquots from each samples were inoculated in wells and incubated for 7 days at 40 °C under aerobic conditions. For each samples the experiments were performed in triplicates. The clear zones were measured according to the method of Zhang et al. (2004).

Scanning electron microscopy of bacteria

Bacterial species which have ability to grow on heavy oil were examined by scanning electron microscope. A loopful of each of the isolated colonies from M7 agar plates containing heavy oil was transferred to 3 cm diameter wells, containing 5 ml of Luria broth. After 24 h incubation at 40 °C, the bacteria grew and adhered to the glass surface. Karnovsky’s fixative (2.5 % gluteraldehyde, 4 % paraformaldehyde, 1 M Na–cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2) was used to fix bacteria for 2 h at 4 °C. It was washed three times with 1 M Na–cacodylate buffer with additives (1 N NaOH, 1 N HCl, sucrose, CaCl2, and MgCl2), pH 7.2 for 15 min at room temperature. It was post-fixed in aqueous 1 % osmium tetroxide solution for 1 h at room temperature. Then it was washed twice with distilled water for 15 min at room temperature. It was dehydrated through ethanol series-wash at room temperature: 25, 50, 70, 90 % and four changes of 100 %, for 15 min at each change. Samples were dried using hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS): the last 100 % ethanol solution was replaced with HMDS and left for 10 min and air-dried in the hood for 20–30 min. Samples were sputter-coated with gold (Au) for 60 s, and were observed in SEM (JOEL Scanning Electron Microscope 5600, Japan) at College of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

For identifying cultivable isolated bacteria from different consortia, DNA was extracted from pure colonies using Ultra Clean Soil DNA isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc, San Diego, USA), as directed by manufacturer (Yamane et al. 2008). One percent (1 %) agarose gel was used to view the extracted DNA. Purified DNA samples were used as templates for polymerase chain reactions (PCR). Universal bacterial primers 27F (5′ AGA GTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG ‘3) and 1492R (5′GCYTACCTTGTTACGACTT ‘3) were used for amplification of 16S rRNA gene fragment. The PCR amplification were done using 1 cycle of 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 2 min at 53 °C and 2 min at 72 °C, followed by one cycle of 7 min at 72 °C in a thermal cycler (Model 2720, Applied Biosystems, USA). First Purification was done using QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGen), and second PCR reaction (sequence reaction) was performed using 2 µl of the first PCR products as template, 2 µl of BigDye (Applied Biosystems, USA), 1 µl of 5× sequence buffer, 3 µl of primers (27F, 1492 R, 515 F), and 2 µl of water. The PCR amplification was done using 1 cycle of 20 s at 96 °C, 10 s at 96 °C, 5 s at 50 °C and 4 min at 60 °C in a thermal cycler (Model 2720, Applied Biosystems, USA). Second purification was performed using DyeEX Kit (QIAGEN Inc., USA). Sequence reaction was performed on Sultan Qaboos University, College of Science, department of Biology using 3130 xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems-Hitachi, USA). For phylogenetic analysis, partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were assembled in a contiguous sequence using ChromasPro v 1.41. Identification was achieved by comparing the contiguous 16S rRNA gene sequence (1000 bp in length) with sequence data from reference available at the public database—NCBI GenBank using BLAST sequence match. The sequences were aligned using ChromasPro. Evolutionary distances were derived from sequence pair dissimilarities calculated as implanted in MEGA 5 (Tamura et al. 2011). The phylogenetic reconstruction was done using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm and maximum likelihood tree with bootstrap value calculated from 1000 replicates run.

Gas chromatography analysis

The crude oil and the alkane fractions were analyzed by gas chromatography—GC/MS (Perkin Elmer—Clarus 600). The experimental conditions were: capillary column—HP-5 MS (HP#19091S-433), 30 m × 250 µm × 0.25 µm with helium as a carrier gas; column temperature—80 °C to 290 °C for 30 min with 10.0 °C/min increment and hold at 240 °C for 30 min; the injector temperature—290 °C. Individual components present in the alkane fraction were determined by matching the retention time with alkane standards (C7–C30 Saturated Alkanes standards—1000 µg/ml in hexane, Supelco Analytical, USA). Samples were fractionated on activated silica-gel columns (1.5 cm diameter, 15 cm length) filled with slurry of 30–50 mesh silica gel in dichloromethane. The concentrated sample (in dichloromethane) was placed on the column. The oil fractions were collected in separate flasks and were concentrated (at 60 °C) by rotary evaporator (Büchi, Switzerland). The concentrated oil was dissolved in dichloromethane and analyzed by GC.

Results

The increase in bacterial population growing on crude oil is clear evidence that bacterial consortia can utilize crude petroleum-oil hydrocarbon as a sole source of carbon and energy. Three different types of reported minimal salt media (M6, M7 and M8) were used to enrich bacterial consortia containing heavy crude oil as a carbon source. Out of three minimal media, M7 showed somewhat better growth during initial ‘21 day’ experiments (data not shown), and thus was further utilized for experiments. Samples were collected at 3, 7, 17 and 21 day intervals and checked for growth. Highest growth was observed on 21st day from majority of samples, except from ‘oil-based mud sample’, where good growth was observed starting from 3rd day, and no further difference was observed till 21st day (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The growth profile (OD660) of bacterial consortia in minimal salt media—M7, with heavy crude oil during 21 days incubation at 40 °C

The reduction in ST was observed from bacterial consortia of ‘oil-based mud’ and ‘w28.2’ samples. The ST was reduced to <50 from 70 mN/m, whereas, other bacterial consortia from rest of the samples showed ST values around ≥55 mN/m. Whereas, much change were not observed in IFT values for all of the consortia from different samples, all showed values ≤28 mN/m from 35 mN/m.

All seven bacterial consortia from different samples were screened for heavy oil degradation by well assay. As shown in Fig. 2, it was observed that bacterial consortia from ‘w14’ and ‘wasta’ samples exhibited larger clearing zones, as compared to rest of the bacterial consortia. Whereas, cell-free filtrate of bacterial consortia from ‘oil-based mud’ and ‘wasta’ samples gave larger zones of clearance. Bacterial consortia from ‘w19’ samples gave smallest zone of clearance and no-zone of clearance was observed from their cell-free filtrates (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Oil clearance zones of seven bacterial consortia and their ‘cell-free filtrates’ on M7 agar plates containing heavy crude oil

A total of 27 different bacterial colonies were isolated from heavy crude-oil and bacterial consortia from 7 oil contaminated samples, which were able to grow on heavy oil. According to PCR amplification, sequencing of 16S rRNA gene and its alignment in BLAST revealed that the isolates belonged to three major bacterial classes: Bacilli, gamma-proteobacteria and alpha-proteobacteria. Isolates belonged to six genera; Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Bosea, Azospirillum and Nitratireductar. Table 1 shows the identified isolates and the closest strains from NCBI database, with similarity percentage of identity.

Table 1 Closest relatives of cultured bacterial isolates from oil contaminated soil

Maximum likelihood trees were constructed by Kimura 2-parameter method using MEGA ver.5 programme (Fig. 3). Boot strap value larger than 50 in tree give an indication that isolate is same to reference sequence. BC-11 sample may be new Acinetobacter sp., due to small boot strap value. Azospirillum, Nitratireductor and Bosea genera belong to Alpha-proteobacteria class. From phylogeny tree, BC-15 and BC-10 isolates were identified as Azospirillum rugosum and Bosea thioxidans, respectively, as boot strap value is 100 for both of them. The third class mainly consisted of Bacillus genus. BC-14, BC-5, and BC-21 were identified as Bacillus firmus, Bacillus foraminis and Bacillus licheniformis. Figure 4 shows the percentage frequency of occurrence of different bacteria isolated from different soil samples and heavy crude oil.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Maximum likelihood derived phylogenetic tree of selected isolates from contaminated soil and related organisms. The length of the branch is proportional to the amount of inferred evolutionary change and the pairwise distance follow the sequence name

Fig. 4
figure 4

Percentage frequency of occurrence of bacteria isolated from seven different oil contaminated soil samples and heavy crude oil sample

Bacterial cells morphology was examined by SEM. Bacillus licheniformis isolated from ‘w28’ samples, were arranged in binary with rough surface (Fig. 5a), B. siralis isolated from ‘oil-based mud’ sample were arranged in long chain and connected to each other by thin filaments similar to fimbriae (Fig. 5b). Figure 5c shows B. licheniformis isolated from ‘wasta’ soil sample, were also found connected with fimbria and B. subtilis isolated from ‘wafra’ soil sample were arranged as long chains (Fig. 5d).

Fig. 5
figure 5

SEM of a Bacillus licheniformis (from w28 sample); b Bacillus siralis (from oil-based mud sample); c B. licheniformis (from wasta soil sample) and d B. subtilis (from wafra soil sample)

The consortia of ‘wasta’ soil samples showed larger zone of clearance on oil-agar plates, and thus were selected for GC analysis. The Fig. 6a shows the chromatogram of heavy-crude oil, which is composed of hydrocarbons from C1− C37+ (also confirmed by supplying local oil company). Microbial treated heavy oil with ‘wasta’ bacterial consortium was broken down to hydrocarbons ranging from C11 to C27 (Fig. 6b). The maximum concentration of treated oil fractions was hydrocarbon with carbon chain—C15 (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The GC analysis of heavy crude oil: Abiotic control (a) and heavy crude oil treated with ‘wasta’ bacterial consortium (b) after 21 days

Fig. 7
figure 7

Main components of treated heavy crude oil after ‘wasta’ bacterial consortium growth

Discussion

Crude-oil will in all likelihood remain a major source of energy worldwide for the foreseeable future. Since the beginning of industrialization, continuous demand has driven oil producing countries to provide oil in huge quantities. But currently ‘easily recoverable light oil’ has peaked, and remaining ‘heavy oil’ reserves will be the key source to meet a big demand on energy. Heavy oil is thick dark fluid with high viscosity and density. Heavy oil requires more expensive and advanced technologies to recover and refine because of its high viscosity. Like most other neighboring Gulf countries, Sultanate of Oman also depends on oil resources as a pillar for its national economy. In Sultanate of Oman large heavy oil reserves were discovered in early 1990s, estimated at 7+ billion barrels (Nadyal et al. 1983). These large but ‘difficult to recover’ heavy oil reservoirs holds the answer to Sultanates ‘ever-developing’ economy. Crude oil is originally formed from remains of dead animals and plants which are degraded by microorganisms. ZoBell and his coworkers were the first to review the action of microorganisms on hydrocarbons, since then scientists have started exploring bacteria and their metabolites in oil recovery or bioremediation of contaminated sites (Al-Sulaimani et al. 2011, 2012; Geetha et al. 2013).

Microbial permeability profile modification (MPPM) by selective plugging or bioclogging is one such mechanisms of MEOR applications (Al-Hattali et al. 2013). The selective plugging or bioclogging by the microbial biofilm growth in highly permeable zones of reservoirs or aquifers diverts water into low permeability zones (Surasani et al. 2013). The MPPM applications by bioclogging at the reservoir scale is still inhibited by a lack of understanding and advanced modeling and prediction tools. Researchers have reported a Reactive Transport Model (RTM) to understand controls of bioclogging processes in the silica sand porous medium, carbonate formations and at the sandstone reservoir scale using L. mesenteroides as a model microorganism (Surasani et al. 2013; Vilcáez et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2014). They reported significant dextran formation and the associated porosity and permeability alterations which eventually diverted the injection water into low permeability zones. They observed between 10 to 75 % bioclogging effectiveness, as measured by the percentage of the water diverted into the low permeability zones, depending on the injection conditions.

Al-Bahry et al. (2013) screened and studied the microbial consortia consisting of 33 genera and 58 species, from oil fields of Al-Wusta region, Oman. They reported that majority of the identified microorganisms were found to be anaerobic, thermophilic, and halophilic, and produced biogases, biosolvants, and biosurfactants as by-products, which may be good candidates for MEOR. In this study we explored isolation of spore-forming bacteria from oil-contaminated sites of Oman and their possible applications in biodegradation or upgrading of heavy-crude oil. In this investigation a ‘selective enrichment’ method was used to isolate thermophile spore-forming bacteria from oil contaminated soil samples. Seven oil contaminated soil samples were collected and boiled at 85 °C to eliminate majority of vegetative non-spore forming bacteria. Samples were observed for 21 days incubation in three different minimal salt media, where one medium—M7 showed somewhat better growth than rest two media (data not shown). Thus, M7 was selected for further studies. The bacterial growth was strong evidence that bacterial consortia utilized heavy oil as carbon and energy sources. Higher growth was observed at the end of day 21 from all the samples. Mandri and Lin (2007) found a correlation between cell number and ability of degrading engine oil. Biria et al. (2007) found that at shorter incubation time, increase in the capillary number will be also less and, hence the oil production will also be reduced.

IFT and ST reduction are reported to have an important effect on light or heavy crude oil recovery by bacterial biosurfactants under laboratory experiments of core-flood or sand-pack column studies (Al-Sulaimani et al. 2012; Joshi and Desai 2013; Joshi et al. 2015). In this study, there was no much reduction in ST and IFT between treated samples and controls were observed, and only minor reduction in ST from day 17 and day 21 was observed. Illias et al. (2001) reported that Bacillus reduced IFT of medium containing kerosene up to 25 dynes/cm. We also observed IFT values around ≤28 mN/m. Sepahy et al. (2005) reported slight increase in ST and IFT was observed at the early stationary phase of bacterial growth. This study showed that there was no drastic decrease in ST and IFT of these samples in M7 media with heavy oil, may be these bacterial consortia were unable to produce biosurfactant in these types of media and conditions.

The bacterial consortia which have the ability to utilize and degrade heavy oil were examined by well-assays. The heavy oil utilization ability was correlated with clearing zone diameter around each well in the plate after incubation for 7 days. Bacterial consortia from all seven contaminated sites showed varied positive results. There was a clear difference between clearing zones diameters when bacterial cells cultures or their cell-free filtrates were used. The highest clearing zone diameters were obtained from w14, wasta, w28.2, wafra, oil-based mud, and w19 consortia, respectively. Cell-free filtrates of wasta, oil-based mud, wafra, w28.2, and w14 samples showed highest clearing zones, respectively, while ‘w19’ cell-free filtrate did not show any clearing zone. Bacterial cells consume oil as a carbon source and thus show clearing zones around their colonies. No clearing zones with abiotic control samples were found, which means that the clearance zones resulted from bacteria action and not because of other abiotic factors. Hasanuzzaman et al. (2004) reported that a clearance halo around Pseudomonas aeruginosa colony was observed after 3 days on an agar plate (with salad, olive, lard, and waste oils) and correlated to the presence of extracellular lipase enzyme. Satpute et al. (2008) found emulsified hole in coated plates with crude oil after incubation for 7–10 days with Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas. In agreement with previous studies, this study found clearing zones formation after 7 day with different bacteria consortia. Wasta sample which have mixture of B. licheniformis, B. firmus and Bosea thioxidants showed the largest clearing zones diameter in heavy oil. Zones formed after incubation with free cells filtrate, suggest that these types of bacteria produce extracellular compounds that break oil and produce clearing zones. Chandran and Das (2010) concluded that culture supernatant of Trichosporon asahii (yeast) when inoculated with diesel oil, produced clear halo. Rodrigues et al. (2006) correlated higher surface activity of biosurfactant solution with larger diameter produced by Lactococcus lactis. Ting et al. (2009) reported that Pseudomonas lundensis produced clearing zones when incubated with oil by metabolizing long-chain-length of alkanes. Based on the result of this experiment and previous studies, the presence of clearing zones in oil plates is an evidence of oil biodegradation by the bacterial cells themselves and also by their extracellular metabolic-products.

A total 27 bacterial strains were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing. Amplification and sequencing of 16S rRNA revealed that these species belonged to six different genera as mentioned in Table 1. Phylogenetic trees showed that isolates belonged to three main classes; gamma-proteobacteria, alpha-proteobacteria and Bacilli. Bacillus spp. presented over 50 % of the isolated cultivable flora. It is reported that the major genera of bacteria active in polluted soils as hydrocarbon-degraders are Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Serratia and Acinetobacter (Hamme et al. 2003; Nkwelang et al. 2008), gamma proteobacterium were reported in Rod Bay seawater contaminated with crude oil (Yakimov et al. 1997).

In this study Acinetobacter junii was isolated from contaminated soil and grew in heavy oil in agreement with previous studies. Acinetobacter spp. is one of the most efficient oil degraders. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. stutzeri, P. reactans and P. fluorescens were isolated from soil and grew in heavy oil as many other studies revealed below. P. southpolaris and P. psychrotoleratus were detected by DGGE from oil contaminated soil (Evans et al. 2004). P. stutzeri was isolated from Antarctic soils and resembled the aromatic hydrocarbon-degradation (Saul et al. 2005).

Bacillus spp. is frequently the dominant species in environments exposed to different petroleum hydrocarbons. We also found Bacillus licheniformis, B. subtilis, B. firmus, B. foraminis, B. siralis, from different soil samples. Bacillus sp., was detected by DGGE from oil contaminated soil (Evans et al. 2004). Yakimov et al. (1997) reported that Bacillus licheniformis strain was isolated which grows on oil as a carbon source, which produced polymers and reduced surface tension.

In this study, Bosea thiooxidans was identified from ‘wasta’ sample. Seo et al. (2007) have reported isolation of Bosea thiooxidans from petroleum-contaminated soil that effectively degraded polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). This study showed that a wasta consortium containing Bosea thiooxidans had the largest clearing zones and higher media viscosity reading. This may be caused by degradation ability of this strain.

Acinetobacter, Bacillus and Pseudomonas are found to be long chain hydrocarbon degrading bacteria (Kubota et al. 2008). Dioxygenase enzyme from Acinetobacter sp. utilized C12 to C20-alkenes (Maeng et al. 1996). Acinetobacter is also reported as capable to utilize n-alkanes with chain lengths ranging from C10 to C40 as a sole carbon source (Throne-Holst et al. 2007). So it is already known that these different bacteria isolate especially Acinetobater sp. from this study can grow in presence of heavy oil and break it down. Brevibacillus, Dietzia, Methylobacterium and Bacillus pumilus from the oil and formation water are reported to produce—monooxygenase, hydroxylase and oxidoreductase enzymes for oil epoxidation (da Cruz et al. 2010). In well assays, we observed oil-clearance zones by cell-free extracts also, which could be because of some of these types of reported enzymes, which needs to be studied in further detail.

SEM of some of the isolated bacteria gave an overview of extracellular morphology of heavy oil utilizing bacteria isolated from oil contaminated soil. These bacteria were like rods arranged in long chain structure. Most of them have cellular extensions that may be used to attach hydrophobic compound and access them to cell metabolism. Surface proteins responsible for adhesion to hydrophobic nutrients are mainly found into fimbriae or distributed in a rough layer over the cell surface (Paul and Jeffrey 1985).

The GC analysis of untreated crude oil showed no clear isolated peaks. This may be because of heavy oil mainly consisted of long chains hydrocarbons (C37+) as also confirmed by Oil Company. After 21 days of incubation with bacteria, GC analysis revealed that treated heavy oil components differed from untreated crude oil. Hydrocarbon fractions especially from C12 to C27 were detected after growth of ‘wasta bacterial consortium’. Disappearance of long chain from GC output may be due to their degradation to light ones. Moran et al. (2000) reported that after treatment of oil with biosurfactant and B. subtilis O9, light carbon fraction ranged from n-C12 to n-C19, with a maximum between n-C15 and n-C16, and the heavy fraction started with n-C23 and had a maximum between n-C27 and n-C29 as detected by GC. Large molecules of aromatics, resin and asphaltic in the heavy oil are degraded extremely slowly in natural degradation process (Hozumi et al. 2000). In present study also we didn’t observed much changes in the values of resins and asphaltenes (data not shown). Indigenous microorganisms of the California seawater degrade up to 80 % of the lighter oils and up to 50 % of the heavier oils (Atlas 1975). B. licheniformis isolated from heavy oils decreases the concentration of the C25+ group by degrading long-chained hydrocarbons. In this study, there was also a decrease in the concentration of light carbon groups, such as the C6–C11 groups. Decreases in light and heavy components lead to increase in the concentrations of the middle carbon groups. The chemical composition analysis of the oil samples showed that the microbes do degrade the long hydrocarbon chains into lighter hydrocarbons to use them as a carbon source. Al-Sayegh et al. (2015) reported isolation of bacterial isolates from an Omani oil field, which were able to degrade and transform heavy crude oil to lighter components. They reported that biodegradation and biotransformation processes lead to 16 % additional oil heavy recovery. Premuzic and Lin (1999) found that crude heavy oil did not show any presence of light components, in comparison heavy oil treated with biocatalysts showed the presence of light chain components in gas chromatography analysis. Mixture of bacterial strains: Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas and Alcaligenes degraded heavy oil components. Beilen et al. (2003) found that Acinetobacter sp. grow on (C6–C44) alkanes, Pseudomonas putida grow on (C5–C12) alkanes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa grow on (C5–C16) alkanes.

In conclusion, thermotolerant spore forming bacterial consortia were isolated from different crude oil contaminated soil samples in Oman. The bacterial consortia mainly consisted of Bacilli group. The consortia were able to grow on minimal media containing only heavy crude oil as carbon source. Samples were analyzed for biosurfactant production, but none of the samples showed substantial reduction in ST or IFT, which could be because of very low or no biosurfactant production by the bacterial consortia, in currently used 3 minimal salt media. Despite the lack of any noticeable decrease in ST or IFT, the consortia showed clearance of oil on oil agar plates in the well assay, which clearly showed a positive effect of either the bacterial consortia or their metabolites. Gas chromatography analysis of treated heavy oil with bacterial consortia isolated from ‘wasta’ samples, revealed significant degradation of heavy oil from C37+ hydrocarbons to lighter hydrocarbons with carbon chain C7–C27. This reduction in carbon chain is probably quite encouraging for enhanced oil recovery applications as well as heavy crude oil bioremediation purposes. Different bacterial isolates from this study may contribute in heavy oil recovery by breaking long hydrocarbons. It is further recommended to study and understand the active mechanism of bacterial metabolites (enzymes) which are responsible for breaking down of heavy oil.