Abstract
We examine basic asymptotic properties of relative risk for two families of generalized Erlang processes (where each one is based off of a simplified Armitage and Doll multistage model) in order to predict relative risk data from cancer. The main theorems that we are able to prove are all corroborated by large clinical studies involving relative risk for former smokers and transplant recipients. We then show that at least some of these theorems do not extend to other Armitage and Doll multistage models. We conclude with suggestions for lifelong increased cancer screening for both former smoker and transplant recipient subpopulations of individuals and possible future directions of research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The authors wish to thank Prof. Marek Kimmel and Prof. Maia Martcheva for their careful reading and helpful comments and suggestions. The authors also wish to thank the anonymous referee for helping to greatly improve the content of the paper and for providing the inspiration for Theorem 10.
References
Armitage P (1985) Multistage models of carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect 63:195–201
Armitage P, Doll R (1954) The age distribution of cancer and a multi-stage theory of carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer 8:1–12
Baker SG (2012) Paradoxes in carcinogenesis should spur new avenues of research: an historical perspective. Disrupt Sci Technol 1(2):100–107
Cannataro Vincent L, McKinley Scott A, St Mary CM (2016) The implications of small stem cell niche sizes and the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations in aging and tumorigenesis. Evolut Appl. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12361
Corthay A (2014) Does the immune system naturally protect against cancer? Front Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00197
Ebbert J, Yang P, Vachon C, Vierkant R, Cerhan J, Folsom A, Sellers T (2003) Lung cancer risk reduction after smoking cessation: observations from a prospective cohort of women. J Clin Oncol 21:921–926
Gsteiger S, Morgenthaler S (2008) Heterogeneity in multistage carcinogenesis and mixture modeling. Theor Biol Med Model 5(13):1–12
Harding C, Pompei F, Lee E, Wilson R (2008) Cancer suppression at old age. Cancer Res 68(11):4465–4478
Hiller J, Vallejo C, Betthauser L, Keesling J (2017) Characteristic patterns of cancer incidence: epidemiological data, biological theories, and multistage models. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 124:41–48
Kirschner D, Panetta JC (1998) Modeling immunotherapy of the tumor immune interaction. J Math Biol 37:235–252
Knudson AG Jr (1971) Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. PNAS 68(4):820–823
Moolgavkar S, Venzon D (1979) Two-event models for carcinogenesis: incidence curves for childhood and adult tumors. Math Biosci 47:55–77
Moolgavkar SH (2004) Commentary: fifty years of the multistage model: remarks on a landmark paper. Int J Epidemiol 33(6):1182–1183
Nording CO (1951) A new theory on the cancer-inducing mechanism. Br J Cancer 7(1):68–72
Pompei F, Wilson R (2001) Age distribution of cancer: the incidence turnover at old age. Human Ecol Risk Assess 7(6):1619–1650
Zhenyi S, Yang Z, Yongqing X, Chen Y, Qiang Y (2015) Apoptosis, autophagy, necroptosis, and cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer 14(48):1–14
Wilkie KP (2013) A review of mathematical models of cancer-immune interactions in the context of tumor dormancy. Adv Exp Med Biol 734:201–234
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hiller, J., Keesling, J. Asymptotic Relative Risk Results from a Simplified Armitage and Doll Model of Carcinogenesis. Bull Math Biol 80, 670–686 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-0397-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-0397-3