Skip to main content
Log in

An Exploration of Students’ Science Learning Interest Related to Their Cognitive Anxiety, Cognitive Load, Self-Confidence and Learning Progress Using Inquiry-Based Learning With an iPad

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the cognitive-affective theory, the present study designed a science inquiry learning model, predict-observe-explain (POE), and implemented it in an app called “WhyWhy” to examine the effectiveness of students’ science inquiry learning practice. To understand how POE can affect the cognitive-affective learning process, as well as the learning progress, a pretest and a posttest were given to 152 grade 5 elementary school students. The students practiced WhyWhy during six sessions over 6 weeks, and data related to interest in learning science (ILS), cognitive anxiety (CA), and extraneous cognitive load (ECL) were collected and analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis with structure equation modeling. The results showed that students with high ILS have low CA and ECL. In addition, the results also indicated that students with a high level of self-confidence enhancement showed significant improvement in the posttest. The implications of this study suggest that by using technology-enhanced science learning, the POE model is a practical approach to motivate students to learn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: the contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, T. L., & Derakshan, N. (2011). The neural correlates of cognitive effort in anxiety: effects on processing efficiency. Biological Psychology, 86(3), 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, P. (2006). Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in a mathematical domain. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 287–298. doi:10.1002/acp.1245.

  • Bayer, U. C., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Achtziger, A. (2010). Staying on track: planned goal striving is protected from disruptive internal states. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou, R. J. M., & Tirole, J. (2002). Self-confidence and personal motivation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 871–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. J. (2007). Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: an integrative account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. J., Jenkins, R., & Lawrence, A. D. (2007). Neural processing of fearful faces: effects of anxiety are gated by perceptual capacity limitations. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1595–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boscolo, P., & Mason, L. (2003). Topic knowledge, text coherence, and interest: how they interact in learning from instructional texts. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(2), 126–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, D. (1998). Measuring competitive state anxiety. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 129–148). Morgantown: Fitness Information Technology, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., Howard, K., & Early, S. (2006). Motivational challenges experienced in highly complex learning environments. In J. Elen & R. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: theory and research (pp. 27–42). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, V., & van den Broek, P. (2012). Interest, inferences, and learning from texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 650–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, L. M., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2012). Not that different in theory: Discussing the control-value theory of emotions in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 222–226.

  • Davis, J. E., & Cox, R. H. (2002). Interpreting direction of anxiety within Hanin’s individual zone of optimal functioning. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(1), 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: DC Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, K. E., Lipka, S., Smith, C., & Egan, V. (2013). The effect of cognitive load on faking interrogative suggestibility on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(7), 845–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behaviour. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: an emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. Visualization: theory and practice in science education (pp. 3–24). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, L., Dritschel, B., & Burton, A. (2001). The effects of specific retrieval instruction on social problem-solving in depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40(3), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanton, S., & Connaughton, D. (2002). Perceived control of anxiety and its relationship to self-confidence and performance: a qualitative inquiry. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanton, S., Mellalieu, S. D., & Hall, R. (2004). Self-confidence and anxiety interpretation: a qualitative investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5(4), 477–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 447–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, M. C., Ho, H. Y., & Chen, Y. L. (2014). Using a "prediction-observation-explanation" inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their internet cognitive failure. Computers & Education, 72, 1–11.

  • Hong, J. C., Lu, C. C. Wang, J. L., Liao, S., Wu, M. R., Hwang, M. Y., & Lin, P. S. (2013). Gender and prior science achievement affect categorization on a procedural learning task. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 92–101.

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (2007). Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 260–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (1990). A cognitive perspective on the processes underlying the relationship between stress and performance in sport. In G. Jones & L. Hardy (Eds.), Stress and performance in sport (pp. 17–42). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. C., Scanlon, E., & Clough, G. (2013). Mobile learning: two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings. Computers & Education, 61, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2013). How student characteristics affect girls’ and boys’ verbal engagement in physics instruction. Learning and Instruction, 23, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: how many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7.

  • Kleitman, S., & Gibson, J. (2011). Metacognitive beliefs, self-confidence and primary learning environment of sixth grade students. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 728–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köszegi, B. (2006). Ego utility, overconfidence and task choice. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 673–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: an educational–psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kröner, S., & Biermann, A. (2007). The relationship between confidence and self-concept: towards a model of response confidence. Intelligence, 35(6), 580–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonder, A. W., Wilhelm, P., & Hagemans, M. G. (2008). The influence of domain knowledge on strategy use during simulation-based inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 580–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchionini, G. (2008). Human-information interaction research and development. Library and Information Science Research, 30(3), 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, R., Burton, D., Vealey, R. S., Bump, L. A., & Smith, D. E. (1990). Development and validation of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2). In R. Martens, R. S. Vealey, & D. Burton (Eds.), Competitive anxiety in sport (pp. 117–213). Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, K. E. (1995). Re-assessment of developmental assumptions in children’s science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 93–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R. (2009). Learning from animated classroom exemplars: the case for guiding student teachers’ observations with metacognitive prompts. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 487–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morony, S., Kleitman, S., Lee, Y. P., & Stankov, L. (2013). Predicting achievement: confidence vs. self-efficacy, anxiety, and self-concept in Confucian and European countries. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. W., Davis, M. A., & Hutchings, C. H. (1981). Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: literature review and a revised worry–emotionality scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 541–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Tuovinen, J., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63–71. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8.

  • Paas, F., Renkel, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pegg, J. M. (2006). Developing explanations: student reasoning about science concepts during claims-evidence inquiry lessons. Ph.D. diss. Corvallis, OR: Department of Science and Math Education, Oregon State University.

  • Roeser, R. W. & Peck, S. C. (2009). An education in awareness: self, motivation, and self-regulated learning in contemplative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 119–136.

  • Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Vollmann, B., & Catrambone, R. (2009). The impact of learner characteristics on information utilization strategies, cognitive load experienced, and performance in hypermedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, T., Jänen, I., & Brünken, R. (2007). The impact of intrinsic cognitive load on the effectiveness of graphical help for coherence formation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1055–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety: current trends in theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 23–49). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stankov, L., Lee, J., & Paek, I. (2009). Realism of confidence judgments. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankov, L., Lee, J., Wenshu, L., & Hogan, D. J. (2012). Confidence: a better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety? Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 747–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, C., & West, T. V. (2014). Circumventing anxiety during interpersonal encounters to promote interest in contact: an implementation intention approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5.

  • Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, A., Takehara, T., & Yamauchi, H. (2006). Achievement goals in a presentation task: performance expectancy, achievement goals, state anxiety, and task performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(2), 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tüzün, H., Yılmaz-Soylu, M., Karakus, T., Inal, Y., & Kızılkaya, G. (2009). The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning. Computers & Education, 52(1), 68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–373). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., Giesbers, B., & Paas, F. (2009). Uncovering cognitive processes: different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasey, M. W., & Daleiden, E. L. (1996). Information-processing pathways to cognitive interference in childhood. In I. G. Sarason, G. Pierce, & B. Sarason (Eds.), Cognitive interference: theory, methods, and findings (pp. 117–138). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vealey, R. S. (1986). Conceptualization of sport-confidence and competitive orientation: preliminary investigation and instrument development. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8, 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, P., Mercer, N., & Kershner, R. (2013). ‘Wait, let’s just think about this’: using the interactive whiteboard and talk rules to scaffold learning for co-regulation in collaborative science activities. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, B. A. (2009). A model of overconfidence. Pacific Economic Review, 14, 502–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. (2003). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology (3rd ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 276–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winberg, T., & Berg, C. (2007). Students’ cognitive focus during a chemistry laboratory exercise: effects of a computer-simulated prelab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1108–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the “Aim for the Top University Project” of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU), sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, and the “International Research-Intensive Center of Excellence Program” of NTNU and Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 103-2911-I-003-301 and MOST 101-2511-S-003-056-MY3 and MOST 104-2911-I-003-301).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Yueh Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, JC., Hwang, MY., Tai, KH. et al. An Exploration of Students’ Science Learning Interest Related to Their Cognitive Anxiety, Cognitive Load, Self-Confidence and Learning Progress Using Inquiry-Based Learning With an iPad. Res Sci Educ 47, 1193–1212 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9541-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9541-y

Keywords

Navigation