Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mitigating South Africa’s HIV Epidemic: The Interplay of Social Entrepreneurship and the Innovation System

  • Published:
Minerva Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the struggle against apartheid achieved, South Africa faced the new struggle of overcoming the HIV/AIDS pandemic. This paper examines the response of government, the innovation system and civil society in rising to the challenge. The response included a fatal denialism concerning the etiology of AIDS, a fatalism that constitutes political market failure. This political market failure was counteracted through the emergence of social entrepreneurship in the form of the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) that mobilized civil society and like-minded health practitioners and researchers within the innovation system. Dependency Theory coupled with a Quadruple Helix model of the innovation system offer possible explanations of this complex human tragedy and the way that government was compelled to embark on a massive program of providing anti-retroviral therapy that has now significantly improved life expectancy. The paper provides socio-economic context, appraisal of the innovation system, and a sketch of how the Quadruple Helix took form. Of special importance is the independence of South Africa’s ‘Republic of Science.’ Independent courts were critical in allowing TAC to obtain remedy against government, Big Pharma, and AIDS dissident scientists. It is argued that its Republic of Science met its obligation of objectivity by shifting emphasis to the cause of AIDS research in the face of official denialism. In effect, the system of innovation and social entrepreneurs are shown to have acted in concert in constituting a Quadruple Helix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Though apartheid regulations have been removed from the statute books, the racial typology of the apartheid years endures. Official policy considers the population to be comprised of the same four groups of the apartheid years: Africans, Coloureds, Indians and Whites.

  2. http://www.southafrica.info/business/economy/middle-class-300413.htm#.VA8VpWSSy3g.

  3. http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/africa-in-focus/posts/2014/01/27-south-africa-welfare-poverty-bhorat.

  4. Recent evidence points to 1920s Kinshasa, DRC as the epicenter of HIV. See Faria et al. (2014).

  5. http://www.hivsa.com/static/hiv-aids-in-south-africa#edays.

  6. www.cptech.org/ip/health/sa/pharma-v-sa.html.

  7. http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=83213&sn=Detail.

  8. http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/MRC-head-slated-on-Aids-stats-20050210.

  9. The Grootboom judgment dealt with the rights of evictees, and had far-reaching consequences through the system of legal precedence that is characteristic of South African jurisprudence. See e.g. http://www.saflii.org/za/journals/LDD/2002/6.pdf.

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron, and James Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, Samir. 1977. Imperialism and Unequal Development. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnkil, Robert, Anu Järvensivu, Pasi Koski, and Tatu Piirainen. 2010. Exploring Quadruple Helix. Outlining user-oriented innovation models. University of Tampere, Institute for Social Research Work, Working Paper 85/2010.

  • Ashoka Foundation. 2014. https://www.ashoka.org/social_entrepreneur. Accessed 26 July 2014.

  • Avert. 2014. See more at: http://www.avert.org/history-hiv-aids-south-africa.htm#sthash.iSEZGmfi.dpuf.

  • Backhouse, Judy. 2009. Doctoral education in South Africa: Models, pedagogies and student experiences. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

  • Bernal, John D. 1939. The social function of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhlungu, Sakhela. 2001. Democracy and Modernisation in the Making of the South African Trade Union Movement: The Dilemma of Leadership: 1973–2000. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

  • Carayannis, Elias G., and David F.J. Campbell. 2009. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management 46(3/4): 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Krishnarpan. 2010. Host genetic factors in susceptibility to HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS. Journal of Genetics 89(1): 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cirone, Alexandra E., and Johannes Urpelainen. 2013. Political market failure? The effect of government unity on energy technology policy in industrialized democracies. Technovation 33: 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, David. 2011. The University in Development. Cape Town: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, David, and George Subotzky. 2001. The skewed revolution. Trends in South African higher education, 1988–1998. University of the Western Cape. Cape Town: Education Policy Unit.

  • Dacin, Peter A., M. Tina Dacin, and Margaret Matear. 2010. Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don’t Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here. Academy of Management Perspectives 24(1): 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DACST. 1996. White Paper on Science and Technology. Pretoria: Department of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology.

  • De Klerk, Willem. 1991. F. W. de Klerk. The man in his time. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball Publishers.

  • DNE. 1993. 1991/92 R&D Survey. Pretoria: Department of National Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni, Chris Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg, and Luc Soete (eds.). 1988. Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DST. 2002. The National Research and Development Strategy. Pretoria: Department of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • DST. 2008. Innovation Plan: Toward the Knowledge Economy. Pretoria: Department of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • DST. 2014. National Survey of Research and Experimental Development. Main Analysis Report 2012/13. Pretoria: Department of Science and Technology.

  • Dubow, Saul. 2006. A Commonwealth of Knowledge. Science, Sensibility and White South Africa 1820–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ellis, Stephen. 2012. External Mission. The ANC in Exile, 1960–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Etzkowitz, Henry. 2002. Networks of Innovation: Science, Technology and Development in the Triple Helix Era. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 1(1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2000. The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy 29: 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria, Nuno R., et al. 2014. The early spread and epidemic ignition of HIV-1 in human populations. Science 346(6205): 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Ben, and Zavareh Rustomjee. 1996. The political economy of South Africa. From Minerals-energy complex to industrialization. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Andre Gunder. 1966. The Development of Underdevelopment. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuzi, Anita. 2013. Quadruple-Helix and its types as user-driven innovation models. Paper given to the 2013 Triple Helix Conference, Istanbul.

  • Geffen, Nathan. 2010. Debunking Delusions: The Inside Story of the Treatment Action Campaign. Johannesburg: Jacana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, Wieland. 2007. Speaking truth to power in South Africa: Nutritional influences on HIV infection and tuberculosis. S A Journal of Science 103: 266–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevisser, Mark. 2009. A Legacy of Liberation: Thabo Mbeki and the Future of the South African Dream. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Weijing, Stuart Neil, Hemant Kulkarni, Edward Wright, Brian K. Agan, Vincent C. Marconi, Matthew J. Dolan, Robin A. Weiss, and Sunil K. Ahuja. 2008. Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines mediates trans-infection of HIV-1 from red blood cells to target cells and affects HIV-AIDS susceptibility. Cell Host Microbe 4(1): 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDRC. 1993. Toward a science policy for a democratic South Africa. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Michael J. 2011. A bibliometric analysis of South Africa’s scientific outputs—some trends and implications. S A Journal of Science 107(1–2): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Michael J. 2013. Rhetoric and change in innovation policy: The case of South Africa. Science, Technology and Society 18(2): 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David. 2008. Science and Technology Policy in South Africa: Past Performance and Proposals for the Future. Science, Technology and Society 13(1): 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Cristobal. 2010. Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King. 2014. https://www.saica.co.za/Technical/LegalandGovernance/King/tabid/2938/language/en-ZA/Default.aspx. Accessed 30 July 2014.

  • Kitching, Gavin. 2010. Development and Underdevelopment in Historical Perspective: Populism, Nationalism and Industrialization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, Loet. 2011. The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-based Economy? Cornell University Library arXiv:1012.1937.

  • Leydesdorff, Loet, Caroline Wagner, and Lutz Bornmann. 2014. The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations. Journal of Informetrics 8(3): 606–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys, Colin. 1975. Underdevelopment in Kenya. Nairobi: East African Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, Merle. 1985. Capitalism and Apartheid: South Africa, 1910–84. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, Bengkt-Åke. 1985. Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maharajh, Rasigan. 2011. Innovating beyond Racial Capitalism. A Contribution towards the Analysis of the Political Economy of Post-apartheid South Africa. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.

  • Mandela, Nelson R. 2013. Closing address by Former President Nelson Mandela at the 13th International AIDS Conference. http://db.nelsonmandela.org/speeches/pub_view.asp?pg=item&ItemID=NMS083.

  • Mangcu, Xolela. 2011. Becoming worthy ancestors. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbeki, Thabo. 2003. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3143850.stm.

  • NACI. 2014. South African S&T Indicators 2013. Pretoria: National Advisory Council on Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nattrass, Nicoli. 2004. The Moral Economy of AIDS in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nattrass, Nicoli. 2008. AIDS and the Scientific Governance of Medicine in Post-Apartheid South Africa. African Affairs 107(427): 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nattrass, Nicoli. 2012. The AIDS Conspiracy. Science fights back. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglas C., John J. Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ntsebeza, Lungisile, and Ruth Hall (eds.). 2007. The Land Question in South Africa: The Challenge of Transformation and Redistribution. Cape Town: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2014. Main Science and Technology Indicators 2014/1. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, Gerrit. 2003. Is Thabo Mbeki Africa’s Saviour? International Affairs 79(4): 815–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, Carlota. 2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pogue, Thomas. 2006. The Evolution of Research Collaboration in South African Gold Mining. PhD dissertation. Maastricht: UNU-Intech.

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1962. The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. Minerva 1(1): 54–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, Raoul. 1950. The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. Paper for the Economic Commission for Latin America, Santiago de Chile. New York: United Nations Department of Economic Affairs.

  • Presidency. 2001. Presidential Aids Advisory Panel Report. Pretoria: The Presidency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidency. 2012. National Development Plan: Vision for 2030. Pretoria: The Presidency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1924. Icarus; or, The Future of Science. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Trubner.

  • Saul, John, and Stephen Gelb. 1981. The Crisis in South Africa. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Helen, and Joanne Stein. 2001. Implementing AIDS Policy in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Social Science and Medicine 52: 723–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Jack, and Ray Simons. 1968. Class and Colour in South Africa 1850–1950. London: Defence and Aid Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonne, Lina. 2014. Mapping regional social enterprise ecosystems in India: Framework and indicators. Working Paper 2014-50, Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.

  • Stats SA. 2014. Mortality and causes of death in South Africa, 2011: Findings from death notification. Statistical release P0309.3. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.

  • TAC. 2007. Annual report March 2006–February 2007. http://www.tac.org.za/sites/default/files/annual_reports/AnnualReport-March2006ToFebruary2007.pdf.

  • TAC. 2009. Annual report March 2008–February 2009. http://www.tac.org.za/sites/default/files/annual_reports/TACAnnualReport2009.pdf.

  • TAC. 2010. Fighting for our lives. The history of the Treatment Action Campaign. Treatment Action Campaign: Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2013. Global Education Digest 2013. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velho, Lea, and Maria C. de Souza. 2007. Public–private partnerships in HIV vaccine trials as a contribution to the Brazilian response to the AIDS epidemic. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 6(1): 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter, Francois, et al. 2012. The medical proof doesn’t get much better than VMMC. South African Medical Journal 102(3): 124–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • WSSR. 2013. World Social Science Report. Changing Global Environments. Paris: International Social Science Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper arose from a discussion with Prof. Gita Surie of Adelphi University, New York. The paper is the work of an independent unaligned analyst and was self-funded. The final paper has benefited from the comments of two anonymous reviewers to whom thanks are due.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Kahn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kahn, M. Mitigating South Africa’s HIV Epidemic: The Interplay of Social Entrepreneurship and the Innovation System. Minerva 54, 129–150 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9293-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9293-x

Keywords

Navigation