Abstract
Complications of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are well documented including migration, erosion, prolapse, infection, pouch dilatation, and gastric perforation. Band prolapse within the first 5 years after LAGB is observed in about 5 % of cases, requiring an operative procedure. Here we report our experience of endoscopic treatment of band prolapses. From December 2007 to December 2013, 1,347 consecutive patients (202 male, 1,145 female) underwent LAGB; 47 patients had band prolapses and 7 were treated by endoscopy. All patients were women (median age, 34 years). The mean preoperative body mass index was 38.3 ± 2.9 kg/m2. The mean duration to band prolapse after LAGB was 10.6 ± 5.6 months. The mean duration of endoscopy was 12 ± 3 min. One patient had recurrence of the prolapse 3 months after the first endoscopy and was treated by endoscopy again. There was no operative procedure required and no mortality. Endoscopic treatment of band prolapses is effective without the need for an operative procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a simple, safe, and effective procedure for treating morbid obesity. However, several complications after LAGB have been reported, such as band erosion, prolapse, gastric perforation, abscess, tube disconnection, port flip down, and infection. These complications could be the main cause of failure after LAGB. Revision weight loss surgery after failed LAGB might be considered occasionally [1].
Band prolapse is a significant and common late complication after LAGB [2]. Many surgeons advocate using gastrogastric sutures to prevent band prolapse [3]. However, band prolapse within the first 5 years even after using such a suturing technique is still observed in as many as 5 % of cases, requiring operative procedures [4]. Although the pars flaccida technique reduces the prolapse rate, the rate was still up to 5 % [5]. In addition, delayed diagnosis of a band prolapse can cause life-threatening complications such as pouch necrosis and gastric perforation [6].
We have performed a sutureless technique for the placement of Swedish adjustable gastric bands (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NK, USA) or MIDBAND™ bands (MID, Lyon, France). We treated some patients with a band prolapse using an endoscopic approach, and here we report our experience.
Materials and Methods
Patients
From December 2007 to December 2013, a total of 1,347 consecutive patients (202 male, 1,145 female) underwent LAGB procedures using the pars flaccida technique with no imbrication suture and port placement under the anterior sheath of the rectus abdominis muscle (Fig. 1). From December 2007 to November 2011, 40 patients underwent revision surgery for a band prolapse. From December 2011 to December 2013, seven patients underwent endoscopic treatment of a band prolapse. We have followed them up for 2 years.
Endoscopic Procedure
We evaluated the stomach by endoscopy before surgery, every 6 months after the LAGB procedure, and when the patients had symptoms of prolapse such as sudden abdominal pain and repeated vomiting.
The endoscopic procedure was performed after deflation of the band when the patient had these symptoms of prolapse. Band prolapse was diagnosed by X-rays after the patient has swallowed a barium contrast medium or by endoscopy. When diagnosed with band prolapse, the patient was sent to the endoscopy room under intravenous anesthesia. If we found a prolapsed stomach pouch, we inserted an endoscope and then inflated the stomach with air. The prolapsed stomach was gradually reduced as the stomach was inflated with air (Fig. 2). The stomach was fully reduced, and finally the band was returned to its normal position. After reduction, we examined the entire lumen of the stomach to check for normalcy (Fig. 3).
Results
All seven patients were female. The patients’ ages ranged from 22 to 45 years (median, 34 years). The preoperative body mass index ranged from 35 to 43 kg/m2 (mean, 38.3 kg/m2). The duration to band prolapse after LAGB ranged from 1 to 18 months (mean, 10.6 months). The duration of endoscopy ranged from 9 to 15 min (mean, 12.3 min; Table 1).
The first adjustment of the band after reduction was done at 1 month. One patient had recurrence of the band prolapse 3 months after the first endoscopic treatment and was also treated by endoscopy (case 3, Table 1). We followed her up for 1 year without another recurrence of the band prolapse. There was no other operative procedure required and no mortality.
Discussion
Since its first introduction in 1993, LAGB has been accepted as a reliable surgical option for treating obesity, thanks to its safety, minimal invasiveness, and effectiveness. However, bariatric surgeons have largely abandoned LAGB since 2008, and the number of procedures has declined because of adverse complications [7].
When a LAGB procedure is performed, the band should be placed around the upper part of the stomach, approximately 1 to 2 cm below the gastroesophageal junction to allow normal functions, limiting food intake and slowing the emptying of stomach contents into the duodenum. Surgical techniques have been suggested to lower the incidence of gastric prolapse, such as reduction of the size of the gastric pouch, the appropriate placement of gastrogastric sutures, and correct positioning of the posterior aspect of the band. The main advantage of gastrogastric suturing in LAGB is prevention of band prolapse [8, 9].
Band prolapse is a significant and common late complication after LAGB. The incidence of band prolapse within the first 5 years is still as much as 5 %, requiring operative procedures. It can occur anteriorly or posteriorly. The common symptoms and signs of band prolapse include food intolerance, vomiting, abdominal pain, reflux esophagitis, pouch dilatation, dehydration, and muscle weakness [10].
Band prolapse can be diagnosed by X-rays after the patient has swallowed a barium contrast medium or by endoscopy [11, 12]. A delay in diagnosis can cause hypokalemia with or without loss of consciousness, gastric perforation, or pouch necrosis leading to death [13]. As band prolapses do not respond to conservative measures, many surgeons advocate surgical options including repositioning of the band, replacement with a new one, or even removal of the band [14].
We have performed LAGB without imbrication sutures, and this makes the procedure much simpler and reduces the risk of complications during the initial or any potential revision surgery. Not all anterior band prolapses were reduced by band deflation and endoscopic approach. When we found any sign of infection or perforation inside the stomach, we fixed it operatively. Otherwise, almost all band prolapses after such sutureless LAGB without delay in diagnosis can be fixed easily with an endoscopic procedure. We could treat the patient without operative procedures even in case of a recurrent prolapse.
Conclusion
Band prolapse is a significant and common late complication after LAGB. Endoscopic treatment of band prolapse is safe and feasible without requiring an operative procedure.
References
Tran TT, Pauli E, Lyn-Sue JR, et al. Revisional weight loss surgery after failed laparoscopic gastric banding: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(11):4087–93.
Brown WA, Burton PR, Anderson M, et al. Symmetrical pouch dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: incidence and management. Obes Surg. 2008;18(9):1104–8.
O’Brien PE, Brennan L, Laurie C, et al. Intensive medical weight loss or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of mild to moderate obesity: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomised trial. Obes Surg. 2013;23(9):1345–53.
Vertruyen M. Experience with LAP-BAND system up to 7 years. Obes Surg. 2002;12:569–72.
O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, et al. A prospective randomized trial of placement of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: comparison of the perigastric and pars flaccida pathways. Obes Surg. 2005;15(6):820–6.
Lunca S, Vix M, Rikkers A, et al. Late gastric prolapse with pouch necrosis after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2005;15(4):571–5.
Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–36.
Favretti F, Cadiere GB, Segato G, et al. Laparoscopic banding: selection and technique in 830 patients. Obes Surg. 2002;12:385–90.
Fielding GA, Allen JW. A step-by-step guide to placement of the LAP-BAND adjustable gastric banding system. Am J Surg. 2002;184(Suppl):26S–30S.
Favretti F, Cadiere GB, Segato G, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LAP-BAND): how to avoid complications. Obes Surg. 1997;7:352–8.
Mortele KJ, Pattijn P, Mollet P, et al. The Swedish laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: radiologic findings in 218 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:77–84.
Toppino M, Cesarani F, Comba A, et al. The role of early radiological studies after gastric bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2001;11:447–54.
Chevallier JM, Zinzindohoue F, Elian N, et al. Adjustable gastric banding in a public university hospital: prospective analysis of 400 patients. Obes Surg. 2002;12:93–9.
Hadar S, Franco F. Avoiding postoperative complications with the LAP-BAND system. Am J Surg. 2002;184(Suppl):31S–7S.
Conflict of Interest
All authors have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, S.H., Kim, K.C. & Kim, K.H. Endoscopic Treatment of Gastric Band Prolapse. OBES SURG 24, 954–957 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1253-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1253-7