Abstract
Inadequate infrastructure is recognized as an important barrier to cycling; therefore, improvements in the provision of bicycle facilities, such as bikeways, are frequently associated with increments in bicycle use. However, the overall impact of better facilities may vary with socio-demographic and attitudinal characteristics of potential cyclists. Using a sample of university students in the city of Barranquilla, Colombia, this paper examines the role that these characteristics have on prospective bicyclists’ monetary valuation of this kind of infrastructure, measured as the willingness to pay (WTP) for a dedicated bikeway. Two attitudinal factors: environmental friendliness and Pro-Car attitude were integrated into the WTP model as latent variables (LV), and address the question of whether these factors help to better explain the WTP. It was found that including the LVs did not add significant explanatory power to the WTP model. The results suggest that travel distance, expenditure, the undergraduate program and the current mode of transport are the most important variables influencing the WTP of university students for a bikeway.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asadi, S., Sarvi, M., Wallace, M.: Bicycle lane priority: promoting bicycle as a green mode even in congested urban areas. Transp. Res. A 87, 102–122 (2016)
Buckland, S.T., MacMillan, D.C., Duff, E.I., Hanley, N.: Estimating mean willingness to pay from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. D (Stat) 48(1), 109–124 (1999)
Buehler, R.: Determinants of bicycle commuting in the Washington, DC region: the role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, and free car parking at work. Transp. Res. D 17, 525–531 (2012)
Cantillo, V., Arellana, J., Rolong, M.: Modelling pedestrian crossing behaviour in urban roads: a latent variable approach. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 32, 56–67 (2015)
Carson, R.T., Hanemann, W.M.: Chapter 17 contingent valuation. In: Vincent, J.R., Mäler, K.-G. (eds.) Handbook of Environmental Economics, pp. 821–936. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)
Caulfield, B.: Re-cycling a city–Examining the growth of cycling in Dublin. Transp. Res. Part A. Policy Pract. 61, 216–226 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.02.010
Cawley, J.: Contingent valuation analysis of willingness to pay to reduce childhood obesity. Econ. Hum. Biol. 6(2), 281–292 (2008)
Damant-Sirois, G., El-Geneidy, A.M.: Who cycles more? Determining cycling frequency through a segmentation approach in Montreal, Canada. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 77, 113–125 (2015)
Delmelle, E., Delmelle, E.C.: Exploring spatio-temporal commuting patterns in a university environment. Transp. Policy 21, 1–9 (2012)
Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G.: Willingness-to-pay of public transport users for improvement in service quality. Eur. Transp. 38, 107–118 (2008)
Fernández-Heredia, Á., Jara-Díaz, S., Monzón, A.: Modelling bicycle use intention: the role of perceptions. Transportation 43(1), 1–23 (2016)
González, F., Melo-Riquelme, C., de Grange, L.: A combined destination and route choice model for a bicycle sharing system. Transportation 43(3), 407–423 (2016)
GwanSeon, K., Petrolia, D., Interis, M.: Using multiple-scenario contingent valuation data to estimate willingness to pay for restoration of Mississippi’s Barrier Islands. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Texas (2011)
Habib, K.N., Mann, J., Mahmoud, M., Weiss, A.: Synopsis of bicycle demand in the City of Toronto: investigating the effects of perception, consciousness and comfortability on the purpose of biking and bike ownership. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 70, 67–80 (2014)
Handy, S., van Wee, B., Kroesen, M.: Promoting cycling for transport: research needs and challenges. Transp. Rev. 34(1), 4–24 (2014)
Kim, J., Choi, K., Kim, S., Fujii, S.: How to promote sustainable public bike system from a psychological perspective? Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 11(4), 272–281 (2017)
Kpadé, C.P., Mensahb, E.R., Fokc, M., Ndjeungab, J.: Cotton farmers’ willingness to pay for pest management services in northern Benin. Agric. Econ. 48(1), 105–114 (2017)
Laird, J., Page, M., Shen, S.: The value of dedicated cyclist and pedestrian infrastructure on rural roads. Transp. Policy 29, 86–96 (2013)
Lierop, D.V., Lee, B., El-Geneidy, A.: Secure investment for active transport: willingness to pay secured bicycle parking in Montreal, Canada. In: Transportation Research Board 93th Annual Meeting (2012)
Ma, L., Dill, J., Mohr, C.: The objective versus the perceived environment: what matters for bicycling? Transportation 41(6), 1135–1152 (2014)
Mahieu, P.-A., Riera, P., Giergiczny, M.: Determinants of willingness-to-pay for water pollution abatement: a point and interval data payment card application. J. Environ. Manag. 108, 49–53 (2012)
Majumdara, B.B., Mitrab, S.: Investigating the relative influence of various factors in bicycle mode choice. Proc. Social Behav. Sci. 104, 1120–1129 (2013)
Maldonado-Hinarejos, R., Sivakumar, A., Polak, J.W.: Exploring the role of individual attitudes and perceptions in predicting the demand for cycling: a hybrid choice modelling approach. Transportation 41(6), 1287–1304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9551-4
Manaugh, K., Boisjoly, G., El-Geneidy, A.: Overcoming barriers to cycling: understanding frequency of cycling in a University setting and the factors preventing commuters from cycling on a regular basis. Transportation 44(4), 871–884 (2017)
Muñoz, B., Monzón, A., Daziano, R.A.: The increasing role of latent variables in modelling bicycle mode choice. Transp. Rev. 36(6), 737–771 (2016)
Ortúzar, J., Willumsen, G.L.: Modelling Transport. Wiley, Chichester (2011)
Ortúzar, J., Iacobelli, A., Valeze, C.: Estimating demand for a cycle-way network. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 34(5), 353–373 (2000)
Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Making cycling irresistible: lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transp. Rev. 28(4), 495–528 (2008)
Ruiz, T., Bernabé, J.C.: Measuring factors influencing valuation of nonmotorized improvement measures. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 67, 195–211 (2014)
Rybarczyk, G., Gallagher, L.: Measuring the potential for bicycling and walking at a metropolitan commuter university. J. Transp. Geogr. 39, 1–10 (2014)
Sælensminde, K.: Cost–benefit analyses of walking and cycling track networks taking into account insecurity, health effects and external costs of motorized traffic. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 38(8), 593–606 (2004)
Shen, J.: Understanding the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay for eco-labeled products: an empirical analysis of the China environmental label. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. 5(1), 87–94 (2012)
Sigurdardottir, S.B., Møller, M., Kaplan, S., Teasdale, T.W.: Understanding adolescents’ intentions to commute by car or bicycle as adults. Transp. Res. D 24, 1–9 (2013)
Soto, J.J., Cantillo, V., Arellana, J.: Incentivizing alternative fuel vehicles: the influence of transport policies, attitudes and perceptions. Transportation 45(6), 1721–1753 (2018)
Tilahun, N.Y., Levinson, D.M., Krizek, K.J.: Trails, lanes, or traffic: valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 41(4), 287–301 (2007)
Unión Temporal GSD + Moviconsult: Informe 1. Resultados de la toma de información primaria y análisis de información secundaria. Área Metropolitana de Barranquilla, Barranquilla (2013)
Vij, A., Walker, J.: How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful. Transp. Res. B 90, 192–217 (2016)
Vij, A., Carrel, A., Walker, J.L.: Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 54, 164–178 (2013)
Walker, J., Ben-Akiva, M.: Generalized random utility model. Math. Soc. Sci. 43(3), 303–343 (2002)
Whitehead, J.C., Wicker, P.: Estimating willingness to pay for a cycling event using a willingness to travel approach. Tour. Manag. 65, 160–169 (2018)
Acknowledgements
The article is not based on any conference paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TC: Econometric modelling and manuscript writing. VC: analysis of results and editing. AV: analysis of results and editing. JR: editing and revision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cantillo, T., Vargas, A., Cantillo, V. et al. What determines university student’s willingness to pay for bikeways?. Transportation 47, 2267–2286 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10014-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10014-w