Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cultivating Greater Well-being: The Benefits Thai Organic Farmers Experience from Adopting Buddhist Eco-spirituality

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organic farming is spreading throughout Asia, including in Thailand. Little is known about whether farmers’ values change as they make the shift from conventional farming to organic farming. The benefits farmers perceive from making the shift have also scarcely been studied. We investigated these factors in Northeastern Thailand by conducting observations, key informant interviews, semi-structured interviews and questionnaire interviews. We found that as Thai farmers adopted organic methods, they developed an eco-consciousness. In comparing members of a Buddhist temple-based organic farmer support group with members of a non-profit organic agriculture support group, we found that the temple-based group adopted deeper Buddhist eco-spiritual values while the non-profit group remained more commercially oriented. Farmers who adopted Buddhist eco-spiritual values enjoyed greater financial and health benefits from making the organic shift. A higher proportion of the temple-based group eliminated their debts after making the shift (p > 0.001). Additionally, a higher proportion of members in the temple-based group felt that their physical health improved after becoming an organic farmer (p = 0.003). Interestingly, the less debt farmers carried, the healthier they felt (p > 0.001). Participants believed that eliminating the use of agro-chemicals, using organic fertilizers, consuming organic food, and increasing biodiversity on their farms also contributed to improving their health. We conclude that for Thai farmers who are devoutly committed to Buddhism, temple-based organic support programs provided an effective pathway to improving their finances, health and well-being. For Thai farmers generally, a fundamental adoption of eco-conscious values is integral to experiencing deeper non-commercial benefits from organic farming. Findings suggest that the expansion of organic farming systems depends on changing perspectives about well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Thewadas (angels) and pii or ghosts were said to inhabit certain forests, mountains, bodies of water (Kabilsingh 2010). In fact, many large old trees, such as the ironwood and sala are venerated by Buddhists. The Bodhi or fig tree (ficus religiosia) is considered particularly auspicious, as the Buddha was reported to have attained enlightenment under its branches (de Silva 1994; ibid).

References

  • Allen, P. (2004). Together at the table: Sustainability and sustenance in the American agrifood system. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baconguis, R., & Cruz, F. (2005). Paradigmatic outlook of alternative and conventional rice farmers in southern Philippines. Philippines Scientist, 42, 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti, L., Conzo, P., & Gianfreda, G. (2010). Market access, organic farming and productivity: The determinants of creation of economic value on a sample of fair trade affiliated Thai farmers. University of Rome (unpublished research).

  • Beus, C. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1991). Conventional versus organic agriculture: The paradigmatic roots of the debate. Rural Sociology, 55(4), 590–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonman, C., & Anpim, U. (2006). The possibility of Homali rice production in organic farming systems as an alternative farming career with poverty alleviation potential for lower-northeastern farmers: A case study of Yasothon Province. Bangkok: Thai Research Foundation. (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. London: Sage Publications.

  • Curry, J. (2000). Community worldview and rural systems: A study of five communities in Iowa. Annals of American Geography, 90(4), 693–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Silva, L. (1994). The hills wherein my soul delights. In M. Bachelor & K. Brown (Eds.), Buddhism and ecology (pp. 18–30). New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drentea, P., & Lavrakas, P. (2000). Over the limit: The association among health, race and debt. Social Science and Medicine, 50(4), 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater, L. E., Letouneau, D., Workneh, F., van Bruggen, A. H. C., & Shennan, C. (1995). Fundamental differences between conventional and organic tomato agroecosystems in California. Ecological Applications, 5(4), 1098–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duram, L. A. (2000). Agents’ perceptions of structure: How Illinois organic farmers view political, economic, social, and ecological factors. Agriculture and Human Values, 17, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. (2008). Management research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. C., & Woodward, W. A. (2007). Statistical analysis quick reference guidebook with SPSS examples. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essen, J. (2005). Right development: The Santi Asoke Buddhist reform movement of Thailand. Maryland: Lexington Books.

  • Falvey, L. (2000). Thai agriculture: Golden cradle of millennia. Bangkok: Kasetsart Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, L. (2002). AgriDhamma: The duty of professional agriculturalists. A lecture by Buddhahassa Bhikku to agricultural teachers and officials on 25 March 1991 at Suan Mokkhapharam, Chaiya, Surat Thani province, Thailand. South Australia: Institute for International Development.

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funahashi, K. (1996). Farming by the older generation: The exodus of young labor in Yasothon Province. Southeast Asian Studies, 33(4), 625–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. University of California: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandstaff, T., Grandstaff, S., Limpinuntana, V., & Suphanachanchaimat, N. (2008). Rain fed revolution in Northeast Thailand. Southeast Asian Studies, 46(3), 289–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Net Cooperative and Earth Net Foundation. (2013). http://www.greennet.or.th/home. Accessed 7 April 2008.

  • Hardwick, K., Heaey, J. R., Elliot, S., & Blakesley, D. (2004). Research needs for restoring seasonal tropical forests in Thailand: Accelerated natural regeneration. New Forests, 27, 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. (1987). The evolution of agroecological thought. In M. Altieri (Ed.), The scientific basis of alternative agriculture (pp. 1–27). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, D. (2002). A manual for Buddhism and deep ecology. Bangkok: The World Buddhist University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutanawat, N., & Hutanawat, N. (2006). Sustainable agriculture: Vision process and indicators. Nonthaburi: Kledthai Company. (in Thai).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPM-DANIDA. (2004). Pesticide health surveys. Data from 606 farmers in Thailand. Report 62 by the IPM DANIDA Project: Strengthening farmers IPM in pesticide intensive areas from http://thailand.ipm-info.org/download_documents.htm. Accessed 10 Oct 2012.

  • Jitsanguan, T. (2001). Sustainable agriculture systems for small scale farmers in Thailand: Implications for the environment. http://www.agnet.org/library/eb/509/html. Accessed 25 May 2011.

  • Kabilsingh, C. (2010). Buddhism and conservation. Bangkok: Thai Tibet Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. (2012). Organic farmers’ connectedness with nature: Exploring Thailand’s alternative agriculture network. Worldviews, Global Religions, Culture and Ecology, 16, 154–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiatsuphimol, J. (2002). A strategy for green net to promote and organic farming product in Bangkok, Thailand. Masters Thesis, Manila: Asian Institute of Management.

  • Lotter, D. W. (2003). Organic agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 21(4), 59–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace, G., Subhadhira, S., & Simarks, S. (1998). Introduction. In G. Lovelace, S. Subhadhira, & S. Simarks (Eds.), Rapid rural appraisal in Northeast Thailand (pp. 3–19). Khon Khen: KKU-FORD Rural Systems Research Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, F., & Frantz, C. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J., & Scherr, S. J. (2003). Ecoagriculture: Strategies to feed the world and save biodiversity. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, J. (2000). Thai views of wellness, sabaay, smoking, and Buddhist health promotion. Ph.D Dissertation. University of California, San Francisco.

  • National Statistics Office. (2011). Statistical yearbook 2010. http://web.nso.go.th/eng/link/solink.htm. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.

  • Od-ompanich, W., Kittsiri, A., & Thongchai, M. (2007). Organic and inorganic rice production: A case study in Yasothon Province, Northeastern Thailand. http://p7953.typo3server.info/uploads/media/Thai_OIRice.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2014.

  • Onwuegbuzie, A., & Collins, M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. L. (2004). Post hoc power: A concept whose time has come. Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panya, O. (2003). Community-first agriculture: A search for Thailand’s post-crisis sustainable transformation. In R. Doyle (Ed.), Strengthening community competence for social development: Asia-Pacific perspectives (pp. 219–235). Phitsanulok: Naresuan University.

  • Panya, O., & Sirisai, S. (2003). Environmental consciousness in Thailand: Contesting maps of eco-conscious minds. Southeast Asian Studies, 41, 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., Hepperly, P., Hanson, J., Douds, D., & Seidel, R. (2005). Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience, 7, 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. (2003). Agri-culture: Reconnecting people, land and nature. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambo, T. (1983). Conceptual approaches to human ecology. Research Report 14. Hawaii: East–West Environmental and Policy Institute.

  • Ratanamalai, A. (1999). Thailand cooperatives role in decentralized rural development for poverty alleviation and food security at the community level. Food and agriculture organization, decentralized rural development and the role of self help organizations. A regional workshop held from 4–6 Nov 1998, Chiang Mai, Thailand, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Bangkok.

  • Rigg, J. (1997). Southeast Asia: The human landscape of modernization and development. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitner-Schobesberger, B., Darnhofer, I., Somsook, S., & Vogl, C. R. (2008). Consumer perceptions of organic foods in Bangkok. Food Policy, 33, 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samerpak, P. (2006). A strategy for sustainable agriculture system by Rak Thammachat Club in Kudchum district, Yasothon Province, Thailand. Unpublished Master Thesis, Manila: Asian Institute of Management.

  • Schreinemachers, P., Schad, I., Tipraqsa, P., Williams, P. M., Neef, A., Riwthong, S., et al. (2012). Can public GAP standards reduce agricultural pesticide use? The case of fruit and vegetable farming in Northern Thailand. Agriculture and Human Values, 29, 519–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semaan, S., Lauby, J., & Liebman, J. (2002). Street and network sampling in evaluation studies of HIV risk-reduction interventions. AIDS Review, 4, 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setboonsarng, S. & Gilman, J. (1999). Alternative agriculture in Thailand and Japan, Asian Institute of Technology. www.solutions-site.org/cat11_sol85.htm. Accessed 11 Dec 2007.

  • Sirisai, S. (1990). Rice goddess and rice farming in Thailand.In U. Kyaw Than & P. Ratanakul (Eds.). Development, modernization and tradition in South East Asia (pp 163–177). Salaya: Mahidol University.

  • Sullivan, S., McCann, E., De Young, R., & Erickson, D. (1996). Farmers’ attitudes about farming and the environment: A survey of conventional and organic farmers. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics, 9(2), 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe, S. (1994). Ecology and practical technology: Peasant farming systems in Thailand. Bangkok: White Lotus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thongdee, I. (1990). Thai Farmers and Buffaloes a cultural interpretation. In U. Kyaw Than & P. Ratanakul (Eds.), Development, modernization and tradition in South East Asia (pp. 178–183). Salaya: Mahidol University.

  • Thongtawee, C. (2006). Attractors in the paradigm shift process towards sustainable agriculture of farmers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Nakhon Pathom: Mahidol University.

  • Wasi, P. (1988). Buddhist agriculture and the tranquility of Thai society. In S. Phongphit & R. Bennoun (Eds.), Turning point of Thai farmers (pp. 1–43). Bangkok: Thai Institute for Rural Development.

  • White, P. (1994). Rice: The essential harvest. National Geographic, 185(5), 48–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer, H., Lernoud, J., & Kilcher, L. (Eds.). (2013). The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2013. Bonn: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). http://www.organic-world.net/2413.html?&L=0. Accessed on 5 Jan 2014.

  • Willer, H. & Yussefi, M. (Eds.). (2004). The world of organic agriculturestatistics and emerging trends 2004. Bonn: International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. http://www.organic-world.net/former-editions.html?&L=0#c13 Accessed on 5 Jan 2014.

  • Wishik, S. M., & Van der Vynckt, S. (1976). The use of nutritional “positive deviants” to identify approaches for modification of dietary practices. American Journal of Public Health, 66(1), 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, D. (1982). Thailand: A short history. Bangkok: Silkworm Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Harrow Kaufman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaufman, A.H., Mock, J. Cultivating Greater Well-being: The Benefits Thai Organic Farmers Experience from Adopting Buddhist Eco-spirituality. J Agric Environ Ethics 27, 871–893 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-014-9500-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-014-9500-4

Keywords

Navigation