Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Explaining the differing effects of corporate reputation across nations: a multilevel analysis

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although multinational corporations increasingly use their reputation as an important differentiation criterion, little is known about the varying effects of corporate reputation in an international context. In this study, the effects of corporate reputation across nations, particularly the moderating role of important institutional country differences, are analyzed. To provide insight into these issues, the authors refer to hierarchical data on 13,665 consumer evaluations of a multinational corporation in 40 countries. The results indicate a strong link between corporate reputation and consumers’ loyalty, but this relationship is reinforced or diminished by cultural, economic, or knowledge differences between countries. These moderators represent important factors when managing corporate reputations across nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although this theorizing emphasizes a smaller set of institutional dimensions than the theory of business systems, the underlying logic is also one of institutional variations that produce larger differences between countries (Berry et al. 2010, p. 1463).

  2. Because distances from a focal country are not the focus of this study, geographic distance and administrative distance were not observed (Berry et al. 2010, p. 1465). The financial dimension (e.g., stock market capitalization) was not observed because theoretical arguments for consumer behavior are not obvious.

  3. Schwartz (1994, 1999) distinguishes seven value types: embeddedness, intellectual autonomy, affective autonomy, hierarchy, egalitarianism, mastery, and harmony. Societies that score high on one value type in a dimension (e.g., high mastery) are known to have lower value scores on the opposite value type in the same dimension (e.g., low harmony) and vice versa.

  4. A robustness check was conducted by estimating the models without the replaced countries. The results remained substantively the same.

  5. Effect sizes (ES) were computed as ES = (2*b*SD predictor )/SD outcome, where b is the unstandardized regression coefficient, SD predictor is the predictors’ standard deviation and SD outcome is the standard deviation of the outcome variable (Marsh et al. 2009). This effect size is comparable to Cohen’s d (Cohen 2013).

  6. The number of patents in a country as a known indicator of the ability of a country to create knowledge was not analyzed because of weak theoretical reasoning for its effects on the CR–loyalty link. However, testing of the moderator patents per 1 million population (provided by the WIPO IP Statistics Data Center) show non-significant results (b = .076; p > .05).

References

  • Ailon, G. (2008). Mirror, mirror on the wall: “Culture's consequences” in a value test of its own design. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 885–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, T. W. (1998). The effect of corporate image in the formation of customer loyalty. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 82–92.

  • Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: a review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2014). Causality and endogeneity: Problems and solutions. In The oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. Ed. D. V. Day. New York: Oxford University Press, 93–117.

  • Baack, D. W., & Singh, N. (2007). Culture and web communications. Journal of Business Research, 60(3), 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceiling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimates bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartikowski, B., & Walsh, G. (2011). Investigating mediators between corporate reputation and customer citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 64(1), 39–44.

  • Bartikowski, B., Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. E. (2011). Culture and age as moderators in the corporate reputation and loyalty relationship. Journal of Business Research, 64(9), 966–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., Ringle, C. M., & Völckner, F. (2013). Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 665–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, A., Bardhi, F., & Venkatraman, M. (2010). How global brands travel with consumers: an examination of the relationship between brand consistency and meaning across national boundaries. International Marketing Review, 27(5), 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, G., Riel, C. B. M., & Bruggen, G. H. V. (2005). Corporate associations and consumer product responses: the moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R. J., Whittome, J. R., & Brush, G. J. (2009). Investigating the service brand: A customer value perspective. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 345–355.

  • Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product response. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.

  • Burke, D. M., & Light, L. L. (1981). Memory and aging: the role of retrieval processes. Psychological Bulletin, 90(3), 513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A., & Ewing, M. T. (2010). How corporate reputation, quality, and value influence online loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), 1103–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chacar, A. S., Newburry, W., & Vissa, B. (2010). Bringing institutions into performance persistence research: exploring the impact of product, financial, and labor market institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1119–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. B. (1982). The role of affect in categorization: toward a reconsideration of the concept of attitude. Advances in Consumer Research, 9(1), 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. East Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mooij, M. (2011). Consumer behavior and culture: Consequences for global marketing and advertising. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2007). Governing societies. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, M. J., Golden, P. A., & Saxton, T. (1997). The effect of reputation on the decision to joint venture. Strategic Management Journal, 18(2), 127–140.

  • Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, D., & Karunaratna, A. (2006). Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies.

  • Erdem, T., Swait, J., & Louviere, J. (2002). The impact of brand credibility on consumer price sensitivity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T., Swait, J., & Valenzuela, A. (2006). Brands as signals: a cross-country validation study. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenreck, C., & Wagner, R. (2010). Impact of direct marketing activities on company reputation transfer success: empirical evidence from five different cultures. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(1), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourinchas, P. O., & Parker, J. A. (2002). Consumption over the life cycle. Econometrica, 70(1), 47–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A. (2010). Understanding multi-level institutional convergence effects on international market segments and global marketing strategy. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkanson, L., & Ambos, B. (2010). The antecedents of psychic distance. Journal of International Management, 16(3), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabilites to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 607–618.

  • Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, R., Rosenbaum, P. R., & Small, D. S. (2009). Split samples and design sensitivity in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104(487), 1090–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herremans, I. M., Akathaporn, P., & Mcinnes, M. (1993). An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(7/8), 587–604.

  • Hox, J. H. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, M.-H., Pan, S.-L., & Setiono, R. (2004). Product-, corporate-, and country-image dimensions and purchase behavior: a multicountry analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Griffith, D. A., Chabowski, B. R., Hamman, M. K., Dykes, B. J., Pollitte, W. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2008). An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1064–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies: Cambridge Univ Press.

  • Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1992). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & Desarbo, W. S. (1997). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B., Park, J. Y., & Kim, J. (2008). Cross-cultural examination of the relationships among firm reputation, e-satisfaction, e-trust, and e-loyalty. International Marketing Review, 25(3), 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (2011). The ceo of heinz on powering growth in emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 89(10), 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Grayson, K. (2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 500–507.

  • Kalyanam, K., & Putler, D. S. (1997). Incorporating demographic variables in brand choice models: an indivisible alternatives framework. Marketing Science, 16(2), 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kester, W. C. (1996). American and japanese corporate governance. In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National diversity and global capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: a critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford press.

  • Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2009). Theorizing on mncs: a promise for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 171–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotha, S., Rindova, V. P., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). Assets and actions: firm-specific factors in the internationalization of us internet firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4), 769–791.

  • Lafley, A. G. (2009). What only the ceo can do. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, F., Griffin, M., & Babin, B. J. (2009). How quality, value, image, and satisfaction create loyalty at a chinese telecom. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 980–986.

  • Lambert-Pandraud, R., & Laurent, G. (2010). Why do older consumers buy older brands? The role of attachment and declining innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 104–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S. L. (2010). Sampling: Design and analysis: Cengage Learning.

  • Malle, B. F., & Horowitz, L. M. (1995). The puzzle of negative self-views: an exploration using the schema concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 470–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(6), 764–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. V., Mithas, S., Keiningham, T. L., & Aksoy, L. (2011). An investigation of the cross-national determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 198–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musteen, M., Rhyne, L., & Zheng, C. (2013). Asset or constraint: corporate reputation and mncs’ involvement in the least developed countries. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In National innovation systems. Ed. R. R. Nelson. New York: Oxford University Press, 3-21.

  • Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (2015). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S. O. (2002). Comparative evaluation and the relationship between quality, satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 240–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, R. J., & Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutional exceptions on global projects: a process model. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 562–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J. E., & Yeung, B. (2001). E-commerce readiness: institutional environment and international competitiveness. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4), 705–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajunen, K. (2008). Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: a fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 652–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, L., & Goldstein, H. (1991). New statistical methods for analysing social structures: an introduction to multilevel models. British Educational Research Journal, 17(4), 387–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkova, A. P., Wadhwa, A., Yao, X., & Jain, S. (2014). Reputation and decision making under ambiguity: A study of us venture capital firms' investments in the emerging clean energy sector. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 422–448.

  • Pieters, R. G. M., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (1997). Consumer memory for television advertising: a field study of duration, serial position, and competition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puffer, S. M., Mccarthy, D. J., & Boisot, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship in russia and china: the impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(3), 441–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratchford, B. T., Lee, M.-S., & Talukdar, D. (2003). The impact of the internet on information search for automobiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods: Sage.

  • Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1033–1049.

  • Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubera, G., Ordanini, A., & Griffith, D. A. (2011). Incorporating cultural values for understanding the influence of perceived product creativity on intention to buy: An examination in italy and the us. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(4), 459–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Wilczynski, P., & Melewar, T. C. (2013). Measuring reputation in global markets—a comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In New cultural dimensions of values. Eds. U. Kim, H. C. Tirandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi and G. Yoon. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc, 85-119.

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, L., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Guedhami, O. (2010). National culture and dividend policy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1391–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. (2011). Country of origin effects in developed and emerging markets: exploring the contrasting roles of materialism and value consciousness. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(2), 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisted: towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N. (2011). Impact of emerging markets on marketing: rethinking existing perspectives and practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 166–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. T., Smith, M., & Wang, K. (2010). Does brand management of corporate reputation translate into higher market value? Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(3), 201–221.

  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: SAGE Publications LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, N., & Ratchford, B. T. (1991). An empirical test of a model of external search for automobiles. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2001). The role of national culture in international marketing research. International Marketing Review, 18(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Geyskens, I. (2006). How country characteristics affect the perceived value of web sites. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. (2015). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies.

  • Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2011). Introduction to econometrics. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styles, C., Patterson, P. G., & Ahmed, F. (2008). A relational model of export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 880–900.

  • Swoboda, B., Berg, B., & Schramm-Klein, H. (2013). Reciprocal effects of the corporate reputation and store equity of retailers. Journal of Retailing, 89(4), 447–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischer, S., & Hildebrandt, L. (2014). Linking corporate reputation and shareholder value using the publication of reputation rankings. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1007–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veloutsou, C., & Moutinho, L. (2009). Brand relationships through brand reputation and brand tribalism. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 314–322.

  • Viswanathan, M., Rosa, J. A., & Harris, J. E. (2005). Decision making and coping of functionally illiterate consumers and some implications for marketing management. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachopoulos, S. P. (2008). The basic psychological needs in exercise scale: measurement invariance over gender. Structural Equation Modeling, 15(1), 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 303–319.

  • Wagner, U., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T. F., Stellmacher, J., & Wolf, C. (2006). Prejudice and minority proportion: contact instead of threat effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(4), 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., & Bartikowski, B. (2013). Exploring corporate ability and social responsibility associations as antecedents of customer satisfaction cross-culturally. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 989–995.

  • Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. E. (2007). Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Beatty, S. E., & Shiu, E. M. K. (2009a). The customer-based corporate reputation scale: replication and short form. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 924–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Mitchell, V.-W., Jackson, P. R., & Beatty, S. E. (2009b). Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: a customer perspective. British Journal of Management, 20(2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Shiu, E., & Hassan, L. M. (2014). Cross-national advertising and behavioral intentions: A multilevel analysis. Journal of International Marketing, 22(1), 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. (2000). Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1992). Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets and societies: Sage.

  • Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: a review and comprehensive cfa marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, L., Yang, Z., & Hui, M. K. (2009). Non-local or local brands? A multi-level investigation into confidence in brand origin identification and its strategic implications. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 202–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Professor Shalom H. Schwartz, Hebrow University of Jerusalem, Israel, for his helpful comments on culture and for providing the most recent cultural data, and Dr. Tassilo Schuster, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany, for his helpful comments. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their very constructive comments which have essentially helped us to develop this research further. Finally we thank Professor G. Tomas M. Hult for the possibility to revise and resubmit the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Swoboda.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swoboda, B., Puchert, C. & Morschett, D. Explaining the differing effects of corporate reputation across nations: a multilevel analysis. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 44, 454–473 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0457-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0457-2

Keywords

Navigation