Skip to main content
Log in

Suspension feeding in ciliated protozoa: Functional response and particle size selection

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quantitative uptake of latex beads of different sizes and of live cells by 14 species of ciliates was studied. The functional response (uptake rate as function of food particle concentration) can be fitted to a hyperbolic function and this can be explained in terms of the function of the mouth apparatus. Each species shows a distinct size spectrum of particles which are retained and ingested. These size spectra may be explained by mouth morphology, and particle size selection may play a role for niche separation of coexisting ciliates. Most bacterivorous holotrich ciliates retain particles down to 0.2μm and in one case down to 0.1μm; they retain particles between 0.3 and 1μm most efficiently. The spirotrich ciliates investigated do not retain particles smaller than 1–2μm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coleman, A. S.: The metabolism ofEscherichia coli and other bacteria byEntodinium caudatum. J. Gen. Microbiol.37, 209–223 (1964)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crowley, P. H.: Filtering rate inhibition ofDaphnia pulex in Wintergreen Lake water. Limnol. Oceanogr.18, 394–402 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Curds, C. R., and A. Cockburn: Studies on the growth and feeding ofTetrahymena pyriformis in axenic and monoxenic culture. J. Gen. Microbiol.54, 343–358 (1968)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dive, D.: La nutrition holozoique des protozoaires cilies. Ses conséquences dans l'épuration naturelle et artificielle. Ann. Biol.12, 343–380 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fenchel, T.: The ecology of marine microbenthos. II. The food of marine benthic ciliates. Ophelia5, 73–121 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fenchel, T.: Suspension feeding in ciliated protozoa: structure and function of feeding organelles. Arch. Protistenk.123(in press)

  7. Fenchel, T.: Suspension feeding in ciliated protozoa: feeding rates and the ecological significance. Microb. Ecol. (this volume)

  8. Fenchel, T. and E. B. Small: Structure and function of the oral cavity and its organelles in the hymenostome ciliateGlaucoma. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. (in press)

  9. Giese, A. C. (ed.):Blepharisma: The Biology of a Light-Sensitive Protozoan. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton, R. D., and J. E. Preslan: Observations on the continuous culture of a planktonic phagotrophic protozoan. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.5, 94–104 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heinbokel, J. F.: Studies on the functional role of tintinnids in the Southern California Bight. I. Grazing and growth rates in laboratory cultures. Mar. Biol.47, 177–189 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holling, C. S.: Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol.91, 385–398 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jørgensen, C. B.: Biology of Suspension Feeding. Pergamon, Oxford (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jørgensen, C. B.: Suspension feeding. Handbook of Nutrition and Food, Sect. E. CRC Press, Cleveland (in press)

  15. Mueller, M., P. Röhlich, and I. Törö: Studies on feeding and digestion in protozoa. VII. Ingestion of polystyrene latex particles and its early effect on acid phosphatase inParamecium multimicronucleatum andTetrahymena pyriformis. J. Protozool.12, 27–34 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mullin, M. M., and E. F. Stewart: Ingestion by planktonic grazers as a function of concentration of food. Limnol. Oceanogr.20, 259–262 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nilsson, J. R.: Further studies on vacuole formation inTetrahymena pyriformis GL. C. R. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg39, 83–110 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rapport, D. J., J. Berger, and D. B. W. Reid: Determination of food preference ofStentor coeruleus. Biol. Bull.142, 103–109 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor, W. D.: Growth responses of ciliate protozoa to the abundance of their bacterial prey. Microb. Ecol.4, 207–214 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor, W. D., and J. Berger: Growth responses of cohabiting ciliate protozoa to various prey bacteria. Can. J. Zool.54, 1111–1114 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenchel, T. Suspension feeding in ciliated protozoa: Functional response and particle size selection. Microb Ecol 6, 1–11 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020370

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020370

Keywords

Navigation