Scientific representation: A long journey from pragmatics to pragmatics
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Once again, van Fraassen has given us an incredibly rich, learned and profound book that will be studied and argued about for decades to come. The book is about scientific representation, but from the perspective of Bas van Fraassen’s empiricism this means “representation of the empirical phenomena” (1). He is keen to distance himself from the empiricist tradition that would interpret the latter notion in terms of mental representation, and instead focuses his attention on mathematical and material representations, and one main form of representation in which he is interested is the representational aspect of measurement. Following and extending the line of argument that we find in the work of Poincaré and Weyl among others, van Fraassen argues for the “essential indexical” (3) in science. This is a radical view that is at odds with the idea of objective inquiry that enables us to transcend our situation and describe the world independently of human beings, which is how ma ...
- Bueno, O. 2005. Dirac and the dispensability of mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36: 465–490. CrossRef
- Bueno, O. 2009. Mathematical fictionalism. In New waves in philosophy of mathematics, ed. O. Bueno, and Ø. Linnebo, 59–79. Hampshire: Palgrave-MacMillan. CrossRef
- French, S. 2003. A model-theoretic account of representation (or, I don’t know much about art, but I know it involves isomorphism). Philosophy of Science 70: 1472–1483. CrossRef
- Hacking, I. 1981. Do we see through a microscope? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62: 305–322.
- Palade, G. 1955. A small particulate component of the cytoplasm. Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology 1: 59–79. CrossRef
- Sober, E. 1985. Constructive empiricism and the problem of aboutness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36: 11–18. CrossRef
- Suárez, M. 1999a. The role of models in the application of scientific theories: Epistemological implications. In Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science, ed. M. Morgan, and M. Morrison, 168–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Suárez, M. 1999b. Theories, models, and representations. In Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery, ed. L. Magnani, et al., 75–83. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. CrossRef
- Suárez, M. 2003. Scientific representation: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 225–244. CrossRef
- Suárez, M. 2004. An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of Science 71: 767–779. CrossRef
- Suárez, M. 2005. The semantic view, empirical adequacy and application. Crítica 37: 29–63.
- Suárez, M. 2010. Scientific representation. Philosophy Compass 5: 91–101. CrossRef
- van Fraassen, B.C. 1967. Meaning relations among predicates. Nous 1: 160–179.
- van Fraassen, B.C. 1969. Meaning relations and modalities. Nous 3: 155–167. CrossRef
- van Fraassen, B.C. 1977. The only necessity is verbal necessity. Journal of Philosophy 74: 71–85. CrossRef
- van Fraassen, B.C. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossRef
- van Fraassen, B.C. 1985. Empiricism in the philosophy of science. In Images of science, ed. P. Churchland and C. Hooker, 245–305. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- van Fraassen, B.C. 1994. Interpretation of science: Science as interpretation. In Physics and our view of the world, ed. J. Hilgevoord, 169–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- van Fraassen, B.C. 1997. Structure and perspective: Philosophical perplexity and paradox. In Logic and scientific methods, vol. 1, ed. M.L. Dalla Chiara, et al., 511–530. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- van Fraassen, B.C. 2000. The theory of tragedy and of science: Does nature have narrative structure? In Aristotle and contemporary science, vol. 1, ed. D. Sfendoni-Mentzou, 31–59. New York: Peter Lang.
- van Fraassen, B.C. 2004. Science as representation: Flouting the criteria. Philosophy of Science 71: 794–804. CrossRef
- van Fraassen, B.C. 2006a. Representation: The problem for structuralism. Philosophy of Science 73: 536–547. CrossRef
- van Fraassen, B.C. 2006b. Replies. In Bas C. van Fraassen: The fortunes of empiricism, ed. A. Berg-Hildebrand, and C. Suhm, 125–171. Frankfurt: ontos verlag.
- van Fraassen, B.C. 2007. Structuralism(s) about science: Some common problems. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Suppl. LXXXI: 45–61. CrossRef
- van Fraassen, B.C. 2009. The perils of Perrin, at the hands of philosophers. Philosophical Studies 143: 5–24. CrossRef
- Scientific representation: A long journey from pragmatics to pragmatics
Volume 20, Issue 3 , pp 417-442
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, 9 Woodland Rd, Bristol, BS8 1TB, UK
- 2. Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA
- 3. Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain
- 4. Philosophy Department, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94132, USA