Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding and influencing urban residents’ knowledge about wildland management in Austin, Texas

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to increasing exurban settlement around Austin, Texas and subsequent land use changes, the City of Austin Wildland Division faces competing pressures from residential communities regarding land and wildlife management actions. Current environmental education and outreach efforts in Austin focus on developing environmental literacy about the city’s wildland areas adjacent to exurban settlement as well as their management program. The desired outcome is to promote more positive perceptions and motivate pro-environmental behaviors that are consistent with the city’s wildland program. We conducted a mail survey of 1,000 residents living near the urban wildlands to better understand factors that influence residents’ proficiency in four knowledge domains: karst aquifers, endangered species, rangeland ecology, and the city’s management program. Regression analyses identified positive associations between local newspaper readership and residents’ environmental knowledge of karst aquifer geology, rangelands, and city’s wildland program. Previous engagement in environmentally oriented education programs or organization was positively associated with all four knowledge domains. Some strategies for information dissemination about the wildlands include the use of local newspapers and homeowners association newsletters. Newer, younger residents are the suggested target audience for initiating a proposed environmental education and outreach program. Such programs should incorporate both local environmental organizations and homeowners associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the term wildland-urban interface in this paper in the context of communities that are mixed in with undeveloped wildland areas (USDA and USDI 2001). It was created in conjunction with wildland fire policy (Radeloff et al. 2005). The broader term urban-rural interface is more frequently used to imply the co-existence of urban and rural features in the same region (Allen 2003).

  2. The socio-demographic factors used as controls in this model are not reported in Table 6 having previously been discussed in the context of Table 5.

References

  • Allen A (2003) Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field. Environ Urban 15:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuthnot J (1974) Environmental knowledge and recycling behavior as a function of attitudes and personality characteristics. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1:119–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcury TA (1987) Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge: the case of acid rain. Sex Roles 16:463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcury TA (1990) Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Hum Organ 49:300–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcury TA, Johnson TP (1987) Public environmental knowledge: a statewide survey. J Environ Educ 18:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong K, Berlin M, Schwartz JS, Propert K, Ubel PA (1999) Educational content and the effectiveness of influenza vaccination reminders. J Gen Intern Med 14:695–698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey GA (1971) The public, the media, and the knowledge gap. J Environ Educ 2:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett ME, Charbeneau RJ (1997) A parsimonious model for simulating flow in a karst aquifer. J Hydrol 196:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein R (2009) Raleigh and Austin are fastest-growing metro areas. 19 March 2009. U.S. Census Bureau News: Public Information Office, Washington, D.C. www.census.gov/ (accessed 05.11.10)

  • Brehm JM, Eisenhauer BW, Krannich RS (2004) Dimensions of community attachment and their relationship to well-being in the amenity-rich rural West. Rural Sociol 69:405–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brothers CC, Fortner RW, Mayer VJ (1991) The impact of television news on public environmental knowledge. J Environ Educ 22:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunson MW, Reiter DK (1996) Effects of ecological information on judgments about scenic impacts of timber harvest. J Environ Manage 46:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries RS, Foley JA, Asner GP (2004) Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Front Ecol Environ 2:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (2000) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • George SL, Crooks KR (2006) Education and conservation on the urban-wildland interface: testing the efficacy of informational brochures. Southwest Nat 51:240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhards J, Schafer MA (2010) Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany. New Media Soc 12:143–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heer C, Rusterholz HP, Baur B (2003) Forest perception and knowledge of hikers and mountain bikers in two different areas in northwestern Switzerland. Environ Manage 31:709–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holbert RL, Kwak N, Shah DV (2003) Environmental concern, patterns of television viewing, and pro-environmental behaviors: integrating models of media consumption and effects. J Broadcast Electron Media 47:177–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson SK, Marynowski SB (1997) Public attitudes and knowledge about ecosystem management on Department of Defense land in Florida. Conserv Biol 11:770–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson SK, Monroe MC, Marynowski S (2001) Fire at the wildland interface: the influence of experience and mass media on public knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Wildl Soc Bull 29:929–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda JD, Janowitz M (1974) Community attachment in mass society. Am Sociol Rev 39:328–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurian L (2003) A prerequisite for participation: environmental knowledge and what residents know about local toxic sites. J Plann Educ Res 22:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler BJ, Lynch L, Bennett PC (1999) Mobile sediment in an urbanizing karst aquifer: implications for contaminant transport. Environ Geol 39:25–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney MP, Ward MP (1973) Ecology: let’s hear from the people; an objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. Am Psychol 28:583–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkowski T (1991) The relationship between environmental literacy and responsible environmental behavior in environmental education. In: UNESCO An environmental education approach to the training of middle level teachers: a prototype programme, pp 1–7. unesdoc.unesco.org

  • McCool SF, Martin SR (1994) Community attachment and attitudes toward tourism development. J Travel Res 32:29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohai P, Twight B (1987) Age and environmental concern: an elaboration of the Buttel model using national survey evidence. Soc Sci Q 68:798–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostman RE, Parker JL (1987) Impact of education, age, newspapers, and television on environmental knowledge, concerns, and behaviors. J Environ Educ 19:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, McKeefry JF (2005) The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reading RP, Clark TW, Kellert SR (1994) Attitudes and knowledge of people living in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Soc Nat Resour 7:349–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regional Environmental Consultants (RECON) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (1996) Habitat conservation plan and final environmental impact statement. https://www.ci.austin.tx.us/water/wildland/downloads/habitatconservationplanfinal.pdf (accessed 04.20.10)

  • Roth C (1992) Environmental Literacy: its roots, evolution and direction in the 1990s. Ohio State University, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S (1997) Defining environmental literacy. Trends Ecol Evol 12:457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz PW, Stone WF (1994) Authoritarianism and attitudes toward the environment field and laboratory perspective. Environ Behav 8:471–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler B, Mallon A (2006) Public acceptance of disturbance-based forest management: a study of the blue river landscape strategy in Oregon’s central cascades adaptive management area. Final Project Report: Pacific Northwest Research Station. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_rp581.pdf (accessed 04.10.10)

  • Stedman R (2002) Toward a social psychology of place. Environ Behav 34:561–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger MA, Pierce JC, Lovrich NP, Steel BS (1988) Information source reliance and knowledge acquisition: Canadian/US comparisons regarding acid rain. West Polit Q 41:747–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodori GL, Luloff AE (2002) Position on environmental issues and engagement in pro-environmental behaviors. Soc Nat Resour 15:471–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toman E, Shindler B, Brunson M (2006) Fire and fuel management communication strategies: citizen evaluations of agency outreach programs. Soc Nat Resour 19:321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSDC (Texas State Data Center) (2000) Austin-Roundrock Metropolitan (Senario 1.0) descriptive data tables from the 2000 census. In: Texas Population Estimates and Projected populations. www.txsdc.utsa.edu (accessed 05.11.10)

  • USDA and USDI (2001) Urban wildland interface communities within vicinity of federal lands that are at high risk from wildfire. Fed Regist 66:751–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Liere KD, Dunlap RE (1981) The social bases of environmental concern: a review hypothesis, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opin Q 44:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White WB (2002) Karst hydrology: recent developments and open questions. Eng Geol 65:85–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RL (2001) Public knowledge, preferences and involvement in adaptive ecosystem management. Masters Thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR

  • Williams DR, Patterson ME, Roggenbuck JW, Watson AE (1992) Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leis Sci 14:29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WQPL Stakeholder Steering Committee (2001) Conceptual plan for public use on City of Austin water and wastewater utility Water Quality Protected Lands (WQPL). https://www.ci.austin.tx.us/water/wildland/bccptrailplan.htm (accessed 04.20.10)

  • Wright AS (2000) Citizen knowledge and opinions about watershed management in the South Santiam Basin in Oregon. Masters Thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank W. Conrad, K.Thuesen, S. Rowin, and D. Dietz for help with organizing the focus group meeting and providing feedback on survey design. We thank D. Scott, C. Smith, and S. Miller for help with sample selection. This project was finically supported under an interlocal agreement between the City of Austin and Texas A&M University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urs P. Kreuter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, L.E., Sorice, M.G. & Kreuter, U.P. Understanding and influencing urban residents’ knowledge about wildland management in Austin, Texas. Urban Ecosyst 16, 33–51 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0177-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0177-4

Keywords

Navigation