Skip to main content
Log in

When God Talks Back: Summary and Commentary for Psychologists of Religion

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is a review of T. M. Luhrmann’s When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God. I engage the book from the perspective of psychology of religion and suggest that the book will be of interest to psychologists of religion for three reasons: (1) psychologists of religion have emphasized the importance of “context” and “culture” in recent decades, and Luhrmann, writing as an anthropologist, offers a model for how psychologists of religion or psychological anthropologists with an interest in religion might attend to context and to culture; (2) the book offers new data about an understudied group or denomination of American Christianity, the Vineyard Christian Fellowship; and (3) the book is distinctive in its analysis in that it offers a reductive yet sympathetic and adaptive interpretation of American evangelical religious experience. To the extent that pastoral theologians are interested in psychology of religion, they will find this book of interest as well. Some limitations of the book are also noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. For autobiographical accounts written by many influential psychologists of religion, see Belzen (2012). These psychologists of religion write about their training and how they came to the field.

  2. The term “psychological anthropologist” recalls the founding of pastoral theology/pastoral psychology as a field or discipline, where a major area of debate concerned whether the field or discipline was grounded in psychology or in theology. The term “pastoral theology” implies that the field or discipline is grounded in theology (or at least that theology has more weight), whereas the term “pastoral psychology” implies that the field or discipline is grounded in psychology (or at least that psychology has more weight) (cf. Dittes 2003).

References

  • Altizer, T., & Hamilton, W. (Eds.). (1966). Radical theology and the death of God. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belzen, J. (2010). Towards cultural psychology of religion: Principles, approaches, applications. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belzen, J. (Ed.). (2012). Psychology of religion: Autobiographical accounts. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingaman, K. (2011). The art of contemplative and mindfulness practice: incorporating the findings of neuroscience into pastoral care and counseling. Pastoral Psychology, 60(3), 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1937). I and thou. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capps, D. (1993). The depleted self: Sin in a narcissistic age. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capps, D. (2000). Jesus: A psychological biography. St. Louis: Chalice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T., & Randall, R. (2011). Grace for the injured self: The healing approach of Heinz Kohut. Eugene: Pickwick Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, H. (1990). The secular city. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, J. (1991). The historical Jesus: The life of a Mediterranean Jewish peasant. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1987). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittes, J. (2003). Some accidents, coincidents, and intents: a vocational narrative. Pastoral Psychology, 52(1–2), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, R. (2001). Discovering a sermon: Personal pastoral preaching. St. Louis: Chalice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamman, J. (2007). Becoming a pastor: Forming self and soul for ministry. Cleveland: Pilgrim Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2004). The end of faith: Religion, terror, and the future of reason. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, C. (2007). God is not great: How religion poisons everything. New York: Hachette/Warner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, D. (2011). How I learned to stop worrying and love the brain. Religious Education, 106(3), 257–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, P. (1979). Jung in context: Modernity and the making of a psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, P. (1989). The ability to mourn: Disillusionment and the social origins of psychoanalysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, P. (Ed.). (2000). Symbolic loss: The ambiguity of mourning and memory at century’s end. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, P. (2008). Symbolic loss and the re-creation of meaning: Freud and Eliade as culture makers. In W. B. Parsons, D. Jonte-Pace, & S. Henking (Eds.), Mourning religion (pp. 13–43). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1984). In A. Golberg (Ed.), How does analysis cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luhrmann, T. M. (2001). Of two minds: An anthropologist looks at American psychiatry. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhrmann, T. M. (2012). When God talks back: Understanding the American evangelical relationship with God. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, B. (2010). The social construction of emotions: a new direction in the pastoral work of healing. Pastoral Psychology, 59(6), 799–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., & Carlin, N. (2010). Joel Osteen as cultural selfobject: meeting the needs of the group self and its individual members in and from the largest church in America. Pastoral Psychology, 59(1), 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller-McLemore, B. (1996). The living human web: Pastoral theology at the turn of the century. In J. Moessner (Ed.), Through the eyes of women: The handbook of women care (pp. 9–26). Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagels, E. (1979). The Gnostic gospels. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. (1999). The enigma of the oceanic feeling: Revisioning the psychoanalytic theory of mysticism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruyser, P. (1974). Between belief and unbelief. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruyser, P. (1983). The play of the imagination: Toward a psychoanalysis of culture. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambo, L. (1993). Understanding religious conversion. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzuto, A. (1979). The birth of a living god: A psychoanalytic study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runyan, W. (1982). Life histories and psychobiography: Explorations in theory and method. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Carlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlin, N. When God Talks Back: Summary and Commentary for Psychologists of Religion. Pastoral Psychol 63, 185–194 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-013-0533-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-013-0533-9

Keywords

Navigation