Abstract
Socioeconomic status (SES) has been widely used as a determining factor to explain educational processes and outcomes such as mathematics academic achievement. Research has documented the links between SES and mathematics academic achievement. However, further understanding the complex relationship between contextual factors, such as policy, and its implications for these processes within an ideologically patriarchal society is paramount. After decades of United States school policy and reform—with the most recent focus on Common Core Standards—there continue to be inconsistent notions of what the “real” issues are and how to address those issues. This paper sets out to explore one specific case—House Bill 2281 (HB 2281) and, in effect, the banning of the Mexican–American Studies program in one school district in the US—in understanding the implications of policy in the shaping of the public education system. Implications for mathematics education research are explored.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Signed into law in 2010, Senate Bill (SB) 1070 includes provisions on: (1) registration documents for undocumented immigrants; (2) state penalties relating to immigration law enforcement including trespassing, harboring, and transporting undocumented immigrants; and (3) law enforcement officers’ responsibility to determine an individual’s immigration status during “lawful contact” made by law enforcement officials (Senate Bill 1070, 2010).
Signed into law in 2011, House Bill (HB) 2281 includes, in part, a ban on programs that: (1) promote the overthrow of the US government; (2) promote resentment toward a race or class of people; (3) are designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group; and (4) advocate ethnic solidarity instead of treating pupils as individuals (House Bill 2281, 2010).
The Mexican–American Studies (MAS) program is also known as Mexican–American/Raza Studies (MARS) or Raza Studies. For our purposes, we use Mexican–American Studies (MAS).
TUSD = Tucson Unified School District.
The National Council of La Raza (n.d.) clarifies that the term La Raza “was coined by Mexican scholar José Vasconcelos to reflect the fact that the people of Latin America are a mixture of many of the world’s races, cultures, and religions.” They recognize that the very limited translation of “La Raza” to simply mean “the race” implies an inaccurate assumption “that it is a term meant to exclude others”.
References
Acosta, C. (2007). Developing critical consciousness: resistance literature in a Chicano literature class. The English Journal, 97(2), 36–42.
Acosta, C. (2013). Pedagogies of resiliency and hope in response to the criminalization of Latin@ students. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 9(2), 63–71.
Acosta, C., & Mir, A. (2012). Empowering young people to be critical thinkers: the Mexican American studies program in Tucson. Voices in Urban Education, 34(Summer), 15–26.
Altschul, I. (2012). Linking socioeconomic status to the academic achievement of Mexican American youth through parent involvement in education. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 3(1), 13–30.
Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and poststructuralist approach. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London and New York: Routledge.
Bornstein, M. C., & Bradley, R. H. (Eds.). (2003). Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cabrera, N. L., Mesa, E. L., & Rodriguez, R. (2011). The fight for ethnic studies in Tucson. North American Congress on Latin America’s Report on the Americas, 44(6), 20–24.
Cabrera, N. L., Meza, E. L., Romero, A. J., & Rodríguez, C. (2013). “If there is no struggle, there is no progress”: transformative youth activism and the school of ethnic studies. Urban Review, 45, 7–22.
Cabrera, N. L., Milem, J. F., & Marx, R. W. (2012). An empirical analysis of the effects of Mexican American studies participation on student achievement within Tucson unified school district. Tucson: University of Arizona College of Education. http://www.coe.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/MAS_report_2012_0.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2014.
Casteel, T., Gilzean, G., & Faulkner, G. (2011). Curriculum audit of the Mexican American studies department, Tucson Unified School District. Cambium Learning and National Academic Educational Partners. http://saveethnicstudies.org/assets/docs/state_audit/Cambium_Audit.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2014.
U.S. Census Bureau (2012). State and county quickfacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/04000.html. Accessed 9 June 2014.
Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards/mathematics. Accessed 9 June 2014.
Doğan, O., & Haser, Ç. (2014). Neoliberal and nationalist discourses in Turkish elementary mathematics education. ZDM—The International Journal for Mathematics Education, 46(7). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0605-z.
Doyle, L. H. (2003). Synthesis through meta-ethnography: paradoxes, enhancements, and possibilities. Qualitative Research, 3, 321–344.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (1977). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Franciosi, R. J. (2004). The rise and fall of American public schools: The political economy of public education in the twentieth century. Westport: Praeger.
Gándara, P., & Hopkins, M. (Eds.). (2010). Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gerring, J. (1997). Ideology: a definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 957–994.
Gómez, C., & Benton, B. (1998). Nuestro futuro: A blueprint for the future. Bilingual Education/Hispanic Studies and Second Language Acquisition Review Committee Report. Tucson: Tucson Unified School District.
Gonzales, M. G. (2009). Mexicanos: A history of Mexicans in the United States. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Grant, C. A., & Sleeter, C. E. (1986). Race, class, and gender in education research: an argument for integrative analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 195–211.
Graven, M. (2014). Poverty, inequality and mathematics performance: the case of South Africa’s post-apartheid context. ZDM—The International Journal for Mathematics Education, 46(7). doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0566-7.
Grumet, M. (1988). Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Horne, T. (2007, June 11). An open letter to the citizens of Tucson. http://nau.edu/uploadedFiles/Academic/CAL/Philosophy/Forms/An%20Open%20Letter%20to%20Citizens%20of%20Tucson.pdf.
House Bill 2281 (2010). 49th Legislature, House of Representatives Second Regular Session.
Jiménez-Castellanos, O., Cisneros, J., & Gómez, L. M. (2013). Applying racist nativism theory to K-12 education policy in Arizona, 2000–2010. Aztlán: A Journal of Chicano Studies, 38(2), 175–190.
Knapp, M. S., & Woolverton, S. (1995). Social class and schooling. In J. A. Banks & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 548–569). New York: Macmillan.
Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Krieder, A. (2012). 1988: Madeleine Grumet publishes bitter milk. In D. Schugurensky (Ed.), History of Education: Selected Moments of the 20th Century. [Online]. http://schugurensky.faculty.asu.edu/moments/1988grumet.html [July 1, 2013].
Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York and London: Routledge.
Lubienski, S. T. (2002). Good intentions were not enough: Lower SES students’ struggle to learn mathematics through problem solving. In J. Sowder & B. Schappelle (Eds.), Lessons learned from research (pp. 171–178). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Martin, D. B., Gholson, M. L., & Leonard, J. (2010). Commentary. Mathematics as gatekeeper: power and privilege in the production of knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 12–24.
Morales, M. C., & Saenz, R. (2007). Correlates of Mexican American students’ standardized test scores: an integrated model approach. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 29(3), 349–365. doi:10.1177/0739986307302176.
Morse, A. (2011). Arizona’s immigration enforcement laws. National Conference of State Legislatures. Washington, DC.
National Council of La Raza (n.d.). The translation of our name. http://www.nclr.org/index.php/about_us/faqs/the_truth_about_nclr/the_translation_of_our_name. Accessed 9 June 2014.
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage.
O’Leary, A. O., Romero, A. J., Cabrera, N. L., & Rascon, M. (2012). Assault on Ethnic Studies. In O. Santa Ana & C. González de Bustamante (Eds.), Arizona firestorm: Global realities, national media, and provincial politics (pp. 97–120). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Olson, H. A. (2001). The power to name: representation in library catalogs. Signs, 26(3), 639–668.
Orozco, R. A. (2011). “It is certainly strange…”: attacks on ethnic studies and whiteness as property. Journal of Education Policy, 26(6), 819–838.
Orozco, R. A. (2012). Racism and power: Arizona politicians’ use of the discourse of anti-Americanism against Mexican American studies. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 34(1), 43–60. doi:10.1177/0739986311430209.
Otero, L. R., & Cammarota, J. (2011). Notes from the ethnic studies home front: student protests, texting, and subtexts of oppression. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(5), 639–648.
Passell, J. S., Cohn, D., & Lopez, M. H. (2011). Hispanics account for more than half of nation’s growth in past decade. Washington, D.C.: Pew Hispanic Center.
Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Powers, J. M., & Williams, T. R. (2012). State of outrage: immigrant-related legislation and education in Arizona. Association of Mexican-American Educators (AMAE) Journal, 6(2), 13–21.
Reeves, E. B. (2012). The effects of opportunity to learn, family socioeconomic status, and friends on the rural math achievement gap in high school. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(7), 887–907.
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2013). Globalizing education policy. New York: Routledge.
Romero, A. F. (2012). The hypocrisy of racism: Arizona’s movement towards state-sanctioned apartheid. Journal of Educational Controversy, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.wce.wwu.edu/Resources/CEP/eJournal/v006n001/a013.shtml.
Senate Bill 1070 (2010). 49th Legislature, Senate Second Regular Session.
Serna, E. (2013). Tempest, Arizona: criminal epistemologies and the rhetorical possibilities of Raza studies. Urban Review, 45, 41–57. doi:10.1007/s11256-012-0223-4.
Shavit, Y., & Hans-Peter, B. (Eds.). (1993). Persistent inequality: Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status an academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
Sleeter, C. E. (2011). The academic and social value of ethnic studies: A research review. National Education Association Research Department.
Soto, S. (2010). Convocation Speech. Speech presented at the University of Arizona, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tucson, AZ.
Soto, S. K., & Joseph, M. (2010). Neoliberalism and the battle over ethnic studies in Arizona. Thought & Action: NEA Journal of Higher Education, 26, 45–56.
Spring, J. (2000). The American schools 1642–2000 (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Stearns, E., Moller, S., Blau, J., & Potochnick, S. (2007). Staying back and dropping out: the relationship between grade retention and school dropout. Sociology of Education, 80, 210–240. doi:10.1177/003804070708000302.
Stevens, L. P., & Stovall, D. O. (2010). Critical literacy for xenophobia: a wake-up call. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(4), 295–298.
Tate, W. F. (1997). Race, ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: an update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 652–680.
Telles, E. M., & Ortiz, V. (2008). Generations of exclusion: Mexican-Americans, assimilation, and race. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Thompson, J. B. (1984). Studies in the theory of ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Torres, R. S. (2012). Border challenges and ethnic struggles for social justice in Arizona: Hispanic communities under siege. In M. Lusk, K. Staudt, & E. Moya (Eds.), Social justice in the U.S.—Mexico border region (pp. 231–246). doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4150-8.
Turner, S. (1980). Sociological explanation as translation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
U.S. Department of Education (2012). The federal role in education. http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/fed/role.html. Accessed 9 June 2014.
Valero, P., Graven, M., Jurak, M., Martin, D., Meaney, T., & Penteado, M. (2012). Socioeconomic influence on mathematics achievement: what is visible and what is neglected? Survey Team 5 presentation at 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 8 July–15 July, 2012, Seoul, Korea. http://www.icme12.org/forum/forum.asp. Accessed 9 June 2014.
Wallin, D. C. (2001). Postmodern feminism and educational policy development. McGill Journal of Education, 36(1), 27–43.
White, K. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.
Zehr, M. (2010). Tucson students aren’t deterred by ethnic-studies controversy. Education Week, 30(4), 1–17.
Zhao, Y. (2009). Comments on the common core standards initiative. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 6(3), 46–54.
Zinn, M. B., & Dill, B. T. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22(2), 321–331.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torres, Z.N., Moran, R.A. Race, SES, and mathematics achievement conflicts: how policy and political climate affect academic achievement. ZDM Mathematics Education 46, 987–998 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0609-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0609-8