Abstract
Users’ perceptions are identified as key elements to understand bicycle use, whose election cannot be explained with usual mobility variables and socio-economic characteristics. A hybrid model is proposed to model the intention of bicycle use; it combines a structural equations model that captures intentions and a choice model. The framework is applied to a case of a university campus in Madrid that is studying a new internal bike system. Results show that four latent variables (convenience, pro-bike, physical determinants and external restrictions) help explaining intention to use bike, representing a number of factors that are linked to individual perceptions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Several actions were carried out to limit the effect of repeated observations and possible overestimation of certain statistics. A correlation panel analysis was performed among duplicate observations using the test Wooldridge with the software STRATA. The results indicated that the serial correlation levels were low. When assessing the logit model, estimators were applied with a Panel- Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) to correct the effects of these autocorrelations. In our study data showed no correlation among alternatives nor heteroscedasticity, so we did not go beyond model structure (1)–(3) to keep the analysis simple.
Leisure purpose was introduced as an attribute or factor because non-commuters trips are residuals, which prevented the estimation of a purpose specific model.
References
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991)
Akar, G., Clifton, K.J.: The influence of individual perceptions and bicycle infrastructure on the decision to bike. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88st Annual Meeting (2009)
Allen-Munley, C., Daniel, J., Dhar, S.: Logistic model for rating urban bicycle route safety. Transp. Res. Rec. 1878, 107–115 (2004)
Alves, M.J.: Os perigos da segregação de tráfego no planeamento para bicicletas. Accessed at http://mariojalves.googlepages.com/problemas_segregacao_bicicleta (2006)
Ashok, K., Dillon, W.R., Yuan, S.: Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables. J. Mark. Res. 39, 31–46 (2002)
Aultman-Hall, L.: The impact of work-related factors on levels of bicycle commuting. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2009)
Baltes, M.: Factors influencing nondiscretionary work trips by bicycle determined from 1990 U.S. census metropolitan statistical area data. Transp. Res. Rec. 1538, 96–101 (1996)
Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P.: Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 25, 175–187 (2003). ISSN 0197-3533
Barnes, G., Krizek, K.: Estimating bicycling demand. Transp. Res. Rec. 1939, 45–51 (2005)
Ben-Akiva, M., Bolduc, D., Parki, J.: Discrete choice analysis of shipper’s preferences. In: Van de Voorde, E. (ed.) Recent Developments in Transport Modeling: Lessons for the Freight Sector. Elsevier, Oxford (2008)
Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Train, K., Walker, J., Bhat, C., Bierlaire, M., Bolduc, D., Boersch-Supan, A., Brownstone, D., Bunch, D.S., Daly, A., De Palma, A., Gopinah, D., Karlstrom, A., Munizaga, M.A.: Hybrid choice models: progress and challenges. Mark. Lett. 13(3), 163–175 (2002)
Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Gärling, T., Gopinath, D., Walker, J., Bolduc, D., Bärsch-Supan, A., Delquil, P., Larichev, O., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A., Rao, V.: Extended framework for modeling choice behavior. Mark Lett 10, 187–203 (1999)
Bentler, P.M.: Multivariate analysis with latent variables. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31, 419–456 (1980)
Bergström, A., Magnusson, R.: Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter. Transp. Res. Part A 37, 649–666 (2003)
Bolduc, D., Álvarez-Daziano, R.: On estimation of hybrid choice models. In: Hess, S., Daly, A. (eds.) In Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-Art and the State-of-Practice: Proceedings from the Inaugural International Choice Modelling Conference. Emerald Group Publishing (p. 259) (2010)
Bolduc, D., Giroux, A.: The integrated choice and latent variable (ICLV) model: handout to accompany the estimation software. Département d’économique, Université Laval, Québec (2005)
Bolduc, D., Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J.L., Michaud, A.: Hybrid choice models with logit kernel: applicability to large scale models. In: Lee-Gosselin, M., Doherty, S. (eds.) Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models: Behavioral Foundations, pp. 275–302. Elsevier, Oxford (2005)
Bolduc, D., Boucher, N., Álvarez-Daziano, R.: Hybrid choice modeling of new technologies for car choice in Canada. Transp. Res. Rec. 2082, 63–71 (2008)
Burbidge, S.K., Goulias, K.G.: Active travel behavior. Transp. Lett. 1(2), 147–167 (2009)
Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L.: How do individuals adapt their personal travel? Objective and subjective influences on the consideration of travel-related strategies for San Francisco Bay Area commuters. Transp. Policy 12, 291–302 (2005)
Carré, J.R.: Mobilité urbaine et déplacements non motorisés. Institut National de Recherche sur les transports et leur Sécurité, Francia (1999)
Carter, D.L., Hunter, W.W., Zegeer, C.V., Stewart, J.R., Huang, H.F.: Bicyclist intersection safety index. Transp. Res. Rec. 2031, 18 (2007)
Cervero, R., Duncan, M.: Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence From the San Francisco Bay Area. Am. J. Public Health 93, 1478–1483 (2003)
Correia, G., Abreu e Silva, J., Viegas, J.: Using latent variables for measuring carpooling propensity. Presented at the World Conference on Transport Research, 2010. Lisbon (2010)
Cour Lund, B.: Driver behaviour towards circulating cyclists at roundabouts A vehicle simulator study with concurrent collection of eye movements. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2009)
Danya, Y., Sihan, C., Yuelong, S., Yi, Z., Li, L.: A New CA Model for Simulating Behaviors of Conflicts in Vehicle-Bicycle Laminar Flow. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2009)
Daziano, R.A., Bolduc, D.: Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transp. A 9(1), 74–106 (2013)
Dill, J.: Travel Behavior and Attitudes: New Urbanist Vs. Traditional Suburban Neighborhoods. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 82st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2003)
Dill, J., Voros, K.: Factors affecting bicycling demand: initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon, Region. Transp. Res. Rec. 2031, 9–17 (2007)
Di Ciommo, F., Monzón, A., Fernandez-Heredia, A.: Improving the analysis of road pricing acceptability surveys by using hybrid models. Transp. Res. Part A 49, 302–316 (2013)
Duarte, A., Garcia, C., Limao, S., Polydoropoulou, A. (2009). Experienced and expected happiness in transport mode decision making process. Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2009, Washington D.C
Eash, R.: Destination and mode choice models for nonmotorized travel. Transp. Res. Rec. 1674, 1–8 (1999)
Elrod, T.: A factor-analytic probit model for representing the market structure in panel data. J. Mark. Res. 32, 1 (1995)
Emond, C.R., Tang, W., Handy, S.L.: Explaining gender difference in bicycling behavior. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2009)
Faghri, A., Egyháziová, E.: Development of a computer simulation model of mixed motor vehicle and bicycle traffic on an urban road network. Transp. Res. Rec. 1674, 86–93 (1999)
Fernández-Heredia, A., Monzon, A., Jara-Díaz, S.: Understanding cyclists’ perceptions, keys for a successful bicycle promotion. Transp. Res. Part A 63, 1–11 (2014)
Fleischer, A., Tchetchik, A., Toledo, T.: The impact of fear of flying on travelers’ flight choice choice model with latent variables. J. Travel Res. 51(5), 653–663 (2012)
Garrard, J., Rose, G., Lo, S.K.: Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. Prev. Med. 46, 55–59 (2008)
Golob, T.F.: Joint models of attitudes and behavior in evaluation of the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project. Transp. Res. Part A 35, 495–514 (2001)
Golob, T.F.: Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp. Res. Part B 37, 1–25 (2003)
Green, P.: Hybrid models for conjoint analysis: an expository review. J. Mark. Res. 21, 155–169 (1984)
Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis. Pearson, New Jersey (1990)
Harris, C., Glaser, D.: Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgem. Decis. Making 1, 48–63 (2006)
Harris, K.M., Keane, M.P.: A model of health plan choice: inferring preferences and perceptions from a combination of revealed preference and attitudinal data. J. Econom. 89(1), 131–157 (1998)
Heath, Y., Gifford, R.: Extending the theory of planned behavior: predicting the use of public transportation. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32, 2154–2189 (2006)
Heinen, E., Maat, K., Wee, B.: The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transp. Res. Part D 16(2), 102–109 (2010a)
Heinen, E., van Wee, B., Maat, K.: Commuting by bicycle: an overview of the literature. Transp. Rev. 30, 59–96 (2010b)
Hopkinson, P., Wardman, M.: Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities. Transp. Policy 3, 241–249 (1996)
Hunt, J., Abraham, J.: Influences on bicycle use. Transportation 34, 453–470 (2007)
Hyodo, T., Suzuki, N., Takahashi, K.: Modeling of bicycle route and destination choice behavior for bicycle road network plan. behavior. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 79st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2000)
Jöreskog, K.G.: A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In: Goldberguer, A.S., Duncan, O.D. (eds.) Structural Models in the Social Sciences. Academic Press, New York (1973)
Karash, K.H., Coogan, M.A, Adler, T., Cluett, C., Shaheen, S.A., Azjen, I., Simon, M.: Understanding how individuals make travel and location decisions: Implications for Public Transportation Behaviour. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 87st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2008)
Keesling, J.W.: Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Causal Analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago (1972)
Kemperman, A., Timmermans, H.: Influences of the built environment on walking and cycling of latent segments of the aging population. Behaviour. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2009)
Koppelman, F.S., Hauser, J.R.: Destination choice behaviour for non-grocery-shopping trips. Transp. Res. Rec. 673, 157–165 (1978)
Krizek, K.J., Johnson, P.J., Tilahun, N.: Gender differents in bicyling behavoir and facility preferences. In: Rosenbloom, S. (ed.) National Research Council (U.S.). Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation, pp. 31–40. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C (2005)
Landis, B.W., Vattikuti, V., Brannick, M.: Real-time human perceptions: toward a bicycle level of service. Transp. Res. Rec. 1578, 119–126 (1997)
Lapietra, M. (2007) Transport Surveys. Guidelines. PhD Dissertation. Department of Hydraulics, Transport and Civil Infrastructures. Politecnico di Torino
McCahil, C., & Garrick, N. W.: The applicability of space syntax to bicycle facility planning. Trans. Res. Rec. J. Trans. Res. Board. 2074(1), 46–51 (2008)
McClintock, H., Cleary, J.: Cycle facilities and cyclists’ safety. Transp. Policy 3, 67–77 (1996)
Mokhtarian, P.L., Cao, X.: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies. Transp. Res. Part B 42, 204–228 (2008)
Molino, J.A., Emo, A.K.: Pedestrian and bicyclist exposure to risk: a methodology for estimation in an urban environment. Transp. Res. Rec. 2140(1), 145–156 (2009)
Moudon, A.V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A.D., Collier, C.W., Johnson, D., Schmid, T.L., Weather, R.D.: Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective. Transp. Res. Part D 10, 245–261 (2005)
Nankervis, M.: The effect of weather and climate on bicycle commuting. Transp. Res. Part A 33, 417–431 (1999)
Natarajan, S., Demetsky, M.J.: Selection and evaluation of bicycle and pedestrian safety projects. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2009)
Nkurunziza, A., Maarseveen M., Zuidgeest, M.: Cycling potencial demand and travel behaviour change in Dar-es-Salaam. Tanzania. Habitat Int. 36(1), 78–84 (2010)
Noland, R.B., Kunreuther, H.: Short-run and long-run policies for increasing bicycle transportation for daily commuter trips. Transp. Policy 2, 67–79 (1995)
Noland, R., Quddus, M.: Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Casualties with Regional Panel Data. Transp. Res. Rec. 1897, 28–33 (2004)
OECD: National policies to promote cycling. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, European Conference of the Ministers of Transport, Paris, France (2004)
Ortúzar, J.D., Willumsen, L.G.: Modelling Transport. Wiley, West Sussex (1990)
Ortúzar, J.D., Iacobelli, A., Valeze, C.: Estimating demand for a cycle-way network. Transp. Res. Part A 34, 353–373 (2000)
Parkin, J., Wardman, M., Page, M.: Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation 35, 93–109 (2008)
Petritsch, T.A., Landis, B.W., Huang, H.F., Challa, S.: Sidepath safety model bicycle sidepath design factors affecting crash rates. Transp. Res. Rec. 1982, 194–201 (2006)
Petritsch, T.A., Landis, B.W., McLeod, P.S., Huang, H.F., Scott, D.: Energy Savings Resulting from the Provision of Bicycle Facilities. Behaviour. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 87st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2008)
Pinjari, A., Eluru, N., Bhat, C., Pendyala, R., Spissu, E.: Joint model of choice of residential neighborhood and bicycle ownership: accounting for self-selection and unobserved heterogeneity. Transp. Res. Rec. 2082, 17–26 (2008)
Prashker, J.N.: Scaling perceptions of reliability of urban travel modes using indscal and factor analysis methods. Transp. Res. Part A 13, 203–212 (1979)
Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Making cycling irresistible: lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transp. Rev. 28, 495–528 (2008)
Pucher, J., Dill, J., Handy, S.: Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev. Med. 50, 106–125 (2010)
Pucher, J., Buehler, T.J., Seinen, M.: Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transp. Res. A 45(6), 451–475 (2011)
Rietveld, P.: The accessibility of railway stations: the role of the bicycle in The Netherlands. Transp. Res. Part D 5, 71–75 (2000)
Rietveld, P., Daniel, V.: Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter? Transp. Res. Part A 38, 531–550 (2004)
Raveau, S., Álvarez-Daziano, R., Yáñez, M., Bolduc, D., Ortúzar, J.D.: Sequential and simultaneous estimation of hybrid discrete choice models. Transp. Res. Rec. 2156, 131–139 (2010)
Rondinella, G., Fernandez-Heredia, A., Monzón, A. (2012). Analysis of Perceptions of Utilitarian Cycling by Level of User Experience. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C.
Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F., Frank, L.D.: Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann. Behav. Med. 25, 80 (2003)
Schossberg, M., Brehm, C.: Participatory GIS and active transportation: collecting data and creating change. Transp. Res. Rec. 2105(1), 83–91 (2009)
Sener, I.N., Eluru, N., Bhat, C.R.: An Analysis of Bicyclists and Bicycling Characteristics: Who, Why, and How Much are they Bicycling? Behavior. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2009)
Shiva Nagendra, S.M., Khare, M.: Principal component analysis of urban traffic characteristics and meteorological data. Transp. Res. Part D 8, 285–297 (2003)
Stinson, M., Bhat, C.: Commuter bicyclist route choice: analysis using a stated preference survey. Transp. Res. Rec. 1828, 107–115 (2003)
Taylor, D., Mahmassani, H.: Analysis of stated preferences for intermodal bicycle-transit interfaces. Transp. Res. Rec. 1556, 86–95 (1996)
Teich, T.L. (2009) Adapting planning process and tools to the promotion of cycling in a medium-sized, developing city. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C
Thomas, T., Jaarsma, C.F., Tutert, S.I.A. (2009) Temporal variations of bicycle demand in the Netherlands: The influence of weather on cycling. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C
Titze, S., Stronegger, W.J., Janschitz, S., Oja, P.: Association of built-environment, social-environment and personal factors with bicycling as a mode of transportation among Austrian city dwellers. Prev. Med. 47, 252–259 (2008)
Vredin Johansson, M., Heldt, T., Johansson, P.: The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transp. Res. Part A 40, 507–525 (2006)
Walker, J.L.: Extended Discrete Choice Model: Integrated Framework, Flexible Error Structures and Latent Variables. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2001)
Walker, J.L., Ben-Akiva, M.: Generalized random utility model. Math. Soc. Sci. 43, 303–343 (2002)
Wardman, M., Tight, M., Page, M.: Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transp. Res. Part A 41(4), 339–350 (2007)
Wiley, D.E.: The identification problem for structural equation models with unmeasured variables. In: Goldberguer, A.S., Duncan, O.D. (eds.) Structural Models in the Social Sciences. Academic Press, New York (1973)
Xing, Y., Handy, S.L., Buehler, T.J.: Factors Associated with Bicycle Ownership and Use: A Study of 6 Small U.S. Cities Behavior. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 87st Annual Meeting, Washington D.C (2008)
Yáñez, M.F., Raveau, S., Ortúzar, J.D.: Inclusion of latent variables in mixed logit models: modelling and forecasting. Transp. Res. Part A 44, 744–753 (2010)
Zahran, S., Brody, S.D., Maghelal, P., Prelog, A., Lacy, M.: Cycling and walking: explaining the spatial distribution of healthy modes of transportation in the united states. Transp. Res. Part D 13, 462–470 (2008)
Acknowledgments
Prof. Jara-Diaz acknowledges partial funding of Fondecyt, Chile, Grant 1120316, and the Institute for Complex Engineering Systems, grants ICM: P-05-004-F and CONICYT: FBO16. Alvaro Fernandez Heredia and Andres Monzon acknowledge partial funding of IDAE (Spanish Institute for Energy Efficiency), CRTM (Transport Authority of Madrid) and the Municipality of Madrid. We are grateful to the three unknown referees for their useful comments; remaining errors are, of course, our responsibility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernández-Heredia, Á., Jara-Díaz, S. & Monzón, A. Modelling bicycle use intention: the role of perceptions. Transportation 43, 1–23 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9559-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9559-9