Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge: The case of acid rain

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several theories have been presented that predict differences between women and men in attitudes toward the environment due to differences in sex roles. Research on which these theories can be tested has tended to examine general environmental concern, and the results have generally been weak and inconclusive. Using an approach suggested in the literature, this study examines sex differences in concern and knowledge, using multi-item scales for each, about one environmental issue — acid rain. The results contradict the theories being tested, however: if there is a sex difference, men are found to be more concerned and knowledgeable about the environmental problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A. B., Basilevsky, A. & Hum, D. P. J. Measurement: Theory and techniques. In P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Survey Research. New York: Academic Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuthnot, J. The roles of attitudinal and personality variables in the prediction of environmental behavior and knowledge. Environment and Behavior, 1977, 9, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcury, T. A., Johnson, T. P. & Scollay, S. J. Ecological world view and environmental knowledge: An examination of the “New Environmental Paradigm.” Journal of Environmental Education, forthcoming.

  • Barbour, I. Technology, environment, and human values. New York: Praeger, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, C. J. Differences by sex in support for nuclear power. Social Forces, 1984, 63, 209–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, C. J., Jr., & Dunlap, R. E. Environmental sociology: A paradigm. The American Sociologist, 1978, 13, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality. Public opinion on environmental issues: Results of a national public opinion survey. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. From Virginia Dare to Virginia Slims: Women and technology in American life. Technology and Culture, 1979, 20, 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E. & Catton, W. E., Jr. Environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 1979, 5, 243–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. D. Why the green nigger? Wellesley, MA: Roundtable, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, J. W., & Torantzky, L. G. A scale for assessing attitudes toward environmental quality. Journal of Social Psychology, 1977, 101, 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, G. D., Pinhey, T. K., & Grimes, M. D. Public support for environmental protection: New evidence from national surveys. Pacific Sociological Review, 1980, 23, 423–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, M. P., & Ward, M. P. Ecology: Let's hear from the people: An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 583–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, J., III. The American concern with the environment. In W. B. Burch, Jr., N. H. Cheek, & L. Taylor (Eds.), Social behavior, natural resources, and the environment. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • McStay, J. R., & Dunlap, R. E. Male-female differences in concern for environmental quality. International Journal of Women's Studies, 1983, 6, 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper & Row, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passino, E. M., & Lounsbury, J. W. Sex differences in opposition to and support for construction of a proposed nuclear power plant. In L. M. Ward, S. Coren, A. Gruft, & J. B. Collings (Eds.), The behavioral basis of design, Book I. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, C. E., & Rickson, R. E. Environmental knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 1976, 8, 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuther, R. R. New women, new earth. New York: Seabury, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognacci, L. N., Weigel, R. H., Widen, M. F., & Vernon, D. T. A. Environmental quality: How universal is public concern? Environment and Behavior, 1972, 4, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap R. E. The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1980, 44, 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waksberg, J. Sampling methods for random digit dialing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1978, 73, 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arcury, T.A., Scollay, S.J. & Johnson, T.P. Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge: The case of acid rain. Sex Roles 16, 463–472 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292481

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292481

Keywords

Navigation