Skip to main content
Log in

Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and soil N availability under legume crops in an arid environment

  • SOILS, SEC 2 • GLOBAL CHANGE, ENVIRON RISK ASSESS, SUSTAINABLE LAND USE • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Legume crops often present an important option to maintain and improve soil nitrogen (N) quality and fertility in a dryland agroecosystem. However, the work on the integral assessment of the symbiotic N2 fixation (Nfix) and their effects on soil N availability under field conditions is scare.

Materials and methods

Five treatments consisted of legumes (capello woolly pod vetch and field pea), two non-legume crops (Saia oat and Indian mustard), and a nil-crop treatment as control (CK) in southeastern Australia to investigate the effects of legume crops on the amount of Nfix, which was estimated using a 15N natural abundance technique, and soil N pools, microbial biomass, microbial quotient, soil basal respiration, metabolic quotient (qCO2), net N mineralization rates, and substrate-induced respiration (SIR) using the MicroResp method.

Results and discussion

Crop 15N natural abundances under legume crops were lower, and the amounts of Nfix in the aboveground vetch and pea biomass were 42.1 and 37.3 kg ha−1, respectively, compared with the reference crops (oat and mustard). The crop treatments had higher soil pH, and lower moisture, NH +4 –N and NO 3 –N contents compared with the CK. The NO 3 –N was predominant form of soil inorganic N across the treatments. Although no significant differences were found in microbial biomass carbon (C) and N across the treatments, legume crops had lower soil basal respiration and metabolic quotient, indicating that soil organic carbon was less easily accessible to microorganisms in comparison with the non-legume crops. In addition, no pronounced differences were found in soil available N pools (NH +4 –N, NO 3 –N, and soil soluble organic N) among the crop treatments. However, legume crops had lower soil net N mineralization rates and SIR, indicating lower soil potential N availability compared with the non-legume crops. These results showed that the amounts of Nfix by legume crops did not have immediate effects on soil N availability.

Conclusions

Compared with non-legume crops, legume crops exerted less negative effects on the soil microbial properties in this dry environment. However, the amount of Nfix under legume crops did not immediately increase soil N availability over the growing season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertin C, Yan X, Weston LA (2003) The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 256:67–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bever JD (2003) Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests. New Phytol 157:465–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgo A, Masse D, Sall S, Serpantie G, Chotte JL, Hien V (2007) Chemical and microbial properties of semiarid tropical soils of short-term fallows in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Biol Fertil Soils 43:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes PC, Kragt JF, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: the effects of fumigation time and temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 17:831–835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buerkert A, Bationo A, Dossa K (2000) Mechanisms of residue mulch-induced cereal growth increases in West Africa. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:346–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CD, Chapman SJ, Cameron CM, Davidson MS, Potts JM (2003) A rapid microtiter plate method to measure carbon dioxide evolved from carbon amendments so as to determine the physiological profiles of soil microbial communities by using whole soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3593–3599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carranca C, de Varennes A, Rolston D (1999) Biological nitrogen fixation by fababean, pea and chickpea, under field conditions, estimated by the 15N isotope dilution technique. Eur J Agron 10:49–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman SJ, Campbell CD, Artz RRE (2007) Assessing CLPPs using MicroResp™. A comparison with Biolog and multi-SIR. J Soils Sediments 7:406–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CR, Xu ZH (2008) Analysis and behavior of soluble organic nitrogen in forest soils. J Soils Sediments 8:363–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CR, Xu ZH, Hughes JM (2002) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil nitrogen pools and microbial properties in a hoop pine (Araucaria cunninghamii) plantation in southeast Queensland, Australia. Biol Fertil Soils 36:276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CR, Xu ZH, Mathers NJ (2004) Soil carbon pools in adjacent natural and plantation forests of subtropical Australia. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:282–291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng WX (2009) Rhizosphere priming effect: its functional relationships with microbial turnover, evapotransporation, and C–N budgets. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1795–1801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Degens BP (1999) Catabolic response profiles differ between microorganisms grown in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 31:475–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Degens BP, Sparling G (1996) Changes in aggregation do not correspond with changes in labile organic C fractions in soil amended with 14C-glucose. Soil Biol Biochem 28:453–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Formowitz B, Joergensen RG, Buerkert A (2009) Impact of legume versus cereal root residues on biological properties of West African soils. Plant Soil 325:145–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frazão LA, Piccolo MC, Feigl BJ, Cerri CC, Cerri CEP (2010) Inorganic nitrogen, microbial biomass and microbial activity of a sandy Brazilian Cerrado soil under different land uses. Agric Ecosyst Environ 135:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisseler D, Horwarth WR (2009) Relationship between carbon and nitrogen availability and extracellular enzyme activities in soil. Pedobiologia 53:87–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino A, Knapp BA, Moscatelli MC, De Angelis P, Grego S, Insam H (2007) Structural and functional diversity of soil microbes is affected by elevated [CO2] and N addition in a poplar plantation. J Soils Sediments 7:399–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti A (1983) Atmospheric nitrogen is a reliable standard for 15N natural abundance measurements. Nature 303:685–687

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen C (2003) Rhizodeposition of organic C by plants, mechanisms and controls. Agronomie 23:375–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oberson A, Naner S, Bosshard C, Dubois D, Mäder P, Erossard E (2007) Symbiotic N2 fixation by soybean in organic and conventional cropping systems estimated by 15N dilution and 15N natural abundance. Plant Soil 290:69–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson E (2003) Importance of rhizodeposition in the coupling of plant and microbial productivity. Eur J Soil Sci 54:741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennanen T, Caul S, Daniell TJ, Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Wheatley RE (2004) Comunity-level responses of metabolically active soil microorganisms to the quantity and quality of substrate inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 36:841–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schloter M, Dilly O, Munch JC (2003) Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling G (1992) Ratio on microbial biomass carbon to soils organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Aust J Soil Res 30:195–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Unkovich MJ, Pate JS, Armstrong EL, Sanford P (1995) Nitrogen economy of annual crop and pasture legumes in southwest Australia. Soil Biol Biochem 27:585–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (1992) A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Bio Rev 67:321–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Ghani A (1995) A critique of the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO2) as a bioindicator of disturbance and ecosystem development. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1601–1610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wichern F, Mayer J, Joergensen RG, Müller T (2007) Rhizodeposition of C and N in peas and oats after 13C–15N double labelling under field conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2527–2537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wichern F, Eberhardt E, Mayer J, Joergensen RG, Müller T (2008) Nitrogen rhizodeposition in agricultural crops: methods, estimates and future prospects. Soil Biol Biochem 40:30–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZH, Chen CR, He JZ, Liu JX (2009) Trends and challenges in soil research 2009: linking global climate change to local long-term forest productivity. J Soils Sediments 9:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Australian Research Council, Griffith University, Industry and Investment NSW, and Grains Research and Development Corporation. We thank Mr. Eric Koetz for assistance in the field experiments, soil and biomass sampling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoqi Zhou.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hailong Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Liu, X., Rui, Y. et al. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and soil N availability under legume crops in an arid environment. J Soils Sediments 11, 762–770 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0353-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0353-4

Keywords

Navigation