Abstract
Community-based caregivers form an important part of the long-term care system in China. Rather than institutionalization in residential facilities, the majority of older adults in China continue to live with their families and in their communities; ageing-in-place is the norm. The services provided by community-based caregivers thus play a crucial role in shaping the quality of life for older adults in China. Yet this population of caregivers has been understudied, with most researchers and policymakers focusing instead on familial or institutional care providers. Our qualitative study addresses this gap by examining the experiences of community-based eldercare providers in urban Shanghai, one of the most rapidly-aging cities in China. Over 25 h of semi-structured, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted among 20 community-based caregivers. Our study revealed important demographic characteristics and trends in the experiences of this understudied population of caregivers, who were often confused about their jobs and demonstrated an ambiguous sense of professional identity. We provide a typology of the main factors influencing the experiences of community-based caregivers for older adults. This typology enables us to provide targeted suggestions to improve the work experiences and develop the sense of professional identity among community-based caregivers. We also present suggestions for strengthening the long-term care system for older adults in urban China.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The city region of Shanghai is divided into different geographic districts—smaller municipal administrative units and independent living compounds—according to the ‘city-district-street-neighborhood’ hierarchy (Xu et al. 2005, p.80). The street office (jiedao) is the street-level administrative authority that implements policies and programs. The tangible community area at the street level is thus the basic administrative governance unit (Xu et al. 2005). It includes many neighborhoods that differ in size and complexity of social phenomena and in relation to the ecological structure of the larger community as a ‘unified, organic whole’ (Agrawal and Gibson 1999). Services currently rendered by the community are most restricted in terms of offering fundamental help to the elderly.
Care person, in Chinese关爱员 ( Guan Ai Yuan) is the name or proxy for people called by the community administrative organs. Its literal meaning is: people who bring care and love.
There is no adoption relationship between the elderly and the caregiver. The terms simply express feelings of closeness between the two parties.
See footnote 2 in previous text.
References
Aggar, C. (2012). Caring burden. Australian Nursing Journal, 20(5), 35–50.
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649.
Bedim, L. A., & Guinan, D. M. (1996). “If I could just be selfish…”: caregivers’ perceptions of their entitlement to leisure. Leisure Sciences, 18(3), 227–239.
Chen, X. M. (2000). Qualitative research methodology and social science research. Beijing: Education and Science Press (In Chinese).
Chen, J. Y. (2003). Long-term care of the elderly. The Journal of Taiwan Medicine, 7(3), 404–413.
Dai, W. D. (2011). The analysis of the needs and impact factors of long-term-care in old age—a comparative study in Jiangsu and Anhui province in China. Population Research, 35(4), 85–93 (In Chinese).
Godwin, K. M., Swank, P. R., Vaeth, P., et al. (2013). The longitudinal and dyadic effects of mutuality on perceived stress for stroke survivors and their spousal caregivers. Aging & Mental Health, 17(4), 423–431.
Graham, H. (1983). Caring: A labor of love. In J. Finch & D. Groves (Eds.), A labour of love: Women, work and caring (pp. 13–30). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Li, W. F., & Liang, L. X. (2008). The overview of community care for old people and its implication for indigenous practice in China. Journal of Population and Development, 57(3), 84–89 (In Chinese).
Lin, Y. (2009). Why shall we establish long-term care system in China. Journal of Population and Development, 85(4), 52–64 (In Chinese).
Lum, T. (2012). Long-term care in Asia. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 55(7), 563–569.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2014). 2014 state statistical communique. Beijing: China Statistical Publishers.
Pei, W. M., & Fang, L. J. (2010). Introduction on long-term care for the elderly (p. 101). Beijng: Beijng social science literature press.
Rossi Ferrario, S., Zotti, A. M., Massara, G., Nuvolone, G. (2003). A comparative assessment of psychological and psychosocial characteristics of cancer patients and their caregivers. Psycho-Oncology, 12(1), 1–7.
Shanghai Municipal Human Resource and Social Security Bureau (2015). The notice of adjust the lowest salary standard in Shanghai, retrieved on March 30, 2015 from http://www.12333sh.gov.cn/201412333/xxgk/flfg/gfxwj/ldbc/bcfp/201504/t20150401_1199450.shtml. (In Chinese).
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tang, Y. (2012). To be integrated: Long-term care policy and its integration approach for Chinese elderly. Quarterly of Shenzhen University (Social Science Edition). 29(5). (In Chinese).
Thomése, F., & Tilburg, T. V. (2000). Neighbouring networks and environmental dependency: differential effects of neighbourhood characteristics on the relative size and composition of neighbouring networks of older adults in the Netherlands. Ageing and Society, 20(1), 55–78.
Tian, X. Y. (2006). ‘A bowl of soup’ distance. The Seniors, 230(1), 32 (In Chinese).
Wong, Y. C., & Leung, C. B. (2012). Long-term care in China: issues and prospects. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 55(7), 570–586.
Xu, Q., Gao, J., & Yan, M. C. (2005). Community centers in urban China: context, development, and limitations. Journal of Community Practice, 13(3), 73–90.
Yu, Z. H. (2009). Studies on the long term care issues among disabled elderly in Chinese cities, unpublished master thesis. Beijing: Minzu University of China (In Chinese).
Zhou, Y., & Chen, M. Z. (2008). The study on current elderly institutions in China. Population Journal, 164(4), 19–24.
Acknowledgments
The study is supported by the following grant agencies: China National Social Science Foundation (“Intergenerational Equilibrium and Multi-Governance: Research on the Social Support System in China’s Ageing Society”, project no. 71490733) and Washington University Harvey A. Friedman Center for Aging (Global Aging Initiative Award).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Ethical Treatment of Experimental Subjects (Animal and Human)
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Honglin Chen, Hui Yang, Priscilla Song and Lu Wang are co-first authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, H., Yang, H., Song, P. et al. An Ambiguous Sense of Professional Identity: Community-Based Caregivers for Older Adults in China. Ageing Int 42, 236–250 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-016-9266-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-016-9266-2