Skip to main content
Log in

Catalytic coating in microstructured devices and their performance in terms of the SO2 oxidation

  • Original Paper: Sol-gel and hybrid materials for catalytic, photoelectrochemical and sensor applications
  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microstructured reactors offer several advantages due to their small dimensions and due to their unique heat transfer capabilities. Highly exothermic reactions can be carried out readily in microreactors. In heterogeneous reactions with a catalyst, which is applied as a thin film on the channel walls, the full potential of these microreactors can be utilized. A challenge in the application of the catalyst is whether the microchannel has open ends or whether the microchannel has an opening along the channel axis. The coating is done via the sol–gel route by injecting the liquid precursor into the microchannels or by dropping the liquid precursor onto the microchannels. For the examinations, two types of specimen are coated with Pt/TiO2 gel in two different compositions (2.5 and 10 wt%) in one step. After calcination, the specimen are reduced under flow conditions in 5 vol% H2 in Ar at 773 K for 5 h to obtain Pt(0) from Pt2+. The performance of the catalyst (Pt(0)) is investigated by means of the SO2 oxidation. The results for the oxidation test with the lower concentrated composition show higher conversion values, which can be related to a good dispersion and small particles of the active phase. But differences are found for the tests with the open-ended microchannels, resulting in lower conversion values compared to the microchannels with opening along the channel axis. The influence of the catalyst caused by an insufficient oxidation of the deposited gel, leading to an interaction between support and active component (SMSI) is discussed. The XRD measurements indicate rutile modification as well as large crystallite sizes. Due to this fact, SMSI effect can be excluded and is not responsible for the differences measured in the SO2 conversion. Microprobe analyses determine the distribution of the platinum in the porous titanium dioxide support as uniform. SEM investigations show that the low value in conversion can be related to a non-uniform distribution of the catalyst in the closed microchannels. Considering the drying process in the closed microchannel, an influence of the geometry is obvious. Based on the observation, a model has been developed, which explains qualitatively the distribution of the coating. As a consequence of this model, the coating parameter has to be chosen that no maldistribution occurs.

Graphical Abstract

SEM picture showing the maldistribution of the catalytic coating introduced by a sol–gel process in a microstructured channel system of diffusion welded specimen. Drying may be carried out only via the inlets/outlets, which seems to be responsible for the accumulation of coating. The model explains that the contact line moved with time to the center of the microchannel and the deposition takes place at the moving contact line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kiwi-Minsker L, Renken A (2005) Catal Today 110:2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bier W, Keller W, Linder G, Seidel D, Schubert K, Martin H (1993) Chem Eng Process 32:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schubert K, Bier W, Brandner J, Fichtner M, Franz C, Linder G (1998) In: 2nd International conference on microreaction technology, Proceedings, New Orleans, pp 88–95

  4. Ates A, Goerke O, Pfeifer P (2013) Chem Ing Tech 85(5):664–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brandner JJ, Bohn L, Henning T, Schygulla U, Schubert K (2007) Heat Transf Eng 28:761–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gavrilidis A, Angeli P, Cao E, Yeong KK, Wan YSS (2002) Chem Eng Res Des 80(1):3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Janicke M, Kestenbaum H, Hagendorf U, Schüth F, Fichtner M, Schubert K (2000) J Catal 191:282–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfeifer P, Görke O, Schubert K (2002) In: 6th International conference on microreaction technology, Proceedings, New Orleans, 14–10 March 2002, pp 281–287

  9. Wunsch R, Fichtner M, Schubert K (2000) 4th International conference on microreaction technology, Proceedings, Atlanta, 6–10 March 2000, pp 481–487

  10. Lim MS, Kim MR, Noh J, Woo SI (2005) J Power Sources 140:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hench LL, West JK (1990) Chem Rev 90:33–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfeifer P, Haas-Santo K, Thormann J, Schubert K (2007) Chim Oggi 2:42–46

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pfeifer P, Zscherpe T, Haas-Santo K, Dittmeyer R (2010) Appl Catal A Gen 391:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Benzinger W, Wenka A, Dittmeyer R (2011) Appl Catal A Gen 397:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gomez R, Lopez T, Castillo S, Gonzalez RD (1994) J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 1:205–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Su C, Hong B-Y, Tseng C-M (2004) Catal Today 96:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang C-C, Ying JY (1999) Chem Mater 11:3113–3120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bischoff BL, Anderson MA (1995) Chem Mater 7:1772–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Navrotsky A, Kleppa OJ (1967) J Am Ceram Soc 50:626–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang H, Banfield JF (1998) J Mater Chem 8:2073–2076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanchez E, Lopez T, Gomez R, Bokhimi X, Morales A, Novaro O (1996) J Solid State Chem 122:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bokhimi X, Morales A, Novaro O, Lopez T, Sanchez E, Gomez R (1995) J Mater Res 10(11):2788–2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ertl G, Knözinger H, Schüth F, Weitkamp J (eds) (2008) Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis, vol 4. VCH, Weinheim, pp 1178–1188

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tauster SJ, Fung SC, Garten RL (1978) J Am Chem Soc 100:170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tauster SJ, Fung SC, Baker RTK, Horsley JA (1981) Science 211(4487):1121–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bernal S, Calvino JJ, Cauqui MA, Gatica JM, Larese C, Omil JP, Pintado JM (1999) Catal Today 50:175–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonne M, Samoila P, Ekou T, Especel C, Epron F, Marécot P, Royer S, Duprez D (2010) Catal Commun 12:86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Han W, Lin Z (2012) Angew Chem Int Ed 51:1534–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Adachi E, Dimitrov AS, Nagayama K (1995) Langmuir 11:1057–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin Y, Balizan E, Lee LA, Niu Z, Wang Q (2010) Angew Chem Int Ed 49:868–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fischer BJ (2002) Langmuir 18:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pelofsky AH (1966) J Chem Eng Data 11(3):394–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hu H, Larson RG (2005) Langmuir 21:3972–3980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Deegan RD, Bakajin O, Dupont TF, Huber G, Nagel SR, Witten TA (1997) Nature 389:827–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Leng J (2010) Phys Rev E 82:021405

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support from Helmholtz Program SCI (Storage and Cross-linked Infrastructure) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank Dr. Marcus Müller (KIT, IAM-KWT) for the XRD measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walther Benzinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benzinger, W., Goerke, O. & Pfeifer, P. Catalytic coating in microstructured devices and their performance in terms of the SO2 oxidation. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 80, 802–813 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-016-4174-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-016-4174-1

Keywords

Navigation