Skip to main content
Log in

John Dewey’s Theory of Growth and the Ontological View of Society

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

John Dewey’s famous early twentieth-century account of the relationship between education as growth and democratic societies, presented in Democracy and Education, was later rejected by him, because it failed to properly identify the role of societal structures in growth and experience. In the later Ethics, Dewey attempts to correct that omission, and adumbrates the argument required to reconstruct his theory, which is an appeal to the role of institutions in individual growth and experience. It is the contention of this paper that the inadequacy Dewey finds in his early account is more comprehensively explained by means of recent analyses in philosophy of society, especially John Searle’s ontological analysis. Following in Dewey’s direction, a more complete analysis of the role of society in the theory of growth is presented in terms of the deontological analysis of institutions. It is suggested that the current analyses in philosophy of society provide the means for the completion of Dewey’s views of both growth and experience, making Dewey’s account more useful today than it was a century ago.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Dewey (1930).

  2. Searle (2010).

  3. Searle cites Donald Davidson and Michael Drummett as examples. Ibid. p. 61.

  4. Ibid. p. 69.

  5. Dewey (1916).

  6. Ibid. p. 88.

  7. Ibid. pp. 88–89.

  8. Ibid. p. 89.

  9. Ibid. p. 93.

  10. See note no. 1.

  11. Dewey (1989a).

  12. Ibid., p. 299.

  13. Ibid., p. 300.

  14. Ibid.

  15. Dewey (1988).

  16. Dewey (1989b). “Prose is set forth in propositions. The logic of poetry is super-propositional even when it uses what are, grammatically speaking, propositions.”

  17. Searle, op. cit., p. 161.

  18. Searle, op. cit. pp. 126–132.

  19. See the various discussions produced by searching “Non-Coding RNA Has Changed the Definition of a Gene.”

References

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (Vol. 9, pp. 82–83). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1930). From absolutism to experimentalism. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1929–1930 (Vol. 5, p. 156). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1988). The public and its problems (1927). In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1927 (Vol. 2, p. 330). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1989a). Ethics (1932). In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 7, pp. 298–299). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1989b). Art as experience (1934). In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1934 (Vol. 10, p. 91). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization (p. 62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerome A. Popp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Popp, J.A. John Dewey’s Theory of Growth and the Ontological View of Society. Stud Philos Educ 34, 45–62 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9425-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9425-4

Keywords

Navigation