Abstract
Despite major changes in the governance of universities overtly intended to transform them into authoritatively integrated collectivities, the extent of their organisational actorhood remains quite limited and varied between OECD countries. This is because of inherent limitations to the managerial direction and control of research and teaching activities in public science systems as well as considerable variations in how governance changes are being implemented in different kinds of states. Four ideal types of university can be distinguished in terms of their strategic and operational autonomy and capability: Hollow, State-contracted, State-chartered and Private-portfolio. These become established under different proximate and background conditions such that relatively high levels of organisational actorhood are unlikely to be achieved in many OECD countries without major shifts in state structures and policies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, Stephen B. 2009. Follow the money: Engineering at Stanford and UC Berkeley during the rise of Silicon Valley. Minerva 47(4): 367–390.
Ballarino, Gabriele, and Loris Perotti. 2011. Italy: Gradual changes and an uncertain autonomy. In European universities and the challenge of the market, ed. M. Regini, 168–182. Cheltenham: E Elgar.
Boffo, Stefano, and Roberto Moscati. 1998. Evaluation in the Italian higher education system: Many tribes, many territories…many godfathers. European Journal of Education 33: 349–360.
Brunsson, Nils, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson. 2000. Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies 21: 721–746.
Capano, Giliberto. 2008. Looking for serendipity: The problematical reform of government within Italy’s universities. Higher Education 55: 481–504.
Clark, Burton. 1983. The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clark, Burton. 1998. Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Coleman, Samuel. 1999. Japanese science: View from the inside. London: Routledge.
Crouch, Colin, and Wolfgang Streeck (eds.). 1997. Political economy of modern capitalism. London: Sage.
Crouch, Colin. 2005. Capitalist diversity and change: Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Boer, Harry, Juergen Enders, and Liudvika Leistye. 2007. Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration 85: 27–46.
de Boer, Harry, Ben Jongbloed, Juergen Enders, and Jon File. 2010. Progress in higher education reform across Europe: Governance reform. Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
Dobbins, Michael, Christoph Knill, and Eva Maria Voegtle. 2011. An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher Education 62: 665–683.
Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Feller, Irwin. 2009. Performance measurement and the governance of American academic science. Minerva 47(3): 323–344.
Ferlie, Ewan, Christine Musselin, and Gianluca Andresani. 2009. The ‘steering’ of higher education systems: A public management perspective. In University governance, eds. C. Paradeise et al., 1–20.
Geiger, Roger. 2004. Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gläser, Jochen, and Grit Laudel. 2007. Evaluation without evaluators: The impact of funding formulae on Australian university research. In The changing governance of the sciences, Sociology of the sciences yearbook, eds. R. Whitley and J. Gläser, 127–152. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gläser, Jochen, Stefan Lange, Grit Laudel, and Uwe Schimank. 2010. The limits of universality: How field-specific epistemic conditions affect authority relations and their consequences. In Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation, eds. R. Whitley, J. Gläser, and L. Engwall, 291–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grabher, Gernot. 2002. Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Studies 36: 204–214.
Henkel, Mary, and Brenda Little (eds.). 1999. Changing relationships between higher education and the state. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Huisman, Jeroen (ed.). 2009. International perspectives on the governance of higher education. London: Routledge.
Johnson, C. 1982. MITI and the Japanese miracle. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Kehm, Barbara, and Ute Lanzendorf (eds.). 2006. Reforming university governance. Bonn: Lemmens.
Kneller, Robert. 2010. The changing governance of Japanese public science. In Reconfiguring knowledge production, eds. R. Whitley, J. Glaeser and L. Engwall, 110–145. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knill, Christoph. 2001. The Europeanisation of national administrations: Patterns of institutional change and persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kruecken, Georg, and Frank Meier. 2006. Turning the university into an organizational actor. In Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change, eds. G.S. Drori, J.W. Meyer, and H. Hwang, 241–257. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marginson, Simon, and Mark Considine. 2000. The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meier, Frank, and Uwe Schimank. 2010. Mission now possible: Profile building and leadership in German universities. In Reconfiguring knowledge production, eds. R. Whitley, J. Glaeser, and L. Engwall, 211–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miozzo, Marcela, and Damian Grimshaw (eds.). 2006. Knowledge intensive business services: Organizational forms and national institutions. Cheltenham: E Elgar.
Moscati, Roberto. 2001. Italian professors in transition. Higher Education 41: 103–129.
Musselin, Christine. 2007. Are universities specific organizations? In Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions, eds. G. Kruecken, Anna Kosmützky, and Marc Torka, 63–84. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Paradeise, Catherine, Emanuela Reale, and Gaele Goastellec. 2009a. A comparative approach to higher education reforms in Western European countries. In University governance, eds. C. Paradeise et al., 197–245. Dordrecht: Springer.
Paradeise, Catherine, Emanuela Reale, Ivar Bleiklie, and Ewan Ferlie (eds.). 2009b. University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Perotti, Loris. 2011. Funding, assessment and governance. In European universities and the challenge of the market, ed. M Regini, 63–79.
Reale, Emanuela, and Bianca Poti. 2009. Italy: Local policy legacy and moving to an ‘in between’ configuration. In University governance, eds. C. Paradeise et al., 77–102.
Regini, Marino (ed.). 2011a. European universities and the challenge of the market. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Regini, Marino. 2011b. Introduction: European universities meet the market. In European universities and the challenge of the market, ed. M. Regini, 1–8.
Regini, Marino. 2011c. The challenge of the market. In European universities and the challenge of the market, ed. M. Regini, 80–90.
Schimank, Uwe. 2005. New public management and the academic profession: Reflections on the German situation. Minerva 43: 361–376.
Schimank, Uwe, and Stefan Lange. 2009. Germany: A latecomer to new public management. In University governance, eds. C. Paradeise et al., 51–74.
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2002. The futures of European capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stokes, Donald E. 1997. Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Tepe, Markus, Karin Gottschall, and Bernhard Kittel. 2010. A structural fit between states and markets? Public administration regimes and market economy models in the OECD. Socio-Economic Review 8: 653–684.
Thelin, John R. 2004. A history of American higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Trow, Martin. 1993. Comparative perspective on British and American higher education. In The European and American university since 1800, eds. S. Rothblatt, and B. Wittrock, 280–299. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitley, Richard. 1999. Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitley, Richard. 2000. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (first edition 1984).
Whitley, Richard. 2006. Project-based firms: New organisational form or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate Change 15: 77–99.
Whitley, Richard. 2007. Business systems and organisational capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitley, Richard. 2008. Universities as strategic actors: Limitations and variations. In The university in the market, eds. Lars Engwall, and Denis Weaire, 23–37. London: Portland Press.
Whitley, Richard. 2010. Reconfiguring the public sciences: The impact of governance changes on authority and innovation in public science systems. In Reconfiguring knowledge production, eds. R. Whitley, et al., 3–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitley, Richard, Jochen Gläser, and Lars Engwall (eds.). 2010. Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships on the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Duncan. 2008. Reconfiguring biological sciences in the late twentieth century: A study of the University of Manchester. Manchester: Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester.
Windolf, Paul. 1998. Expansion and structural change: Higher education in Germany, the United States, and Japan. 1970–1990. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Wright, Susan, and Jacob Williams Orberg. 2009. Prometheus (on the) rebound? Freedom and the Danish steering system. In International perspectives on the governance of higher education, ed. J. Huisman, 69–87. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitley, R. Transforming Universities: National Conditions of Their Varied Organisational Actorhood. Minerva 50, 493–510 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9215-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9215-5