Abstract
Color adjectives have played a central role in work on language typology and variation, but there has been relatively little investigation of their meanings by researchers in formal semantics. This is surprising given the fact that color terms have been at the center of debates in the philosophy of language over foundational questions, in particular whether the idea of a compositional, truth-conditional theory of natural language semantics is even coherent. The challenge presented by color terms is articulated in detail in the work of Charles Travis. Travis argues that structurally isomorphic sentences containing color adjectives can shift truth value from context to context depending on how they are used and in the absence of effects of vagueness or ambiguity/polysemy, and concludes that a deterministic mapping from structures to truth conditions is impossible. The goal of this paper is to provide a linguistic perspective on this issue, which we believe defuses Travis’ challenge. We provide empirical arguments that color adjectives are in fact ambiguous between gradable and nongradable interpretations, and that this simple ambiguity, together with independently motivated options concerning scalar dimension within the gradable reading accounts for the Travis facts in a simpler, more constrained, and thus ultimately more successful fashion than recent contextualist analyses such as those in Szabó (Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics and discourse: A festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, 2001) or Rothschild and Segal (Mind Lang, 2009).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asher, N. (2007). A web of words: Lexical meaning in context. Ms., CNRS-IRIT and U. Texas Austin.
Berlin B., Kay P. (1969) Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
Broström, S. (1994). The role of metaphor in cognitive semantics. Lund: Lund University Cognitive Studies 31.
Carlson, G. N. (1977). Reference to kinds in English. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chierchia G. (1995) Individual-level predicates as inherent generics. In: Carlson G., Pelletier F. J. (eds) The generic book. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 176–223
Gärdenfors P. (2000) Conceptual spaces: On the geometry of thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Grinder J., Postal P. (1971) Missing antecedents. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 269–312
Hankamer J., Sag I. (1976) Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428
Kennedy, C. (1999). Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland (1997 UCSC PhD thesis).
Kennedy C. (2007) Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1): 1–45
Kennedy C., McNally L. (2005) Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81(2): 345–381
Kratzer A. (1995) Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In: Carlson G., Pelletier F. (eds) The generic book. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 125–175
Lahav R. (1993) The combinatorial-connectionist debate and the pragmatics of adjectives. Pragmatics and Cognition 1: 71–88
Lakoff G. (1970) A note on vagueness and ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 1(3): 357–359
Lasersohn P. (1999) Pragmatic halos. Language 75(3): 522–551
Predelli S. (2005) Painted leaves, context, and semantic analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 351–374
Quine W. V. O. (1960) Word and object. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Rothschild D., Segal G. (2009) Indexical predicates. Mind and Language 24(4): 467–493
Rotstein C., Winter Y. (2004) Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 12: 259–288
Sainsbury R. M. (2001) Two ways to smoke a cigarette. Ratio 14(4): 386–406
Sauerland U., Stateva P. (2007). Scalar vs. epistemic vagueness: Evidence from approximators. In Gibson M., Friedman T. (eds). Proceedings of SALT 17 (pp. n–m). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Szabó Z. (2001) Adjectives in context. In: Kenesei I., Harnish R. M. (eds) Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics and discourse: A festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 119–146
Travis C. (1985) On what is strictly speaking true. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15(2): 187–229
Travis C. (1994) On constraints of generality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94(2): 165–188
Travis C. (1997) Pragmatics. In: Hale B., Wright C. (eds) A companion to the philosophy of language. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 87–106
Wheeler S. (1972) Attributives and their modifiers. Noûs 6(4): 310–334
Zwicky A., Sadock J. (1975) Ambiguity tests and how to fail them. In: Kimball J. P. (eds) Syntax and semantics. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kennedy, C., McNally, L. Color, context, and compositionality. Synthese 174, 79–98 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9685-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9685-7