Abstract
Bacteria-specific uptake rates of three different protozoan taxa on a pure and mixed bacterial community was studied by means of a simplified and functionally reproducible experimental model. The bacterial species Shigella flexneri, Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi were isolated and classified from stool samples of patients suffering from diarrhea. Paramecium caudatum, Tetrahymena pyriformis and Halteria grandinella, free living ciliate Protozoans, were isolated and identified from Tigris river water. Pure and mixed (E. coli + S. typhi), (E. coli + Sh. flexneri) bacterial cultures were used with each ciliate genera to evaluate the following: predator duplication rate, prey reduction rate, clearance rate and net grazing rate. We used selective lactose fermentation phenomena of enteric bacteria on MacConkey medium for the quantification of bacteria cultural characteristics. The final bacteria concentration was reduced by growing protozoa of 98–99.9 % compared to protozoa-free controls. It showed that Tetrahymena pyriformis had the highest duplication rate (4.13 time/day) in both types of cultures (pure and mixed), followed by Paramecium caudatum and Halteria grandinella, respectively. Paramecium caudatum had the highest rate of ingestion in both types of cultures (26 × 103 bacteria/organism/hr) and yielded the longest time required for 90 % bacterial reduction in a pure suspension of S. typhi (166 h). Clearance rates of pathogenic bacteria by ciliates ranged between 106 nanoliter/organism/h by P. caudatum to S. typhi and 1.92 nanoliter/organism/h seen in T. pyriformis in (E. coli + S. typhi) mixed culture. We used aquatic experimental microcosms under controlled conditions to explore bacteria-dependent ciliate growth and examined whether these ciliates could discriminate between equally sized bacterial preys in a mixture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The interactions of protozoa and bacteria perhaps represent the oldest predator–prey relationships we may study in nature (Jurgens and Gude 1994). Therefore, the understanding of the micro-ecosystem and the relationship between protozoa and disease-causing bacteria within contaminated water has become increasingly important in the context of freshwater purification and pollution control design. Among the most important factors controlling bacterial communities in polluted river water is the ciliates’ ability to graze on a variety of bacterial species (Jennifer et al. 2008; Kathol et al. 2009; Ana et al. 2010); they can partly control bacterial standing stock abundance by preferentially removing dividing cells (Simek et al. 1997). Diverse ciliates exhibit different feeding types; some of them up taking suspended bacteria, while some preferably feed on surface-binding bacteria. It appears that different protistan species possess a variety of selection mechanisms which may be important for discriminating between food and non-food objects, rather than between different bacterial strains, (Boenigk et al. 2002) and implies that different bacteria are probably ingested and metabolized at different rates. This finding is deduced from laboratory studies of protozoa feeding which have shown significant taxon-specific differences in feeding mechanisms and selectivity (Fenchel 1986). The impacts of ciliate grazing on bacterial communities and prey selectivity are based on the complex interplay of several factors. These include grazing differences in the sensitivity of bacterial species to grazing, differences in responses of single bacterial populations to grazing (size flexibility and physiology) (Jan Jezbera et al. 2005), and also other impacts are direct and indirect influence of grazing on bacterial growth conditions (modifying, e.g., substrate supply) and bacterial competition via elimination of competitors. Additionally, other studies have revealed other non-morphological traits such as release of defense metabolites or toxins, changes in prey size, motility, charge and hydrophobicity that affect bacterial vulnerability to protozoan feeding (Pohnert et al. 2007).
However, quantitative studies on the pathogenic bacteria grazing rates by freshwater ciliates are few, because usage of the present means (e.g., microscopy) for the identification of prey types is limited and time-consuming. It is still unknown whether or not human harmful bacteria grazing rates by bacterivorous ciliates respond in a similar manner as natural bacteria grazing rates. Here, we describe studies designed to investigate protistan bacteria uptake of some of the different Enterobacteriaceae species that are routinely found in polluted influents, in semi-natural micro-environments, which are monitored by using differential lactose fermentation on MacConkey agar.
The experiments were designed to test two hypotheses:
-
(1)
Freshwater ciliate assemblages form bacterial grazing morphs in the presence of pathogenic bacteria.
-
(2)
The effects of bacterivorous ciliates are important in the clearance rate of bacterial polluted water.
Materials and methods
Bacterivorous ciliate isolation
Freshwater samples were taken directly from 0.2 m depth in 500 ml 7 cm diameter orifice bottles precleaned with dilute HCl, or by using PUF polyurethane foam as described in (Muqi and Wood 1999), from the pelagic zone of Tigris river, located in the beach of Baghdad University (Jaderyah location), Baghdad, Iraq. Samples were collected from the river at 2–3 days intervals from May to September; the water temperature was 13–20 °C. The samples were processed within 2 h of sampling. Ciliate species used in these experiments were isolated as single cells. After ciliate isolation by the dilution method (Fenchel 1982) and their classification according to (Jahn et al. 1980; Kudo 1954), their culturing occurred in a covered, sterile 500 ml flask containing 300 ml of sterile (15 min, 121 °C, 15 lb/in2) autoclaved river water, with growing bacteria. Prior to the introduction of protozoans into the grazing experiments, 4–10 days old ciliate cultures grown at room temperature (around 20 °C) were taken from maintenance cultures, gently concentrated by centrifugation and washed five times with 20 ml of autoclaved bacteria-free (0.2-μm-pore-size filters) tap water supplied with antibiotic (penicillin) to remove most of the original bacteria present in the maintenance cultures and to ensure the absence of interfering coliform (no aberrant bacteria colonies observed on MacConkey medium).
Maintenance of bacterivorous protozoans
All protozoa were cultured in bacterised water of the river. Ciliates were cultured and maintained on an uncharacterized assemblage of 0.5–2 μm-long rods. Cocci natural bacteria that isolated from Tigris river water grew as suspensions, maintained by their culturing on yeast extract agar and incubating at 25 °C for 48 h to reach the exponential phase. These bacteria were inoculated into ciliate vessel, to maintain protozoan life, before doing experiments.
Pathogenic bacteria strain isolation
150 stool samples of patients suffering from diarrhea who went to the Central Child Hospital and Central Health Laboratory in Baghdad from October 2000 to May 2001 were processed to isolate O157:H7 Strain of E. coli, S. typhi and Sh. flexneri. The bacterial species were diagnosed by using physical characteristics, Epi20E system and biochemical and serological tests. Pathogenic bacteria suspensions were maintained by growing on nutrient broth (Difco Laboratories) at 37 °C.
Experimental design
Diarrhea-causing species of bacteria were harvested at exponential culture phase, centrifuged (5,900×g, 20 min), washed and suspended in 10 ml of 0.45 μm filtered Tigris river water in 30 ml screw-capped tubes in duplicate (initial average bacterial concentration, 3 × 106 to 6 × 106 cells/ml). Culturing of autoclaved or roughly filtered river water was compared with 0.45 μm filtered water samples on MacConkey medium to check the efficacy to exclude the putative effect of endogenous coliform. There were no significant differences (data not shown). To reduce the count of indigenous bacteria in ciliate inocula, 40 ml of protozoan suspension was washed with autoclaved river water + antibiotics and centrifuged three times for 10 min at 2,000–5,000 rpm according to their size. The pellets were carefully overlaid with 3 ml autoclaved river water, counted with a Buerker counting chamber and then re-suspended to reach the desired concentration.
Ciliates were added to 30 ml vessels as 10 ml ciliate culture suspension and allowed to acclimate for 3–4 h prior to prey introduction. Then, pure and mixed prepared bacterial suspensions were inoculated into the vessel and incubated at 25 °C with shaking (30 times/min) for up to 384 h.
Protozoan grazing evaluation in pure and mixed bacterial feed
In pure culture, prey (bacteria) and predator (bacterivorous protozoan) counting was done by sampling in triplicate according to a time series ranging from 0 to 384 h (depending on the grazer species). Aliquots of 1 ml were collected at each 0, 24, 48, 72, 120, 144, 168, 192, and 384 h time point after the time of prey addition. The number of non-grazed living bacteria as well as control bacteria count was monitored as distinctive colonies on the Enterobacteriaceae selective medium (MacConkey agar) by culturing under experimental conditions with time. The predators were enumerated by slide chamber counting under light microscope. To estimate individual protozoan grazing, we divided the uptake rates of bacteria (evaluated by MacConkey culture) by ciliate abundance (monitored by hematocytometer).
For evaluation of nonspecific grazing, the particular ciliate culture was inoculated with E. coli, S. typhi or Sh. flexneri singly and colony forming unit (CFU) numbers were determined directly by counting the lactose-fermented colonies (E. coli is a lactose fermenter and has pink color colonies on MacConkey agar), when incubated at 37 °C for 24 h.
An assay of species-selective grazing in mixed cultures was done, by ciliate exposure to certain concentrations of two bacteria combinations (E. coli + S. typhi) or (E. coli + Sh. flexneri). Bacterial mixtures were added to bacterivorous organism’s suspension vessel and incubated at 25 °C for the aforementioned time series. At each time point, a particular volume was removed from the reactor vessel for direct protozoan count by cytometer slide counting, while mixed enteric bacteria were enumerated by their differential lactose fermentation on MacConkey agar (E. coli have pink colonies, while S. typhi or Sh. flexneri are non-lactose fermented and have white colonies).
Parameter calculation
-
1.
The percentage of grazing rate was calculated according to the equation:
$$\begin{gathered} \% {\text{ grazing rate }} = \, 100 \, \times \, \left[ {{\text{CFU on control plate }}\left( {\text{without the predator}} \right)} \right] \, \hfill \\ {-}\;\left[ {{\text{CFU on test plate }}\left( {\text{with the predator}} \right)} \right]/\left[ {{\text{CFU on control plate }}\left( {\text{without the predator}} \right)} \right]. \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$ -
2.
Daily duplication rate (time/day) \(R = \frac{\log B - \log A}{\log 2}\)where A is the number of ciliates on day1 and B the number of ciliates on day 2 (Curds and Vandyke 1966).
-
3.
Ingestion rate (bacteria/ciliate/h) \(I.R = \frac{No - Nt}{t(Hr)} \times \frac{1}{Np}\) where N0 is the prey (bacteria) count at zero time, Nt the prey count at (t) time and Np the count of bacterivorous ciliates (Carrias et al. 1996).
-
4.
Clearance rate (nanoliter/ciliate/h) CR = IR/Ci × 106 (CR: clearance rate, IR: ingestion rate, Ci: concentration of prey; Pfister and Arndt 1998).
Statistical analysis
All presented results were analyzed as experimental points, obtained in triplicate and indicated as means of significance levels that were determined by Student’s t test analysis at 95 % confidence interval (CI). The analysis was done using Graph-pad Prism 5.0 software. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered as the statistical difference between groups in all the tests performed.
Results
The use of MacConkey agar (Enterobacteriaceae selective medium) yields a sufficiently strong and distinguishable approach, which allows a relatively precise quantification of the targeted bacterial cell uptake by the studied bacterivorous protists.
Growth and food requirements of ciliates in pure culture
Pathogenic bacteria sustained the growth rate and duplication of the studied ciliates clearly (see Fig. 1). The addition of pathogenic bacteria to the ciliate organism culture vessel resulted in the expected fast development of protozoan numbers into logarithmic growth state, especially during the first 2 days of the experiment. S. typhi was the most ingested species than others in their pure culture, followed by its shared culture with E. coli. The importance of bacteria for ciliate growth ranged from very relevant (as for Tetrahymena pyriformis) to slightly low dependency, (Halteria grandinella), which may reflect the variable bacterial nutritional values, such as vital amino acids, provided to ciliates.
The highest prey concentration was 108 bacteria/ml. However, maximum ingestion rates were attained by all grazers at 107 bacteria/ml. The minimum prey concentration that was ingested was 103 bacteria/ml (see Fig. 2). S. typhi had the highest maximum ingestion rate, attaining 26 × 103 bacteria/ciliate/h at a prey concentration of 108 bacteria/ml by Paramecium caudatum. The lowest prey concentration, while still inducing bacterial uptake, was observed in 1.3 × 103 bacteria/ml for Sh. flexneri by Tetrahymena pyriformis. Consumption of prey was not observed for Paramecium sp. below 1 × 104 bacteria/ml, where bacteria were ingested at 3 × 103 cells/ciliate/h.
At low bacterial concentrations (6 × 106 bacteria/ml), the rates of ingestion were markedly reduced to between 1/2 and 1/3 of the maximal levels (data not shown). We examined ciliate grazing by comparing and quantifying the proportions of bacterial prey concentration versus prey ingested by protists. Figure 5b shows the results of ingestion experiments of three ciliates species feeding on both pure and mixed bacterial strains (S. typhi + E coli) or (Sh. flexneri + E. coli), monitored by lactose fermentation. In parallel with increasing ciliate numbers, bacteria dropped sharply under the influence of grazing. For example, the inoculation of Tetrahymena pyriformis with Sh. flexneri caused a bacterial decrease from 4.38 × 107 to 1.3 × 103 cells/ml, in contrast with increasing ciliate numbers during the first 4 days, and then both remained relatively stable. T. pyriformis abundance increased sharply to 2500 cells/ml (see Figs. 1, 2 and data not shown).
Growth and food consumption of ciliates in mixed culture
A maximum number of ciliate organisms accompanied with mixed bacterial count decline were observed with all studied ciliates except Halteria grandinella. The time of maximum growth ranged from 48 to 192 h for H. grandinella and T. pyriformis, respectively (see Fig. 3). T. pyriformis did not ingest bacteria under a density of 102 cell/ml.Ciliates showed fast exponential growth and reached up to 2.83 × 104 cells/ml, by T. pyriformis. During the experiment the mean individual grazing rate was up to 1.3 × 104 bacteria/ciliate/h, by Paramecium caudatum in the first bacterial mixture.
Although we still do not know the reasons for the slow H. grandinella growth, we decided to include this data set as an example of lower pathogenic bacteria grazing by the well-known freshwater bacterivorous ciliate that has bad grazing in comparison with obvious bacterivorous effect of others, in spite of their good duplication rate. For example, E. coli abundance decreased from 1.5 × 107 to 0.9 × 107cells/ml during the experiment period due to this ciliate organism.
Mixed bacteria count was reduced sharply under ciliate grazing pressure, approximately by all of the studied ciliates beginning from the second day (see Fig. 4).
Ciliate grazing resulted in a 1000- to 10000-fold decrease of mixed bacterial numbers within 2 days. E. coli + S typhi abundance dropped from 4.38 × 107 to 1.25 × 104 and from 1.03 × 108 to 8.8 × 104cell/ml, respectively, while E. coli + Sh. flexneri decreased from 4.38 × 107 to 6.3 × 104 and from 1.63 × 107 to 7.5 × 103 cell/ml, respectively, during just 2 days. Ciliate sp. grew constantly for 3–8 days before the expected decline in their count (Fig. 1).
Bacterial abundances in the control, predator-free vessel remained almost stable during the experiment, with slightly higher numbers (on average 2 × 105 cells/day/ml).
Comparison of ciliate bacterivory characteristics
Rate of duplication
Comparisons of ciliate division times in pure and mixed bacterial culture revealed an inverse relationship between the rate of replication and size of ciliates. Therefore, T.pyriformis ciliate was the fastest doubling organism among studies of ciliates (4.13 times/day) in mixed (S. typhi + E. coli) suspension (see Fig. 5a), followed by P. caudatum and H. grandinella. P. caudatum and T.pyriformis ciliates had a better duplication in the mixed than in the pure bacterial suspensions, while H. grandinella did not develop in mixed culture, but grew and multiplied only in the pure Shigella suspension (1.2 times/day).
Ciliate consumption rate of bacteria
Paramecium caudatum had the greatest rate of bacteria ingestion (26 × 103 bacteria/ciliate/h) in this study in the pure Salmonella suspension, with the Salmonella species being more prone to be eaten by ciliates, whether in the pure or mixed suspension. (Fig. 5b) followed by E. coli, while Shigella was the lowest consumed and preferable bacteria in this study.
The high rate of consumption of S. typhi was probably due to their high initial density in comparison with the others. All studied bacteria were negative for Gram staining and taxonomically belonged to the same family (Enterobacteriaceae). They have similarity in many phenotypic features except motility. Potential selection of Salmonella may be a result of positive chemotaxis of ciliates toward the protein (flagellin) that is composed of a large number of peripheral flagella or because flagellin is essential for the growth of several ciliate species, the reason Salmonella has a greater nutritional value than (for example) the Shigella species.
Even in mixed bacterial culture, S. typhi + E. coli was the most attractive mixture to graze by different species of ciliates, except H. grandinella that had the least appetite for pathogenic bacteria, with the one exception of Sh. Flexneri bacteria in pure culture.
The consumption rate was proportional to the size of the organism. Paramecium was the largest ciliate included in this study and it was the most bacterivorous, followed by Tetrahymena species that comes after it in the size.
Ciliate clearance rate
Pure bacterial culture was cleared at the highest rate by Paramecium. It was able to filtrate higher amount of water that containing all three types of bacteria (80, 106 and 97.4 nanoliter/ciliate/h, respectively; see Fig. 5c). T. pyriformis consumed E. coli at a considerably higher rate than S. typhi and Sh. flexneri (34, 2 and 2 nanoliter/ciliate/h), respectively, in pure culture. In mixed bacterial culture, also Paramecium had the highest bacterial ingestion rate, especially for E. coli and shigella mixture (96.4 nanolitre/ciliate/h), coming before T. pyriformis and H. grandinella, respectively. Our data here indicated clearance rate less than in previously documented experiments for some ciliates (Dolan 1991; Simek et al. 1995). in which lower bacterial densities were used.
The percentage of net ciliate grazing
In pure bacterial culture, T. pyriformis ciliate achieved the highest percentage of net grazing rate for all studied bacteria types, followed by P. caudatum and H. grandinella. The grazing of Salmonella was higher than the remaining two species, when grazed by Paramecium and Tetrahymena. Unusually, the grazing of Sh. flexneri was the highest by H. grandinella only (see Fig. 5d). In the mixed bacterial culture, also T. pyriformis and P. caudatum achieved the highest rates of net grazing, while H. grandinella did not achieve any grazing net rate in the mixed culture.
In general, the rate of grazing in the second mixture (Sh. flexneri + E. coli) is higher than that of the first mixture (S. typhi + E. coli).
What is the reason for significant reduction of ciliate net grazing calculation? The loss of bacteria in the control vessels may be accelerated by unrecognizable reasons that leads to underestimation of values obtained by subtraction the rate of reduction of bacteria by ciliate organism in comparison with control vessel count (bacteria without ciliate). Generally, the results of net grazing agree with the previously published results (Drift et al. 1977; Warren 2001) that show theoretically ciliates’ ability to remove all enteric bacteria from sewage, but there are other mechanisms that make their contribution up to 50 % of elimination, such as antagonism and competition (Sherr and Sherr 1987). However, it was ensured that ciliates alone were responsible for 100 % of the total protozoan bacterivory of bacteria.
Discussion
The ciliate grazing impact of bacteria (especially pathogenic bacteria) is essential to evaluate their role in auto-recovery of polluted water, such as in effluent of domestic wastes. Hence, the purpose of this study was to measure the initial ingestion rates of three species of bacterivorous ciliates over a wide range of prey concentrations of three human pathogenic bacteria species.
Our data showed that ingestion rates of different ciliate organisms increased with prey density and the uptake of three bacterial species ranged from 103 to 105 bacteria/ciliate/h, in 106–108 bacteria/ml range concentration. It can be argued that this is not real within the range of pathogenic bacteria concentrations, typically reported for river water. However, bacterial concentrations can reach much higher concentrations at times or in areas of high productivity (Santos et al. 2007). Prey size is well documented as the most important property which influences ingestion and selection, but in our study we used three enteric bacterial species, characteristically similar, as targets to prevent size-selective grazing from taking place. For selectivity testing, we used highly concentrated bacteria in almost all experiments, because it has been well documented that increased selectivity occurs after acclimation to higher bacterial concentrations (~107 cells/ml). There is no direct evidence that under typical natural conditions with relatively low prey abundance, ciliates do select for or against certain bacterial species or groups and the discrimination may decrease at lower concentrations (Boenigk et al. 2001). Therefore the uptake rates of ciliates might be modulated by prey concentration decline. Decreased ingestion rates at a certain prey density suggests a possible prey concentration threshold, below which the ciliate’s ability to graze human pathogenic bacteria diminishes. Other characteristic features such as surface charge, mobility or chemical composition of cell wall may be involved in differential digestion of bacteria, as Gram-negative bacteria are generally digested more rapidly than Gram-positive cells (Ronn et al. 2002).
Theoretically, in contrast with natural bacteria, the pathogenic strains are not capable of balancing grazing losses, and growth rates are likely to be present in natural assemblages, due to unsuitable environmental conditions, resulting in almost complete eradication of human pathogenic strains.
Studies of taxon-specific bacterivory have shown that among pelagic ciliates, the most important consumers of bacteria in both marine and freshwaters are often small oligotrichs (Sherr and Sherr 1987; Simek et al. 1995; 1996; Thouvenot et al. 1999) such as the genus Halteria. The species H. grandinella has been identified as an abundant bacterial consumer and is common and widespread in several meso- and eutrophic lakes and freshwater ponds (Simek et al. 2000).
In our study, ciliate H. grandinella was the lowest consumer of pathogenic bacteria, partially because this small filter-feeding ciliate is an omnivorous species which is able to efficiently feed on a wider prey size spectrum from 0.5 to 5 μm, covering heterotrophic and autotrophic pico- and nanoplankton in its diet (Jürgens and Simek 2000). Therefore, they did not depend on living bacteria only, but detritus also serve as potential food source or it is negatively influenced by other suspended non-grazable particles.
The main food uptake mechanism of the studied ciliates was surface dwelling, which permits ingestion rates of ciliates to be higher in sediment-associated bacteria than those in suspension. This is because the growth of bacteria attached to surfaces presents localized areas of high prey density allowing ciliates to ingest efficiently and reduce searching time and amount of effort spent on capture of prey as opposed to filtering prey from suspension, allowing energy to be conserved for other metabolic processes.
Each protozoan species shows highest clearance rates for a distinct bacteria species, and for larger ciliates this range may even change with the size of the predator during its life cycle (Fenchel 1980). The bacteria may play an important role in the development and growth of ciliates: positively (for example) by releasing some peptides that are required for suppression of ciliate encystment (Yukari Otani and Tatsuomi Matsuoka 2010) or negatively as some prey types exhibit behavioral defensive strategies, such as exopolymer formation, aggregation, prey stickiness and electrostatic or hydrodynamic factors generation (Montagnes et al. 2008) that minimize prey contact with predator. With some ciliates, the bacterial count increased slightly at the end of the time series. This may due to high rates of survived bacteria that released into the environment through food vacuoles exocytosis would be more likely to be recovered as CFUs by plating either vacuoles or bacteria released from vacuoles; this in addition to fact of regeneration of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus by the grazers might have stimulated bacteria growth.
The difference in the ciliate selection of bacteria may be based on prey characteristics and predator physiological status. Therefore, we used the ciliates at logarithmic growth phase due to low nutrition state during constancy phase (Decamp et al. 1999), as the size of protozoan organisms varied greatly according to the feeding rate and ciliate ingestion rate depending on the size (Pelegri et al. 1999). The anaerobic conditions created by heavy bacterial growth may be a reason for decrease in ciliate H. grandinella count. There are some ciliates such as T. periformes that devour each other upon reaching certain density as well as cause the accumulation of some toxic metabolic substances that reduce both ciliate growth rate and their bacterial prey ingestion. Also, the physical contact of ciliates or reluctance behavior may limit their count. Ciliate organic debris may provide suitable matter and place for bacteria multiplication protect them from bacterivous ciliates and affecting the conditions in the accounts of prey-predator (Caron 1991). So we took into account as much as possible the conditions that ensured the stability of bacterial density during the experiment time.
In this study, we attempted to directly measure protozoan food preferences employing lactose sugar bacterial fermentation as indicator. The results obtained from this study suggest the possibility of using this method as a qualitative and quantitative measure of ciliate predation of Enterobacteriaceae family members that differ in this manner. In future, we will use different sugars for further analysis of protozoan preferences, especially when assessing other enteric bacteria species.
References
Ana MM, Carsten M, Staffan K, Mike M (2010) Identification of Ciliate Grazers of Autotrophic Bacteria in Ammonia-Oxidizing Activated Sludge by RNA Stable Isotope Probing. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(7):2203–2211
Boenigk J, Matz C, Jürgens K, Arndt H (2001) Influence of preculturing conditions and food quality on the ingestion and digestion processes of three species of heterotrophic nanoflagellate. Microb Ecol 42:168–176
Boenigk J, Matz C, Jürgens K, Arndt H (2002) Food concentration dependent regulation of food selectivity of interception feeding bacterivorous nanogflagellates. Aquat Microb Ecol 27:195–202
Caron DA (1991) Evolving role of protozoa in aquatic nutrient cycles. NATO ASI series, G25: 387–415
Carrias JF, Amblard C, Bourdier G (1996) Protistan Bacterivory in an oligomesotrophic Lake: importance of attached ciliates and flagellates. Microb Ecol 31:249–268
Curds CR, Vandyke JM (1966) The feeding Habits and growth rates of some fresh water, ciliates found in activated Sludge plants. J Appl Eco 3:127
Decamp O, Warren A, Sanchez R (1999) The rate of ciliated protozoa in subsurface flow wet lands and Their potential bioindicators. Wat Sci Tech 40(3):91–98
Dolan JR (1991) Guilds of ciliate microzooplankton in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 33:137–152
Drift CV, Seggelen EV, Stumm C, Hol W, Tuinte J (1977) Removal of E. coli. in waste water by activated sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 34(3):315–319
Fenchel T (1980) Suspension feeding in ciliated protozoa functional response and particle size selection. Microb Ecol 6:1–11
Fenchel T (1982) Ecology of heterotrophic microflagellates. I. Some important forms and their functional morphology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 8:211–223
Fenchel T (1986) The ecology of heterotrophic microflagellates. Adv Microb Ecol 9:57–97
Jahn TL, Bovee EC, Jahn FF (1980) How to know the protozoa, 2nd edn. Wm. C. Brown Co. publishers, USA, pp 1–42
Jezbera J, Hornak K, Simek K (2005) Food selection by bacterivorous protists: insight from the analysis of the food vacuole content by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 52:351–363
Jurgens K, Gude H (1994) The potential importance of grazing-resistant bacteria in planktonic systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 112:169–188
Jürgens K, Simek K (2000) Functional response and particle size selection of Halteria cf. grandinella, a common freshwater oligotrichous ciliate. Aquat Microb Ecol 22:57–68
Kathol M, Norf H, Arndt H, Weitere M (2009) Effects of temperature increase on the grazing of planktonic bacteria by biofilm-dwelling consumers. Aquat Microb Ecol 55:65–79
Kudo RR (1954) Protozoology. 4th ed. Charles C. Thomas, spring field. I Illinois
Montagnes DJS, Barbosa AB, Boenigk J, Davidson K, Jürgens K, Macek M, Parry Emily JD, Roberts C, Simek K (2008) Selective feeding behaviour of key free-living protists: avenues for continued study. Aquat Microb Ecol 53:83–98
Muqi X, Wood B (1999) Preliminary Study of protozoa of Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland. Biology and Environment proceedings of the Royal Irish academy. 99 (2):103–108
Pelegri SP, Christaki V, Dolan J, Rassoalzadegan F (1999) Particulate and dissolved organic carbon production by the heterotrophic nano flagellate pteridomonasdanica. Microbial Ecol 37:276–284
Pfister G, Arndt H (1998) Food Selectivity and Feeding behavior in omnivorous Filter-Feeding ciliates: a case Study for Stylonychia. Europ J protistol 34:446–457
Pohnert G, Steinke M, Tollrian R (2007) Chemical cues, defence metabolites and the shaping of pelagic interspecific interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:198–204
Ronn R, McCraig AE, Griffiths BS, Prosser JI (2002) Impact of protozoan grazing on bacterial community structure in soil microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:6094–6105
Santos L, Cunha A et al (2007) Influence of salt marsh on bacterial activity in two estuaries with different hydrodynamic characteristics (Ria De Aveiro and Tagus Estuary). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60(3):429–441
Sherr EB, Sherr BF (1987) High rate of consumption of bacteria by pelagic ciliate. Nature 325:710–711
Simek K, Bobková J, Macek M, Nedoma J, Psenner R (1995) Ciliate grazing on picoplankton in a eutrophic reservoir during the summer phytoplankton maximum: a study at the species and community level. Limnol Oceanogr 40(6):1077–1090
Simek K, Macek M, Pernthaler J, Psenner R, Strasˇkrabová V (1996) Can freshwater planktonic ciliates survive on a diet of picoplankton? J Plankton Res 18:597–613
Simek K, Vrba J, Pernthaler J, Posch T, Hartman P, Nedoma J, Psenner AR (1997) Morphological and compositional shifts in an experimental bacterial community influenced by protists with contrasting feeding modes. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(2):587–595
Simek K, Jürgens K, Nedoma J, Comerma M, Armengol J (2000) Ecological role and bacterial grazing of Halteria spp.: small freshwater oligotrichs as dominant pelagic ciliate bacterivores. Aquat Microb Ecol 22:43–56
Thouvenot A, Richardot M, Debroas D, Devaux J (1999) Bacterivory of metazooplankton, ciliates and flagellates in a newly-flooded reservoir. J Plankton Res 21:1659–1679
Warren A (2001) The activated sludge process, biological Sciences. Review 14(3):25–28
Wey JK, Scherwass A, Norf H, Arndt H, Weitere M (2008) Effects of protozoan grazing within river biofilms under semi-natural conditions. Aquat Microb Ecol 52:283–296
Yukari Otani and Tatsuomi Matsuoka (2010) Encystment-inducing factor “starvation” in ciliated protozoan Colpoda cucullus. Protistology 6(4):245–250
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, T.H., Saleh, D.S. A simplified experimental model for clearance of some pathogenic bacteria using common bacterivorous ciliated spp. in Tigris river. Appl Water Sci 4, 63–71 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0130-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0130-1