Abstract
It is now largely accepted as uncontroversial amongst systemic action researchers that there is practical value in theoretical pluralism: seeing through multiple theoretical ‘lenses’ that bring different (sometimes contradictory) assumptions into play. However, the practice of theoretical pluralism is paradoxically often justified with recourse to a single foundational epistemological theory: i.e., a theory of the nature of knowledge, accepted as universally true, which explains how it is that human beings can accept multiple theoretical perspectives. Justifying theoretical pluralism through the use of a foundational theory carries two risks. First, because the foundational theory is viewed as such a basic truth, it can become hard to accept other theories that may contradict it. Therefore, researchers may slip from an initial, strong commitment to theoretical pluralism to a more limited version that eliminates the use of theories that contradict the foundational one. The second risk is that the researcher’s understanding of his or her practice may come to be both constructed and evaluated using a single theoretical lens, so disconfirming evidence of the utility of that lens is never seen. Following an explanation of these risks, an alternative systemic approach to the philosophical justification of theoretical pluralism is advanced, and it is argued that this is less likely to introduce unwitting theoretical restrictions into action research practice than establishing a foundational epistemology. Finally, five consequences of this systemic perspective on theoretical pluralism are proposed: (i) knowledge cannot be regarded as universal and cumulative; (ii) theories are more or less useful depending on the purposes of intervention that are being pursued; (iii) we can think pluralistically about the agency and choices of the researcher; (iv) while it is impossible to produce universal standards for choice between theories, it is nevertheless still possible to generate standards of relevance to particular contexts; and (v) given that different theories inform different methodologies and methods, methodological pluralism (drawing upon methods from different paradigms) becomes a useful partner to theoretical pluralism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Elsewhere, I have discussed in more detail how we can choose between multiple definitions of knowledge generating systems (including agents and agency), and I have also acknowledged that all epistemological theories have some minimal common ground concerning the necessary presence of one or more sentient beings (Midgley 2000).
Here I part company from Von Glasersfeld (1985) and Gergen (1991) who say that any talk of ‘reality’ is problematic. I believe that, if we acknowledge that our talk of reality involves a particular type of boundary judgement, we can escape from the naïve objectivism that these authors rightly criticize. Acknowledging one particular type of boundary judgement raises the possibility that we might be mistaken in this judgement, and that what we have taken to be objective is actually the product of social construction or subjective positioning (both of which involve a different type of boundary judgement about what is generating knowledge).
References
Ackoff RL (1981) Creating the corporate future. Wiley, New York
Argyris C, Schön DA (1985) Strategy, change and defensive routines. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA
Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. Jason Aronson, Northvale, NJ
Bateson G (1979) Mind and nature: a necessary unity. Wildwood House, London
Bhaskar R (1986) Scientific realism and human emancipation. Verso, London
Bilson A (1997) Guidelines for a constructivist approach: steps toward the adaptation of ideas from family therapy for use in organizations. Syst Pract 10:153–177
Bohm D (1980) Wholeness and the implicate order. Ark, London
Burrell G, Morgan G (1979) Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Heinemann, London
Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester
Churchman CW (1968) The systems approach. Dell, New York
Churchman CW (1970) Operations research as a profession. Manage Sci 17:B37–B53
Córdoba J-R (2002) A critical systems thinking approach for the planning of information technology in the information society. PhD thesis, University of Hull, Hull
Fals-Borda O, Rahman MA (1991) Action and knowledge: breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. Apex Press, New York
Flood RL (1990) Liberating systems theory. Plenum Press, New York
Flood RL, Jackson MC (eds) (1991) Critical systems thinking: directed readings. Wiley, Chichester
Flood RL, Romm NRA (eds) (1996) Critical systems thinking: current research and practice. Plenum, New York
Fodor JA (1974) Special sciences (or: the disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese 28:97–115
Freeden M (1991) Rights. Open University Press, Milton Keynes
Georgiou I (2000) The ontological constitution of boundary-judging in the phenomenological epistemology of Von Bertalanffy’s general system theory. Syst Pract Action Res 13:391–424
Gergen KJ (1991) The saturated self: dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. Basic Books, New York
Gergen KJ (1994) The limits of pure critique. In: Simons HW, Billig M (eds) After postmodernism: reconstructing ideology critique. Sage, London
Greene B (2004) The fabric of the cosmos: space, time, and the texture of reality. Vintage Books, New York
Gregory WJ (1992) Critical systems thinking and pluralism: a new constellation. PhD thesis, City University, London
Hacking I (1999) The social construction of what? Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA
Jackson MC (1990) Beyond a system of systems methodologies. J Oper Res Soc 41:657–668
Jackson MC (1991) Systems methodology for the management sciences. Plenum, New York
Jackson MC (2000) Systems approaches to management. Kluwer/Plenum, New York
Jackson MC, Keys P (1984) Towards a system of systems methodologies. J Oper Res Soc 35:473–486
James W (1907) Pragmatism: a new name for some old ways of thinking, 1975 edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA
Kelly GA (1955) The psychology of personal constructs. volume one: a theory of personality. W.W. Norton, New York
Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Luhmann N (1986) Ecological communication. 1989 trans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Maturana H (1988) Reality: the search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. Irish J Psychol 9:25–82
Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1992) The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding, revised edn. Shambhala, Boston
Merleau-Ponty M (1962) The phenomenology of perception. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Midgley G (1992) Pluralism and the legitimation of systems science. Syst Pract 5:147–172
Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. Kluwer/Plenum, New York
Midgley G (2003) Science as systemic intervention: some implications of systems thinking and complexity for the philosophy of science. Syst Pract Action Res 16:77–97
Midgley G (2004) Five sketches of post-modernism: implications for systems thinking and operational research. J Organ Transform Social Change 1:47–62
Midgley G (2008) Systems thinking, complexity and the philosophy of science. Emergence Complexity Organization 10(4):55–73
Midgley G, Ochoa-Arias AE (2001) Unfolding a theory of systemic intervention. Syst Pract Action Res 14:615–650
Midgley G, Foote J, Ahuriri-Driscoll A, Wood D (2007a) Towards a new framework for evaluating participative and systemic methods. In: Proceedings of the 51st annual conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS), Tokyo, Japan, July 2007
Midgley G, Ahuriri-Driscoll A, Baker V, Foote J, Hepi M, Taimona H, Rogers-Koroheke M, Gregor J, Gregory W, Lange M, Veth J, Winstanley A, Wood D (2007b) Practitioner identity in systemic intervention: reflections on the promotion of environmental health through Māori community development. Syst Res Behav Sci 24:233–247
Miller JG (1965) Living systems: basic concepts. Behav Sci 10:193–237
Mingers JC (1992) Criticising the phenomenological critique: autopoiesis and critical realism. Syst Pract 5:173–180
Mingers JC (1995) Self-producing systems: implications and applications of autopoiesis. Plenum, New York
Mingers J (2006) Realising systems thinking: knowledge and action in management science. Springer, New York
Mingers J, Gill A (eds) (1997) Multimethodology: the theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. Wiley, Chichester
Morgan G (1986) Images of organization. Sage, London
Oliga JC (1988) Methodological foundations of systems methodologies. Syst Pract 1:87–112
Popper KR (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Originally published as Logik de Forschung, 1935. Harper, New York
Popper KR (1972) Objective knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Prigogine I (1987) Exploring complexity. Eur J Oper Res 30:97–103
Prigogine I (1989) The rediscovery of time: science in a world of limited predictability. Beshara 9:28–32
Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos: man’s new dialogue with nature. Fontana, London
Rahman MA (1993) People’s self-development: perspectives on participatory action research—a journey through experience. Zed Books, London
Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Reason P (ed) (1988) Human inquiry in action: developments in new paradigm research. Sage, London
Romm NRA (1996) Inquiry-and-intervention in systems planning: probing methodological rationalities. World Futures 47:25–36
Seidman E (1988) Back to the future, community psychology: unfolding a theory of social intervention. Am J Community Psychol 16:3–24
Selvini-Palazzoli M, Cecchin G, Prata G, Boscolo L (1978) Paradox and counterparadox. Jason Aronson, New York
Taket A, White L (2000) Partnership and participation: decision-making in the multiagency setting. Wiley, Chichester
Ulrich W (1983) Critical heuristics of social planning: a new approach to practical philosophy. Haupt, Berne
Ulrich W (1996) A primer to critical systems heuristics for action researchers. Centre for Systems Studies, Hull
Von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory. Penguin, London
Von Glasersfeld E (1985) Reconstructing the concept of knowledge. Arch Psychol 53:91–101
Walker RJ (2007) Social auditing as social learning: a theoretical reconstruction. PhD thesis, University of Hull, Hull
Watzlawick P, Beavin J, Jackson DD (1968) Pragmatics of human communication: a study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. Faber and Faber, London
Whyte WF (ed) (1991) Participatory action research. Sage, London
Willmott H (1993) Breaking the paradigm mentality. Organ Stud 14:681–719
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Midgley, G. Theoretical Pluralism in Systemic Action Research. Syst Pract Action Res 24, 1–15 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9176-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9176-2