Abstract
Root growth has a fundamental role in nitrogen (N) use efficiency. Nevertheless, little is known about how modern breeding progress has affected root growth and its responses to N supply. The root and shoot growth of a core set of 11 representative Chinese maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids released between 1973 and 2009 were investigated under high N (4 mmol L−1, HN) and low N (0.04 mmol L−1, LN) levels in a solution culture system. Compared with LN, HN treatment decreased root dry weight (RDW), the root: shoot ratio (R/S), and the relative growth rate for root dry weight (RGRroot), but increased the total root length (TRL) and the total lateral root length (LRL). The total axial root length (ARL) per plant was reduced under HN, mostly in hybrids released before the 1990s. The number of seminal roots (SRN) was largely unaffected by different N levels. More recently released hybrids showed higher relative growth rates in the shoot under both HN and LN. However, the roots only showed increased RGR under HN treatment. Correspondingly, there was a positive linear relationship with the year of hybrid release for TRL, LRL and ARL under HN treatment. Together, these results suggest that while shoot growth of maize has improved, its root growth has only improved under high N conditions over the last 36 years of selective breeding in China. Improving root growth under LN conditions may be necessary to increase the N use efficiency of maize.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tollenaar M. Genetic improvement in grain yield of commercial maize hybrid grown in Ontario from 1959 to 1988. Crop Sci, 1989, 29: 1365–1371 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900060007x
Tollenaar M, Lee E A. Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica, 2006, 51: 399–408
Russell W A. Genetic improvement of maize yields. Adv Agron, 1991, 46: 245–298 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60582-9
Duvick D N. Genetic contributions to advances in yield of U.S. maize. Maydica, 1992, 37: 69–79
Qiao C G, Wang Y J, Guo H A, et al. A review of advances in maize production in Jilin Province during 1974–1993. Field Crops Res, 1996, 47: 65–75 10.1016/0378-4290(96)00007-X
Khush G S. Green revolution: preparing for the 21st century. Genome, 1999, 42: 646–655 10464789, 10.1139/g99-044, 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzpsVSmtw%3D%3D
Duvick D N, Cassman K G. Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the north-central United States. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1622–1630 10.2135/cropsci1999.3961622x
Xie Z J, Li M S, Xu J S, et al. Contributions of genetic improvement to yields of maize hybrids during different eras in north China. Sci Agri Sin, 2009, 42: 781–789
Raun W R, Johnson G V. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron J, 1999, 91: 357–363 10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100030001x
Mackay A D, Barber S A. Effect of nitrogen on root growth of two corn genotypes in the field. Agron J, 1986, 77: 699–703 10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800040028x
Pan W L, Jackson W A, Moll R H. Nitrate uptake and partitioning by corn (Zea mays L.) root systems and associated morphological differences among genotypes and stages of root development. J Exp Bot, 1985, 36: 1341–1351 10.1093/jxb/36.9.1341
Wang Y, Mi G H, Chen F J, et al. Response of root morphology to nitrate supply and its contribution to nitrogen accumulation in maize. J Plant Nutri, 2004, 27: 2189–2202 10.1081/PLN-200034683, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXptV2hsrc%3D
Hochholdinger F, Tuberosa R. Genetic and genomic dissection of maize root development and architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2009, 12: 172–177 19157956, 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.002, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjsVOgtbk%3D
Liu J C, Li J S, Chen F, et al. Mapping QTLs for root traits under different nitrate levels at the seedling stage in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil, 2008, 305: 253–265 10.1007/s11104-008-9562-z, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjsVGitLY%3D
Coque M, Martin A, Veyrieras J B, et al. Genetic variation for N-remobilization and postsilking N-uptake in a set of maize recombinant inbred lines.3. QTL detection and coincidences. Theor Appl Genet, 2008, 117: 729–747 18566796, 10.1007/s00122-008-0815-2, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVSnsrnN
Liu J C, Cai H G, Chu Q, et al. Genetic analysis of vertical root pulling resistance (VRPR) in maize using two genetic populations. Mol Breeding, 2010, DOI 10.1007/s11032-010-9496-z
Herder G D, Gert V I, Tom B, et al. The roots of a new green revolution. Trends Plant Sci, 2010, 15: 600–607 20851036, 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.009
Garnett T, Vanessa C, Brent N K. Root based approaches to improving nitrogen use efficiency in plants. Plant Cell Environ, 2009, 32: 1272–1283 19558408, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02011.x, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtFGhtrfF
Siddique K H M, Belford R K, Tennant D. Root: shoot ratios of old and modern, tall and semi-dwarf wheats in a mediterranean environment. Plant soil, 1990, 121: 89–98 10.1007/BF00013101
Waines G J, Bahman E. Domestication and crop physiology: roots of green-revolution wheat. Ann Bot, 2007, 100: 991–998 17940075, 10.1093/aob/mcm180
Wilson H K. Plant characters as indices in relation to the ability of corn strains to withstand lodging. J Am Soc Agron, 1930, 22: 453–458
Jenison J R, Shank D B, Penny L H. Root characteristics of 44 maize inbreds evaluated in four environments. Crop Sci, 1981, 21: 233–237 10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100020007x
Landi P, Albrecht B, Giuliani M M, et al. Seedling characteristics in hydroponic culture and field performance of maize genotypes with different resistance to root lodging. Maydica, 1998, 43: 111–116
Clarke J M, McCaig T N. Breeding for efficient root systems. In: Hayward M D, Osemark M O, Ramagosa I, Eds. Plant Breeding: Principles and Prospects. London: Chapmann & Hall, 1993. 485–499
Hammer G L. Can changes in canopy and/or root system architecture explain historical maize yield trends in the U.S. Corn Belt? Crop Sci, 2009, 49: 299–312 10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0152
Hirel B, Le G J, Ney B, et al. The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. J Exp Bot, 2007, 58: 2369–2387 17556767, 10.1093/jxb/erm097, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXos1ykt74%3D
Liu J C, Li J S, Mi G H, et al. QTL Mapping of seedling growth traits and grain yield under two nitrogen conditions in maize. Sci Agri Sin, 2009, 42: 3413–3420 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsVSntrfE
Cai H G. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of root and nitrogen and phosphorus efficiency related traits in maize. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2009
Feil B. Breeding progress in small grain cereals-a comparison of old and modern cultivars. Plant Breeding, 1992, 108: 1–11 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1992.tb00093.x
Tong P Y. The course and the achievement of corn variety improving in the 20th century in China. China Histor Mater Sci Technol, 2001, 22: 113–127 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M7jvVWqtg%3D%3D
Zhang J L. Maize variety evolution since 1982 in China. J Henan Agri Sci, 2008, 6: 36–39 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVagtrY%3D
Wolt J P, Song C M. Dymamic-stiffness matrix of unbounded soil by finite-element multi-cell cloning. Earthquake Eng Struc Dyn, 1994, 23: 233–250 10.1002/eqe.4290230302
Sanderson J B, Daynard T B, Tollenaar M. A mathematical model of the shape of corn leaves. Can J Plant Sci, 1981, 61: 1009–1011 10.4141/cjps81-151
Botella M, Martinez V, Nieves M, et al. Effect of salinity on the growth and nitrogen uptake by wheat seedlings. J Plant Nutri, 1997, 20: 793–804 10.1080/01904169709365295, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjsFeitb8%3D
Bingham I J. Soil-root-canopy interactions. Ann Appl Biol, 2001, 138: 243–251 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00108.x
Tian Q Y, Chen F J, Zhang F S, et al. Possible involvement of cytokinin in nitrate-mediated root growth in maize. Plant Soil, 2005, 277: 185–196 10.1007/s11104-005-6837-5, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1GlsL3K
Tian Q Y, Chen F J, Liu J X, et al. Inhibition of maize root growth by high nitrate supply is correlated to reduced IAA levels in roots. J Plant Physiol, 2008, 165: 942–951 17928098, 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.02.011, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXptlagurc%3D
Wiesler F, Horst W J. Differences among maize cultivars in the utilization of soil nitrate and the related losses of nitrate through leaching. Plant Soil, 1993, 151: 193–203 10.1007/BF00016284, 1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXmt1Git74%3D
Wiesler F, Horst W J. Root growth and nitrate utilization of maize cultivars under field conditions. Plant Soil, 1994, 163: 267–277 10.1007/BF00007976, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXislWmt7g%3D
Mi G H, Chen F J, Wu Q P, et al. Ideotype root architecture for efficient nitrogen acquisition by maize in intensive cropping systems. Sci China Ser C, 2010, 53: 1369–1373 10.1007/s11427-010-4097-y
Campos H M, Cooper J E, Habben G O, et al. Improving drought tolerance in maize: A view from industry. Field Crops Res, 2004, 90: 19–34 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.003
Li S K, Wang C. Evolution and development of maize production techniques in China. Sci Agri Sin, 2009, 42: 1941–1951
Duvick D N. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv Agron, 2005, 86: 83–145 10.1016/S0065-2113(05)86002-X
Sun Q Y, Hu C H, Dong S T, et al. Evolution of root characters during all growth stage of maize cultivars in different eras in China. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29: 641–645
Chen C Y, Hou H P, Li Q, et al. Effects of panting density on photosynthetic characteristics and changes of carbon and nitrogen in leaf of different corn hybrids. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 871–878 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00871, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtF2nsrnO
He D Y, Zhou L D, Liu J W, et al. A preliminary study on the role of US maize germplasm resources in maize breeding in China. Bull Agri Sci Techno, 2009, 4: 5–6
Yang J S, Wang Y J, Zhang J W, et al. Dry matter production and photosynthesis characteristics of three hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.) with super-high-yielding potential. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 355–361 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXksVeju7s%3D
Zhang W X, Zhao Z, Bai G X, et al. Response on water stress and low nitrogen in different maize hybrid varieties and evaluation for their adversity-resistance. Sci Agri Sin, 2007, 7: 1361–1370
Peter R T, Eschholz W, Stamp P, et al. Swiss maize landraces-early vigour adaptation to cool conditions. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 2006, 54: 329–336 10.1556/AAgr.54.2006.3.7
Reinke R F, Richards R A, Angus J F, et al. Early vigor: an important foundation for rapid biomass accumulation. International Rice Research Institute Los Baños, Laguna, the Philippines, 2002. 429–438
Fakorede M A B, Ojo D K. Variability for Seedling Vigour in Maize. Exp Agric, 1981, 17: 195–201 10.1017/S0014479700011455
Cirilo A G, Dardanelli J, Balzarini M, et al. Morpho-physiological traits associated with maize crop adaptations to environments differing in nitrogen availability. Field Crops Res, 2009, 113: 116–124 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.04.011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Q., Chen, F., Chen, Y. et al. Root growth in response to nitrogen supply in Chinese maize hybrids released between 1973 and 2009. Sci. China Life Sci. 54, 642–650 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-011-4186-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-011-4186-6