Introduction

Global freshwater scarcity due to the pollution of water demands for integrating water management and monitoring all over the world (Dahunsi et al. 2014). Physicochemical and microbial quality of river water is now in great stress by gulping a huge amount of industrial and household disposal (Koshy and Nayar 1999). Therefore, assessment of water quality in terms of physicochemical and microbial aspects can help to take effective management decision to prevent those (Behbahaninia et al. 2009).

Rajshahi City, located in the northwest part of Bangladesh on the bank of the River Padma, has experienced considerable growth over the past few decades. These residential and commercial establishments along the River Padma cause discharge of wastewater either directly into the river or into the drains which subsequently find their way into the river. Hence, there is a possibility that the aquatic environment of the river may be affected somehow by these pollutants. High temperature makes the environment hotter, drier and ultimately results in frequent droughts that deplete necessary river flows to dilute pollutants entering into the river (Banglapedia 2004). Therefore, seasonal variations in both of the anthropogenic and natural processes such as temperature and precipitations affect the quality of river water and lead to different attributes between seasons. Thus, it is important to perform river quality assessment to detect the alterations of the water quality and evaluate pollution sources.

Effective monitoring of physicochemical and microbiological parameters can prevent river water pollution (Chandra et al. 2006), and this type of initiative has a special significance to protect human health from water pollution (APHA 1981). Indicator bacteria, such as total coliform (TC) and fecal coliforms (FC), are useful for the assessment of fecal pollution (APHA 1995). Detailed knowledge of fecal pollution in aquatic environments is crucial for maintaining healthy water body for recreational and economic purposes (Farnleitner et al. 2001). Concentrations of heterotrophic bacteria and Vibrio cholera can be a threat together with increasing water temperatures and decomposition of organic matter in Padma River. That can cause cholera disease through the faster growth rate of this pathogen in aquatic environments (Koelle et al. 2005). However, bacterial study in Padma River is very limited and thus a detailed empirical study is needed to assess the present water quality and bacterial parameters of this river. For this purpose, this study was aimed at analyzing some selected physicochemical and bacteriological parameters of surface water of Padma River.

Materials and methods

Selection of study area and sample collection

The present study was conducted at four sites (T-dam, Padma Garden, I-dam and Talaimari point) along the Padma River covering most parts of Rajshahi City Corporation. Location and description of sampling sites are shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1. Sampling was done on three respective seasons, namely summer, monsoon and winter, in the year 2016. For the physicochemical analysis, 500 ml of water sample has been collected from the selected sites. On-site measurement of some physicochemical parameters was performed, while others were transported to the laboratory in dark polyethylene plastic bottle and ice box. For the bacteriological analysis, another 500 ml of water samples has also been collected from the selected sampling points and the samples were delivered to the laboratory as quickly as possible; i.e., the time gap between sampling and analyses was below 3 h.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Location of the study sites (yellow stars). Modified from Google Earth 2017

Table 1 Sampling sites, sampling code and observation

Analysis of physicochemical parameters

Surface water temperature was measured using a thermometer. Water pH was measured using an electronic pH meter (Jenway 3020). The biological oxygen demand (BOD5) of each water sample was measured using the OxiDirect BOD system (HACH) over 5 days of incubation period. Dissolved oxygen (DO), total hardness and total alkalinity were measured by using a portable aquaculture kit (Model FF2, HACH, USA). Electrical conductivity (EC) and total dissolved solids (TDS) were measured with an EC, TDS tester (Adwa AD31 waterproof EC/TDS Testers). Nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), phosphate-phosphorus (PO4-P) concentrations were measured using the Hach Kit (DR/2020, a direct-reading spectrophotometer) with high-range chemicals (Nitra Ver. 5 Nitrate Reagent Powder Pillows for NO3-N and Phos. Ver. 3 Phosphate Reagent Powder Pillows for PO4-P analysis).

Bacteriological analysis

Spread plate method was used to count total heterotrophic bacteria (THB) on nutrient agar media (HiMedia) using 0.1 ml of suitable aliquots. Incubation was done at 37 °C for 24–48 h, and colonies were counted on a digital colony counter. Indicator bacteria (TC and FC) were evaluated by the most probable number (MPN) method where 10, 1 and 0.1 ml aliquots of water samples were inoculated in fermentation tubes containing MacConkey broth (HiMedia) (APHA 1998). The incubation period was 37 °C for 24 h. Positive tubes were indicated by the production of acid and gas in inverted Durham tube. A loopful of broth from each positive tube was inoculated into the brilliant green lactose bile (BGLB) broth, and incubation was done at 37 °C for 24–48 h. Durham tubes with gas formation were considered as positive, and final count of total coliform was done as MPN/100 ml. Completed test of total coliform was performed by plating a loopful of broth from each positive BGLB tube onto an eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar plate (HiMedia) and incubating it at 37 °C for 24–48 h. Positive complete test was confirmed by the appearance of colonies with green metallic sheen. Final fecal coliform count as MPN/100 ml was calculated based on the completed test. Enumeration of V. cholerae was also done by spread plating on Thiosulphate Citrate Bile Salts (TCBS) agar plates (HiMedia). Yellow colonies are primarily selected as VC and finally confirmed by biochemical test (oxidase test).

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed by the use of Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS software Version 20.0). Two-way ANOVA was used to show the interactions between the sites and the seasons at significance level of p < 0.05. Correlation coefficient test was used to determine whether there was a relationship between water quality parameters and bacterial parameters seasonally.

Results and discussion

Physicochemical parameters

The physicochemical parameters of different seasons and sites of water measured during the study period with their interactions are shown in Table 2. Except temperature, all the physicochemical parameters have significant differences (p < 0.01) among the seasons and sites. It is common phenomenon that during summer month, air temperature becomes increased and subsequently does the water temperature. Recorded water temperature showed significant (p < 0.05) seasonal variation which is lower in winter and higher in summer season. Decreasing water level and increasing amount of insoluble pollutants during summer make the water hotter, which is in agreement with the findings of Boyle and Fraleigh (2003) and Ezzat et al. (2012) where they also reported that discharge of pollutants can increase the temperature of water. During the study period, it was found that Site 2 was mostly polluted by dumping of household and municipal waste. That makes the pH acidic at Site 2 by decomposition of organic matter. Bhouyan (1979) and Mahmood et al. (1992) reported that industrial and municipal waste can significantly influence the pH of the water at the dumped site. Increased microbial decomposition of large amount of organic matter at Site 2 also caused a significant depletion of DO. Significant seasonal and spatial changes in DO content were also observed during the study period. The highest concentration of DO at Site 4 (8.70 ± 0.13 mg/l) during winter season indicates recovery of river water from organic pollution. TDS concentrations of the study areas were below the maximum allowable limit (500 mg/l) of World Health Organization (WHO 2008) as well as the standard of Department of Environment (DoE 1997), Bangladesh (1000 mg/l). Low water level, reduced water flow, discharge of domestic sewage, industrial wastewater and agricultural activities increase the TDS of river water at Site 2 during summer season. The water of Padma River is not saline but interestingly it got higher conductivity values during summer at Site 2 and Site 3. We can assume that it may happen due to the presence of a large amount of total dissolved solids as a result of the dumping of domestic and municipal sewage. It was also observed that total hardness was highest at Site 2, which was recognized as more polluted site as it receives huge amount of city garbage and municipal waste through large drains. Similar result was also reported by Roy and Kumar (2002), where they confirmed that the sewage effluents are responsible for high level of total hardness in river water. Lower value of total alkalinity during monsoon might be due to the dilution effect of water that reduces the concentration of ions in water (APHA 1998). The highest total alkalinity observed during summer at Site 2 might be due to disposal of domestic and municipal waste into the river. Higher value of total alkalinity in summer season was also found by Rai et al. (2012) at Harmu River in Ranchi city, Jharkhand, India. The high level of BOD5 (particularly during the dry season) during the study period also indicates the presence of excessive amount of bacteria in the water, which consume the oxygen from the water column. Higher BOD5 values at Site 2 suggest that this site was rich in organic matter content which is being introduced in the rivers by anthropogenic activities. Prasanna and Ranjan (2010) and Mishra et al (2014) also reported that BOD5 of water can be affected by organic content of the water body. The higher value of NO3-N and PO4-P at Site 2 might also be due to the disposal of higher amount of fertilizers, municipal wastewaters and effluents of septic tank. However, the observed values for PO4-P were found well below the DoE (1997) standard (6 mg/l) for aquatic life during both dry and wet seasons.

Table 2 Physicochemical parameters of Padma River water at different seasons and sites during the study period

Enumeration of bacterial microorganisms

Microbial pollution of surface water can be detected by the changes in abundance of bacterial population (Kavka and Poetsch 2002). The presence of bacteria in surface water not only indicates the fecal contamination of water but also the potential human health risks (Baghel et al. 2005). During the study period, the microbial pollution of surface water of Padma River was assessed by monitoring both indicator and pathogenic bacteria (Table 3).

Table 3 Bacterial parameters of Padma River water at different seasons and sites during the study period

THB impaired the quality of the river water by depleting oxygen immediately from the water during the decomposition of the incoming effluents (Garnier et al. 1991). Significantly higher cell counts of THB during summer may be due to the higher water temperature that increases the enzymatic activity of microbes to heavily proliferate during this season (El-Fadaly et al. 2001; Sabae et al. 2014). Therefore, temperature as well as seasonal variation can be recognized as an important factor that influences the bacterial growth (WHO 2003; Neumann et al. 1972; Al-Kareem et al. 2015).

Followed by THB, TC count was also significantly higher during summer at Site 2 (160.00 × 103 MPN/100 ml) and lower during monsoon at Site 4 (0.14 × 103 MPN/100 ml). In general, the higher counts of coliform bacteria at Site 2 were attributed to the rapid growth of the population in that area that was encouraged by discharging of domestic wastes containing fecal matters through city drains and open defecation along the banks of the river. On the other hand, cold climatic condition of winter season was not supportive for bacterial duplication and makes the lower count of total coliform during winter (Tiefenthaler et al. 2008). Generally, the number of total TCs during the study period was higher than FC, which might be due to the fact that FC is a subset of TC (Prescott et al. 1996).

FC count was highest during summer at Site 2 (2.20 × 102 MPN/100 ml) and lowest at Site 4 (0.04 × 102 MPN/100 ml) during monsoon season. Most of the septic tanks of Rajshahi City are connected with municipal drains, which are one of the major sources of fecal coliform bacteria in Padma River. Most of the household garbage and industrial garbage flow into the Padma River through the drains located at Site 2, which contributed to the higher fecal coliform level at this location. It is a common practice for people living along the river to discharge their domestic and agricultural wastes as well as human excreta into river directly which are also responsible for bringing about higher FC counts at Site 2.

Another study revealed that higher TC and FC were strongly associated with rainfall and sewage sources (Crowther et al. 2001; Vincent et al. 2006). However, the higher concentration of fecal coliform during summer season might be the reason for low water level, high organic matter, low bacterivores and optimum growth-supporting nutrient that favor bacterial growth. Similar result was also reported by Jithesh and Radhakrishnan (2015) in water of Chaliyar River, Kerala, India. They also reported higher cell count of fecal coliform during summer season. Higher temperature is also attributed to high load of indicator bacteria which was early reported by Isobe et al. (2004). There was also a significant difference (p < 0.05) of FC counts among seasons while differences among sites were insignificant (Table 3).

In the present study, significantly higher VC count was also recorded during summer at Site 2 (5.21 × 103 cfu/ml) and the lowest at Site 1 (0.29 × 103 cfu/ml) during monsoon season. The possible reason for higher VC during summer might also be due to low water level and sewage contamination which is in agreement with Kenyon et al. (1984).

Relationship between physicochemical and bacteriological parameters

The relationships between physicochemical and bacterial parameters of Padma River water during the three studied seasons are shown in Tables 4, 5 and 6, respectively. During summer season, THB has significant positive correlation with NO3-N, PO4-P and FC, while it has significant negative correlation with DO. TC has significant positive correlation with BOD5, EC, TH, TA, NO3-N, PO4-P and FC and significant negative correlation with DO. FC has significant positive correlation with TA, NO3-N and PO4-P and significant negative correlation with DO. VC has significant positive correlation with TDS, EC, TH, TA, NO3-N and PO4-P (Table 4). During monsoon season, THB has significant positive correlation with EC and VC, while TC did not show significant relation with any of the physicochemical and bacterial parameters. FC showed significant positive correlation with DO and BOD5, and VC was strongly influenced by EC and THB (Table 5). During winter season, THB showed significant positive correlation with EC, TH, FC and VC while significant negative correlation with DO. TC has significant positive correlation with TDS, NO3-N and PO4-P. FC was significantly and positively correlated with BOD5, EC, TH, TA, PO4-P and THB, while it has significant negative correlation with DO. However, VC only has significant positive correlation with EC and THB (Table 6). The negative influence of DO on bacterial parameters during summer and winter seasons agrees with the higher bacterial density which causes the depletion of DO that could be anticipated to the higher rate of microbial decomposition of the excessive organic matter discharged directly into water body (Singh et al. 2002). High BOD5 values and temperature also support the much proliferation of bacteria during this season since BOD5 provides a direct measurement of state of pollution. Relationship between BOD5 and microbial count implies that at high organic loading rates, the ecosystem favors the growth of anaerobes (Mtui and Nakamurs 2006). Although during monsoon season water level of river was high, significant positive relation of FC with DO and BOD5 indicates the mixing of domestic wastes along with flood water.

Table 4 Correlation matrix of physicochemical and bacterial parameters of Padma River during summer season
Table 5 Correlation matrix of physicochemical and bacterial parameters of Padma River during monsoon season
Table 6 Correlation matrix of physicochemical and bacterial parameters of Padma River during winter season

Conclusions

It can be concluded that the water of the Padma River is contaminated with domestic waste, fecal materials and industrial wastewater. The counts of THB, TC, FC and VC were highest at Site 2 (Padma Garden) during summer season which indicates household and recreational activities should be in control during this season. The present study suggests a regular monitoring and effective management strategy to be taken to protect this water body from further pollution.