Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of statistical index and index of entropy methods to landslide susceptibility assessment in Gongliu (Xinjiang, China)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the results applying the statistical index and the index of entropy methods for estimating landslide susceptibility in Gongliu County, China. In order to do this, first, a landslide inventory map was constructed mainly based on earlier reports and aerial photographs as well as by carrying out field surveys. Then the landslide inventory was randomly divided into two datasets 70 % (163 landslides) for training the models and the remaining 30 % (70 landslides) was used for validation purpose. The landslide conditioning factors consist of slope angle, slope aspect, altitude, general curvature, plan curvature, profile curvature, distance to rivers, distance to roads, normalized difference vegetation index, sediment transport index, rainfall, and lithology. The relationships between landslide distributions and these parameters were analyzed using the two models, and the results of both the models were then used to calculate the landslide susceptibility of the entire study area. Finally, the accuracy of the landslide susceptibility maps was evaluated based on the area under the curve (AUC) method. The validation results showed that the statistical index model (AUC = 82.51 %) is slightly lower than the index of entropy model (AUC = 82.80 %) for success rate. Nevertheless, for the prediction rate, it was found that the statistical index model (AUC = 77.90 %) is slightly lower than the index of entropy model (AUC = 77.41 %). The landslide susceptibility maps produced from this study were successful and can be useful for preliminary general land use planning and hazard mitigation purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed B, Ahmed R, Zhu X (2013) Evaluation of model validation techniques in land cover dynamics. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 2(3):577–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgun A, Dag S, Bulut F (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ Geol 54(6):1127–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65(1):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1(1):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarik M, Magulová B, Matys M, Marschalko M (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment of the Kraľovany-Liptovský Mikuláš railway case study. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 35(3):162–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijukchhen SM, Kayastha P, Dhital MR (2013) A comparative evaluation of heuristic and bivariate statistical modelling for landslide susceptibility mappings in Ghurmi-Dhad Khola, east Nepal. Arab J Geosci 6(8):2727–2743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJF, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards 30(3):451–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40(3):381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir G, Aytekin M, Akgün A, İkizler SB, Tatar O (2013) A comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping of the eastern part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and analytic hierarchy process methods. Nat Hazards 65(3):1481–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devkota KC, Regmi AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Althuwaynee OF (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards 65(1):135–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragićević S, Lai T, Balram S (2015) GIS-based multicriteria evaluation with multiscale analysis to characterize urban landslide susceptibility in data-scarce environments. Habitat Int 45:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41(6):720–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Eng Geol 75(3):229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C, Van Asch TW (2004) Landslide susceptibility zoning north of Yenice (NW Turkey) by multivariate statistical techniques. Nat Hazards 32(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erener A, Mutlu A, Düzgün HS (2015) A comparative study for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), logistic regression (LR) and association rule mining (ARM). Eng Geol. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.09.007

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66(1):327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He S, Pan P, Dai L, Wang H, Liu J (2012) Application of kernel-based Fisher discriminant analysis to map landslide susceptibility in the Qinggan River delta, Three Gorges, China. Geomorphology 171:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intarawichian N, Dasananda S (2011) Frequency ratio model based landslide susceptibility mapping in lower Mae Chaem watershed, Northern Thailand. Environ Earth Sci 64(8):2271–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaafari A, Najafi A, Pourghasemi HR, Rezaeian J, Sattarian A (2014) GIS-based frequency ratio and index of entropy models for landslide susceptibility assessment in the Caspian forest, northern Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11(4):909–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan M, Saranathan E, Anabalagan R (2013) Landslide vulnerability mapping using frequency ratio model: a geospatial approach in Bodi-Bodimettu Ghat section, Theni district, Tamil Nadu, India. Arab J Geosci 6(8):2901–2913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan M, Saranathan E, Anbalagan R (2015) Comparative analysis in GIS-based landslide hazard zonation—a case study in Bodi-Bodimettu Ghat section, Theni District, Tamil Nadu, India. Arab J Geosci 8(2):691–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol 85(3):347–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides 11(3):425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavzoglu T, Sahin EK, Colkesen I (2015) An assessment of multivariate and bivariate approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Duzkoy district. Nat Hazards 76(1):471–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Dhital MR, De Smedt F (2013) Evaluation of the consistency of landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from the Kankai watershed in east Nepal. Landslides 10(6):785–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komac M (2006) A landslide susceptibility model using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia. Geomorphology 74(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2005a) Application and cross-validation of spatial logistic multiple regression for landslide susceptibility analysis. Geosci J 9(1):63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2005b) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 26(7):1477–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Dan NT (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility mapping in the Lai Chau province of Vietnam: focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides. Environ Geol 48(6):778–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ Geol 50(6):847–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ Geol 47(7):982–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Min K, Won JS (2003) Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network. Earth Surf Proc Land 28(12):1361–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Won JS, Park HJ (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71(3):289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Chen X, Yang S (2014) Collapse landslide and mudslides hazard zonation. Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment. Springer, Berlin, pp 457–462

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Long NT (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the mountainous area in A Luoi district, Thua Thien Hue province, Vietnam. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

  • Mathew J, Jha VK, Rawat GS (2009) Landslide susceptibility zonation mapping and its validation in part of Garhwal Lesser Himalaya, India, using binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve method. Landslides 6(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q, Miao F, Zhen J, Wang X, Wang A, Peng Y, Fan Q (2015) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping with logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and combined fuzzy and support vector machine methods: a case study from Wolong Giant Panda Natural Reserve, China. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s10064-015-0786-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Durmaz S (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey). Geomorphology 94(3):401–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir A, Altural T (2013) A comparative study of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: Sultan Mountains, SW Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci 64:180–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012a) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin, Iran. Catena 97:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012b) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards 63(2):965–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38(2):301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan AMS, Kim YT (2014) Relative effect method of landslide susceptibility zonation in weathered granite soil: a case study in Deokjeok-ri Creek, South Korea. Nat Hazards 72(2):1189–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Model Softw 25(6):747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). Geosci Remote Sens IEEE Trans 48(12):4164–4177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XM (2007)Based on GIS landslide geological disaster hazard evaluation research-taking Gongliu county as example. Master Thesis, Xinjiang University, Ürümqi, p 45

  • Regmi AD, Devkota KC, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Kumamoto T, Akgun A (2014) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci 7(2):725–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozos D, Bathrellos GD, Skillodimou HD (2011) Comparison of the implementation of rock engineering system and analytic hierarchy process methods, upon landslide susceptibility mapping, using GIS: a case study from the Eastern Achaia County of Peloponnesus, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 63(1):49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi H, Khezri S, Ahmad BB, Hashim M (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping at central Zab basin, Iran: a comparison between analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Catena 115:55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi H, Hashim M, Ahmad BB (2015) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and fuzzy logic methods at the central Zab basin, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 73(12):8647–8668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solaimani K, Mousavi SZ, Kavian A (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Arab J Geosci 6(7):2557–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71(3):303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eeckhaut M, Vanwalleghem T, Poesen J, Govers G, Verstraeten G, Vandekerckhove L (2006) Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: a case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Geomorphology 76(3):392–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Westen C (1997) Statistical landslide hazard analysis ILWIS 2.1 for Windows application guide. ITC Publication, Enschede, pp 73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TW, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(2):167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Li W, Chen W, Bai H (2015) GIS-based assessment of landslide susceptibility using certainty factor and index of entropy models for the Qianyang County of Baoji City, China. J Earth Syst Sci 124(7):1399–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85(3):274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Qiao J, Zhang X (2010) Regional landslide zonation based on entropy method in Three Gorges area, China. IEEE International conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), vol 3. pp 1336–1339

  • Yang ZH, Lan HX, Gao X, Li LP, Meng YS, Wu YM (2015) Urgent landslide susceptibility assessment in the 2013 Lushan earthquake-impacted area, Sichuan Province, China. Nat Hazards 75(3):2467–2487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesilnacar EK (2005) The application of computational intelligence to landslide susceptibility mapping in Turkey (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Melbourne, Department, 200.)

  • Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79(3):251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat—Turkey). Comput Geosci 35(6):1125–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Al-Kathery M, Pradhan B (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Al-Hasher Area, Jizan (Saudi Arabia) using GIS-based frequency ratio and index of entropy models. Geosci J 19(1):113–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to everyone who provided assistance for the present study. The study is jointly supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project (Grant No. 2015CB251601), the State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (Grant No. 41430643) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41302248). The authors would also like to acknowledge two anonymous reviewers and editor for their helpful comments on the previous version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiqing Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Li, W., Wu, Y. et al. Application of statistical index and index of entropy methods to landslide susceptibility assessment in Gongliu (Xinjiang, China). Environ Earth Sci 75, 599 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5400-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5400-4

Keywords

Navigation