Skip to main content
Log in

The Colonizing Realities of Neoliberal Capitalism

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the proliferation of neoliberal capitalism in the United States as a dominant social imaginary that has colonized the psyches of many U.S. citizens. The notion of “colonization” is used as a heuristic device in combination with a pastoral interpretive lens to depict and understand the psychosocial dynamics resulting from the hegemonic realities of neoliberal capitalism. More particularly, it is argued that neoliberal capitalism, as the dominant social imaginary, (1) undermines and corrupts Christian (and humanist) myths, narratives, and rituals that maintain and enrich social and communal life, shared relational faith, and interpersonal care; (2) establishes a superior-inferior value system, rooted in the commodification of everyday life, that introduces an ontological falsehood in individuals’ psyches and relationships; (3) leads to a corresponding internalization of foreignness; and (4) narrows the public and political space of appearances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Briefly, pastoral, as an interpretive lens, refers to the theological notions of care, conscience, and community as frameworks for understanding specific human struggles and other factors that contribute to human suffering. Pastoral analysis that aims toward care of the polis, then, is a necessary religious response to a struggling and suffering body politic.

  2. I have placed the term “rational” in quotes to suggest the underlying illusion that the so-called market or those involved in the market make rational, objective decisions. Any cursory reading of the rises and falls of the stock market reveals that greed, fear, hubris, anxiety, anger, and fantasy play a large role in the making of “rational” decisions. I would add here that the notion of “rational” vis-à-vis capitalism is a kind of rationalism that is associated with the advancement of each individual’s self-interest. This is decidedly different from a rationalism associated with making decisions with regard to the interests and needs of others (Gergen 1994).

  3. Hendricks (2011) points out that John Maynard Keynes dismantled this claim, indicating that “supply cannot be counted on to create its own demand” (p. 152).

  4. Harvey (2005) argues that the power and influence of neoliberal ideas came to fruition in the 1970s/1980s with the proliferation of conservative think tanks as well as the elections of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. See also Dumenil and Levy (2013) and Klein (2007) on the rise and influence of neoliberalism and the process of globalization through varied means of force and coercion by Western powers.

  5. Soft cruelty refers to public instances of cruelty or ruthlessness that take the form of deprivation, as opposed to types of cruelty that involve physical violence and subjugation.

  6. It is important to note that the patriarchal system itself is, in part, responsible for the marginalization of women and children. Nevertheless, the command to care for them involves a recognition of their inherent value as persons.

  7. I am using ontic inferiority to point to the tendency of both colonizer and colonized to hold the belief in the superiority of the colonizer and the inferiority of the colonized as if it is an existential or ontological fact instead of a socially constructed fiction.

  8. In Hannah Arendt’s (1958) political philosophy, the space of appearances involves individuals acting cooperatively in the public realm, expressing and acting on their unique subjectivities as persons. The health of the space of appearances within a given society depends on the use of shared power. The presence of coercion, force, or violence signals a collapse or attenuation of this space.

  9. National Poverty Center, “Poverty in the United States: Frequently Asked Questions,” The University of Michigan Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, http://npc.umich.edu/poverty/, Accessed 26 Oct. 2013.

  10. LWF Tenth Assembly, “Message from the Tenth Assembly,” The Lutheran World Federation Tenth Assembly, http://www.lwf-assembly2003.org/lwf-assembly/htdocs/PDFs/LWF_Assembly_Message-EN.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.

  11. Reformed Church in America, http://www.rca.org/page.aspx?pid=2985. Accessed 30 July 2013.

  12. Christ against culture need not be confined simply to those who identify themselves as Christians. God’s grace works through and is available to all. So we might consider other forms of resistance to neoliberal capitalism as manifestations of God’s grace in the realization of more life-giving and life-enhancing models of economic organizing. For example, consider Mondragon Company, a Spanish multinational corporation that is run by its workers: “Through an annual general assembly the workers choose and employ a managing director and retain the power to make all the basic decisions of the enterprise (what, how and where to produce and what to do with the profits)” (Wolff and Resnick 2012). While operating within the dominant social imaginary of neoliberal capitalism, this large company has relied on humanistic and democratic principles to organize its company.

References

  • Archibald, R. (2010). Arizona enacts stringent law on immigration. New York Times, 23 April. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/us/politics/24immig.html. Accessed 7 July 2011.

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1996). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorstin, D. (1987). The image: a guide to pseudo-events in America. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: parent–child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1958). I and thou. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrette, J., & King, R. (2005). Selling spirituality: the silent takeover of religion. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, A. (2012). Depression: a public feeling. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guittari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, D. (2008). The art of shrinking heads: on the new servitude of the liberated in the age of total capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, L. (2003). The twilight of equality: neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2011). The crisis of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B. (2011). On turning poverty into an American crime. Truthout, 9 August. http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/2579:barbara-ehrenreich-on-turning-poverty-into-an-american-crime. Accessed 29 Oct. 2013.

  • Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove (Original work published 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparino, C. (2012). Bought and paid for: the hidden relationship between Wall Street and Washington. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (1994). Realities and relationships. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghent, E. (1990). Masochism, submission, surrender. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 26, 108–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2012). Disposable youth: racialized memories and the culture of cruelty. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Go, J. (2012). Patterns of empire: the British and American empires, 1688 to present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

  • Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capital and the crisis of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hedges, C., & Sacco, J. (2012). Days of destruction, days of revolt. New York: Nations Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, O. (2011). The universe bends toward justice. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (2000). Where we stand: class matters. New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, M. (2013). Banishing the poor, unemployed and working class from the mainstream media implies they are worthless. Truthout, 17 June. http://truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/item/18031-banishing-the-poor-unemployed-and-working-class-from-the-mainstream-media-implies-that-they-are-worthless. Accessed 12 Oct. 2013.

  • Kinzer, S. (2006). Overthrow: America’s century of regime change from Hawaii to Iraq. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2007). Shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

  • Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than being. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, B., & Liebengood, K. (Eds.). (2009). Engaging economics: New Testament scenarios and early Christian reception. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1999). The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J. (2010). Thieves in the temple: The Christian church and the selling of the American soul. New York: Basic Books.

  • Macmurray, J. (1991a). The self as agent. London: Humanities Press International (Original work published 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmurray, J. (1991b). Person in relation. London: Humanities Press International (Original work published 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander, J. (2012). The capitalism papers: fatal flaws in an obsolete system. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, G. (2013). Disassembly required: a field guide to actually existing capitalism. Edinburgh: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy, A. (1983). The intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Nelson, R. (2001). Economics as religion. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H. R. (1951). Christ and culture. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H. R. (1989). Faith on earth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K. (2004). Colonization of psychic space. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, J. (2011). In Alabama, A harsh bill for residents here illegally. New York Times, June 3. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/04/us/04immig.html. Accessed 7 July 2012.

  • Reiger, J. (2009). No rising tide: theology, economics, and the future. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (2012). What money can’t buy: the moral limits of markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2012). The price of inequality. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, J. (2007). Desire, market, and religion. London: SCM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007). Modern social imaginary. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, T. (1999). The conquest of America: the question of the other. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1992). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, S. (2004). After empire: the art and ethos of enduring peace. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, R., & Resnick, S. (2012). Contending economic theories. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, S. (2008). Democracy incorporated. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. (2005). A people’s history of the United States. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizioulas, J. (2006). Communion as otherness. New York: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan LaMothe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

LaMothe, R. The Colonizing Realities of Neoliberal Capitalism. Pastoral Psychol 65, 23–40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-015-0660-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-015-0660-6

Keywords

Navigation