Abstract
Lower reading and mathematics performance of Turkish immigrant students as compared to mainstream European students could reflect differential learning outcomes, differential socioeconomic backgrounds of the groups, differential mainstream language proficiency, and/or test bias. Using PISA reading and mathematics scores of these groups, we examined the role of bias and various measures related to immigrant integration policies of the host societies. Results of a multilevel analysis of reading and mathematics tests demonstrated that at individual level, students with higher scores on an index of economic, social, and cultural status obtained higher achievement scores. At country level, MIPEX scores of education and the human development index of participating countries could predict differences in reading results but not in mathematics. After correction for background characteristics, effect sizes showed a difference of .65 SD (down from a value of .96 before correction) for reading and .58 SD (down from .78) for mathematics. However, a similar correction for background variables increased the score differences between Turkish immigrants and mainstreamers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ammermüller, A. (2005). Poor background or low returns? Why immigrant students in Germany perform so poorly in PISA. Discussion Paper No. 05–18, Retrieved from http://opus.zbw-kiel.de/volltexte/2005/2908/pdf/dp0518.pdf.
Brouwers, S. A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Van Hemert, D. A. (2009). Variation in Raven’s progressive matrices scores across time and place. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 330–338. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.006.
Callahan, R. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 305–328. doi:10.3102/00028312042002305.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
Driessen, G., & Merry, M. S. (2011). The effects of integration and generation of immigrants on language and numeracy achievement. Educational Studies, 37, 581–592. doi:10.1080/03055698.2010.539762.
Dronkers, J., & De Heus, M. (2012). The educational performance of children of immigrants in sixteen OECD countries (No. 1210). London, United Kingdom: University College London.
Extra, G., & Yagmur, K. (Eds.). (2012). Language rich Europe. Trends in policies and practices for multilingualism in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press / British Council.
Fossati, F. (2011). The effect of integration and social democratic welfare states on immigrants’ educational attainment: a multilevel estimate. Journal of European Social Policy, 21, 391–412.
Griga, D., & Hadjar, A. (2014). Migrant background and higher education participation in Europe: the effect of the educational systems. European Sociological Review, 30, 275–286.
Helbling, M. (2013). Validating integration and citizenship policy indices. Comparative European Politics, 11, 555–576. doi:10.1057/cep.2013.11.
Hochschild, J. L., & Cropper, P. (2010). Immigration regimes and schooling regimes: which countries promote successful immigrant incorporation? Theory and Research in Education, 8, 21–61. doi:10.1177/1477878509356342.
Huddleston, T., Niessen, J. Chaoimh, E. N., & White, E. (2011). Migrant Integration Policy Index III. Brussels, Belgium: British Council and Migration Policy Group.
Kao, G., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417–442. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100019.
Limbird, C. K., Maluch, J. T., Rjosk, C., Stanat, P., & Merkens, H. (2014). Differential growth patterns in emerging reading skills of Turkish-German bilingual and German monolingual primary school students. Reading & Writing, 27, 945–968. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9477-9.
Marks, G. N., Cresswell, J., & Ainley, J. (2006). Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in student achievement: the role of home and school factors. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 12, 105–128. doi:10.1080/13803610600587040.
McNamara, T. (2011). Multilingualism in education: a poststructuralist critique. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 430–441.
Muraki, E., & Bock, R. D. (1997). PARSCALE: IRT based test scoring and item analysis for graded open-ended exercises and performance tasks. Chicago: Scientific Software. Inc..
Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. K. (2012). Mplus (Version 7.1). California. Los Angeles.
OECD (2009). PISA Data Analysis Manual: SAS, Second Edition. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264056251–4-en
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: overcoming social background: equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (volume II). Paris, France: OECD Publishing, doi:10.1787/9789264091504-en
OECD (2012a). Untapped skills: realising the potential of immigrant students. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, doi:10.1787/9789264172470-en
OECD (2012b). PISA 2009 Technical Report, PISA. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, doi:10.1787/9789264167872-en
OECD (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, doi:10.1787/9789264190511-en
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 technical report, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151.
Sam, D. L., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schnepf, S. V. (2007). Immigrants’ educational disadvantage: an examination across ten countries and three surveys. Journal of Population Economics, 20, 527–545. doi:10.1007/s00148-006-0102-y.
Shin, S. H., Slater, C. L., & Backhoff, E. (2013). Principal perceptions and student achievement in reading in Korea, Mexico, and the United States educational leadership, school autonomy, and use of test results. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 489–527.
UNDP (2014). Human Development Index and its components. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/table-1-human-development-index-and-its-components.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1997). Meta-analysis of cross-cultural comparisons of cognitive test performance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 678–709. doi:10.1177/0022022197286003.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three generations of DIF analyses: considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(2), 223–233.
Acknowledgements
This paper is a part of a research project supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) with program no. 2219. Any opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the TUBITAK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F.J.R. & Yagmur, K. PISA mathematics and reading performance differences of mainstream European and Turkish immigrant students. Educ Asse Eval Acc 29, 229–246 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9260-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9260-6