Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landslide susceptibility mapping based on frequency ratio and logistic regression models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to apply and compare a probability model, frequency ratio and statistical model, and a logistic regression to Sajaroud area, Northern Iran using geographic information system. Landslide locations of the study area were detected from interpretation of aerial photographs and field surveys. Landslide-related factors such as elevation, slope gradient, slope aspect, slope curvature, rainfall, distance to fault, distance to drainage, distance to road, land use, and geology were calculated from the topographic and geology map and LANDSAT ETM satellite imagery. The spatial relationships between the landslide location and each landslide-related factor were analyzed and then landslide susceptibility maps were produced using the frequency ratio and forward stepwise logistic regression methods. Finally, the maps were tested and compared using known landslide locations, and success rates were calculated. Predicted accuracy values for frequency ratio (79.48%) and logistic regression models showed that the map obtained from frequency ratio model is more accurate than the logistic regression (77.4%) model. The models used in this study have shown a great deal of importance for watershed management and land use planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abolmasov B, Obradovic I (1997) Evaluation of geological parameters for landslide hazard mapping by fuzzy logic. In: Marinos PG, Koukis GC, Tsiambaos GC, Stourna GC (eds) Engineering geology and the environment. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 471–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Anbalagan R (1992) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. J Eng Geol 32:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda–Yahiko Mountains, central Japan. J Geomorphology 65:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeza C, Corominas J (2001) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques. J Earth Surf Process Landforms 26:1251–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barredol JI, Benavidesz A, Herhl J, van Westen CJ (2000) Comparing heuristic landslide hazard assessment techniques using GIS in the Tirajana basin, Gran Canaria Island, Spain. J Appl Earth Observation Geoinf 2:9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarik M, Magulova M, Matys M, Marschalko M (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment of the Kralovany–Liptovsky Mikulas railway case study. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 35(3–5):162–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binaghi E, Luzi L, Madella P, Pergalani F, Rampini A (1998) Slope instability zonation: a comparison between certainty factor and fuzzy Dempster–Shafer approaches. J Natural Hazards 17:77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists. Modeling with GIS. Pergamon, Oxford, p 398

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabb EE (1984) Innovative approaches to landslide hazard and risk mapping. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Landslides, Toronto, Canada, volume 1, pp 307–324

  • Can T, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Duman Y (2005) Susceptibility assessments of shallow earth flows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analysis. J Geomorphology 82:250–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Cardinalli M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (1995) GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazard. Kluwer, New York, pp 173–175

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P (2003) Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard. Earth Surf Process Landforms 28:1125–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascini L, Critelli S, Gulla G, Di Nocera S (1991) A methodological approach to landslide hazard assessment: a case history. In: Proc 16th Int Landslide Conference. Balkema: Rotterdam, pp 899–904

  • Cevik E, Topal T (2003) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey). J Environ Geol 44:949–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau KT, Chan JE (2005) Regional bias of landslide data in generating susceptibility maps using logistic regression for Hong Kong Island. J Landslides 2:280–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau KT, Sze YL, Fung MK, Wong WY, Fong EL, Chan LCP (2004) Landslide hazard analysis for Hong Kong using landslide inventory and GIS. J Comput Geosci 30:429–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Wang J (2007) Land slide hazard mapping using logistic rsgression model in Mskenzie Vally, Canada. J Nat Hazards 42:75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clerici A, Perego S, Tellini C, Vescovi P (2002) A procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation: by the conditional analysis method. J Geomorphology 4:349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. J Geomorphology 42:213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. J Eng Geol 40:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee FC, Tham LG, Ng KC, Shum WL (2004) Logistic regression modeling of stoem-indused shallow land sliding in time and space on lantau island, Hong Kong. J Bulletin Eng Geol Environ 63:315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JC, Chang ChJ, Ohlamcher GC (2006) two models for evaluating landslide hazards. J Comput Geosci 32:1120–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez-Cuesta M, Jimenez-Sonchez M, Berrezueta E (2007) Landslide on the central coalfield (Cantabarian Mountains, NW Spain): geomorphological feature conditioning factors and meteorological implication in susceptibility assessment. J Geomorphology 89:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman TY, Can T, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu AH, Sonmez H (2006) Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. J Environ Geol 51:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Q J Eng Geol 75:229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Aksoy H (1996) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and image processing technique. J Eng Geol 44:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. J Eng Geol 78(1–2):11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorseveski PV, Gessler P, Foltz RB (2000) Spatial prediction of Landslide hazard using logistic regression and GIS. 14th Int Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental modeling. Alberta, Canada, 2–8 September, Canada. 9 pp

  • Greco R, Sorriso–Valvo M, Catalano E (2007) Logistic regression analysis in the evaluation of mass movement’s susceptibility case study: Calabria, Italy. J Eng Geol 89:47–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. J Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F (2005) Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. J Geomorphology 72:272–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, 373 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jade S, Sarkar S (1993) Statistical models for slope stability classification. J Eng Geol 36:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson WR, Edwin LH, John AM (2000) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps. J Eng Geol 58:271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juang CH, Lee DH, Sheu C (1992) Mapping slope failure potential using fuzzy sets. J Geotech Eng Division, ASCE 118:475–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarcar S, Gupta RP (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling, Himalayas. J Eng Geol 85:347–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelarestaghi A, Ahmadi H (2009) Landslide susceptibility analysis with a bivariate approach and GIS in northern Iran. J Geosci 2:95–101 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelarestaghi A, Garaee P (2007) landslide hazard mapping using AHP in Vastan basin. Geograph Res 87(4):49–68 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelarestaghi A, Habibnegad M, Ahmadi H (2007) Assessment of landslide occurrence related to land use change and road construction. Geograph Res 62:81–91 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen MC, Parks JE (1997) How wide is a road? The association of roads and mass movements in a forested mountain environment. J Earth Surf Processes Landforms 22:835–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analyses of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. J Environ Geol 40:1095–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. J Landslides 4:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. J Environ Geol 50:847–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. J Environ Geol 47:982–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2004) Probabilistic landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing data at Boun, Korea. J Remote Sens 25(11):2037–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei Z, Jimg-feng H (2006) GIS-based logistic regression method for landslide susceptibility mapping in regional scale, Zhejiang. Univ Sci 12:2007–2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzi L, Pergalani F, Terlien MTJ (2000) Slope vulnerability to earthquakes at sub regional scale, using probabilistic techniques and geographic information systems. J Eng Geol 58:313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirsaneee A, Kardan R 1999. Analytic view on landslide characteristics in Iran. Collection of essays of the first Conference of Geology Engineering and Living Environment in Iran. First impression, Teacher Training University of Tehran, pp. 83–84

  • Mousavi Khatir SZ, Kavian A, Hashemzadeh Atoei A (2009) Statistical analysis of some morphometric characteristics and effective factors on landslide occurrence in Sajarood watershed. J Water Soil Conserv 16(2):85–102 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi SZ, Kavian A, Solaimani K, mousavi SR, Shirzadi A (2011) GIS-based spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using logistic regression model. J Geomath Nat Haz and Risk 2(1):33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H (2008) An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the prepration of landslide susceptibility maps. J Eng Geol 97:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlamcher GC, Davis JC (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas USA. Eng Geol 69:331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peart MR, Ng KY, Zhang DD (2005) Landslides and sediment delivery to a drainage system: some observations from Hong Kong. J Asian Earth Sci 25:821–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross-validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. J Adv Space Res 45(10):1244–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2009) Delineation of landslide hazard areas using frequency ratio, logistic regression and artificial neural network model at Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0245-8

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Mansor S, Buchroithner MF, Jallaluddin N, Khujaimah Z (2008) Utilization of optical remote sensing data and geographic information system tools for regional landslide hazard analysis by using binomial logistic regression model. J Appl Remote Sens 2:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2009) Use of geospatial data for the development of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide hazard mapping: a case study in Malaysia. J Appl Geomatics 1:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2010) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis and its cross-validation in three test areas using a frequency ratio model. Photogrammetrie and Fernerkun 1:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rengers N,Van Westen CJ, Chacon J, Irigaray C (1998) Draft for the chapter on the application of digital techniques for natural hazard zonation. Report on Mapping of Natural Hazards, International Association of Engineering Geology, Commission no.1 on Engineering Geology Mapping, Culshaw and Marker, Vancouver.

  • Saha AK, Gupta RP, Arora MK (2002) GIS-based landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) valley, Himalayas. Remote Sens 23(2):357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeters R, Van Westen CJ (1996) Slope instability recognition, analysis and zonation. In: .Turner KA, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: Investigation and mitigation. Transport Research Board Special report, vol. 247, pp 129–177

  • Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004a) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71:303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004b) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45:665–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangestani MH (2009) A comparative study of Dempster–Shafer and fuzzy models for landslide susceptibility mapping using a GIS: An experience from Zagros Mountains. SW Iran J Asian Earth Sci 35:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temesgen B, Mohammed MU, Korme T (2001) Natural hazard assessment using GIS and remote sensing methods, with particular reference to the landslides in the Wondogenet area, Ethiopia. J Phys Chem Earth 26:665–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF, Gori PL, Jager S, Kappel WM, Negussey D (1996) Assessment and management of landslide hazards near Tully Valley landslide, Syracuse, New York, USA. Proceedings of the 7th Int Symp Landslides, Trondheim. Balkema: Rotterdam. pp 411–416

  • Yaclin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. J Catena 72:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale (Turkey). J Eng Geol 79:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009a) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat—Turkey). J Comput Geosci 35:1125–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009b) A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas, Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks. Bulletin Eng Geol Environ 68(3):297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2010) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci 61(4):821–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou G, Esaki T, Mitani Y, Xie M, Mori J (2003) Spatial probabilistic modeling of slope failure using an integrated GIS Monte Carlo simulation approach. J Eng Geol 68:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to the Iranian National Cartographic Center, Meteorological Organization, National Geographical Organization, Forests, Range and Watershed Management Organization (FRWO) of Iran for providing various datasets for this research. Also, the remarks made by two anonymous reviewers on a previous draft have greatly improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Solaimani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solaimani, K., Mousavi, S.Z. & Kavian, A. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Arab J Geosci 6, 2557–2569 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0526-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0526-5

Keywords

Navigation