Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Freire, literacy and emancipatory gender learning

  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contributions to education of one of the great Latin American thinkers, Paulo Freire, have been enormous. His voice and wisdom have inspired educators globally. Three particular contributions – to emancipation, to literacy, and to dialogue – are explored in this article through a critical lens. From a gender perspective, Freire’s path to consciousness-raising is crucial for emancipation but so also is empowerment, a notion contributed by the women’s movement. Adult literacy, Freire’s vehicle to raise consciousness, has been challenged by a recognition of the complexity underlying its acquisition, a factor we still have to incorporate in training and teaching programmes. Dialogical approaches in adult education, essential as they are to the attainment of deeper understanding of social phenomena and the possibility of consensual social action, build on a long trajectory of efforts to use public space for collective advancement. Situating Freire against a denser historical background enables the recognition of his merits and at the same time rescues the confluence of similar perceptions as well as different ideas in the construction of our contemporary world.

Résumé

Freire, alphabétisation et apprentissage émancipateur à l’équité entre les sexes – Les contributions à l’éducation de l’un des grands penseurs latino-américains, Paulo Freire, sont immenses. Sa parole et sa sagesse inspirent des éducateurs dans le monde entier. Trois de ses contributions – à l’émancipation, à l’alphabétisation et au dialogue – sont soumises dans le présent article à un examen critique. S’agissant de l’équité entre les sexes, la démarche de Freire en faveur de la conscientisation est décisive pour l’émancipation, mais tout autant l’autonomisation, notion émanant du mouvement féministe. L’alphabétisation des adultes, pour Freire vecteur permettant d’accroître la prise de conscience, comporte le défi de tenir compte de la complexité de son acquisition, facteur que nous devons encore intégrer dans les programmes de formation et d’enseignement. Les approches dialogiques de l’éducation des adultes, aussi essentielles qu’elles soient pour mieux comprendre les phénomènes sociaux et conduire à une action sociale consensuelle, dépendent d’une longue série d’efforts pour exploiter l’espace public en vue du développement collectif. Positionner Freire dans un contexte historique plus dense permet de reconnaître ses mérites, mais aussi d’intégrer des perceptions similaires et des idées différentes dans la construction de notre monde contemporain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. bell hooks, an American feminist who has been greatly influenced by Freire, holds this was sexist, given the language of his early works (hooks 1993). The English translation of Pedagogy of the Oppressed, published in 1970, preceded the vibrancy of the women’s movement and it would not be correct to judge him by current standards. However, in subsequent writings, Freire could indeed have been more responsive to gender issues.

  2. A formal evaluation of Yo, sí puedo sponsored by UNESCO (2006) found the method to apply a “rather traditional view of language learning” (ibid., p. 4), as it did not incorporate new developments in literacy or take into account the students’ prior learning. Yo sí puedo, however, has contributed to giving greater salience to the problem of illiteracy in the Latin American region.

  3. Originating in the Institute for Social Research at the University of Frankfurt in Germany, the “Frankfurt school” gathered philosophers, sociologists, art critics, psychologists, among others, who held that Western principles such as positivism and materialism needed to be questioned in order to advance social development.

References

  • Bodur, M., & Franceshet, S. (2002). Movements, states and empowerment. In J. Parpart, S. Rai, & K. Staudt (Eds.), Rethinking empowerment: Gender and development in a global/local world (pp. 112–132). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D, Elliott-Johns, S., & Bruce, F. (2008). Boys’ literacy attainment: Research and related practice. A report prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Education. Accessed March 4, 2013 from www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/research/boys_literacy.pdf.

  • Boughton, B., Chee, D., Beetson, J., Durnan, D., & Leblauch, J. (2013). An Aboriginal adult literacy campaign pilot study in Australia using Yes I can. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 21(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandão, C. (1981). O Que É Método Paulo Freire (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity (2nd ed., Vol. II). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Translated by M. Bergman Ramos. New York: Herder and Herder.

  • Freire, P. (1983). Pedagogy in process. The letters to Guinea-Bissau. Translated by C. St. John Hunter. New York: Continuum.

  • Freire, P. (1985). Politics of education: Culture, power and liberation. Translated by D. Macedo. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

  • Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as cultural workers. Letters to those who dare teach. Translated by D. Macedo, D. Koike, and A. Oliveira. Boulder: Westview Press.

  • Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2008). Reading, complexity and the brain. Literacy, 42(2), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, E., & La Belle, T. (1990). Ethnographic contextualization of Freire’s discourse: Consciousness-raising, theory and practice. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 21(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (2007). Prison notebooks, vol. 3. Translated by J.A. Buttigieg. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interest. New York: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, J. (2006). Paulo Freire in Chile, 1964–1969: Pedagogy of the oppressed and its sociopolitical economic context. Harvard Educational Review, 76(2), 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1993). Bell hooks speaking about Paulo Freire: The man, his work. In P. McLaren & P. Leonard (Eds.), Paulo Freire: A critical encounter (pp. 146–154). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J., & Steinberg, S. (2007). Cutting class in a dangerous era: A critical pedagogy of class awareness. In J. Kincheloe & S. Steinberg (Eds.), Cutting class: Socioeconomic status and education (pp. 3–69). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkendall, A. (2010). Paulo Freire and the cold war politics of literacy. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I. S., Jungebluth, A., & Mosenthal, P. B. (1998). The measurement of adult literacy. In S. T. Murray, I. S. Kirsch, & L. B. Jenkins (Eds.), Adult literacy in OECD countries: Technical report on the first International Adult Literacy Survey (pp. 105–134). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, P. (2008). Antonio Gramsci and his relevance for the education of adults. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(3), 418–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2013). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics, and science, vol. I. Paris: OECD. Accessed April 30, 2014 from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-i.htm.

  • Parpart, J., Rai, M., & Staudt, K. (2002). Rethinking em(power)ment, gender and development. In J. Parpart, S. Rai, & K. Staudt (Eds.), Rethinking empowerment. Gender and development in a global/local world (pp. 3–21). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. (2009). Reducing the complexities of reading comprehension. A simplifying framework. Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H., & Sen, G. (2000). Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Laying the groundwork. In H. Presser & G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes. Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 3–11). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, E. (2008). Adult literacy education gender equity and empowerment Insights from a Freirean-inspired literacy program. Studies in the Education of Adults, 40(1), 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, P. (2013). The folk high school: Denmark’s contribution to adult education. In P. Mayo (Ed.), Lifelong learning and the learning society (pp. 219–229). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, G., & Batliwala, S. (2000). Empowering women for reproductive rights. In H. Presser & G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes. Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 15–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudt, K. (2002). Engaging politics: Beyond official empowerment discourse. In J. Parpart, S. Rai, & K. Staudt (Eds.), Rethinking empowerment: Gender and development in a global/local world (pp. 97–111). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromquist, N. P. (1997). Literacy for citizenship: Gender and grassroots dynamics in Brazil. Albany, NY: State University of New York (SUNY) Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromquist, N. P. (2002). Education as a means for empowering women. In J. Parpart, S. Rai, & K. Staudt (Eds.), Rethinking empowerment: Gender and development in a global/local world (pp. 22–38). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromquist, N. P. (2009). Literacy and empowerment: A contribution to the debate. Background study commissioned in the framework of the United Nations Literacy Decade. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, C. (2013). Fifty years after Angicos: Paulo Freire, popular education and the struggle for a better world that is possible. Paper presented at the the XV Comparative Education World Congress (WCCES) held in Buenos Aires 24–28 June.

  • UIL (UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning). (2008). African statement on the power of youth and adult learning and education for Africa’s development. CONFINTEA VI Preparatory Conference in Africa. Nairobi, Kenya, 5–7 November 2008. Hamburg: UIL.

  • UIS (UNESCO Institute for Statistics). (2010). Adult and youth literacy: Global trends in gender parity. Fact Sheet No. 3. Montreal: UIS.

  • UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2006). Study on the effectiveness and feasibility of the literacy method Yo sí puedo. 175 EX/9. Paris: UNESCO Executive Board.

  • Wagner, D. (2005). Monitoring and measuring literacy. Background Paper Prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2006. Literacy for Life. Paris: UNESCO.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nelly P. Stromquist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stromquist, N.P. Freire, literacy and emancipatory gender learning. Int Rev Educ 60, 545–558 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-014-9424-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-014-9424-2

Keywords

Navigation