Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determination of Menbutone in Bovine Milk and Meat Using Micellar Liquid Chromatography: Application to Injectable Dosage Forms

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 15 December 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

A simple, sensitive, and rapid method was developed for the routine identification and quantification of menbutone in different matrices by micellar liquid chromatography. Separation was performed in less than 4 min using a C18 column with UV detection at 234 nm. A micellar solution composed of 0.12 M sodium dodecyl sulfate, 8 % n-butanol, and 0.3 % triethylamine in 0.02 M phosphoric acid at pH 6.0 was used as the mobile phase. The method was fully validated in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. The limits of detection and quantitation were 0.95 and 2.86 ng mL−1, respectively. The method showed good repeatability, linearity, and sensitivity according to the evaluation of the validation parameters. The micellar method was successfully applied for the analysis of menbutone in its commercial injections with a mean % recovery value of 99.73 ± 1.634 % and in spiked bovine milk and meat samples with a mean % recovery values in the range of 98.00–100.60 %. High extraction efficiency was obtained without matrix interference in the extraction process and in the subsequent chromatographic determination. No organic solvent was used during the pretreatment step. Hence, this method can be considered as an interesting example for green chemistry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 15 December 2017

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Affiliation 4 should be included for Manal M. Fouad.

References

  • Ackerman L (2007) Veterinary practice management. Black Well, New Jersey, p 342

    Google Scholar 

  • Belal F, El-Brashy A, Eid M, Nasr J (2009) Liq Chromatogr Related Technol 32:2993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belal F, Sharaf El-Din M, El-Enany N, Saad S (2013) Chem Cent J 7:162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltran-Martinavarro B, Peris-Vicente J, Marco-Peiro S, Esteve-Romero S, Rambla-Alegre M, Carda-Boch S (2012) Analyst 137:269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berthod A, Garcia-Alvarez-Coque MC (2000) 83, Marcel Dekker, New York

  • CX/RVDF 06/16/13, Report on 16th session of the Codex Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods (2006) Codex Alimentarius Commission, Jiont FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Rome. http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/archives.jsp?year=06. Accessed 12 May 2006

  • Fouad M, Abdel-Razeq S, Belal F, Fouad F (2013) Int J Pharm Anal 4:30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirosh M, Kouhei F, Toshiaki T (2010) Kumamoto-Ken Hoken Kankyo Kagaku Kenkyushoho 39:21

  • International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) (2005) Technical requirements for the registration of pharmaceutical for human use: validation of analytical procedures, text and methodology Q2 (R1), Geneva, 1

  • Kalyankar T, Kulkarini P, Wadher S, Pekamwar S (2014) J Appl Pharm Sci 4:128

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund J, Lassen J (1969) Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 27:429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Tan M, Luo L, Wang L, Yang Y, Long F, Wang S, Wu M (2013a) Faming Zhuanli Shenqing CN 103424491 A 12:4

  • Luo Y, Tan M, Luo L, Wang L, Yang Y, Long F, Wang S, Wu M (2013b) Faming Zhuanli Shenqing CN 103439421 A 12:11

  • Malinowska I, Stepnik K (2012) Chromatogr Res Int 2012:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller J, Miller J (2005) Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry, 5th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, p 256

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourya SK, Dubey S, Durgabanshi A, Shukia SK, Esteve-Romero J, Bose D (2011) J AOAC Int 94:1082

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr J, Shalan S, Belal F (2013a) Chromatographia 76:523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr J, Shalan S, Belal F (2013b) Food Anal Methods 6:1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil J (2006) The Merck Index, 14th edn. Merck and Co, Inc, Rahway, p 1008

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambla-Alegre M (2012) Chromatogr Res Int 2012:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizk M, Toubar S, Abou El-Alamin M (2014) Eur J Chem 5:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez E, Moreno-Bondi MC, Marazuela MD (2008) J Chromatogr A 1209:136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shoichiro N, Hisaya T (2008) Nagoya-shi Eisei Kenkyushoho 54:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltani S, Jouyban A (2012) Bioanalysis 4:41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds HW (1982) Vet Rec 110:423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski A (2008) Toxicol Mech Methods 18:473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Zayed.

Additional information

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-017-1120-y.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Belal, F., El-Razeq, S.A.A., Fouad, M.M. et al. Determination of Menbutone in Bovine Milk and Meat Using Micellar Liquid Chromatography: Application to Injectable Dosage Forms. Food Anal. Methods 9, 638–645 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0230-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0230-7

Keywords

Navigation