Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of Ethopabate Residues in Chicken Muscles, Liver, and Eggs after Aqueous SDS Extraction by Micellar Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detection with Application to Baby Food

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple and sensitive liquid chromatographic method was optimized and validated for the analysis of ethopabate residues in chicken muscles, liver, and eggs. Aqueous sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution was used for extraction. Analytical separation was performed in less than 8 min using a C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm internal diameter, 5 μm particle size) with fluorescence detection at 271/364 nm. A micellar solution composed of 0.1 M SDS, 10 % 1-propanol, and 0.3 % triethylamine in 0.02 M phosphoric acid adjusted to pH 4 was used as the mobile phase. The method was fully validated in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization guidelines. The micellar method was successfully applied to quantitatively determine ethopabate residues in spiked chicken muscles, liver, and eggs. It was also extended to the determination of ethopabate residues in chicken-based baby food. The recoveries obtained were in the 93.81–115.67 % range. The limit of detection was found to be 1.6 ng/g. High extraction efficiency for ethopabate was obtained without matrix interference and in the subsequent chromatographic determination. No organic solvent was used during the pretreatment step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Granja RHMM, Montes Niño AM, Zucchetti RAM, Montes Niño RE, Salerno AG (2008) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 91:1483

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao F, Yin CX, Huo FJ, Yang P (2005) Acta Cryst E61:3870

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortier L, Daeseleire E, Van Peteghem C (2005) J Chromatogr B 820:261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott CT, Kennedy DG, McCaughey WJ (1998) Analyst 123:45R

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M, Pierret G, Delahaut P (2004) J Chromatogr B 813:181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veterinary Drug MRL Database, www.mrldatabase.con/results.cfm. Accessed on 12 Jan., 2012

  • Nagata T, Saeki M, Nakazawa H, Fujita M, Takabatake E (1985) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 68:27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata T, Saeki M, Nakazawa H, Fujita M, Takabatake E (1983) J Chromatogr 281:367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez E, Moreno-Bondi MC, Marazuela MD (2008) J Chromatogr A 1209:136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera-Luiz MM, Martinez-Vidal JL, Romero-Gonzalez R, Garrido-Frenich A (2012) Food Chem 132:2171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rambla-Alegre M, Esteve-Romero J, Carda-Broch S (2011) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 94:775

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berthod A, García-Alvarez-Coque MC (2000) Micellar liquid chromatography, chromatographic science series, vol 83. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltani S, Jouyban A (2012) Bioanalysis 4:41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aranda EO, Esteve-Romero J, Rambla-Alegre M, Peris-Vicente J, Bose D (2011) Talanta 84:314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carda Broch S, Gil Agusti MT, Monferrer Pons LI, Esteve-Romero J (2007) J Chromatogr A 1156:254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gil Agusti M, Esteve-Romero J, Carda-Broch S (2008) J Chromatogr A 1189:444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raviolo MA, Rambla-Alegre M, Clausell Tormos J, Capella Peiro ME, Carda-Broch S, Esteve-Romero J (2007) Anal Chim Acta 593:152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rambla-Alegre M, Peris-Vicente J, Esteve-Romero J, Carda-Broch S (2010a) Food Chem 123:1294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rambla-Alegre M, Peris-Vicente J, Marco-Peiró S, Beltrán-Martinavarro B, Esteve-Romero J (2010b) Talanta 81:894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chin-Chen ML, Bose D, Esteve-Romero J, Peris-Vicente J, Rambla-Alegre M, Carda-Broch S (2011) Open Anal Chem J 5:22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walash MI, Kh MM, Sharaf El-din NM, El-enany MIE, Shalan SM (2012) Chem Cent J 6:13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JC, Miller JN (2005) Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry, 5th edn., Prince Hall, England, 256

  • ICH, Q2(R1) (2005) Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology. International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Schronk LR, Colvin BM, Hanks AR, Bushway RJ (1977) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 60:1048

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by L'Oréal-UNESCO Pan Arab Fellowship “For Women in Science” 2010, in partnership with the Arab Science and Technology Foundation (ASTF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenny Jeehan Nasr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nasr, J.J., Shalan, S. & Belal, F. Determination of Ethopabate Residues in Chicken Muscles, Liver, and Eggs after Aqueous SDS Extraction by Micellar Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detection with Application to Baby Food. Food Anal. Methods 6, 1522–1528 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-013-9564-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-013-9564-1

Keywords

Navigation